ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,

In my opinion, you are altering the magnetic flux pattern when you introduce the iron cylinder into the magnet circuit. This action changes the flux lines cutting the coil and therefore represents dΦ/dt. The change of the flux does not require movement of the coil or of the magnet.

But of course the "magnetic flux pattern" has "changed" due to the iron proximity to contact.

Now (the 1M dollars question)...is how it has actually "changed" is where the real answer lies...

If we go based on the geometrical description to cause flux over time displacement; please realize that the time taken is 1/500 milliseconds (Scope is set at 500 mS)...and iron "fall" is as vertical as possible...And if we go by the known structure of Domain Walls (by the way, did you convince of its existence since our last exchange?)...We are only displacing the "reversing wall" by bringing it upwards within the coil range...and that will cause a very fast and very short "up-down" signal of almost not noticeable measurements.

Also, when the iron cylinder comes into contact with the magnet, there is a noticeable sound (clank). So it appears that there is an impact between the cylinder and the magnet. This undoubtedly causes some relative motion between the coil and magnet because they are not rigidly fixed to each other.

Negative, the sound you heard is just the damping vibration of steel hitting another hard metal (Neodymium magnet) plus the heavy steel base it is seating/attracted/attached strongly to...

For example: I could get a metal bat...aluminum for an instance, and hit a very high, rigid, solid and metal pole stuck on the ground...and for sure you will do hear a very loud "clank" noise...however, I bet you I have not moved that steel pole even a fraction of a mm...I for sure moved as well as my bat...

I can't speculate as to the proportion the spike is due to the top or second paragraph above. But it might be interesting to see if you scope (very nice, BTW) could expand the pulse on the time scale.

Regards,

bi

Can't relate it to either one...the size of that signal is too high related to either the flux/time variation...or the very tight and short vibration (clanking noise) taking place...

Please look at the beginning of video where I show the approximate displacement of the Dielectric Field observed through viewing film with the same iron cylinder...now that IS a much bigger displacement than both of your above cited examples.

A very simple way to expand signal (spike) over time is by an ancient engineering method still applied up to now...:

By repetition of the single/modular structure

...that gives rise to all kind of different types of machines...right?

The other way would be by steel/iron vibration at the perfect distance and amplitude range.

I have done a lot more tests than the only ones shown on video...and the more copper I add to coil...the higher the spike gets...it seems there are no "spatial limits" as width expansion of the coils.

Finally I do have another question...

In the case I would be just making the "Typical Faraday Induction" (which I am very sure I am not)...then where is the negative equation of the same magnitude represented by Lenz Law in that signal?

No where...Bistander.


Take care, have to go and thanks for sharing your points of view.


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

To "refresh" some old Documents...

On the Electrodynamics of Moving Bodies (1920 Edition)

by Albert Einstein, translated by Meghnad Saha


It is well known that if we attempt to apply Maxwell's electrodynamics, as conceived at the present time, to moving bodies, we are led to asymmetries which does not agree with observed phenomena. Let us think of the mutual action between a magnet and a conductor. The observed phenomena in this case depend only on the relative motion of the conductor and the magnet, while according to the usual conception, a distinction must be made between the cases where the one or the other of the bodies is in motion. If, for example, the magnet moves and the conductor is at rest, then an electric field of certain energy-value is produced in the neighborhood of the magnet, which excites a current in those parts of the field where a conductor exists. But if the magnet be at rest and the conductor be set in motion, no electric field is produced in the neighborhood of the magnet, but an electromotive force which corresponds to no energy in itself is produced in the conductor ; this causes an electric current of the same magnitude and the same career as the electric force, it being of course assumed that the relative motion in both of these cases is the same.

The above quoted paragraph is just at the beginning of the full article originally written in 1905, being this the start to Special Relativity Theory presentation...The reason why I brought it here (and actually I would have loved to add it to video, but I was very restricted with time) is because of Einstein's very well defined Title and description about the only two "considered" possibilities -and up to now- between two "physical entities" or "Bodies" probabilities of interactions between them...which are very clear:

We whether move magnet while leaving conductor at rest...or We move conductor while leaving magnet at rest...

So, it is either one or two...right?

And we all must realize that from this simple "dichotomy" that started from Faraday's days...to date...has derived in the way we have been designing and constructing "officially" Electric Generators for two Centuries.

Never a "Third Body" or even a Third Possibility got to participate in this "very private and conservative" exchange?!...


Think about it...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

changing magnetic flux

Hello Bistander,

I am referring basically to the Two (2) Main and simple "Bodies" intervening in Faraday's Induction...which are strictly "Conductor" and "Magnet".

In this case the "third body" or the Iron Cylinder is utilized as an exciter to displace the dielectric field towards it.

However, at any point the iron cylinder movement is causing any of the Two Main Bodies cited above to move...right?

If you agree to the above...then we could step into my following question to you:

According to the well known Faraday's Induction concepts...Am I cutting any lines of force in any those tests, except at 15:31 TEST 7 (Duh) or the test where I move the larger coil related to magnet to demonstrate Faraday's Induction wave-output?

Thanks


Ufopolitics

Hi Ufo,

In my opinion, you are altering the magnetic flux pattern when you introduce the iron cylinder into the magnet circuit. This action changes the flux lines cutting the coil and therefore represents dΦ/dt. The change of the flux does not require movement of the coil or of the magnet.

Also, when the iron cylinder comes into contact with the magnet, there is a noticeable sound (clank). So it appears that there is an impact between the cylinder and the magnet. This undoubtedly causes some relative motion between the coil and magnet because they are not rigidly fixed to each other.

I can't speculate as to the proportion the spike is due to the top or second paragraph above. But it might be interesting to see if you scope (very nice, BTW) could expand the pulse on the time scale.

Regards,

bi

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,

I watched the video and see that every pulse on the scope is a result of you moving an iron cylinder to the top of the magnet with the coil around it. That iron cylinder is a moving body.

This is just an observation and not intended to start any argument.

Regards,

bi

Hello Bistander,

I am referring basically to the Two (2) Main and simple "Bodies" intervening in Faraday's Induction...which are strictly "Conductor" and "Magnet".

In this case the "third body" or the Iron Cylinder is utilized as an exciter to displace the dielectric field towards it.

However, at any point the iron cylinder movement is causing any of the Two Main Bodies cited above to move...right?

If you agree to the above...then we could step into my following question to you:

According to the well known Faraday's Induction concepts...Am I cutting any lines of force in any those tests, except at 15:31 TEST 7 (Duh) or the test where I move the larger coil related to magnet to demonstrate Faraday's Induction wave-output?

Thanks


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

moving body

Now, related to the Video Tests:

First notice that NO MOVING BODIES are present at any of the tests conducted.(Conductor(s) or Magnet) and that such motion (derivative of Time)from at least one of the bodies must be present in the typical Faraday-Maxwell-Lenz equations to obtain a Positive or Counter EMF from that type of Induction.

Hi Ufo,

I watched the video and see that every pulse on the scope is a result of you moving an iron cylinder to the top of the magnet with the coil around it. That iron cylinder is a moving body.

This is just an observation and not intended to start any argument.

Regards,

bi

[Ufopolitics]

Hello to All,

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=etaYzqtEnDw&feature=youtu.be[/VIDEO]

ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM, PART 1

Above is just the First Part of a series of Videos I will be uploading in my YT Chanel...

I would ask to please, -basically from the skeptics end- before start writing negative opinions about my work to be displayed here...to fully engage Your brains with your fingers...

Thanks!

Now, related to the Video Tests:

First notice that NO MOVING BODIES are present at any of the tests conducted.(Conductor(s) or Magnet) and that such motion (derivative of Time)from at least one of the bodies must be present in the typical Faraday-Maxwell-Lenz equations to obtain a Positive or Counter EMF from that type of Induction.

During all testing on above Video, the magnet and conductors/coils remain static by firmly attached to a very heavy piece of steel.

So, the displacement of the Dielectric Field is achieved simply by Attraction to Contact at the upper pole of the magnet from a solely -not winded, not magnetized- and loose piece of iron cylinder. Where Gravity and Attraction by dropping this cylinder on top is the only "effort" done to achieve this output measurement.

Now, if we all go to Page 91 from Ken Wheeler's book we read clearly:

Magnetism is dimensional, the dielectric is intradimensional, or in counterspace, and only when these two Ether fields move against each other over time is there electrification, which is the Ether in a modality of dynamic polarization.

Out of that statement above I will cite the most relevant part (in bold and underlined) that I have based all my Video testings:

ONLY when these two Ether fields move against each other over time is there electrification.

And by just making contact with a piece of ferromagnetic material volume to one of the magnet's poles, we are displacing this dielectric field, or moving it against the spatial polarity where the conductors are capturing the charges.

Concluding...That I am NOT moving either Magnet nor Conductor(s) during all the tests, therefore, there are NOT any "cutting" of any "Lines of Force" taking place.

At around 15:31 in TEST 7, I am showing what the Output Sinewave would look like if I move that same Coil related to the Magnet... shape and measurement difference is clearly observed compared to Dielectric displacement output.

The Results from all tests clearly demonstrates that conductors must be placed exactly at the levels where the displacement is taking place during the Interaction, meaning -for this particular case- from the Middle to the Top of the Magnet embodiment, in order to obtain the highest values, whether Negative or Positive outputs.

When conductors are placed either at middle or bottom levels of the magnet, is obtained a lower output, but primarily, we capture a "mixed" positive-negative values due to both polarization's being disturbed due to the inertial dielectric displacement.

Actually the "sufficient proof" of dielectric output measurement could have ended right at TEST 3 (10:53) with the last 1/4 inch copper ring...and the reason why I started testing "Spiral Type Structures"...is to notice the difference in gain, since we are only capturing one revolution of energy displacement with solid/single conductors volumes...and not several, like we observe as the higher number of turns coils are used...to the point of lighting a small LED.

THE DEMONSTRATION OF VORTICITY IN THE MAGNETIC FIELDS POLARIZATION (17:35)

This final testing is so simple...that actually will need no explanation, after watching video.

The Vortex rotation of both polarization types or poles, versus the way we set our coils in either two ways...:

1- Following the same direction (Coil winding versus Spatial Field)...or

2- Following opposite directions between each others.

Where I do find an interesting result is when is used the same directions on both components (either CW-CW or CCW to CCW)...and the big difference in output obtained. And on this tests I have a loose spool of winded wires, which is so easy to reverse...BUT, when we are winding into the steel core of any electro-dynamic machine...there is not an "option" to take it off and reverse it that simple...

Concluding that there are some noticeable losses when both components are interacting opposite to each others.

I only hope that all this work will serve to enlighten others...and start understanding that the "Classic Magnetism" we have been taught is completely wrong and so far apart from reeality in every aspect we look at it. And as a result, all our designed Electrodynamic Machines will never be perfect unless we have full domain of this concepts.


Regards to All


Ufopolitics