There are other forms found by different visual (qualitative) approach.
I believe this behavior does exist and that many other forms do exist.
One form that appears for example on copper plate are circular we call eddy currents.
I think some of the small near field loops of permanant magnets develop like those in the movie.
What we are able to see are the magnetic dipoles that developed as permanent and self reinforcing.
we see the convergent (straight) and divergent (curved) zones.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)
Collapse
X
-
Aether Particle
Originally posted by TheoriaApophasis View Post
any attempt to quantize the Ether into "units" is a specious premise
we can only quantize phenomena, not noumenon.
Those who (try) quantize the Ether are the same who try to reify it as a "particle"
ala the "Ether particle"
Al
Leave a comment:
-
Reda and Blue...pills?...lol
Welcome,Originally posted by bistander View PostThanks for the reply Ufo. So you're saying (as I interpret your post), that the red and blue lines do not represent magnetic flux in the classical sense, say as used in Faraday's voltage equation. But the blue lines represent the paths of high and medium pressure North magnetic particles and the red lines represent high and medium pressure South magnetic particles. I got this using your diagram from yesterday.
In the Classical Sense?...I believe with Lorentz, any possibility of just a single "spin" on a magnet by itself was completely erased from Classic Magnetism History...am I right?
Now as I wrote before, red is South and North is blue...and again, this are just "color codes" for easier understanding of the theory, but in reality, and that part is at the beginning on my latest video (by the way did you watch its 15 minutes?) and the Basic structure of a Magnetic Field in A Magnet is very simple...:
Two Spirals merging from the very center of the magnetic embodiment carrier, whether magnet or electromagnet.
This Two Spatially Polarized Spirals spin in the same direction, at opposed ends of an inclined axis (axial tilt, obliquity, axial precession, etc) to balance out spinning forces.
I have plenty of 3D Animations on that video showing very clear that particular spinning geometrical structure.
So, for your easier understanding, just forget about the way that different pressure gradients return to counterspace (Centripetally)...and just concentrate in the Basic Spiral shape from both Polarized Ends, which, in the end, is the main force that propels everything from magnetic influence ...the Centrifugal Forces.
So, definitively the answer is no, the Classic "sense" does not allow any spinning nor "curls" of magnetic fields...just straight lines that come and go from inside magnet to spatially outwards in only one sense/direction.
This Theory is completely different, since it is based mainly, on a magnet's Spinning Spiral Force from center outwards...as it also manifests from both poles exchanging flow/flux in the two directions and not only "One Way".
Like I wrote before...just forget about the "return back to counterspace" part...and just visualize the two spirals coming out from center of magnetic embodiment.Also, from that diagram, it appears these magnetic particles come and go through those gates on the yellow cone in the magnet. Seems like a complicated model to me, but it's your theory.
I admit it is not a simple model...but it "fits" in every test I have done...and it is not "my theory"...it is Ken Wheeler's...I just kept developing it further through testing and more experimenting...till I found out its beautiful applications to our real world...Oh, yes, definitively they are!...just wait and you will see them all...
That is correct Bistander. Red and Blue ellipses are just vortexes that actually follow a similar kind of a number eight "8" pattern like I have shown on video. In 2D they were represented like simple ellipses to make CAD much simple to understand.BTW, the objects in the vortex of a hurricane or tornado are air molecules, water, dust, debris, etc. So in the case of the vortex in a magnet, the vortices are made up of your magnetic particles, right? And the red and blue lines are 2d representations of these 3d vortices. Have I understood that correctly?
Regards,
bi
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Image above (from video) shows the channels where particles flow...high and medium pressures, North and South, not "painted" in red or blue...

UfopoliticsLast edited by Ufopolitics; 04-13-2016, 02:55 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Not flux?
Thanks for the reply Ufo. So you're saying (as I interpret your post), that the red and blue lines do not represent magnetic flux in the classical sense, say as used in Faraday's voltage equation. But the blue lines represent the paths of high and medium pressure North magnetic particles and the red lines represent high and medium pressure South magnetic particles. I got this using your diagram from yesterday. Also, from that diagram, it appears these magnetic particles come and go through those gates on the yellow cone in the magnet. Seems like a complicated model to me, but it's your theory.Originally posted by Ufopolitics View PostRed and Blue lines represent the two different polarized fields...North is Blue, Red is South.
I really get goose bumps whenever any of you guys start using old terms as baptized in the Classic Physics...lol
According to above definition, the basic Flux Meaning bolts down to Flow
It could be a flow of anything, from vapor, water to "particles" of any kind...so I rather use this concept from above:
the amount of radiation or number of particles incident on an area in a given time.
What particles are we talking about?
All I can tell you according to my studies about Magnetic Particles Properties:
1-Magnetic Particles Physical : which posses absolutely zero mass, invisible to our bare eyes, as they can not be felt with our bare hands either...and reactive to some other materials and other particles as ferromagnetics, polarized light, electron beam gun or fire plasma.
2- Magnetic Particles Forces: within a Field contain a force within which follows specific and very accurate traveling paths that becomes a Cycle from Space to Counterspace and from Counterspace to Space. This generates Spirals and Vortexes that shape out spatially in a specific given Geometry.
3- Magnetic Particles Influence: as "affecting" other materials -like ferromagnetic- with their rotational spins, they DO have a very specific and high "Influence" over them all.
The fact of above properties, basically their traveling force/pressures and zero mass allows them to go through ALMOST ANY KIND OF EXISTING MASS in our Universe.
Then I will tell you that I particularly just need those three Properties cited above...to do all I have done...so, actually the "Name" they decide to "baptize" them before or after...I could really care less.
Hope this answers your question(s).

Ufopolitics
BTW, the objects in the vortex of a hurricane or tornado are air molecules, water, dust, debris, etc. So in the case of the vortex in a magnet, the vortices are made up of your magnetic particles, right? And the red and blue lines are 2d representations of these 3d vortices. Have I understood that correctly?
Regards,
bi
Leave a comment:
-
Flux Meaning
Red and Blue lines represent the two different polarized fields...North is Blue, Red is South.Originally posted by bistander View PostHi Ufo,
From your post:
ATTRACT STAGES Photo by ufopolitics | Photobucket
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Please, what do the red and blue lines represent? I know from your previous post you say they are high pressure spirals. But spirals of what? Magnetic flux?
Thanks,
bi
I really get goose bumps whenever any of you guys start using old terms as baptized in the Classic Physics...lolFlux Meaning (Physics):
The rate of flow of a fluid, radiant energy, or particles across a given area.
synonyms: continuous change, changeability, variability, inconstancy, fluidity, instability, unsteadiness, fluctuation, variation, shift, movement, oscillation, alternation, rise and fall, seesawing, yo-yoing
"the flux of vapor in the tube"
antonyms: stability
the amount of radiation or number of particles incident on an area in a given time.
the total electric or magnetic field passing through a surface.
a substance mixed with a solid to lower its melting point, used especially in soldering and brazing metals or to promote vitrification in glass or ceramics.
a substance added to a furnace during metal smelting or glass making that combines with impurities to form slag.
According to above definition, the basic Flux Meaning bolts down to Flow
It could be a flow of anything, from vapor, water to "particles" of any kind...so I rather use this concept from above:
the amount of radiation or number of particles incident on an area in a given time.
What particles are we talking about?
All I can tell you according to my studies about Magnetic Particles Properties:
1-Magnetic Particles Physical : which posses absolutely zero mass, invisible to our bare eyes, as they can not be felt with our bare hands either...and reactive to some other materials and other particles as ferromagnetics, polarized light, electron beam gun or fire plasma.
2- Magnetic Particles Spinning Forces: within a Field contain a force within which follows specific and very accurate traveling paths that becomes a Cycle from Space to Counterspace and from Counterspace to Space. This generates Spirals and Vortexes that shape out spatially in a specific given Geometry.
3- Magnetic Particles Influence: as "affecting" other materials -like ferromagnetic- with their rotational spins, they DO have a very specific and high "Influence" over them all.
The fact of above properties, basically their traveling force/pressures and zero mass allows them to go through ALMOST ANY KIND OF EXISTING MASS in our Universe.
Then I will tell you that I particularly just need those three Properties cited above...to do all I have done...so, actually the "Name" they decide to "baptize" them before or after...I could really care less.
Hope this answers your question(s).

UfopoliticsLast edited by Ufopolitics; 04-13-2016, 01:57 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Below is just the beginning of that pdf you linked in your post...Originally posted by ldrancer View PostOK i get it you guys, are trying to prove, a vortex as a real actual object and not a concept. and your failing trying because you cant create it. HAHAHA. ok then. change the topic title then in that case, sinc eyou havent got 1 word to say to the other side. heres a Link alinhere
THAT WHOLE ARTICLE, JUST LOOKING AT THIS PROLOGUE, IS PURE BSThe vortex.
A vortex is not an object in physical terms it is a concept. Just as a wave is a concept.
You can not have a vortex or a wave without an object or objects. In science it is best described as an object that travels
with a forward rotational motion. Because it is a concept with an actual physical object as underlying basis I would recommend to state it is a scientific concept. This segregates this concept from religious (or other concepts) of which some have zero physical backing. It is this why I fall so often over the scientific definition of concept.
A Vortex does not necessarily NEED AN OBJECT, A PHYSICAL OBJECT, to be a Vortex.
Example: A Hurricane formed in the coast of Northern Africa...that develops winds up to 200 MPH...becoming category 5 by the time it crosses the Atlantic Ocean...is a Vortex, a Spiral of different pressure gradients...basically what formed it was two different streams of wind and water in circular motion...NO SPECIFIC OBJECT THAT STARTED SPINNING AT ALL!
Same with a TORNADO.
So, we could "resume" (in the Micro World) that in this two cases of Hurricanes and Tornadoes..."Multiple Objects" guess in the water and/or wind molecules/atoms created this natural phenomena?
Absolute Nonsense, at least A FORCE or TWO MUST be present to start that Vortex.
Now, the fact that it can not be baptized, categorized as AN OBJECT, does not mean we have to "automatically" call it "A CONCEPT"
A Hurricane category FIVE(5) is coming to the coast of Florida... name it IDRANCER...Oh, let's not worry...it is "just" a Vortex...a "Concept"...so don't worry, don't take any precautions at all...A Concept can absolutely not harm Us, right?
WRONG!
Now the Religion phobia:
So the Author (which by the way has "no name") of that article is a complete Religious PHOBIC...This segregates this concept from religious (or other concepts) of which some have zero physical backing. It is this why I fall so often over the scientific definition of concept.
And so, deriving from this stupid article...a Magnetic Field is also just a Concept right?
I really believe you are just believing whatever you read out there...without applying not even a micro piece of Common Sense!
UfopoliticsLast edited by Ufopolitics; 04-13-2016, 12:45 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
OK i get it you guys, are trying to prove, a vortex as a real actual object and not a concept. and your failing trying because you cant create it. HAHAHA. ok then. change the topic title then in that case, sinc eyou havent got 1 word to say to the other side. heres a Link alinhereLast edited by ldrancer; 04-12-2016, 09:49 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Flux?
Hi Ufo,
From your post:
ATTRACT STAGES Photo by ufopolitics | Photobucket
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Please, what do the red and blue lines represent? I know from your previous post you say they are high pressure spirals. But spirals of what? Magnetic flux?
Thanks,
bi
Leave a comment:
-
Voidance (Attraction)
The CAD below show the magnetic steps involved in an Attraction:
[IMG]
[/IMG]
The Image above is a Link to my Photobucket Acct, there it could be zoomed and scrolled for better viewing of each step.
A Brief description:
LINE 1 IMAGES - Two Magnets approach from South>><<North
LINE 2 IMAGE- At certain distance which depends upon magnet strength, size, or spec's in general as composition etc,this stage could develop at longer or shorter distance.
What develops here:
PRIMARILY TAKES PLACE THE HIGH PRESSURE EXCHANGE BETWEEN CLOSER POLES OF THE TWO MAGNETS:
A) Left Magnet South HP Vortex starts connecting with Right Magnet HP South Gate (at center of North Pole)
B) Right Magnet North HP Vortex also connects with Left Magnet HP North Gate (at center of South Pole)
The way this takes place is by a Common Center Spiral exactly at the mid space between both magnets faces, this dual vortexes spinning at the same direction create a Higher Counterspace Accretion Disc.
SECOND, IMMEDIATE MID PRESSURES FROM BOTH MAGNETS STARTS CONNECTING ALSO TO THE NEW HP GATES LINKS EXCHANGE
A) Left Magnet South MP Vortex brakes connection with magnet center accretion disc to start entering Right Magnet Higher Pressure Gate.
B) Right Magnet North MP Vortex does exactly same process as above...
I represented the old MP connections in faded colors red and blue.
THIRD, FURTHER MP STARTS CONNECTING TO NEW FORMED CENTERED ACCRETION DISC
A) Left Magnet North MP Links with Center Spatial Accretion Disc.
B) Right Magnet South MP also links to new formed Center Spatial Disc.
This two latest MP connections assists HP Attraction Forces as each magnets center accretion counterspace disc starts approaching Main Center Spatial Disc from both ends and reducing immediate MP Vortexes into "voidance".
LINE 3 (THIRD IMAGE) is a closer approach not making physical contact yet, small gap still, to notice the shrinking of Inner MP Vortexes as both dielectric fields from each magnet get closer to Main Center one.
In 3D this connections looks like two spheres shrinking.
The old method with loose Iron dust model can not define but one single sphere forming between both magnets, however, color CRT Imaging , Viewing Film and Ferrocell Lens depicts this center separation/compression of the two spheres perfectly well.
LINE 4 (FINAL IMAGE) is the full new magnet formed, it has added the strength from both, and the original structure as a single magnet is finished.
You know All this steps takes only fractions of seconds.
This process is completely reversible, meaning, as we brake both magnets apart, the whole process will be reversed also in fractions of seconds.
There are two ways to visualize this interaction...one expensive method and another one cheaper.
HD Cam on tripod filming in slow motion, while magnets run inside a clear plastic tubing...
Or cheaper, get two identical magnets with holes running from pole to pole...and using fine long brass or 100% stainless bolt & nuts to separate air gaps while taking pics...then screwing them together in steps...
CRT SCREENING:
[IMG]
[/IMG]
MIXED UP VIEW FILM AND CRT:
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Regards
UfopoliticsLast edited by Ufopolitics; 04-12-2016, 08:11 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks 4 this video UFO excellent work. It is research like
this that will influence the experimental views of many in
the generations to come.
Each new test can be observed in a complete different light.
[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZhETcDHDRY[/VIDEO]
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by ldrancer View Postthe physical representation of this thing your drawing in your videos, locks in on itself. can you guys explain, how that can lead to any sort of engine which is all youve explained of a magnet? if you can explain it it should be able to be replicated and put in to work.
Leave a comment:
-
Excellent questions...
Great post Guy!Originally posted by MRIGuy View PostWow, UFO thank you so much for your reply!!!
As for the dielectric field in a permanent magnet, sounds like it's concentrated at the dielectric inertial plane (in pic below) as opposed to extending out in an electromagnetic field...
[ATTACH]17035[/ATTACH]
Yes, and if you read my previous post...you will see the reason why I broke in 3 parts the Dielectric Field, or Inertial Counterspace Geometry.
No problem, my pleasure.Also, thanks for clarifying the misperception I had of the dielectric plane in an electromagnetic field in the pic you posted, makes perfect sense!
Absolutely it is not the same, not the same to throw some iron dust RIGHT ON the magnetic field higher strength space, where this particles will be "iso facto" forced to be "bridged/aligned" in very strong chains, basically influenced by the Higher Pressure Spatial Magnetism...without showing absolutely any specific geometrical details, like the Mid Pressure Vortexes, much less to show any flows directions.The reason why I asked about the iron dust is because Im curious whats going on inside of that micron thin ferro suspension. Isn't the ferrous metal in the ferrocell aligning itself just like the iron dust in the pic i posted yesterday?
Rather than being able to play with the distance (whether with Ferrocell lenses or Film) to get the Desired Approach to focus a better spectrum of the Field.
The loose Iron Dust or Ferromagnetic Particles over a Magnetic Field is the most rudimentary and primitive method to "reveal" magnetic fields, when compared to all this new technologies including the CRT screening. It was not and is absolutely not a method that should have utilized to study, much less to design electrodynamic machines at all.
Did you know that Faraday discovered that Polarized Light was affected by Magnetic Fields back at the very time of his Induction Discovery in 1831, and that he built a specific tool to do so?Lol and the reason why I ask that is because I wondered what exactly is causing the incoherent light to become coherent? Then.....today I noticed Ken posted a video few days ago explaining just that, however Im still having trouble visualizing.
Below is a pic of the dielectric inertial plane through a ferrocell of 0.3T vertical field permanent magnet that got me wondering why the colors seperate vertically if the iron in the ferrocell is indeed aligning vertically?
[ATTACH]17038[/ATTACH]
Every color in the RGB Scale has different wavelengths...and this is the reason why they do not align nor bend by the same magnetic field intensity evenly but separated.
Michael Snyder from Revolution Labs as well as Timm Vanderelli from Ferrocell US have written pretty interesting articles about this relation, using specific tools to graph out all different reactions according to the Basic Primary Colors differences.
Oh, and Ken's Book also writes about this Color part...
Thanks, am glad all the time it took me to create and batch render those Scenes, lighting, Texturing, Dynamics, Animations, etc,etc...resulting in only about 25,000 Frames was worth at least some understanding during its short 15 minutes of duration...lolI watched your latest video today, part 3 I believe and WOW!!! I will study that video more for sure! I had a hard time visualizing the flow after studying Ken's work however thats the first time Ive seen such beautiful animated 3d working models, my hats off to you sir! Before watching your latest video I visualized flow leaving the dielectric inertial plane, spinning out horizontally and returning centripetal at the N and S poles, just couldn't wrap my mind around how Ken explained leaving centrifugal and returning centripetal until your latest video.
Oh, yes, indeed, definitively, as Walter Russell's propositions as well...I must ask, have you thought about building/experimenting with coil formations representing your 3d models? It seems to me rodin coils are 50% of the puzzle...
However, don't focus that much on coils shape as on the Magnetic Fields Volume...The way to better use the coil winding and design, for example in Generators...is to get the most of every Time/Sec Variation of the Gradient Spiral Wave those Spirals/Vortexes are influencing the iron cores my friend...
That was extremely interesting details about MRI equipment Guy!Last thought, the superconducting magnets used in MRI have a constant current flow that generates the magnetic field we use. These coils are immersed in liquid helium bringing the resistance to 0 so current continues to flow without any direct connection to power.
I believe an MRI Machine could not only be used to visualize our human anatomy...but also to repair/restore/organize it, using specific frequencies and different strength.
I met a person who became sterile just by going into an MRI while he was taking for a while some vitamins reach in minerals basically containing Iron and others metals...
Are You a technician or operator of MRI Machines?
I really find this machines fascinating!...and actually if I would not be that busy as I am...I would have taken a course in the complete operation and repairs of MRI's.
Absolutely not...We are not too far from that day...Id like to believe someday we wont need liquid helium to create this sort of perpetual current flow...
Regards,
Guy
Regards
UfopoliticsLast edited by Ufopolitics; 04-12-2016, 05:11 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
A Magnet's Real Structure...
Hello to All,
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Above is a CAD of a Magnetic Field...on a "Magnetic Carrier" called "A Magnet"...
It is a 2D Diagram, However, it is understood the real magnetic field is based on a 3D volume expanding in Three Dimensions...and for 3D Animated Graphics please watch:
[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZhETcDHDRY[/VIDEO]
As you all have noticed, I have done some slight changes to the way Ken Wheeler writes about his Theory...for easier understanding of the whole complex Magnetic Spectrum...and I will cite them below:
1- I have broken the Dielectric Field in Three (3) Parts:
a) Equatorial Accretion Disc
b) High North Pressure Southern Gate, which is an inverted Cone Geometry.
c) High South Pressure Northern Gate, which is also an inverted Cone Geometry.
If you all remember, Ken describes and shows this as a whole Dielectric Field Structure:
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Plus the picture you have shown before MRIGuy...:
[IMG]
[/IMG]
d) The main reason I separated the Dielectric Field in 3 parts...was to name each Gate Independently for Medium and Higher Magnetic Spatial Pressures...so we have now:
1- Mid Pressure Equatorial Gate to Counterspace
2- High Pressure North Gate to Counterspace (Located at South Center Pole)
3- High Pressure South Gate to Counterspace (Located at North Center Pole)
I believe it would be easier to understand this High Pressure Gates are responsible for the Attraction to Opposite Poles from another approaching magnet, or electromagnet...as it explains why opposite magnetic fields tend to "instantly" align almost perfectly at Voidance (Attraction).
This will also help to visualize Attraction Interactions in another CAD...based on what we "see" on CRT's, Ferrocells and Viewing Film...all the same basic structures observed in all three different methods.
And finally I am showing the full Spatial Magnetic Exchanges as seen on Ken's Book Image...:
[IMG]
[/IMG]
So, as you all have noticed, I kept developing this Theory as, at the same token, I am also making Lab Testing to verify everything falls perfectly in place.
I have gone much deeper into Magnetic Interactions...Attract and Repulse, plus many other angular reactions.
Everything have tested extremely precise and right on the spot...
Hope this help to understand better this Theory.
Regards to All
UfopoliticsLast edited by Ufopolitics; 04-12-2016, 05:53 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
nobody wants to challenge. i guess i think that if free energy was to be found it would be real world physical and work to give, energy. thats probably just me. why dont yuo guys debunk any of my statements. the physical representation of this thing your drawing in your videos, locks in on itself. can you guys explain, how that can lead to any sort of engine which is all youve explained of a magnet? if you can explain it it should be able to be replicated and put in to work.
you have none of the beginning things, and im reading all these words you guys are using now, field,vortex and those sort of things, in 1 sentence. you do, realize that vortex's are a concept. bill gaedge backs that up. so is a field. so no im completely lost when you guys talk, plus i dont see how you have a conversation you carry on either, when neither of you are moving in the conversation, i guess its just a semblance, like the video is of the actual model that doesnt function, only looks.
I mean you guys waste forum space, my time looking at it and everything when yu do this and your completely wrong. you wont challenge any one and then i come back, 5 posts or more later, and nothings getting done, just more talking and not one mention at any time by wheeler or any of you guys participating sitting in this thread ever. once. i call this topic waste of bandwidth and debunked. please stop posting in here. make it work then prove it. waste your time with other things and quit wasting everyone elses. your not even communicating with each other. there is no conversation goign on OH i forgot where that was at oh thanks thanks a lot. then my posts where i ask questiosn get attacked, and ignored. really appreciate that guys not im ****ing being sarcastic. but i dont expect you guys to respond even when you call me out personally. and make fun of me, wheeler.Last edited by ldrancer; 04-12-2016, 02:54 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Image source?
Hi Guy,Originally posted by MRIGuy View PostHey Bistander, ok cool I'm new of course so was unsure. Unfortunately, I don't remember where I downloaded the 4th edition from, but can tell you it's from page 83 of the pdf I have downloaded. I recommend you check out "Video 18 Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism" on youtube where Ken talks about the dielectric inertial plane of the "Electric Field" which is composed of the Dielectric and Magnetic fields more commonly known as the Electromagnetic Field.
Regards,
Guy
Found it. And again, pages are not numbered. Didn't take long to find. But now to try to understand what Ken is talking about.
Thanks,
bi
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: