Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Motor Generators

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • BroMikey
    replied
    Motor generator explained by demonstration

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Boy makes it work

    No excuses now go to work

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q0k0rJgWuL4







    Last edited by BroMikey; 06-04-2022, 06:19 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Turion View Post
    No, just a new rotor with 1" x 1" magnets that each put out as much power as the original 2" x 1/4" magnets ............. I will have 20.

    Got to see my kids and grandkids. Got to see my best friend from college. Loads of fun. But glad to be home.
    Awesome Dave I am looking foreword to many great experiments ahead. I am glad you got to see an old class mate as well as all of your kin.

    Your new machine will be much better I am sure, especially since you are using excellent core material. Here is a 2400 rpm monopole, people are catching on fast.

    Adams inspired https://patents.google.com/patent/GB2282708A/en




    Last edited by BroMikey; 06-04-2022, 04:47 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Turion
    replied
    No, just a new rotor with 1" x 1" magnets that each put out as much power as the original 2" x 1/4" magnets did. (Not 25% of what the original magnets did like the 3/4" x 3/4" I just replaced) Only instead of six magnets, like I had on on the original rotor, I will have 20.

    Got to see my kids and grandkids. Got to see my best friend from college. Loads of fun. But glad to be home.
    Last edited by Turion; 06-04-2022, 04:43 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Go to 1;22 hour and minutes

    Last edited by BroMikey; 06-04-2022, 03:53 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Turion View Post
    half the shop at my machinist's place came down with Covid, so it will not be ready until Tuesday of next week.
    What did you order done? A whole box and a new rotor? You must be rich. If I had all the money you put into boxes, motors and parts I could move to Hollywood. Good to hear from you Dave

    PS what happed? Did you have fun seeing the chillun's?
    Last edited by BroMikey; 06-04-2022, 02:34 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Turion
    replied
    Back from my trip. My stuff should have been ready last week, but half the shop at my machinist's place came down with Covid, so it will not be ready until Tuesday of next week. Then I will have to assemble it all. But finally on the downhill. It's a 2.5 hour round trip, but because of the delay they are delivering it to my door. Can't beat that.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    JOKE OF THE DAY

    This is the same thing as your flywheel gen

    Last edited by BroMikey; 06-02-2022, 07:36 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    By all means try try try and do bench work is good. Book smarts go only so far then you have to sweat. Don't let the math make you quit ,Keep at it and best of luck. It has always been my assumption that success will come when you modify the generator and motor. Stop the generator cogging and recirculate motor power or collect back 85% and then you will win.

    Those beautiful motor generator flywheel projects are all over the web that never get close after spending many thousands on all the best motors and generators. There is more to it than luck. Thousands of tubers fail this project.

    Put in 120w and get back 100w on the motor modification circuit see Lindemann video this is the number one starting place. Later improve the generator to zero drag / cogging.

    have fun most of all and you will learn the hard way ( best of all learn) like everybody does
    Last edited by BroMikey; 05-30-2022, 06:39 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Memphis
    replied
    I do not think that Chas Campbell had motors with higher efficiency than mine since it uses a part of the permanent magnetic fields, and the same as the generator. The video you suggested I was already following it, but I have to finish it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Memphis
    replied
    thanks Bro, very encouraging, .... at least I try, and I try various ways, rather than calculating on formulas that we know to be deceptive and false, the deep-state has always kept us in ignorance, we have to try and try again, after all, what about Chas Campbell's flywell generator ...? a few years ago I tried to replicate the larger version that brings the book "free energy device", the system did not work, and then I wondered, if instead of pushing the flywheel wheel with sleds that require a lot of work and they make a lot of noise during their operation (and I know something because my wheel was about 7 feet in diameter and 800 lbs, when it was in motion it made a hellish noise, the photo of one of the 3 thrust systems you can see it appear on my profile) I had thought of using an impulse system, a simple, economical attempt that can pave the way for variations, in the meantime I try, and within a few days I realize and evaluate, most of the inventions have been done casually, and not sitting down to study at a table.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Memphis View Post
    I will try to explain myself..... save energy and try to avoid the back-emf.
    that is your problem, you will always have back-emf with or without a weight. your cogging problem is immense. Your weight is wrong, your ratio is wrong and you have no belt slip.

    There is no free lunch just because it's you trying hard. Your motor efficiency sucks, your generator efficiency sucks and what is worse is you have never calculated it.

    Go to minute 6 in the instructional and minute 18 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OSJF3GlYGVc

    Question #1 & #2

    is your motor efficiency over 65%? and the alternator?

    Efficiency is overall and not just a pulse circuit. Your problem is that with a 65% motor and a 65% generator you have an overall percentage of 30% or maybe 20%

    You must start from the beginning finding motor eff. not connected to anything. Then add a pulse circuit not loaded then measure again. Neither motor or generator is lenz free even with a few magnets added.

    Let's say you found a motor that operated at 90% efficiency but that number may drop to 50% upon connecting to your flywheel then get a bigger motor and re-calculate

    Good luck and I hope this helps you back to reality so you are not left wishing on a star.
    Last edited by BroMikey; 05-30-2022, 05:00 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Memphis
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • Memphis
    replied
    I am mistaken, they sold me the motor as brushless, but now that I have disassembled it I have been able to see that it is actually a permanent magnet motor mounted on the stator, now I will look for the fault, otherwise I will take one truly brushless three-phase together with a wpm regulator and I solve the problem.

    Leave a comment:


  • bistander
    replied
    Originally posted by Memphis View Post
    Photo of Hydronit motor
    Thank you.
    It does not appear to be a BLDC nor have any information on the label stating that. The website for Hydronit does not mention the use of BLDC and products pictured there appear to be typical brush DC motors.

    To operate your motor, you simply hook up 2 wires to the battery, correct? That is a big clue that it is a brush type DC motor. A brushless motor (BLDC) with 2 wires would need an electronic controller inside the motor housing. That is seldom done in the size and type of motor you have, a hydraulic pump drive unit for automotive/truck/industrial applications.

    The nameplate indicates that motor is rated for intermittent duty of 5 minutes or 15% on-time which is unlikely to stabilize thermally at any continuous load.
    bi

    ​​​​​​

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X