Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Motor Generators

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Turion
    replied
    Anyone here who knows Bob French should ask him to update the folks on the forum on his motor running between the positives. He is right in the middle of a project to enter a contest for a significant amount of money, so he may not have time, but it is worth it to understand what he is doing.

    His primary batteries are holding, or going down very, VERY slowly while his secondary batteries show gains of +40 times the losses in the primaries. He is able to
    maintain a fairly high potential difference constantly because the changes in battery voltage, while huge compared to each other, are actually incredibly small compared to overall battery voltage. In other words, “.00” change in volts. I have a motor EXACTLY like the one Bob is using because we both built them years ago after talking with each other about the Zero force motor and how it could be improved. I think I may have even posted videos of it at the time although those videos are probably long gone. Please understand, this is just a motor, not a motor generator combination and there is no guarantee that he will get the same kind of results when attaching a generating element, but it’s worth understanding just for the simple fact that it demonstrates you CAN use energy and recover it while running between the positives and adding to it the high voltage spike from the coil collapse of the pulse motor coil to charge the secondary batteries at a rate higher than the primary batteries discharge. This is the 3 battery system + Modified Matt Motor concept except using a different pulse motor. Run on the RIGHT kind of batteries.

    I’m not here to make claims for Bob. He’s a big boy and can speak for himself. I think it’s worth paying attention to because he can document it and post video, although he may want to keep the construction of his motor a secret for now But I have seen these outcomes many, many times over the past 10 years, so I CAN verify that the these outcomes are possible, and I will leave it at that.

    Believe it or don’t. I will not argue with people about someone else’s results nor will I defend mine against those who are too lazy to do these kind of experiments themselves.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied

    Originally posted by BroMikey View Post

    You must listen and learn. First build a regular motor and understand. Do the work you sluggards.


    Originally posted by bistander View Post

    Name-calling. Childish. It's disgusting.
    bi
    Hurts don't it? It is the truth, no name calling involved. Someone who hides and sits this one out and calling out from the shadows, crying a song of the loafer. The least you could do is sit around and watch the board talks..




    Last edited by BroMikey; 04-13-2021, 03:56 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • bistander
    replied
    Originally posted by BroMikey View Post
    You must listen and learn. First build a regular motor and understand. Do the work you sluggards.
    ...


    ...
    Name-calling. Childish. You telling us to do the work? Maybe Thane Heinz, and you, need to do some work. He can't even copy Faraday's Law correctly, let alone comprehend and apply it. He has no idea how a motor works. Just last month on a video he admitted he made a fundamental error and has been teaching a falsehood for the last 10 years or so. Still he doesn't see (or admit) all the other lies he promotes. It's disgusting.
    bi

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    You must listen and learn. First build a regular motor and understand. Do the work you sluggards.





    Last edited by BroMikey; 04-13-2021, 01:50 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Quantum_well View Post
    He's never shown what I would consider an honest representation of his work and I'm leaving it at that.
    Bro, you're easily fooled
    .
    Thanks man. Thane has hours of explanation but I guess you are incapable of seeing it. Big shock.
    Go watch the board talks. Wait I forgot, you can't teach an old dog new tricks. Yup, that's right.




    Last edited by BroMikey; 04-13-2021, 01:51 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Quantum_well
    replied
    He's never shown what I would consider an honest representation of his work and I'm leaving it at that.
    Bro, you're easily fooled.

    Leave a comment:


  • Quantum_well
    replied
    Patent application refused 2003.

    However, Zahn later stated in an interview that "I can't understand how [Heins] can even breathe the words 'perpetual motion.' He plugs it into the wall." In a subsequent e-mail to Heins, Zahn wrote that: "Any talk of perpetual motion, over unity efficiency, etc. discredits you, now me, and your ideas." Zahn further stated that he would not endorse Heins' device until "the foolishness is stopped of hinting that your motor violates fundamental laws of physics."[12]

    Leave a comment:


  • Quantum_well
    replied
    You didn't answer whether or not you would invest in Thane.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Quantum_well View Post
    Bro, that article ought to have deleted "it all began back in 1985".

    .
    "It all began" yes with one man to legally add a new law "For every action there is a complimentary and positive re-action"

    Yes it all began when a young upstart (whipper snapper) entered engineering school back in 85 stumbling onto a new and obvious phenomena. Of course the students teacher could not see this reaction in the positive, all the teacher was programmed to see was the negative work done due to motors poor geometry. So after a while the teach became embarrassed and he send to the principles office for scolding.(how dare he make every engineer on the planet look like a sap?}

    After repeated proof had shown just that, poor ole Thane was cast out, book bag and all. Big mistake.Thane has been kicking azz ever since.

    The present day system requires you to sing the motor blues, so you must pay your dues.

    On the other hand the GOD particle inside each of us is capable of limitless invention. Only a fool says "No God Particle" allowed.
    Last edited by BroMikey; 04-12-2021, 09:28 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Quantum_well View Post
    Bro, that article ought to have deleted "it all began back in 1985".

    Look up con man definition.

    Would you invest $10,000 dollars in Heins? Ask yourself.
    You must be confused. Thane did the inventing from 2007-2017 so the past 10 years of refinements but the same principle. Well around 2011 his hardware approach changed radically.
    Last edited by BroMikey; 04-12-2021, 09:23 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Quantum_well
    replied
    Bro, that article ought to have deleted "it all began back in 1985".

    Look up con man definition.

    Would you invest $10,000 dollars in Heins? Ask yourself.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Part #2 demo with good audio. Learn this and you will pass. Learn these 2 video's and then you will be more apt to understand all of Thane's demo's that are not possible to get the audio. Almost all of Thanes generator video's drown out his message, which is a problem. These 2 video's are very clear.

    Last edited by BroMikey; 04-12-2021, 01:21 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Better audio for the beginners.These are very simple experiments that must be comprehended. Regenerative braking/ bemf 1ST and then 2nd = Regenerative acceleration = infinite COP

    Last edited by BroMikey; 04-12-2021, 04:41 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by pmgriphone View Post
    Wow BroMikey, why all that negative energy?
    I guess PMG is a girl and I apologize for telling her to grow a pair. Sorry about that.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Quantum_well View Post
    Oh!
    It all began back in 1985, when Thane Heins, having studied electronics at Heritage College in Gatineau, Quebec, started thinking about how magnets could be used to improve power generators.
    No, wrong again as usual. Thane was a school boy in 85" in college. Young people are far smarter than many old people who think they know everything. That is your problem. In fact 99% of all breakthru's are done by 30 year olds or younger. This is where the level of sharpness and energy is the highest. Don't worry that you don't see it. Comprehension is a problem at 70-90yrs. I get that.

    Instead of opposing forces acting together to limit the motor action, these forces are rearranged to assist one another. You should try the latter.
    Last edited by BroMikey; 04-12-2021, 12:37 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X