ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Ufopolitics]

Hey UFO and everyone viewing

That is an insanely cool share on video. I thought the spacing between
the rotor and the outside field should be within a few thousands. But you
only running a few volts. Do you think accuracy that way could throw off
the experiment at 100volts?

I know I didn't throw UFO a curve ball.

Thanks Mikey,

This set up was in the very preliminary tests, and no, you do not need that close of a gap if the field is strong enough. Although it would be great if it is pretty tight there, mounted on some insulation and shock absorber material...

Like I wrote on previous post...this is not even close to the set up am working on now, which is based on separated elements with a center iron rotor...with neos mounted in -as I have shown before- this way, once we start spinning the virtual field with the cap charge, rotor would spin and start the self-exciting process.

Let's see how it goes...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Video results...

Hello to All,

I am not going to draw any conclusions out of this video, even though the generating coils are completely isolated from all other input, there could still be some "transformer effects" going on, even though both cores are not in full contact nor enclosed...but it could be easy to arrive to wrong conclusions from either sides.

I am NOT happy at all with this set up (related to the Static Armature Winding and resistors plus closed iron core). it is just vibrating the field at high speeds due to be within an enclosed armature core which does not have an inner rotor to distribute the separated field elements properly. I have tested this by just inserting a Rotor Magnet from a BLDC Motor mounted on its bearings and empty case (SHOWN BELOW)...and it does not FULLY spins...it just spins a quarter turn or just vibrates, which is a clear sign the Virtual Field is not spinning.

[IMG][/IMG]

I uploaded this video basically for you all to see that I do have been working on this system for a while, based on the different winding configurations I have presented before.

[IMG][/IMG]

Regards to All


Ufopolitics

[BroMikey]

Hey UFO and everyone viewing

That is an insanely cool share on video. I thought the spacing between
the rotor and the outside field should be within a few thousands. But you
only running a few volts. Do you think accuracy that way could throw off
the experiment at 100volts?

I know I didn't throw UFO a curve ball.

[Cadman]

Thanks for the detailed explanation. Decay over time had me confused.

I keep losing sight of the fact that you want to use an unmodified stator housing and wiring.

Regards
CM

[Ufopolitics]

An Old Video...

Hello guys,

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pJDArgBSHOI&feature=youtu.be[/VIDEO]

SPINNING VIRTUAL FIELDS ROUGH TEST 3

On the rough video above I have wound a Closed Iron Armature, meaning not fraction into isolated elements, as I do not have a center rotor with magnets either. So, I am not expecting a self maintained exciting system yet. Therefore, I am feeding the Static Armature Field with two small lithium adding around 23 Volts.

In the beginning I made an error describing how the circuit is connected...so, I rectified later on when I realize the BLDC motor is connected to the Gen Output through diodes.

Below is a Diagram of the whole circuit...less messy than video, sorry about that.

[IMG][/IMG]
As you could see I have connected the exciting coils to cap bank, through just one diode...expecting to get some gain...but none was shown.And, that magnetic field is not spinning in an organized fashion at all. since its within a closed iron structure which will not allow it to spin at higher switching speeds, so it will just vibrate.


Regards to All


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Plain, B&W Exciter Circuit...

Hello Cadman and All,

Below I drew a black and white, plain circuit of a typical brushed generator type:

[IMG][/IMG]

First I want to insist, that either on a Brushed or Brushless this exciting circuit is Closed at all times, and either caps type (DC for Brushed, AC Running Cap for Brushless) keep a minimal charge, even when not in operation, plus there is a magnetic reminiscence at rotor core. In order that whenever we start spinning the rotor, current starts flowing and a stronger magnetic field is built through Rotation.

Then, as Rotor reaches required operating RPM's, output power would be at Mains...simple deal.

Now, if we look at Rotor Field Winding is based on fine gauge and many turns, configuring two coils in series, which basically generate just one magnetic field at iron core.

In the case of the Gen I would be working on Rotor Field Coil(s) in series are 67 Ohms, measured right at the two rotor slip rings, before going to brushes.

And Both Exciting Coils at Stator measured exactly 1.4 ohms measured before going to rectifier diodes.

The DC Electrolytic Cap is 200V, 270uF, which means it is only a "momentary low storage" cap.

The difference from both windings is huge...which means that in order to satisfy that Rotor Field Coil to produce the strong enough field, it must spin at the required 3600 RPM's.

This is a self maintained closed circuit, where the Stator Exciting coils induced by the magnetic field at rotor, retro feeds the supply at rotor coil via diodes-cap in order to maintain a closed cycle at all times.

In other words, this exchange "network", must be in a perfect balance in order to perform properly.

That is why my insistence on having exactly the same resistance, as the same number of turns, the same gauge, the same coil pitch, etc,etc at the energized groups of coils at the static armature.

Once we get this system to be balanced and self maintained...it is just a matter of spinning field to RPM's and watch output go up and up...Rock and Roll time!


Regards to All


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

This is what I don't get. Do you have to keep the resistance in order to keep a lower amp draw from the exciter coils? I don't understand the decay over time.

CM

[Cadman]

What I have not being able to accomplish so far, is to get the Exciter Coils -at stator- to close the cycle then keep energizing the Field Coils, in this case, the Virtual Field Energized Coils. Due, precisely to this issue with the resistance, which MUST BE identical to OEM Rotor Field in order there will not be a decay over time.

This is what I don't get. Do you have to keep the resistance in order to keep a lower amp draw from the exciter coils? I don't understand the decay over time.

CM

[Ufopolitics]

No sweat...

Those diodes won't do it but I think you could do it with 8 brushes. Use 2 sets of 2 brushes that are shorted together, spanning the 2 sets of coils to be idled. That would short those coils while letting you run the N-S coils all in series.

Regards
CM

EDIT: NOPE that won't work, that will just shunt across the com to the negative brush. Dang.

[Cadman]

Those diodes won't do it but I think you could do it with 8 brushes. Use 2 sets of 2 brushes that are shorted together, spanning the 2 sets of coils to be idled. That would short those coils while letting you run the N-S coils all in series.

Regards
CM

EDIT: NOPE that won't work, that will just shunt across the com to the negative brush. Dang.

[Ufopolitics]

About the Power Rotary Switch...

Hello to All,

I want to write this facts about this Power Rotary Switch...

This Switch is intended for the solely purposes of demonstrating that by spinning the Virtual Fields we get Power Output.

I have done it with the simple two brush system, and not really caring that much about resistance, but to get as much wire as I could wind within that small armature.

[IMG][/IMG]

And it does generates output at the generator terminals, as in the exciter coils.

What I have not being able to accomplish so far, is to get the Exciter Coils -at stator- to close the cycle then keep energizing the Field Coils, in this case, the Virtual Field Energized Coils. Due, precisely to this issue with the resistance, which MUST BE identical to OEM Rotor Field in order there will not be a decay over time.

Again, this switch will help us to adjust the proper timings, the proper field 3D Amplitude, as the operating rotation speed to achieve the designed OEM output spec's the Head Static Housing is built for.

After that point, a Solid State Electronic Processing Unit based on High Speed FET's could be built...and do a much better job than this rough, mechanical switch did.

I have built roller brushes from brass and also made of carbon...they don't drag at all...so the little motor could run at 3 to 6 volts easy, carrying four brushes.

I could easily install two more brushes there, in order to just finish this stage.

So, by installing "Blocking Diode Brushes" like shown below, the "in between" coils should not be energized as they would be idling:

[IMG][/IMG]


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Current will divide proportionally depending on resistance of the circuit paths. Your circuit of 14 coils (seen as resistors for now), with the jumper, reduces to a series parallel combination of 4 in series in parallel with 10 in series. This neglects shorting of adjacent comm bars by brushes. I calculate an equivalent resistance of about 48 Ohms using equation that Green and I posted a few days ago.

bi

Hello Bistander,

I figured something did not look right...so, I have been thinking of using diodes as adding two extra brushes next to power brushes, to block Positive and Negative from going into the in between coils. Which I assume will allow them to "idle". (see following post image)

I believe there should be many ways to get around this in a better fashion...and still obtain what I am looking for:

1-Have All the Coils at Static Armature wound in series. (Symmetrically)

2- Being able to Power the Energized Coils in Series and not in parallel, which will definitively add way too much wire and there is no room for that.

3- Just leaving the Non Energized Coils simply at idle...open, not energized, doing nothing.

I appreciate all contributions here.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Equivalent resistance

...since the current will choose the path of least resistance, it will energize the colored coils only.(I hope so...)

So, the Real resistance on my OEM Rotor Field is of 67 Ohms...then I am calculating approximately 16.75 ohms per each coil where would be a total of four (4) in series. ...

Current will divide proportionally depending on resistance of the circuit paths. Your circuit of 14 coils (seen as resistors for now), with the jumper, reduces to a series parallel combination of 4 in series in parallel with 10 in series. This neglects shorting of adjacent comm bars by brushes. I calculate an equivalent resistance of about 48 Ohms using equation that Green and I posted a few days ago.

bi

[Ufopolitics]

Virtual Field Rotation Sequences

Hello to All,

Below I will be presenting a very Short Sequence but enough to see it working, plus the latest design on the brushes connections I have chosen. Since I am starting my new set up with an old generator which is brushed and has no resin on rotor field...so easy to unwind plus do all required testings...

[IMG][/IMG]

Note: This set up is not the real one, as I have 14 Coils, and am planning at least 20 total, I just did it for simplicity and easier understanding on this explanation. Also I did not Overlapped coils for the same reason...but they do overlap as I have shown previously.

Above is the Sequence 1, where I have the Positive Brush (Brush 1) (from slip ring feed) at 12 O'Clock approx...as I have the Negative Brush (Brush 2) at Six O'Clock.

And, instead of using the brushes as I have shown on previous diagrams, ...I decided to use Brushes 3 and 4 (green dot) just as an independent "jumper", short circuited by the green connector shown, and am gonna make it "adjustable" during testings.

So, note that this jumper circuit, sets the two -in series- North (blue) coils C1-C2 also in series to the other side South Coils (Red) C8-C9...since the current will choose the path of least resistance, it will energize the colored coils only.(I hope so...)

So, the Real resistance on my OEM Rotor Field is of 67 Ohms...then I am calculating approximately 16.75 ohms per each coil where would be a total of four (4) in series. (In my real set up I should have 20 coils total, then more in each group, meaning less resistance per coil.)

So, let's get back to the Sequence Order...where I will be rotating all brushes in the power switch CW by around 5 to 7 degrees...Note that:

Blue C1-C2 are Energized North as C8-C9 are Red South...

SEQUENCE 2:

[IMG][/IMG]

Note that I have moved ALL BRUSHES by a few degrees (about half commutator element) above and still, ALL COILS as in SEQUENCE 1 are still ON.

SEQUENCE 3:

[IMG][/IMG]

Ok, here the Power Brushes are already at full Next commutator engagement, note that I have set the adjustable Jumper right in between commutator segments for ALL Sequences here.

Note that on the North Blue side, C1 is OFF here,(Actually notice that Jumper Brushes are actually shortening Coils which are off here) while C2 is still ON (keeping the North Field without collapsing), as well as on the South Red side, the coil set at 180 degrees from C2, meaning C9 is still ON keeping the South Virtual Field ON...

Plus we have the new incoming coils Energized in the sequence C10 (South) and C3 North. This New Incoming Coils by turning ON would be just returning the field to the original full strength plus 3D amplitude. Remember that this swapping takes place in very short time, understanding we would be spinning the virtual field at 3600 to 4000 RPM's.

And again here...the more coils we have overlapped per group, the better, since only one would be leaving and one entering while majority will keep the Fields alive. so the field will not suffer a 50% drop like in the case here...which would cause some slight Sine Wave deformation.

SEQUENCE 4

[IMG][/IMG]

Sequence Four (4) is somehow similar to Sequence 2, where power brushes are in the "in-between" commutator segments, and jumper is at full comm contact, but essentially, the same Coils keep energized as in Sequence 3. This is the Field Timing per segment, which guarantees a longer induction time at generating fields, and Time could be increased by adjusting the jumper CCW.

SEQUENCE 5

[IMG][/IMG]

Here the same advancing procedure takes place as before, we have still ON Mating North-South Coils C3-C10 respectively, maintaining the Fields "alive" while new Coils C4-C11 are entering and being energized.

C2 and C9 are OFF.

BASICALLY I intended to show on this five images how we would be TRANSLATING this Virtual Field, without allowing it to Collapse, along the Armature Laminated Elements, as well as the Inner Iron Rotor would be spinning, closing the magnetic circuits.

And of course, a simple way to test this switching circuit and order is functioning ok, is by using LED's Red-Blue per each Coil circuit and watching the sequential rotation is fine.

The reason why I did this changes are simply because the Parallel Connection was forcing me to use too much wire, as it was Double the Resistance per Group...and still as it is now, is still very limited room to wind that static armature.

And I am trying my best not to modify the Generating Fields Housing nor the Exciter Coils and circuitry (Capacitors, Diodes etc)

I am making the video during all construction...


Regards to All


Ufopolitics

[interdesign21]