Muller generator replication by Romerouk

[penno64]

Aye!

Penno

[Xenomorph]

@Penno: Just to clarify the sentence

the shorting component I discovered initialy was replaced by the way the coil pairs are constructed

is also a quote by Romero?

[penno64]

What can you guys make from this -

What is this extra component that provides coil shorting?

with -

the shorting component I discovered initialy was replaced by the way the coil pairs are constructed

Penno

[Shadesz]

Man this is some serious stuff going on IMO! Great results rod! Keep it up!

Here is a great video of another guy who appears to have overcome lens drag. Simple build driven by a 12 volt cordless drill and scrap magnets. He uploaded it a couple days ago is all.

Free Energy Demonstration - Anti-Lenz Effect - YouTube

Subscribe to his channel as he says he will release a video of his own build schematics.

[toranarod]

[quantumuppercut]

I have been trying the same thing with caps please keep posting your results

Thanks Rod, but you're the tanker here. I'm just a supporter. Mondrasek said the waveform looks like Romero so I searched minoly channel to find the waveform. I think this is the one.

Resonance in a Bifilar Coil - YouTube @3:50

Please keep us updated with your work.

[toranarod]

I've done some more experiments today.

The same setup as before. 10 Ohm series resistor to monitor input current to determine speed change. It reads about .880V unloaded.

This time I tested with several AC caps in series with coil to estimate the tolerance of Lenz. Coil and Cap connected and short out while monitor RPM.

102K --- 1 nf or .001 uf
103J --- 10 nf or .01 uf
104M --- 100 nf or .1 uf
1 uf --- 1000 nf or 1 uf
1.0K --- 1000 nf or 1 uf
.82 uf --- big 2100VAC cap from microwave

When short without any cap, reading increase to .885V . This shows a speed decrease as expected by Lenz. When testing each capacitor, there is no measurable change in RPM. I would implies we can continue to increase coil and cap size to increase power until Lenz kicks in.

I have been trying the same thing with caps please keep posting your results

[toranarod]

The controller

Ahh. I see. Thanks Rod you're the man.

What hardware and software are you using to do that? About how much did it cost you?

The controller I use to run the drive coils is PIC 16F648 and about 30 dollars worth of support electronic components. The software I wrote my self .

I am more than happy to send you the program the components are available from any supplier. Good fun to play with on your motor.

[quantumuppercut]

I've done some more experiments today.

The same setup as before. 10 Ohm series resistor to monitor input current to determine speed change. It reads about .880V unloaded.

This time I tested with several AC caps in series with coil to estimate the tolerance of Lenz. Coil and Cap connected and short out while monitor RPM.

102K --- 1 nf or .001 uf
103J --- 10 nf or .01 uf
104M --- 100 nf or .1 uf
1 uf --- 1000 nf or 1 uf
1.0K --- 1000 nf or 1 uf
.82 uf --- big 2100VAC cap from microwave

When short without any cap, reading increase to .885V . This shows a speed decrease as expected by Lenz. When testing each capacitor, there is no measurable change in RPM. I would implies we can continue to increase coil and cap size to increase power until Lenz kicks in.

[Shadesz]

Ahh. I see. Thanks Rod you're the man.

What hardware and software are you using to do that? About how much did it cost you?

[marxist]

Sorry.
I seem to have caused a missunderstanding. (That is my specality)
It was just, that I posted my last posting at the same time you did yours, and so mine proved to be irrelevant, which is why I deleted it.

[toranarod]

edit:
deleted. contained simultaneous posting

what did I ?

[marxist]

edit:
deleted. contained simultaneous posting

[toranarod]

If this was the period between drive pulses, would it not change when the rpm changes?

No the time is delivered by a processor and is not controlled by speed.
So if the conditions of the load change the delivered current cannot.
The display below in the photo should explain this.

This system enables control of motor drive coil with great precision.
The processor also control's timing like the ECU does in a car.
When you manipulate all these factors it is possible to get the best efficiency and RPM and come back to the parameters to make test and determine the success of your next coil design and so on

Thank you marxist
you are correct.

[Zooty]

Hi toranarod,
thanks for the clarification about the columns on the left side of your data sheets.

I understand that in the first column "Duty Cycle in micro Sec" you give the "ON-time". That is the duration, for which you supply energy to the drive coil.
But what actually happens to the drive coil during the time which is quoted in the second column "Frequency in micro Sec"?
What does the quoted period (663 micro Sec) signify?
Thanks

edit: After pondering over it, I think I know what the figures in the second column mean: The second column gives the period between drive pulses. And that parameter only comes into play, when you use multiple "drive pulses per event", as you initially did.
But since you went back to basically "1 drive pulses per event", the second column is more or less meaningless. Right?

If this was the period between drive pulses, would it not change when the rpm changes?