ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Aaron]

bloch wall and dielectric+magnetic

ONLY when these two Ether fields move against each other over time is there electrification.

That quote of Ken's you posted I believe is right on and is the basic premise of the first chapter of Eric Dollard's Lone Pine Writings, which is very foundational and everyone should study it. The attempt at standardizing those basic electrical terms was censored years ago, but its all laid out in that book.

You might find the last 1+ month of of Bedini's posts here interesting in relation to these concepts as well as specific focus on the Bloch Wall for anyone interested: The 3d Monopole Coil How To Build

This image is in relation to the disclosure on John's Zero Force Motor.

[bistander]

Davis & Rawls

Davis-Rawls Scientific Investigations date back to 1936...:

They were 21 and 8 years of age respectively in 1936.

[IMG][/IMG]

Albert Roy Davis and Walter C. Rawls, Jr. wrote the book Magnetism and its Effects on the Living System copyright 1974. This is where you will find the image you posted above. And no, I do not believe that is an accurate representation of a magnet.

bi

[bistander]

Scale

Bistander,

See, that is your problem on above quoted post...you keep looking at the microscopic levels while ignoring (or simply denying to accept) the Big Picture. And I really can not understand why?...if you can find those images all over the net!!!

All you have to do is type in any search engine:

Magnet Domain Wall Pictures

Most, nearly all, of those domain wall pictures are of microscopic scale, same as the one I posted. And I do understand the big picture.

[Ernst]

As an opponent to anything counterspace, I am very interested to see your proof of Kenny's theories. The experiment shown and its results can be explained with current theories as well as with Ken's. So they do not distinguish one theory from the other.
To prove Ken's theory you should show an experiment that does.
In other words, an experiment that shows a result that can not be explained by current theories but can be explained by Ken's.
Then you have proof.
Now you still have a long way to go.


Ernst.

[BroMikey]

[IMG][/IMG]

Now that's the way to go, I like equations don't get me wrong yet
all of the endless/meanless math that I have pursued over the years
thinking It was going to put me on top of things, left me with only
more number crunching. I thought it would make me the smartest
man on earth? I was wrong.

What I like math for is to get me into the ball park so I can begin
experimenting as we see with UFO's work. Most excellent UFO, not
boring at all. Right on Que. A big thumbs up!!!


Well I guess it wouldn't hurt to mathematically hang this ball and chain
around the super duper brash madman so we could all convince him that
all of his college training needs to be dumped out on the table like
rocks out of a rock tumbler so sorting and reordering can be done.

GOOD LUCK WITH THAT!!!

So onward my friend, "YER PITCHING AND I"M GRININ" that is pitchin
out the trash while I grin from ear to ear.

All of your coil experiments are worth their weight in gold. A good many
math genius will never be able to find the answers without experimentation.

"Teacher Toed Me" is just not enough, sorry.

[Ufopolitics]

The simple Test 1...

TEST 1

[IMG][/IMG]

Above simple image of TEST 1...where we could see the North Field plus the Dielectric schematic for rotation (Right small image), generating field rotation sense...and transmitted to open copper tubing, then to each terminal.

Obviously by swapping either Scope connectors...or inverting Copper Element upside down (SAME THING)...will reverse the results, BUT BASICALLY what is trying to be tested/observed is the SOURCE polarization-vortex-rotation EMITTING the SIGNAL to the related capturing device.

Thanks


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Quotes from Ken Wheeler...1

In speaking of “magnetism”, the immediate connotation is that of (N and S) polarity, however this spatial abstraction does not exist. Magnetism is but one force itself, however, as magnetism is purely spatial in denotation it is polarized but as one moving Ether ‘sink’ and ‘bubble’; magnetism has but one movement not two, nor ‘two poles’, CW and CCW are spatial abstractions of a singular movement of the magnetic field itself. There are no static fields.

[IMG][/IMG]

The ‘polarized’ conception of magnetic ‘polarity’ is a long held intellectual defect in electro-magnetic geometric understanding.

Any spatial distention is naturally ‘polarized’ definitionally by distention. A spinning object of any variety appears to be moving clockwise from one end, and counterclockwise from the other, however the object is moving in one direction, it has ‘no concept’ of poles or polarity, only the ignorant humans scratching their heads have this perceptual defect.

Ken Lee Wheeler

[Ufopolitics]

The same as your iron cylinder does. Just that your set-up uses more air in the magnetic path. But the iron cylinder changes the flux pattern when it is placed on magnet.

NO, NEGATIVE, The Iron Cylinder on video does NOT "Transfer" any magnetic fields simply because I do NOT use a secondary field / magnet on top, in between or anywhere else...so there are absolutely no fields transferring!

That Iron Cylinder EXPANDS ONLY the UPPER Polarization (Pole) thus, DISPLACING the Dielectric Field from the Magnet towards the Top of Coil as well.

The Upper Pole climbs into the Iron Cylinder, that fact is also shown on video through Viewing Film.


But like I wrote before...IF You are not able to see the basic and old Main Domain Wall in EVERY Magnet...How could we expect that you see beyond into more clever magnetic geometries?

[bistander]

....what that iron rotor does is to TRANSFER FLUX from one point to the other.

The same as your iron cylinder does. Just that your set-up uses more air in the magnetic path. But the iron cylinder changes the flux pattern when it is placed on magnet.

[Ufopolitics]

It would invert the polarity. The scope doesn't know positive and negative. It displays the signal as is. Inverting the probe is to invert the signal.

I know that.

The issue was about "forcing" the scope to display a one way signal...by not testing other options like changing the scope connectors.

In the case of the video, by just swapping the coil or the copper elements is exactly the same thing as to reverse the connectors from scope while leaving the elements or coil the same way. I chose to swap the coils, leaving scope probe connected the same way through whole video...it is easier to understand one way or the other that the source signal has changed polarity when moving dielectric field towards North or towards South.

[Ufopolitics]

I say there are domain walls at the center of the magnet and throughout the rest of the magnet. But I see no proof of a "Main Domain Wall".



I gave it a shot here:

Sorry but your shot never hit the Target...

I was referring to Magnetic Viewing Film and NOT to Ferrocells.

Ferrocell is a High Definition and Higher Resolution to reveal basically the whole Magnetic Field...in 3D.

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,

I'd like to revisit the moving body concept. I say the placement of the iron cylinder constitutes altering the magnetic flux pattern thru the coil even though the coil and magnet are stationary. If I understand you, you claim that the stationary coil and magnet rules out magnet induction as the cause of the observed voltage spike. Below is a motor (or generator) which operates on this same principle, ie. stationary magnet and coil and moving iron. The diagrams demonstrate the changing flux thru the coils. Is it not the same as your set up, only you have a simpler magnetic circuit with a much larger air gap?



Flux-Switching Permanent Magnets Machine | Agros2D

Regards,

bi

That was the WRONG example to my set up, Bistander.

In the case of the reluctance motor or generator what that iron rotor does is to TRANSFER FLUX from one point to the other.

Iron Rotor is always SANDWICHED in between -at least- two to four magnetic fields. So there is REDIRECTION all the time from one to other field...Iron serves as a Switching Flux Bridge...

Try something else...

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,

So we agree there are millions of domains in your magnet, not just two, correct? Next step: Please clarify, do you believe all the South domains migrate to the red end of the magnet and all the North domains to the blue end?

Domains do not "migrate" as in "physically" displace/transport from one end to the other within the mass of the magnet...come on Bistander!

All this domains do is RE-ORIENT their magnetic polarization in a very fast "3D CHAIN REACTION", and that takes place in nano seconds...the iron molecules are all in the same exact place.

Or as I believe, that the magnetic material is essentially homogeneous down to the microscopic level and that the material in the red area is the same as the material in the blue area? And that on a microscopic investigation, it all looks the same, even the middle where you claim there is a wall. The middle is just like all the rest of the magnet.

You have to learn how to separate magnetic orientation from physical molecular mass even at microscopic levels.

For God sake...It is so simple!...you get a non magnetized iron bar, then you magnetize it by electrification in one way your DC energy flow...so you get a North and a South at each ends...NOW, REVERT the Electrification Process again...then, where you had a South, now you have a North...while all those iron particles are still in the same exact place...no deformation, nor displacement of any particle has occurred!

The North and South poles (or Blue and Red) are just visualization aids to identify the direction of the field.

Ok..."direction of the field" Uh?...how is that "direction"?...a straight vector?...or a spiral CURLED VECTOR?...

So again, my point, there is nothing in the middle of the magnet different from the rest of the magnet. If you want to imagine an invisible dielectric inertial plane there, fine with me, but I see no value in it.

Regards,

bi

Davis-Rawls Scientific Investigations date back to 1936...:

[IMG][/IMG]

What you are trying to deny above (The Existence of a Domain Wall in every center of a Magnet)...is NOT the main Topic of this Thread.

You are trying to deny a discovery that was made a very long time ago...and that many, many Books, Science Articles and else...have shown, developed and demonstrated all over.

Therefore, I am really sorry, because I liked your debate...However. I can not try to illustrate nor enlighten a knowledge you deliberately deny to accept. Unfortunately, by not accepting even a Domain Wall in the center of every magnet...I much less would expect you will start a logical debate about a much complex field like is a Dielectric Plane substituting/replacing what you don't believe it exists.


So, I believe you really should maintain like your name means: A Bistander on this Thread...

I am sorry but I have tried...

[bistander]

Domain Walls

Bistander...You are welcome here...well... after you finally accept there IS the existence of a Main Domain Wall in the center of every magnet...of course.

I say there are domain walls at the center of the magnet and throughout the rest of the magnet. But I see no proof of a "Main Domain Wall".

Who is gonna answer that?

I gave it a shot here:

Inside the magnet there is not an all North domain on one end and an all South domain on the other end divided by a wall down the middle. I don't believe there is anything "in" the magnet in the middle which shows as the white line on your images. I think the line on the images results from the directional flow of magnetic flux which is all parallel to the magnet's axis at that location meaning no flux in the perpendicular direction to intersect with the viewing film and react with the medium and light. * A quote from Timm@Ferrocell USA at the Ferrocell reply #4 appears to support my thoughts.

A Ferrocell will pass light where the flux "isn't" (the lowest potential), and appears in a different vector in relation to the location of incoming light.

I don't know if there is or is not a dielectric inertial plane there. I don't know what a dielectric inertial plane is or how it interacts with our world. I also do not feel that the interesting patterns from ferrocells and CRTs using magnets depict magnetic flux fields (follow the magnetic flux lines). When we use magnets they are not stand-alone chunks being held behind a viewing screen. The magnets are in a machine like a motor or such which will have a magnetic circuit containing the magnetic field. The pattern seen on the stand-alone magnet hardly represents the useful flux field in most cases.

[bistander]

Moving body

Hi Ufo,

First notice that NO MOVING BODIES are present at any of the tests conducted.(Conductor(s) or Magnet) and that such motion (derivative of Time)from at least one of the bodies must be present in the typical Faraday-Maxwell-Lenz equations to obtain a Positive or Counter EMF from that type of Induction.

During all testing on above Video, the magnet and conductors/coils remain static by firmly attached to a very heavy piece of steel.

In my opinion, you are altering the magnetic flux pattern when you introduce the iron cylinder into the magnet circuit. This action changes the flux lines cutting the coil and therefore represents dΦ/dt. The change of the flux does not require movement of the coil or of the magnet.

Hi Ufo,

I'd like to revisit the moving body concept. I say the placement of the iron cylinder constitutes altering the magnetic flux pattern thru the coil even though the coil and magnet are stationary. If I understand you, you claim that the stationary coil and magnet rules out magnet induction as the cause of the observed voltage spike. Below is a motor (or generator) which operates on this same principle, ie. stationary magnet and coil and moving iron. The diagrams demonstrate the changing flux thru the coils. Is it not the same as your set up, only you have a simpler magnetic circuit with a much larger air gap?



Flux-Switching Permanent Magnets Machine | Agros2D

Regards,

bi