Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • mikrovolt
    replied
    There is a less complicated approach but it is Howard Johnson.
    If you don't mind Ken, I am bringing up magnet flipper video.
    I think your book is really incredible work.
    Reference can be made to publication "Uncovering the missing secrets of magnetism" page 86
    The pictures of a dielectric plane (Johnson labels it zero) in both a strong and weak magnet. A helpful distinction.

    magnet flipper video:
    There are 4 vortices that lead somewhere ?
    This video trys to explains an opinion by Howard Johnson in simple terms.
    Here is the point trying to be made by Magnet flipper and raises question why has science not taught this ?
    Howard Johnson makes this statement:

    " Here is really what the magnetic particles look like !! "

    The diagram shows a line perpendicular to the pole N and S that is labeled zero and
    is there are width measurements indicated and 4 vortices; north has 1 CW and 1 CCW and the south has same.

    Later in video he shows the N S flux is spinning.



    What about the width of the bloch wall ?
    the round or elliptical or egg shaped anomolies possibly distorted by the monitor ?
    these 4 vortices are inside the inscribed square ?

    What are they good for in better using magnetic energy ?
    Last edited by mikrovolt; 03-05-2016, 10:34 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • aljhoa
    replied
    Originally posted by ldrancer View Post
    it dont matter anyway. you havent explained a magnet, which noone understands or the galaxies which you show to prove that You know what you're talking about. Either way your wrong.



    W/o Aether there is 0.

    Al

    Leave a comment:


  • ldrancer
    replied
    it dont matter anyway. you havent explained a magnet, which noone understands or the galaxies which you show to prove that You know what you're talking about. Either way your wrong.

    And I'd like to think since your wrong and can't even prove your theory theoretically, like imagined or in real life, like a working model without throwing out other thigns that noone understands to pretend you know what your saying, which is the opposite of the truth you dont know what your saying your full of crap you dont know what your doing you are LYING.

    Id like, to think kens idea is just a model, since he cant prove it himself and neither can ANY of you, show, prove, theorize or try to attempt to give an answer without using something else that noone understands either.. then I SAY ITS just a THEORY OF PERPETUAL SLAVERY. it goes around, then around without being explained and keeps on keeping you guys, going on and on and on about, nothing. Bwahahhhaaa. Yea. It goes around then you guys talk about it and talk about it, then nothing gets explained. Then it comes around, again and you guys, go off again.

    ITS PERPETUAL SLAVERY AND tHEORY THEREOF you ****ing idiots. i dont want to hear about this BULL****.

    wheres those vortex lawn mowers ken? oh wait thats right hahaha. vortex hardrives? oh right nothing. but a big mouth.

    his idea of an invention is screwing you over until your forced to give him money to do something. like the mechanics that break your crap. car mechanics, yea the same idea he is and einstein the physics monkey mechanics.

    You guys think in all your mouths openning and running yuo can explain yru stupid theory without it being a model for perpetual slavery, and get it away from that model or you gonna pull a race card every 2 seconds to get through another discussion arguement..

    I believe you brought up this topic so you could DISCUSS it, and have it being a big thing on this forum since it is a model for perpetual slavery. there. now, can you shutup or sway away from the model or not talk about it. then. or is this how, you guys, engage in conversation daily?
    Last edited by ldrancer; 02-26-2016, 06:10 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Originally posted by Sputins View Post
    Thanks for the feedback Ufopolitics

    The Ferrocells do seem to be a unique viewing device for magnetic fields. I was after some feedback from people that may have had direct use and experience with them.
    Hello Sputins,

    Good luck...Honestly I do not think you would get absolutely any huge feed back on this Forum, related to experience with Ferrocells...except from just a few, maybe three or four members including Ken Wheeler and me...plus, of course Timm Vanderelli who is also a member on this Forum.

    They do seem like they show up the field of strong magnets rather well, however noted the caution of them being fragile and not allowing strong fields near them for too long...

    Do they work okay with the weaker magnets?
    It depends basically on the sensitivity of the cell...If you would be dealing ONLY with weak magnets, then make sure you specify Timm to build it for this type of magnets...HOWEVER, You must realize that a higher sensitivity Cell would definitively get burnt VERY EASY under an N-52 huge Neo long exposure...or at least it would loose sensitivity once you start playing with stronger magnets.

    So, you would need a specific one for lower intensity fields and another one for Higher ones.

    Would for example an alternating current (say 50Hz) through a small electromagnet show up a steady view of the resulting magnetic field? Regardless of the frequency? Or would there be a limit to the frequency response? (I would say at a guess, it would show the resulting average magnetic field at whatever response the ferro-fluid could react to..
    Like I wrote before, Ferrocells take some time to fully develop the whole visible field, they do not react fast or immediately to field influence...then obviously they would not be good for a constant and fast changing magnetic field, like from an AC or pulsed Source.

    Nevertheless, the 62mm demo Ferrocell with the RGB LED’s power supply and magnet for $99 seems like a reasonable deal for a 3D magnetic field viewing device that every experimenter should probably have. (Regardless of what people may think of Ken’s theories)
    I agree, also believe so...

    Now they’ll just have to invent a cell that shows what the Dielectric Field looks like in 3D.
    Dielectric Field is not a Spatial Field...so the only way to show this kind is by observing how a spatial entity will be sucked inwards this "crack" of counterspace.

    Someone posted here a video from Ken where he shows how a green laser beam disappear when reaching/passing by this middle part of a magnet, and filmed through a Ferrocell lens...I don't have time to look it up now, but link is a couple of pages back.

    Like I posted before, and like Ken has written originally on his book...Magnetic Viewing film shows clearly the dielectric plane right at center of any magnet, weak or strong...no matter.

    Some people would not believe this is the dielectric field...but like Galileo once said..."it still moves"...


    Regards


    Ufopolitics
    Last edited by Ufopolitics; 02-19-2016, 04:25 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sputins
    replied
    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    Hello Sputins,

    The Ferrocell is THE BEST Higher Definition 3D Method to observe the real magnetic fields that I have ever tested.

    I have tested magnetic interactions which are not experimented in Ken's Book...and the results are excellent.

    In the first pages of the book Ken mentions the Ferrocell as the invention of Timm Vanderelli and Ferrocell USA.



    They are very useful, but they are very fragile as well, the cell could be burnt if let for too long time exposed to a strong field and would take weeks to clear up in the best of cases...

    I have a few of them, and thanks for posting the link to the new set that Timm is offering with the led ring assembly...that saves a lot of time to build one with the right spec's.

    The perfect illumination is required to achieve best and stronger development of field in order to be captured properly by cam, normally the magnet must not make any reflections or refractions due to chromed surface that could lead to artifacts and wrong interpretations...so it is better to paint it flat black or just use some heat shrink tube...

    It would be a great idea to use it to observe electromagnets as well

    Regards


    Ufopolitics

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Ferrocell

    Originally posted by Sputins View Post
    After watching some of Ken’s videos showing the Ferrocell demonstrations, which I do find quite interesting…

    A straight forward question: Has anyone purchased one of these Ferrocells?
    Available from: Home

    They are the invention of Timm Vanderelli, (they’re not Ken’s invention).
    Hello Sputins,

    The Ferrocell is THE BEST Higher Definition 3D Method to observe the real magnetic fields that I have ever tested.

    I have tested magnetic interactions which are not experimented in Ken's Book...and the results are excellent.

    In the first pages of the book Ken mentions the Ferrocell as the invention of Timm Vanderelli and Ferrocell USA.

    They seem to be a useful tool for the experimenter. There are lots of videos viewing various magnets or lasers etc. But I can’t find any as yet showing the view from small electromagnetic coils.

    Let alone what a resonant coil may look like through one of these Ferrocells.

    For around $100 they seem like a good educational toy or piece of test equipment.

    Any opinions?
    They are very useful, but they are very fragile as well, the cell could be burnt if let for too long time exposed to a strong field and would take weeks to clear up in the best of cases...

    I have a few of them, and thanks for posting the link to the new set that Timm is offering with the led ring assembly...that saves a lot of time to build one with the right spec's.

    The perfect illumination is required to achieve best and stronger development of field in order to be captured properly by cam, normally the magnet must not make any reflections or refractions due to chromed surface that could lead to artifacts and wrong interpretations...so it is better to paint it flat black or just use some heat shrink tube...

    It would be a great idea to use it to observe electromagnets as well

    Regards


    Ufopolitics
    Last edited by Ufopolitics; 02-17-2016, 03:07 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Sputins
    replied
    Home
    Last edited by Sputins; 02-10-2016, 04:07 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • aljhoa
    replied
    Originally posted by ldrancer View Post
    a motor makes energy. STFU.

    Originally posted by ldrancer View Post
    transmission is a free energy device. your full of crap
    You Are Right

    Al

    Leave a comment:


  • ldrancer
    replied
    you dont understand magnets put it that way. your drawing is up yoru ass and full of crap. thats the end of the story.

    you dont explain **** so stfu. you drew something in 2d. its been modeled in 3d. it doesnt circle. its not a motor. a motor makes energy. if its a car engine.. or whatever other kind of motor, they spin around. you cannot turn put something through something then turn it back around the other way without it stopping. you havent any idea what is happening in the middle. you drew make up lines. i showed the model that follows those lines. and does function, but only if split into 2 seperate things.

    you love stupid forums dont you where noone has the capability to think past 2 seconds of crap. where you can run that mouth where you can get on there and beg for money and pretend your a genius while getting the attention of a bunch of morons with stupid other things.

    explaining how stupid yyou guys are i deserve money but i dont go around begging for it all day long do I? and you are a hinderance to the world.

    so unless you can explain it better than me and show it. STFU.

    Leave a comment:


  • ldrancer
    replied
    whatever, you cant draw a picture and make a working model.

    This is so simple a young kid can understand it. your full of crap.

    you can draw a picture but you cant make a working model. THERE IS A MODEL but it doesnt circle around. You've made like a knot. or something. but it doesnt work. it still turns and i shown that it turns because its a transmission.

    And as far as any of you are concerned its nothing more than a transmission. you keep claiming you;ve explianed how a magnet works. i believe that your just wrong. you cant claim a transmission is a free energy device.

    my model works. Yours doesn't. your drawing is made to work by me. you will not discuss the model or the working one i put.

    SO you know your full of crap.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by ldrancer View Post
    duh act like im dumb and just repeat the same thing I just said

    noone cares.

    but i dont expect and **** you nothing from you but you to

    You are stupid do not even insinuate i talk with yur stupid ass.

    Cause you didnt respond to me you mocked me.

    another waste of ****ign tjime.

    BUt screw thinking right?
    Stupid place.

    .

    Dearest ldrancer

    When people see from day one (This was years ago) that you are
    a totally irrational person, then they respond accordingly. I don't know
    why that is

    But it is the way it is and you are not going to get anymore
    than you already have. Nothing is what you will get because
    you have a made up mind.

    So you just figured that out? Well there maybe be
    some hope for you in the long run.

    It sounds like you are frustrated all of the time so you pour
    high minded hate slurs on your opponents whenever you
    speak. Spitting mad and ready to strike.

    Your opponent being those who you disagree with.

    @ UFO

    Thanks for the" Super Swirls of Sea Shells" it has taken
    a new twist on so and so's noodle.

    Magnetic and or gravitational fields are constantly influencing
    matter as it grows or evolves into maturity. To bad not all
    brain matter is non malignant or it would fall into line too.

    Thanks for the refresher on spin and the many wonderful
    geometrical patterns connected to living systems. One name comes
    to mind, Viktor Schauberger


    Elementry my dear boy Watson Follow Nature.

    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8M81_FRbTLc[/VIDEO]

    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ItsSYwTSnTY[/VIDEO]
    Last edited by BroMikey; 02-04-2016, 11:03 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • aljhoa
    replied
    Originally posted by ldrancer View Post
    duh act like im dumb and just repeat the same thing I just said aljhoa.

    Do NOT respond to me You are stupid do not even insinuate i talk with yur stupid ass. Cause you didnt respond to me you mocked me. another waste of ****ign tjime. a working model IS A TRANSMISSION. does not explain the motor or how it works. It might just be a form of power we havent understood but i dont think thats how it works. just look at it. i dont have to do nothing. so theres no possible way for me to do anything ot stop it to be able to show anything.

    BUt screw thinking right? go write your retard books and beg for donations online and get dumb monkeys to hit a screen and pretend their smart which then you pretend your smart by copying off of. do not talk to me if yoru not going to respond. you attacked, didnt respond. Stupid place.

    your diagram shows nothing, is not a working model.





    Al

    Leave a comment:


  • ldrancer
    replied
    duh act like im dumb and just repeat the same thing I just said aljhoa.

    WHat you need to explian is why one of them pulls on the other, not show a copy of it. noone cares. but i dont expect and **** you nothing from you but you to copy me again. what you should do is go back and ask for donations on yoru videos some more. because man them people if they can touch a screen and pretend theyve read a book cause someone gave them some money boy their smart arent they.

    Do NOT respond to me You are stupid do not even insinuate i talk with yur stupid ass. Cause you didnt respond to me you mocked me. another waste of ****ign tjime. a working model IS A TRANSMISSION. does not explain the motor or how it works. It might just be a form of power we havent understood but i dont think thats how it works. just look at it. i dont have to do nothing. so theres no possible way for me to do anything ot stop it to be able to show anything.

    BUt screw thinking right? go write your retard books and beg for donations online and get dumb monkeys to hit a screen and pretend their smart which then you pretend your smart by copying off of. do not talk to me if yoru not going to respond. you attacked, didnt respond. Stupid place.

    the point is you dont understand and you show more pictures of things YOU DONT UNDERSTAND and dont even try to crack at what is goign on or working their. your diagram shows nothing, is not a working model.
    Last edited by ldrancer; 02-04-2016, 01:53 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • aljhoa
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • ldrancer
    replied
    wrong. first, a motor produces what, energy. to get free energy it has to be produced. you use gas to power a car. the car engine is the motor, that gives you the power. energy, comes from motors. never mind that word that has two meanings, as in motor and motor. i used car motor, really should of said, engine. but it takes a motor to make energy. lets not confuse a word, that means 2 things. that was a normal mistake and you shouldnt take it and use it against me here.

    without a motor your not powering or giving energy to, anything. you cant get free energy without a motor to run it with. a car runs on gas so thats the fuel. and gas isnt, free, but what do we consider the charge for gas? what is free? we have to get from fuel to power, however we get there.

    and all of these vortexes and things you show, are all concepts. vortex is a verb. its what something does. and there are no vortexes but the one on a magnet which is just plain magnetism that we know about. and thats what where trying to figure out. a like for example, a whirlpool, thats just, swirling water. and its in no way free energy. something opened and is letting the water out the other side like in a toilet, and makes a vortex. but you have to make the energy to hold the same amount of water on the other side to get that water to travel over there so you never produced anything free. if it wasnt there to start with you would of had to of dug the hole, to hold the water in, then connected the two places that hold the water together for the water to funnel from one to the other so any energy you wouldof got you lost for making the place to hold the water with. the water would of powered your, free energy thing.

    all those things probably are made by a magnet. where back to where you started again, your not understanding anything or doing anything, yuo keep pointing at a magnet. over and over.

    you drawing a picture and saying thats how it works, does not show how it works. you didnt say how any of those things got there so you didnt explain magnets again.

    nothing you say really says anything.

    .. for example..
    A MAGNETIC FIELD IS A NATURAL PHENOMENA, AND LIKE SO, IT HAD TO BE ANALYZED AND STUDIED FROM THE NATURAL APPROACH, BY COMPARISON TO NATURAL MODELS AND ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ELSE!
    << this line. for example. a magnetic field is natural so .. what else approach would we take to study it at? any other thing in nature that modeled, itself its OWN self after it, done it naturally. by nature. we can look at the magnet and see this. i mean we dont even need to look at the other thing. just look at the magnet. looking at the other thing as you say is yoru way of studying, has shown NOTHING. we learned nothing and its a waste of time and its a way to sell bullcrap to people. like an idea that you understand magnets cause you seen something else behave in the same way. like i didnt in the first place believe a magnet.

    so since you dont understand and youve not taught anybody anything with any working models besides nature which is no different than a magnet, you dont have a working model out of nature which you didnt model and is no different than that your saying oh that you can explain, you dont understand it, so everything you say is describing, a transmission. and it works in the definition perfectly too. i already linked a movie about a transmissio that fits this picture i linked in the last post i did before the one before this.

    that picutre makes no sense it ends in the middle then goes haywire then for some reason you think it can make a 90 degree and keep going, without stopping. somehow. now go back to my defintion of energy the MOTOR, and like an engine, without its power source, a detonation of gas, it does spin around and around and doesnt stop. with it being afree energy engine, lets just say that, there wouldnt be an explosion right? and the motor would continously spin around and around for us to grab onto and power a, tire or car or something down the road. wheres the continous motion in that model of a transmission you make do a 90 degree, and think it doesnt stop. that model is ridiculous. it is not continous and cant be a motor. iF IFF it was you then could or would apply it to a magnet then say hey look free energy but its not. theres not a owrking model of your diagram. which would be simple to make, if it where real. but it disappears in the middle and you make up some junk, throw it together then say, it works.
    but if it was a working model you could point at it, say a magnet does it, then say it does it without anything else and say its energy and a motor and say it powers it. but it doesnt. your ideas, are transmissions, exmaples of them. nothing else.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X