Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

My Motors got me to Tap into Radiant Energy

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • JohnStone
    replied
    Originally posted by prochiro View Post
    ... Motor will not run with 6.25 duty and long wait period on 12 volts....
    Dana
    Possibly correct: for 12 volts. But let's look beyond this small palyground.
    The pulses themselves are not the goal but the disruption of current / megnetic push. We shall not misunderstand the tool with the work piece.
    (This interchange can be observerd at those replicators working on tesla switch - dicussing endlessly pulsing methods while negelcting the rest of setup that should make use of those pulses)

    I'd like to share my concerns:

    1. I suppose that any UFO motor construction will prefer a certain peak flux before interruption. The effects seem to increase nonlinearly with flux strength. It might increase even more beyond linear magnetic area. This area is told to kick magentic resonance emittign own special effects.

    2. Pulse pause is necessary for gathering (radiant) flow back and it will depend on several pararameters. Not all seem to be known up to now. I.e. what is the half period of flow back (it might derate like e-function)

    3. For higher rpm the voltage needs to be increased in order to arrive at same max flux before interruption - possibly. But pulse width might require certain timing requirements differnt from rpm timing.
    BTW: If we reduce pulse time and increase voltage we will get much less losses for short pulse time and same end current (Flux). The motor might squeal like a pig but might run like an injured one.

    4. Will the flow back be best by one giant pusle per cycle or a pluraity of them?

    5. Still not certain if this 4 (6) phase rotating field requires to run synchronously with armature rotation. Alternatively it would be a very special kind of asynchronous machine.

    I feel we need to check the concerns above (and some more) and agree for priority. For all of them we need answers and all of them need to be examined with different pulse patterns in order to find the mode proving to be best.
    JS

    Leave a comment:


  • prochiro
    replied
    @ Hitby
    Are you saying that the fets from china and the fets from US sources do not act the same and/or are not the same?. That may explain a lot. If that is the case, maybe we should not use the fets from china as basic longevity may be an issue. Even for testing they may have caused confusion and caused diversion of development.
    Dana

    Leave a comment:


  • prochiro
    replied
    Hitby
    The control you are using is I think the push button version. That does not allow for ramp up safety. Using at first, just the pot version allows one to turn up slowly as I showed on video. Now that advanced version of code will have built in ramp up and ramp down. I have that on my system now. Also will have code to keep RPM steady regardless of load.
    Your video is great. Info is great also.

    @ All
    It is hard to be a motor maker and then a Arduino programmer all in a short while. As we have seen with Machine. When you are changing testing methods in motor, say from Quad to single pulse you can not do both with the same program. Code within Arduino is still producing four pulses, each with time space. If you run only one wire, motor is fine on that line but timing is off and there will be a 3x wait of the first total pulse period. Lets say you run one wire at full or 25%, that will actually be 6.25% and you will get a high frequency squeal. Motor will not run with 6.25 duty and long wait period on 12 volts.
    Dana

    Leave a comment:


  • JohnStone
    replied
    Originally posted by Cornboy 555 View Post
    ... Am i correct Hitby, because you can't have more out than in, you know, that's impossible, Right....
    Some of readers will interpret this question as real concern.
    @ALL:
    A sailship gets more energy out than putting gas energy in. Given we comprehend oil as sole energy source. The existance of sailships does not negate the existance of motor ships but add a plane of knowledge to the overall realm of truth. (Unfortunately some passengers of motrships negate sail ships)
    What we are after is the existing wind of radiant events. We need conventional energy for departing the port only.
    Radiant events tend to be tranparent to matter similar to radio waves as long we have no tuned radio receiver. Radiant events are several magnitudes stronger than that tiny 300 Watts of kicking energy.
    UFO's pulsed machines kick radiant events and tend to be an attractive bait for HER in order to receive her gifts - all built in one elicited unit.

    We currently have no correct terms for those notions. We can stumble only and need to be careful to not misunderstand incorrect terms as facts related to textbook knowledge.
    We have the state like that little african girl seeing first time motorized traffic. Her sudden interpretation - oriented on her terms of birth, growing up and death - : Motorcycles are baby cars and need to grow up and once they will have 4 wheels and will further grow up to be trucks.

    Our setups are a special kind of wonderland and we represent Alice struggling to meet HER in Radiant Castle in order to uncover the mystery of radiant to to world.
    JS
    Last edited by JohnStone; 07-22-2013, 11:17 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • JohnStone
    replied
    Originally posted by Midaztouch View Post
    ... Is it possible to harvest the radiant energy to charge the same super capacitor to extend the run time of the battery pack? ...
    Bedini states that a cap is a converter for radiant energy and it is more to it than jammed and stacked electrons (like we were told in kindergarden as handy thinking model).
    It is still to be defined on how to make use of this notion. That's why we operate setups for research.
    JS

    Leave a comment:


  • Cornboy 555
    replied
    Say What.

    OK HITBY, so i am sitting here after watching your last video, and i have a calculator, and i add up the numbers, as you must have,
    3.8 amps X 75V = 285 watts, to run the motor-generator, which powered 600 watts of lighting.

    Am i correct Hitby, because you can't have more out than in, you know, that's impossible, Right.

    Naah, something is wrong, and you better get ready for the onslaught.



    Warmest Regards, Cornboy.
    Last edited by Cornboy 555; 07-22-2013, 07:11 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Midaztouch
    replied
    @hitby13kw

    Hitby,

    Great run

    Is it possible to harvest the radiant energy to charge the same super capacitor to extend the run time of the battery pack?


    Keep it Clean and Green
    Richie
    Last edited by Midaztouch; 07-22-2013, 09:22 AM. Reason: Had a mistake

    Leave a comment:


  • Hitby13kw
    replied
    Imperial updates

    OK Team my apologies for being off the list for a bit after last weeks video https://www.dropbox.com/s/t5ak1l1au8jwqie/SAM_0208.AVI



    with in this first video https://www.dropbox.com/s/0bat5qksrv1g4ne/SAM_0209.AVI


    https://www.dropbox.com/s/8a1p9u7kml8sq69/SAM_0215.AVI

    Prochiro/Dana, GChilders /Garry, I am ready to compare Software routines, all these tests have been done with Quadblink outputting to 5, 6, 9, 11 do you have any suggestions as to the order I compare your other code in ?

    Regards

    Hitby13kw

    Leave a comment:


  • Cornboy 555
    replied
    Let's Swap.

    Thanks UFO, so seemless, battery swapping, awaits us in the future.

    Maybe someone watching us, from out there, might have some suggestions!

    Regards Cornboy.

    Leave a comment:


  • Midaztouch
    replied
    Batteries to catch radiance

    Hi Ufo,

    I was thinking about batteries. Leads are too heavy for racing, lipos can't be charged when driving and ultra caps not give enough run time.

    My thought was to run the lipos energy through a super capacitor. Could we then catch the energy from our lady and run it back to the super cap?

    Keep it Clean and Green
    Richie

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Charging Batteries...while "driving"...

    Originally posted by Cornboy 555 View Post
    You make some very valid points there John Stone, in regards to Hitby's setup.

    Please Hitby, could you give us a schematic of how you had the diodes set at fets for battery charging, during your tests.

    Much appreciated, Cornboy.
    Cornboy,

    When Hitby said "Reversed Diodes" from FET's...I am pretty sure he meant from all four Negative Drains from the Four Channels, he connected Diodes to collect (flow through) the Positive...

    Drain1---l>l----(+)Battery1

    Drain2---l>l----(+)Battery2

    and so on...

    When you build your Machine and run/test it...you will realize through same Input Wires travels Two Flows...opposite to each others...I have shown this Asymmetric "Attribute" on this Thread here...on a Static Coil been Shorted/Pulsed.

    As in the Quad Drivers...we are getting very "wide" Times Off (75% per Channel)...and that is where "Our Beautiful Princess"...enters the "Show"...the longer the Off Times...the Higher SHE enters...

    Hitby is making a very smart "Add" to this circuit...since it will "Sink" that PULSED reversed flow into his "Alternate Bank of Batteries"...

    You know Radiant will first "Crystallize" Batteries...then would be on and on...


    Regards


    Ufopolitics

    Leave a comment:


  • prochiro
    replied
    Hello Garry
    A week or so ago, while running the Imperial and using it to test the program with processing, I closed the processing program by accident and restarted it again. When it started, the motor was automatically set to stop. I thought about that as being a potential problem if running a generator, so I forced processing to write a text file befor closing with enough data to restart processing and keep arduino running as before without skiping a beat. If you do not have that sort of thing on your to do list that is important as computers stop for many reasons and this should not interrupt Generator function. Hope all in going well.
    Dana

    Leave a comment:


  • Cornboy 555
    replied
    How Hitby.

    You make some very valid points there John Stone, in regards to Hitby's setup.

    Please Hitby, could you give us a schematic of how you had the diodes set at fets for battery charging, during your tests.

    Much appreciated, Cornboy.

    Leave a comment:


  • JohnStone
    replied
    @Hitby
    PLEASE do not discard your defective FETs. They might be the reason for low amps. Radiant likes resistance without producing losses. What about you found the right way for separation. some kind of Fogal transistor or better. The longitudinal wave passes in order to energize electrons who start traveling but the lossy current travels through coils and back to battery.

    I am still convinced we are in blind flight - despite UFOs great revelations. There is a pyisics ongoing where we have no textbooks to learn. And Tesla's later writings are confusing because he had no terms for his physics - hence he used words like frequency and electricity - but with another meaning.

    Another example:
    The lamdba sensor for exhaust oxigen measurement was an accident at BOSCH research dept. They had a defective temperature sensor and intended to discard it. One smart guy looked at the faulty diagram and mentioned it looked like oxigen concentration in exhaust area. Then they paked the sensor very thoroughly and sent it to another specialized research lab in order to find out, what the heck is goning on there.

    Hitby, please treat HER gently and do not make any minor change you can not redo. It might be essential.
    JS
    Last edited by JohnStone; 07-21-2013, 09:45 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • prochiro
    replied
    @Garry
    I agree With UFO that this is the place to post your code. I have looked at what you have shown so far and eagerly wait to get the rest of your program. I set out earlier to see how this stuff works and have accomplished that for myself and provided a starting point of code for all to get there Imperials running. I can see that your programming is excellent and you are a natural. It is time for me to step back and let you take over coding from this point on if you will. I have far too little time for everything in this tech, and again look forward to you running this up the flag pole. Now I can get back to the boards and future tech. Thank you.
    Dana

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X