Originally posted by prochiro
View Post
The pulses themselves are not the goal but the disruption of current / megnetic push. We shall not misunderstand the tool with the work piece.
(This interchange can be observerd at those replicators working on tesla switch - dicussing endlessly pulsing methods while negelcting the rest of setup that should make use of those pulses)
I'd like to share my concerns:
1. I suppose that any UFO motor construction will prefer a certain peak flux before interruption. The effects seem to increase nonlinearly with flux strength. It might increase even more beyond linear magnetic area. This area is told to kick magentic resonance emittign own special effects.
2. Pulse pause is necessary for gathering (radiant) flow back and it will depend on several pararameters. Not all seem to be known up to now. I.e. what is the half period of flow back (it might derate like e-function)
3. For higher rpm the voltage needs to be increased in order to arrive at same max flux before interruption - possibly. But pulse width might require certain timing requirements differnt from rpm timing.
BTW: If we reduce pulse time and increase voltage we will get much less losses for short pulse time and same end current (Flux). The motor might squeal like a pig but might run like an injured one.
4. Will the flow back be best by one giant pusle per cycle or a pluraity of them?
5. Still not certain if this 4 (6) phase rotating field requires to run synchronously with armature rotation. Alternatively it would be a very special kind of asynchronous machine.
I feel we need to check the concerns above (and some more) and agree for priority. For all of them we need answers and all of them need to be examined with different pulse patterns in order to find the mode proving to be best.
JS
Leave a comment: