ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Markoul]

What you mean by the term magnetic vector potential?

Before we start a conversation you must define exactly what you mean by that?


In a magnetic field as described with lines, there are only two things magnetic flux and lines of force. Nothing else, I don't know what you mean by this famous magnetic vector potential. This is not a correct scientific term for describing magnetic fields.

Potential in general is quantitative in nature and has no vector involved. How you can describe potential with vectors truly escapes me?!

On the other hand, force of lines in a magnetic field are always tangent to its magnetic flux lines shown by the ferrocell.

Magnetic flux lines are simple in the case of the ferrocell the ferrofluid nanoparticles trajectories or orientation under the influence of the force vectors (force lines) of the magnetic field induced into the ferrocell.

Flux lines shown by the the ferrocell are pretty close to the force vectors which I remind you are always tangent to the flux lines. This is because ferrofluid nanoparticles are single domain (google it) and can follow exactly the force vectors of an induced magnetic field (superparamagnetism) whereas iron fillings are not and essentially are deforming the field of a magnet and depicting it incorrectly.

I have proved in my video that it is impossible for them to enter into the Bloch axis of a magnet therefore they can not depict it.

There is no passive device in the planet that can more accurately depict the magnetic field of a magnet than the ferrocell today.

Potential or not, this is the field of a magnet as shown by the ferrocell and not the iron fillings one.

Iron fillings are distorting the field, not showing it!

Best regards,

EM

[bistander]

ferrocell

Ferrocell depicts correctly the field of a magnet, iron fillings does NOT!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCdu2TE_Wk8

Therefore, as far we can see 100% with the ferrocell the true field of a permanent magnet is illustrated below:




https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yLp...ew?usp=sharing

as also shown by the ferrocell:



https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EwR...ew?usp=sharing


all the rest are mere speculations.

EM

Your second link:



Obviously from: intro
Had you clicked on "More Info Here" under the image you would have seen this:



Had you continued to read that description you would have noticed this:

The center point between poles of the viewed image represents the Null Zone or more generally, the Bloch Wall. The 'lines' on either side of the null indicate magnetic vector potential. (Not field lines like iron filings show)

Had you clicked on this:

For more detailed information, see References

you could have found some really good papers detailing research into how the ferrocell works. Like this one:

Magnetically controlled reflection of a ferrofluid cell

http://www.ferrocell.us/references/Magnetically%20Controlled%20Reflection%20of%20a%20Ferrofluid%20Cell.doc

And when you understand that, you will learn that the ferrocell does NOT

Ferrocell depicts correctly the field of a magnet

as you say but rather shows the magnetic vector potential, which is NOT the same as the magnetic field or the magnetic lines of force or flux.

I've been trying to tell Ufopolitics this for several years. He, and you, and Ken are misinterpreting what is presented by the ferrocell when a magnet and bright lights are placed near it.

Regards,

bi

[Markoul]

Me explaining why iron fillings experiments is BS! And ferrocell displaying correctly

Ferrocell depicts correctly the field of a magnet, iron fillings does NOT!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lCdu2TE_Wk8

Therefore, as far we can see 100% with the ferrocell the true field of a permanent magnet is illustrated below:




https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yLp...ew?usp=sharing

as also shown by the ferrocell:



https://drive.google.com/file/d/1EwR...ew?usp=sharing


all the rest are mere speculations.

EM

[Markoul]

So how far are these high potential lines you are talking about? 10 cm away 30 cm 1m? That does not make any sense!

Strongest force vectors are always the shortest between two spatial points or regions.

On the other hand attraction and repulsion can easily be explained by different spin directions of the vortices on the poles.

When opposite polarity poles of two magnets are approached from opposite directions the resulting effect is their vortices are in phase and therefore coincide and attract each other. That what is called magnetic attraction. It's like a handshake.

On the other hand same polarity poles of two magnets when approached they vortices are out of phase from each other and they hit against each other and repel. That what is called magnetic repulsion.

no fancy things here. simple.

I' m not convinced about CRT showing these high potential lines you are talking about, could be anything...

Show me the lines...?

[aljhoa]

Therefore, this aligns with Ken's Theory perfectly well, meaning, the outgoing forces aligned (parallel) to axis, or zero degrees, are CENTRIFUGAL, stronger forces emanating into SPACE gradually loose strength and are SUCKED BACK into their ORIGIN, COUNTERSPACE, AETHER...which is the DIELECTRIC FIELD ACCRETION DISC.

Mercury vortex in a magnetic field

Rotation of liquid mercury generated by a magnetic field

Al

[Ufopolitics]

The Ferrolens IS SHOWING 100% AND ACCURATE THE MAGNETIC FLUX LINES AND FIELD OF A PERMANENT MAGNET.
Since they did not find the magnetic charge particle there is no such thing like magnetic current. There is only magnetic field and field potential.
The iron fillings experiment shows falsely I repeat the magnetic permeability (or else inductance) of the iron fillings as the magnetic field outline of a magnet.

This is wrong, the iron fillings suck out (steal) magnetic flux from the magnet's field essentially deforming it and align themselves across the two highest potential spatial regions of the magnetic source namely the two poles of a magnet. thus actually short circuiting the magnet!!

The Ferrocell or else ferrolens (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ferrolens) is the accurate one because it has single domain magnetic particles (superparamagnetism) meaning they can form dipoles between them following exactly the magnetic flux, tangent to the force lines (potential) of a dipole magnet field.

As far I am concerned the iron fillings experiment is a corpse...as proven R.I.P.

END OF STORY

Hello Markoul,

Thanks for your opinions!

I agree 100% that Iron Filings kills the Real Magnetic Field Visuals...as a matter of fact, I have dedicated a full video to prove why they are wrong, comparing it to Ferrocell, View Film and Color CRT (3 Guns R,G,B):

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4v5YsV_M5hc[/VIDEO]

According to Wheeler's Theory, Higher Pressures which bypass accretion disc, are Higher Speed Flux, which are not captured by neither ferrocell nor view film, BUT, Color CRT does show this lines from pole to pole, at the outer limits of screen, almost out of it.

Iron Filings as you wrote, freeze, shunt, chain the magnetic field, shrinking this higher pressure lines, while hiding the Mid-Pressure 3D Layers, which show two bubbles one for each pole.

When we step into what we all know as "Attraction" and "Repulsion" is when this higher forces field lines enter into stage to play the deciding roles.

On that video comments I wrote related to Attraction:

Attraction, as we all think off...as we have been taught...since the beginning of times...is that Alike Poles Attract...that is a wrong concept...they never do, they never blend, fuse together at all.

When we face a S/N Magnet with a S/N Magnet, like:

[S/N>>S1/N1]

We all perceive that the two end poles N>>S1 are the "Attracting Acting Poles"...but in reality S1 is seeking to Fuse with S from the other magnet...and so, N1 is seeking fusion with N.

Poles in a magnet are generated from the very center (equator) of whatever magnetic carrier volume, outwards, so we have a single magnet looks like:

[ N <<l>>S]

And Attraction between Two would then look like:

[ N <<l>>S] + [ N1 <<l>>S1]

And result from adding above would be:

[N+N1<<l>>S+S1]

Which would give Us a Double strong Magnet as is the sum from both.

Concluding: N1 seeks Fusion with N, since both Origins and Spin Directions are aligned Spatially.

And so S seeks Fusion with S1, also having same origin vectors.

We could be able to see this full interaction with Magnetic Viewing Film, which clearly shows the lighter center green stripe at very center of every magnet...

And when two magnets are attracted and contacted together...we can see how that light green stripe moved from each magnet's center towards the Intersecting Gap... Which means that each magnet Now, became a Full Pole...

And so for Repulsion I posted:

And so a Repulsion is the Opposite from Attraction on my previous post:

[ N <<l>>S] + [ S1 <<l>>N1]

Parting from Non Compatible Alike Poles, in above Interaction could not be Any Complete Fusion Seeking Pole, by approaching them, since all directional vectors from the like poles are opposing each others... However, both S+S1 blend together since they are both of same magnetic pressures. When we face two magnetic fields in repulsion we have pure, positive, compressed energy.

Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Dear Ufo,

For long I wanted to comment and ask you about you excellent animation of the magnetic field particle dynamics according Wheeler, the first video you refer to, in your above post.

On your video you show the particles/field leaving the magnetic axis North/South (0 degree), spiraling out, for finally returning in the disk plane, at the Bloch Wall 90 degree.

This to me, is counter intuitive. I would expect the particle to leave the center in a 90 degree angle (like magnetic field along a conductor), and from there the particle loose its strength, and depending of the particle ‘polarity’ or simple random fall out, it would then be spiraling back into either North or the South pole. To me the falling back into and the center in a more and more narrow spiraling along the axis, seems much more according how I see the law of nature elsewhere, being sucked back into a black hole.

Sorry for my English, not native, but may I ask you to consider, whether the ‘particle’ should be sprout out in 0 degree along the axis, or 90 degree along the Bloch wall. In the latter, the spiraling way back home seems much more natural to me.

Best of regards, Fessor

[Markoul]

The Ferrolens IS SHOWING 100% AND ACCURATE THE MAGNETIC FLUX LINES AND FIELD OF A PERMANENT MAGNET.
Since they did not find the magnetic charge particle there is no such thing like magnetic current. There is only magnetic field and field potential.
The iron fillings experiment shows falsely I repeat the magnetic permeability (or else inductance) of the iron fillings as the magnetic field outline of a magnet.

This is wrong, the iron fillings suck out (steal) magnetic flux from the magnet's field essentially deforming it and align themselves across the two highest potential spatial regions of the magnetic source namely the two poles of a magnet. thus actually short circuiting the magnet!!

The Ferrocell or else ferrolens (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Draft:Ferrolens) is the accurate one because it has single domain magnetic particles (superparamagnetism) meaning they can form dipoles between them following exactly the magnetic flux, tangent to the force lines (potential) of a dipole magnet field.

As far I am concerned the iron fillings experiment is a corpse...as proven R.I.P.

END OF STORY

[Fessor]

[Markoul]

Thanks for your very detailed description of what is really happening here. I have watched the particle dynamics video in the past. Excellent job! Congratulations! much better that stubborn academia guys. I love your videos and explanations.

Understanding that different rotation of north and south swirls vortexes is just caused by their opposite mirror spatial location and that they actually spin exactly the same is very important.

The iron fillings experiment is actually the same as attaching an iron plate on the side of a magnet,a short circuited magnet. And i am not convinced still about ken's take about direct high potential N-S flux. I think he is repeating the same mistake as the iron fillings, thus the short circuited magnet field.

So in that point i have to disagree with you. Seems Ken changed your initial intuition which was the correct one.

This high potential flux is nonsense.

Show it to me in the ferrocell...? or in the CRT? The lines in your video with the big CRT may appear to come from one pole to the other but if you count carefully the lines coming out of the Bloch region match the number of lines returning to these poles and the change color tint midway at their curl. Maybe these bring the confusion. Anyway unless wi do a gigantic ferrocell to encompass the whole field we will never have real proof, i submit. The lines always brake on the ferrocell light strip perimeter on a side view of a magnet.

BTW, I am the guy who made radio waves on a transmitting antenna rod section visible...using Timm's ferrocell. Magnetic field on a transmitting radio antenna is coaxial in appearance.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGcvh4Rb0G4&t=

article: https://www.sciencedirect.com/scienc...194?via%3Dihub

Keep up the good work Ufopolitics I am a fan of yours and I believe (although I am an academic) that underground movement is much closer to the truth than academia.

Kind Regards,

Emmanouil

[Ufopolitics]

Misunderstandings...

I also align with ufopolitcs opinion and stick to model 2 and not Ken's model 1.

Model 1 in electrical and electronic engineering we call this a short circuit between the two poles!

Instead model 2 is the analogue of a complementary push-pull with symmetrical power supply +/- and the ground, amplifier circuit where the are two electrical current circuits one on each each supply rail and the ground.

I think Ken Wheeler's confusion comes from that he has not real knowledge or training of electrical engineering and is confused from the interlacing of the flux lines above the poles as shown by the ferrocell.

He overcomplicates things. With all these Greek talking, i am Greek BTW, and self invented terminologies and definitions.

Hello Markoul,

I believe you are not understanding Ken's Theory well...

There are no "Model 1" and "Model 2"...but one single model here.

The confusion maybe -as I also had it in the beginnings- is between the Two different PRESSURES in Ken's Magnetic Theory.

The "Model 2" you are referring to (two bubbles) are the MID PRESSURES which do not have sufficient strength to bypass the center accretion (equatorial) Disc, therefore, return back to Counterspace (Ether) exactly at that disc PLANE.

However, the HIGHER PRESSURES can and DO bypass center accretion disk, therefore, travel to each OPPOSITE'S poles center (aligned with axis) to return (centripetally) back to dielectric field (center of magnet)

If you take a look at my video below, it will show pretty clear the differences between Hi-Low Pressures...through my animated CAD CGI's Images...

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZhETcDHDRY[/VIDEO]

I myself have tried to bring the matter on academia but they stick on the iron fillings model and kick back like mules!

look here this thread:

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_we_are_wrong_about_the_field_of_a_magnet

(registration needed on RG but it is worth just to read what it is told there)

But of course they (Academia) will NEVER accept it!!
If they do...they will never be able to explain all the development done based on Lorent'z work...as to all the "corrections" he did to Maxwell Equations and Theories.

Iron Model is very convenient as it was appropriately "ADAPTED" (or better written: FORCED) to fit Academia requirements.

Ufopolitics,

I had like to hear your opinion -as to- why these interlacing of the field lines happens on the two separate magnetic dognhout bubbles touching back to back at the Bloch region?

Like I wrote above...after you watch my video, you may understand it.

I will cite an example that Ken mentions...as when making (drawing) a line...

We draw a line either from left to right...or from right to left, depending if you are left-right handed...

Now NATURE, does NOT uses our "ways" to draw lines ...NATURE writes a LINE from a center towards both ends.

Now, for Us to do it that way, we will need both hands...moving at unison from a common point towards the TWO OPPOSITE extremes...

As an example...observe ANY seed development...say a tree, a big tree...first you plant seed, which is Nature's first dot, point where "line" STARTS...then, seed DIVERGES to TWO opposite extremes of growth...one end to the skies, searching the sun light, the rain, the air...while the other seeking all the nutrients from the ground...

Why they don't turn all in parallel spin direction CCW (when watched from above the pole) for the north pole and CW for the south pole?

Kind Regards,

EM

But, that is exactly how it works!

North aiming to your eyes will seem "CCW"...while South will be CW...

However, Both Spins are exactly same directional (parallel?) spin development.

Post from my Other Thread, which I believe answers your question:

Hello,

The First thing this Instrument will clearly REVEAL, and ALWAYS IDENTIFY SAME WAY, is the Opposite Spin Directions between a NORTH and a SOUTH Polarization (Poles):

NORTH SPIN SEEN ON CRT SCOPE




SOUTH SPIN SEEN ON THE SAME CRT SCOPE SCREEN




And this FAST AND ACCURATE RESPONSE works the same way for an ELECTROMAGNET which is being fed with direct DC Currents...Or whenever we pulse it with ANY SIGNAL we would be working with.

Example: If we just connect our Coil to a Regulated PSU, and start dialing UP Voltage and Amperage...we will see the ANGLES WILL INCREASE, tending to reach the Vertical Line at center of screen, and perpendicular to ZERO LINE.


Ufopolitics

Even though, I have shown on my above quoted post, that a NORTH SPIN is COMPLETELY OF OPPOSITE NATURE to a SOUTH SPIN ...

When we get TWO of this CRT SCOPES, and set them according to below CAD DIAGRAM, meaning FACE TO FACE with the FIELD IN CENTER:



It is ONLY then, when we realize that BOTH SPINS AGREE ON SAME ROTATIONAL DIRECTION, from BOTH POLARIZATIONS...NORTH AND SOUTH.


Regards to All


Ufopolitics

Thanks for posting Markoul...our further understanding about Magnetism...will open up many unknown or denied fields of Science, like Antigravity, Free Energy, Motion Perpetuals...etc,etc

And then who would not like to make any one of above field-experiments in the future?


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Markoul]

I also align with ufopolitcs opinion and stick to model 2 and not Ken's model 1.

Model 1 in electrical and electronic engineering we call this a short circuit between the two poles!

Instead model 2 is the analogue of a complementary push-pull with symmetrical power supply +/- and the ground, amplifier circuit where the are two electrical current circuits one on each each supply rail and the ground.

I think Ken Wheeler's confusion comes from that he has not real knowledge or training of electrical engineering and is confused from the interlacing of the flux lines above the poles as shown by the ferrocell.

He overcomplicates things. With all these Greek talking, i am Greek BTW, and self invented terminologies and definitions.

I myself have tried to bring the matter on academia but they stick on the iron fillings model and kick back like mules!

look here this thread:

https://www.researchgate.net/post/Why_we_are_wrong_about_the_field_of_a_magnet

(registration needed on RG but it is worth just to read what it is told there)

Ufopolitics,

I had like to here your opinion why these interlacing of the field lines happens on the two speparate magnetic dognhout bubbles touching back to back at the Bloch region?

Why they don't turn all in parallel spin direction CCW (when watched from above the pole) for the north pole and CW for the south pole?

Kind Regards,

EM

[Ufopolitics]

CRT Scanning a Magnetic Field Vortex Video

Hello to All,

Here is the B&W small CRT Video...I was talking about a while back...I finally repaired the vortexes directions for each polarization and did all lab work again...

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l7OzMURRU_k&lc=z12fjdg4fvmuers0222sx5vggoi vdf05r04[/VIDEO]

CRT REVEALING MAGNETIC FIELD VORTEXES

I had to stop building my Generators...just because I consider this Video is crucial to understand future readings when I show you the Pulsing Primary Coils Sinewave...


Regards to All


Ufopolitics

[aljhoa]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QReGWNP5fSs

Interesting discussion.

emV027U4: The Sun: An Ether Dynamo


Al

[pault]

www.distinti.com

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QReGWNP5fSs

Interesting discussion.