If this is your first visit, be sure to
check out the FAQ by clicking the
link above. You may have to register
before you can post: click the register link above to proceed. To start viewing messages,
select the forum that you want to visit from the selection below.
Calculations are nice for a working principle. I will ask you again because like all of the other seekers and yourself you avoid the question. Point us to a single video showing an extra 1000w output.
Math is fine and I am glad you can make the numbers crunch but where is a video proof?
No one has a single proof but you all continue to build the secret mystery painting.
Just 1 short video that is more than just wires pulsing coils
Surely someone can show OU, right? I guess not, no reply, ignore, avoid and sidestep.
This behavior of avoiding is cause for the bulzhit button to be pushed.
My time is valuable to me and a non response is wasteful. If I can't see one working then I won't be able to get it to work either. Show me
I was asked a question in a PM on a friendly forum, I think my answer and comparison will be very interesting. Reasons for the success of solid state construction on the surface. And so let's start with the reason for the possibility of such a device.
Listening to tales of spinning electrons is for media losers.
Take a conventional synchronous mechanical generator with electromagnetic excitation.
Consider only the input excitation power and also the output power of a generator phase, such as a car. The maximum costs for excitation of the rotor electromagnet are: 5 Amperes * 12 Volts = 60 watts. Maximum phase power 1.5 kW. It remains only to solve the problem of a solid-state electromagnet that simulates the rotation of the field from the electromagnet. Let's say all this will take us 200 watts of power. The result of the COP will be 1.5/0.2=7.5. What is the conversion ratio without taking into account the mechanical force in a traditional generator, you can calculate yourself.
I hope I explained clearly. What is the magnetic permeability of electrical steel, and how it enhances the magnetic field, I gave an example in one of my posts in this thread. https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-...511/#msg566511
The magnetic circuit, it is in its correct calculation that the secret of the entire project lies.
In my design, there is a similar principle and condition for using magnetic field amplification in electrical steel.
Here is an example of an engineer who calculates AND shows you the result of what otherwise would only be considered speculation. Anything less is of little consequence.
Everyone has problems precisely in the approach of calculating the generator, the generator circuit.
Calculations are nice for a working principle. I will ask you again because like all of the other seekers and yourself you avoid the question. Point us to a single video showing an extra 1000w output.
Math is fine and I am glad you can make the numbers crunch but where is a video proof?
No one has a single proof but you all continue to build the secret mystery painting.
Just 1 short video that is more than just wires pulsing coils
Surely someone can show OU, right? I guess not, no reply, ignore, avoid and sidestep.
This behavior of avoiding is cause for the bulzhit button to be pushed.
My time is valuable to me and a non response is wasteful. If I can't see one working then I won't be able to get it to work either. Show me
Just my hints to the fellow forum seeker. He is very close to solving the problem. I'm glad that he realized that the generator is a very bad motor, and the motor is a bad generator.
***********************
Another seeker is developing a solid-state design. Everyone has problems precisely in the approach of calculating the generator, the generator circuit. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i4qOE5XBbbk&t=31s
The book is not finished yet, it is like a chronicle of my research from idea to design. I started it in 2019, I hope to finish it this year. The goal is not only a book, but an algorithm for calculating the design. Just when you invent something yourself, you begin to understand other inventions, including the designs of Clemente Figuera, and many others.
Attached is the secret of the Figuera generator. On the example of a generator with four rotor poles.
Everything lies in the correct calculation of the design. Like Figuera's first device, it could be connected to an external AC source, or a resistive controller.
Great news on the book. Everything must be calculated and this picture looks like an induction motor on the market today. So far you haven't said anything that makes us see the difference. Algorithm is always used in math.
We need a bench top lesson, not an idea that might be or might not work out to be correct after testing. On the book, how much do they generally run?
Nice book. Do you have any detailed data showing your results? Or is the book all theory?
Did you get it to work, is my question. There are many a essay of higher learning all around the web. I need more than words to understand. Who should I believe?
All I see is a pretty picture.
The book is not finished yet, it is like a chronicle of my research from idea to design. I started it in 2019, I hope to finish it this year. The goal is not only a book, but an algorithm for calculating the design. Just when you invent something yourself, you begin to understand other inventions, including the designs of Clemente Figuera, and many others.
Attached is the secret of the Figuera generator. On the example of a generator with four rotor poles.
Everything lies in the correct calculation of the design. Like Figuera's first device, it could be connected to an external AC source, or a resistive controller.
Nice book. Do you have any detailed data showing your results? Or is the book all theory?
Did you get it to work, is my question. There are many a essay of higher learning all around the web. I need more than words to understand. Who should I believe?
BroMikey, good analysis of events. https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/history/
Missed one part of Figer and his mechanic made a working model. Just a patent, without a working prayer, no one will buy it. In the material I am trying to show the essence of the invention, and the option of repetition in the USA. https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-...186872/image//
In the scheme of the patent "Fieger's Generator" - "y" denotes a phase or secondary winding. But nowhere is its design disclosed. In the variant of mutual induction, the coil wound on the core cannot work with the result of overunity.
What is the difference between the secondary winding of the transformer and the phase of the generator? Why was the outer winding of the Gramme generator replaced with a generator winding in the stator slot? These are questions that have answers, and solutions used in these designs.
BroMikey, good analysis of events. https://figueragenerator.wordpress.com/history/
Missed one part of Figer and his mechanic made a working model. Just a patent, without a working prayer, no one will buy it. In the material I am trying to show the essence of the invention, and the option of repetition in the USA. https://overunity.com/19069/holcomb-...186872/image//
In the scheme of the patent "Fieger's Generator" - "y" denotes a phase or secondary winding. But nowhere is its design disclosed. In the variant of mutual induction, the coil wound on the core cannot work with the result of overunity.
What is the difference between the secondary winding of the transformer and the phase of the generator? Why was the outer winding of the Gramme generator replaced with a generator winding in the stator slot? These are questions that have answers, and solutions used in these designs.
In 1902 Mr. Figuera filed 4 patents ( 30375, 30376, 30377, 30378 ) which were sold in few days to a banking cartel as it may be derived in sight of a telegram published in the available press clippings of that year.
In October of 1908, suddenly Clemente Figuera filed a new patent (no. 44267) . As far as we know Mr. Figuera died very few days after filing this patent. Was it his legacy?.
After his death in 1908, his partner, Constantino de Buforn Jacas, filed 5 new patents (47706, 50216, 52968, 55411 and 57955) between the years 1910 and 1914.
The important features of all those patents is that they are almost identical. And they are an exact copy of the design patented by Figuera in 1908.
The very same design and in some cases the very same text to describe the machine. Buforn was clearly patenting as his own invention a machine created by Figuera
Anybody caught on yet? People fight over patents and they never get used.
Leave a comment: