Same old crazy stories with no proof.
bi
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Motor Generators
Collapse
X
-
Electric generator without rotation braking, generator system on the principle of a curtain on one side of the coil on the other side of the static magnet. In Ukraine there is a craftsman who repeated a similar machine that was built in Germany. The material contains the entire history of such devices. In the appendix to the publication is a video demonstration of the Ukrainian craftsman.
Electric generator without braking rotation. | Patreon
1.jpg?token-time=1741046400&token-hash=B3THqFBQbBxM3NqvO2mET9AS18CkeLm0udJGA5KWT9c%3D.jpg
Leave a comment:
-
Africa's Energy Secret: The Unlimited Range Car Big Oil Doesn't Want You To See
just see how it gains market share. In the interview, he says he's already sold some of his products. What's surprising is that no one is rushing to brag that they have his product.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bistander View Post
Rakarskiy,
The mechanical power input to the alternator's shaft must overcome friction and aerodynamic loss of the rotor and also overcome the core loss (hysteresis & eddy current) say 4% of rated output. Then once conversion to electrical power occurs, armature resistive loss and excitation are accounted, amounting to say 3% and 3% respectfully. Conversion efficiency is 90%, mechanical input power to useful electric output power. 96% of the mechanical input power was converted to electrical power at the air gap. These are typical values in accordance with industry standards.
The fact that you don't recognize how induction occurs (wires in grooves and enclosed magnetic circuits and flux cutting and such) is of no real consequence. It is your failure of comprehension and understanding, not a flaw in society's science and engineering.
bi
bistander,
the main task performed by mechanical power in a mechanical generator is the rotation of the core of the magnetic rotor with an excited constant magnetic field (magnetic poles). This magnetic flux of the rotor poles, closing through the stator core with the windings, forms a constant magnetic closed flux ANAPOLE, which is characterized by the Anapol moment. (American version - Toroidal moment). The physical rotation of these closed magnetic fluxes - toroidal moments, with overcoming the magnetic attraction between the rotor and stator cores, is the mechanical cost, not the conversion energy. All that is needed is to organize the rotation of toroidal moments in the structure of a synchronous generator, by means of an algorithm for switching excitation electromagnets. Which was actually patented and implemented by Dr. Robert Holcomb. A patent for this type of device and switching was issued by the US Patent Office 2022-05-17 US11336134B2 (2038-07-01 adjusted to the term dii).
I like that he put all engineers and physicists in the lurch with his false standards, which you drool over at me. Many people cherish their dissertations or PhDs, which this working principle simply nullifies. And the education system can also revoke a teaching license if this issue is even raised.
I have researched this issue and proposed the most optimal design of an alternator without physical rotation of the magnetic rotor. The only question is desire and means. But to begin with, just find a suitable anchor from a constant current motor and a stator with a three-phase winding, make a device for rotating brushes around fixed collector lamellas with anchor fittings inserted into the stator with windings and see what happens there - anyone with brains and hands can do it.
As for Maxwell from Zimbabwe, I just watch how this self-taught guy hasn't released at least one small device from his box every month for 8 years (he already had his own company back then). Here's a YouTube video from 2016 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kDKyS6OUbBw&t=17s
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Rakarskiy View Post
bi
Originally posted by Turion View Post
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Rakarskiy View PostHow is mechanical power [P=Fv] converted into electrical power [W=IU]?
Turbine generators are devices with closed magnetic circuits. There is no cutting of the phase winding wire by power lines. However, the transformer emf formula E=4.44NФf is used to calculate the emf.
This statement of yours is part of the misleading of all mankind.
How about Zimbabwe, I remember it back in 2016.
https://youtu.be/B5EygmKqCJk?si=Q1LEqSqv3q6461re
The mechanical power input to the alternator's shaft must overcome friction and aerodynamic loss of the rotor and also overcome the core loss (hysteresis & eddy current) say 4% of rated output. Then once conversion to electrical power occurs, armature resistive loss and excitation are accounted, amounting to say 3% and 3% respectfully. Conversion efficiency is 90%, mechanical input power to useful electric output power. 96% of the mechanical input power was converted to electrical power at the air gap. These are typical values in accordance with industry standards.
The fact that you don't recognize how induction occurs (wires in grooves and enclosed magnetic circuits and flux cutting and such) is of no real consequence. It is your failure of comprehension and understanding, not a flaw in society's science and engineering.
biLast edited by bistander; Today, 07:12 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
How is mechanical power [P=Fv] converted into electrical power [W=IU]?
Turbine generators are devices with closed magnetic circuits. There is no cutting of the phase winding wire by power lines. However, the transformer emf formula E=4.44NФf is used to calculate the emf.
This statement of yours is part of the misleading of all mankind.
How about Zimbabwe, I remember it back in 2016.
https://youtu.be/B5EygmKqCJk?si=Q1LEqSqv3q6461reLast edited by Rakarskiy; Today, 06:11 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Rakarskiy View PostIn the case of an engine, power is also a similarly "evaluative" characteristic. In this case, we can say that the engine's work is essentially torque. After all, the engine's job is to turn the crankshaft. So, torque and power are interrelated. The generator has electromagnetic torque, but this is all about the mechanical power generated by the rotor rotation to overcome the electromagnetic attraction of the rotor and stator. If you rotate the magnetic poles by switching electromagnets in a constant continuous current mode, you get the same thing without the mechanical power.
That's nonsense. You don't get electromechanical energy conversion and therefore no more electric output than the electric input.
bi
Leave a comment:
-
In the case of an engine, power is also a similarly "evaluative" characteristic. In this case, we can say that the engine's work is essentially torque. After all, the engine's job is to turn the crankshaft. So, torque and power are interrelated. The generator has electromagnetic torque, but this is all about the mechanical power generated by the rotor rotation to overcome the electromagnetic attraction of the rotor and stator. If you rotate the magnetic poles by switching electromagnets in a constant continuous current mode, you get the same thing without the mechanical power.
Leave a comment:
-
Rakarskiy says
"Does it matter if it is rotated mechanically or by switching armature windings in the manner of a DC motor armature."
Yes it matters. Switching currents to induce a moving magnetic field onto a series of coils housed in a device can impart mechanical force onto the structure. However, if said structure allows no motion, there can be no mechanical power. Motion is a necessary component of mechanical power. Therefore that device cannot fit the definition of an electric generator, a device which converts mechanical power into electric power. The device using switched currents to produce the rotating magnetic field without mechanical motion would be considered a transformer with electric power input and electric power output.
bi
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Rakarskiy View PostDo you have different components for torque and mechanical power? You surprise me even more.
The frequency of generation depends on the speed of rotation of the two-pole rotor of the turbine generator. Does it matter if it is rotated mechanically or by switching armature windings in the manner of a DC motor armature.
I learned torque and mechanical power from conventional physics. Torque is the rotational analogue to force. The S.I. unit is the newton meter abbreviation Nm assigned as a vector. Torque is a necessary component of rotational power, which is found by the product of torque times angular velocity. Angular velocity carries units of radians per second, r/s. The product of torque times angular velocity yields the mechanical power with units of watts.
Basic stuff. No?
bi
Leave a comment:
-
Do you have different components for torque and mechanical power? You surprise me even more.
The frequency of generation depends on the speed of rotation of the two-pole rotor of the turbine generator. Does it matter if it is rotated mechanically or by switching armature windings in the manner of a DC motor armature.
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by Rakarskiy View PostDear bistander ,
You either deliberately ignore or your professional level does not allow you to make judgments.
The production of electricity through the rotation of a magnetic rotor in the stator of a mechanical alternator is not the transformation of mechanical power [P=Fv] into electrical power [W=IU].
This is the greatest disenformation of people on the planet, in which you are participating intentionally or through stupidity.
The production of electricity consists of two parts, electromagnetic induction [E=-dФ/dt] -generation, in the phase conductor when the magnetic field changes, and ensuring the rotation of the excited constant magnetic flux [Ф] in the magnetic system of closed alternator circuits. Thus, simply replacing the physical rotation of the anchor magnetic field with the switchable rotation of the magnetic field in the armature inserted into the stator with phase windings, we exclude the expensive method of physical rotation of the field.
Let them wipe their asses with what physicists and marauders of people have taken for a constant.
It works very well if everything is done correctly, at least to provide mechanical switching of brushes and collector lamellas when the brushes rotate around the non-rotating anchor. Now to make a consumer machine, an engineering approach is needed.
You posted this:
"active power is determined by the turbine speed and its torque"
It means that turbine's torque and speed (the product of which is mechanical power) is converted into the alternator's electrical output power. The magnetic excitation just facilitates this conversion process.
Wake up.
bi
Leave a comment:
-
Dear bistander ,
You either deliberately ignore or your professional level does not allow you to make judgments.
The production of electricity through the rotation of a magnetic rotor in the stator of a mechanical alternator is not the transformation of mechanical power [P=Fv] into electrical power [W=IU].
This is the greatest disenformation of people on the planet, in which you are participating intentionally or through stupidity.
The production of electricity consists of two parts, electromagnetic induction [E=-dФ/dt] -generation, in the phase conductor when the magnetic field changes, and ensuring the rotation of the excited constant magnetic flux [Ф] in the magnetic system of closed alternator circuits. Thus, simply replacing the physical rotation of the anchor magnetic field with the switchable rotation of the magnetic field in the armature inserted into the stator with phase windings, we exclude the expensive method of physical rotation of the field.
Let them wipe their asses with what physicists and marauders of people have taken for a constant.
It works very well if everything is done correctly, at least to provide mechanical switching of brushes and collector lamellas when the brushes rotate around the non-rotating anchor. Now to make a consumer machine, an engineering approach is needed.
Leave a comment:
-
Also, Rakarskiy,
You said
"We provide rotation of the excitation field in the stator without mechanical rotation we get direct efficiency."
Doesn't work, does it? All you get is a transformer with sucky efficiency.
bi
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: