ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[bistander]

Parallel resistors

hello bistander,

could you specify?

I believe you meant 1/r1+1/r2= rt?


Thanks


ufopolitics

1/rt = 1/r1 + 1/r2
edit:
Green beat me to it. Thanks. Was on the road. Wonder why caps disappeared. R?

[Ufopolitics]

Thanks Guys!

So, coming from an OEM Coil of 60 Ohms, then we need 120 Ohms on each Parallel Group in Series of Four Coils each.

So, that means it is Double the Resistance per Coil...meaning, from my previous wrong example : it is then 30 Ohms and not 15 per each coil in series. (30X4=120)

The problem I see here is that if I wind a much finer gauge, to achieve a higher resistance per coil in less space, I would be decreasing the Magnetic Field Strength...And I don't want to do that.

An easy solution would be to expand the number of coils energized per group...without going a smaller gauge.

I guess it won't matter that much to expand the Field.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[dR-Green]

i believe you meant 1/r1+1/r2= rt?

1/rt = 1/r1 + 1/r2

[Ufopolitics]

Equivalent resistance for parallel resistors is incorrect.

Hello Bistander,

Could You specify?

I believe you meant 1/R1+1/R2= RT?


Thanks


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

As, If anyone believes I have made any errors in my calculations, please feel free to let me know.

Equivalent resistance for parallel resistors is incorrect.

[Ufopolitics]

Dielectric Field Mapping...

Hello to All,

I could not forget about the main essence of this Thread Theory...

[IMG][/IMG]

Therefore, I could not forget about analyzing the Dielectric Field on this set up...

If We all notice on the Image above...I have kind of "bleed" the Magnetic Polarities according to Rotation Sense (Green Arrows) by "over spraying" the colors on the following "stepping in" iron core elements movement...and this is the way it happens in reality, either we decide to picture it as "Flux" or whatever other name we choose.

But the Main issue here is NOT about Magnetic Field Flux leakage according to Rotation...but, about the Dielectric Field.

The curved Green Shadows on BOTH SIDES of the Static Armature, at the exact center of each set of Coils Groups... are The Two Dielectric Fields that we are Generating and Rotating.

Remember in this Theory, Dielectric Field is the Origin and the return of All Magnetic Field Spatial Polarizations.

The same way the Magnetic Polarizations shown at the Loose Centered Iron Rotor, is just a Result, AN INFLUENCE from the Two Main Fields generated at both ends of the Static Armature...The Dielectric Field at Rotor is also JUST A CONSEQUENCE, A REFLECTION As a RESULT from the Two Main Dielectric Fields Spinning.

Which means -in general speaking- that the Virtual Spinning Fields generated at the Static Armature are the "Masters" as the consequential "Image" seen at Rotor, is just a "Slave"...which in Computer Language means:

"The Slave always follows the Commands from its Master"...

[IMG][/IMG]


Regards to All


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Static Armature plus Rotor Magnetic Map

Hello again,

Below is a CAD on the Static Armature plus the Rotor Magnetic Polarity MOMENTARY Map.

[IMG][/IMG]

Also note the corresponding MOMENTARILY Excited Coils.

I have also pointed out the Contacts receiving the Momentary Voltage Polarity from the ROTARY Brushes.

I have emphasized on "Momentary" because I need you to realize this is just a Paused Frame on this Rotational Sequence of the Virtual Field.

Now, related to electrical measurements that we must have in mind about the coils on this set up, versus the Original measurements on the replaced Rotor Field Windings...

This Measurement Ratio is VERY Important to have in mind:

The "Old" OEM Rotor Field Coil (if it is based on a Single Coil, from a typical Brushed Gen Head) is in SERIES receiving the feed from the Two Brushes contacting the two slip rings, meaning, if we measure the resistance on coil TWO terminals at slip rings, it would give us the TOTAL Resistance that Polarizes BOTH FACES (NORTH-SOUTH) of Rotor Core.

Let's call this Total OEM Rotor Coil Resistance as R OEM

If We look at our Diagram above, the way Brushes are connected to BOTH Sequential Pair of Coils Group in series, generating BOTH POLES...IS IN PARALLEL.

Which means the current received from our NOT MODIFIED Exciting Sourcing Coils located at the Gen Head... would be SPLIT IN TWO.

And like I wrote before, this Applies ONLY to a set up like the one shown, based on the Spec ific OEM Rotor Face Angle of Interaction, where it takes Four (4) Total Coils per Energized Sequence Group.

If it is different, then everything changes.

These values are more or less approximate to reality related to the R OEM...where this Field Coils run on Lower Voltage than Mains Generating Coils (Note their AWG (Gauge) is always finer).

I hope everything is pretty clear up to here...and please ask me whatever, as later on, like I said, am going back to my work...and be there for a long while.

As, If anyone believes I have made any errors in my calculations, please feel free to let me know.


Regards to All


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

UFO,

Ingenious design, my hat's off to you.

Hello Cadman,

Hey, many thanks Cadman!

After studying what you have presented here I understand what you are building, but I have a question, of course.

Referring to your drawing Rotary Virtual Field Circuit 1, the free rotating central shaft has a shape that reminds me of a two pole armature. This shaft revolves following the rotating magnetic field and completes the magnetic circuit between the two shifting field poles. Correct so far?

YES!, Perfectly correct!

As a matter of fact, when I saw you post, I was making the post below where it shows the magnetic "Map" for better understanding...

Yes, You are right, it is similar to a two pole design rotor.

My question to you is: Why not provide this central shaft with two windings similar to a two pole armature, and energize them with a constant current (through another set of slip rings) from the static exciter coils making a stronger N-S field as it passes through this shaft? The added magnetic field would reinforce the fields created in the static armature assembly and increase the generated emf.

Regards,

CM

Your idea for improvement is great!. and definitively we could test it on later designs, However, think of Lenz Law...if you reinforce the Magnetic Field Source right from the very center of this structure, Lenz reversed forces will go easily through the Static Armature and hit your Rotor Main Source, delaying the whole process from the supplied energy to all coils plus magnetic field point of view.

That is the reason why I have been playing with an empty solid iron rotor core so far, (which eventually I will replace by a Laminated one, once I have the final and best structure) and just inserting two small magnets as to keep the reminiscence magnetism present (in case our Exciting Coils Caps, loose charge and we need to pre-excite by spinning rotor shaft)

Now, Lenz WILL crash definitively against the Static Armature Core...but can not "follow" nor delay -in Full- a Virtual, Mass-Less, Weight-Less Field.

What happens when Lenz appears by loading this generator Mains, is a slight increase of sparks at Main Commutator and Slip Rings, due to the Electric Field increased by reversed currents.

Now, going back to iron rotor...Lenz will "hit it" also...but, since it is a loose -not connected mechanically- rotor, it would just slow it a bit...where the Virtual Field Spinning will "take over" and keep pulling Rotor to follow movement.

In further designs we could play with this rotor further development, as to set a speed sensor, which determines when it is slowing down, to then increase the Virtual Field acceleration, when Generator have heavy loads...sort of a compensating circuit, like the Carburator Governor works in the Gas Engine attached to a Gen Head...

Now Lenz originates at specific Momentarily Energized set of Series Coils at the Static Armature...and as soon as Brushes "refresh" the circuit, by braking it and restarting a new one, that Lenz originated in the previous broken circuit is now gone...then a new Lenz would originate AFTER We excite the new set of Coils...and so on...

The main point above, to think off, is that Lenz is a Reactive response that takes place AFTER we Energize a set of Coils and their respective iron core elements, so, once we brake that circuit, Lenz fades away there, and we will keep leaving it always behind.

Picture how a Two Pole DC Brushed Symmetrical Motor works at its Armature...picture its Magnetic Field is STATIC defined by the Brush Plane, however, this design keeps "replacing" leaving single coils by the ones coming In ...which makes Rotor spins, but, it is constantly reversing the voltage polarity at each coil that enters a magnetic pole plane, as the ones leaving the plane are also reversed when entering to the other pole across reversed voltage.

We have an enormous advantage here by being able to spin the field this way...

Thanks Cadman, and I hope you decide to join me in the Building Thread!


Kind Regards


Ufopolitics

[Cadman]

Suggestion for improvement

UFO,

Ingenious design, my hat's off to you.

After studying what you have presented here I understand what you are building, but I have a question, of course.

Referring to your drawing Rotary Virtual Field Circuit 1, the free rotating central shaft has a shape that reminds me of a two pole armature. This shaft revolves following the rotating magnetic field and completes the magnetic circuit between the two shifting field poles. Correct so far?

My question to you is: Why not provide this central shaft with two windings similar to a two pole armature, and energize them with a constant current (through another set of slip rings) from the static exciter coils making a stronger N-S field as it passes through this shaft? The added magnetic field would reinforce the fields created in the static armature assembly and increase the generated emf.

Regards,

CM

[Ufopolitics]

Rotating Virtual Field Circuit 1

Hello to All


Please find below Circuit 1 on the Rotational Virtual Field set up.

[IMG][/IMG]

This drawing is just a "Paused Frame" from rotation in order to analyze the components connections and their functioning.

On Left Side is the Static Armature Assembly which is conformed by 24 laminated Iron and Isolated Poles-Elements.

A Full closed iron armature from a typical motor will not work "as is" for this method, (I had to cut/fragment mine into elements, drilling each hole first and passing bolts-nuts through each, after I have wound a Full Armature Core a few times and tested, see image below) because when the spinning field is going at high RPM's, the whole iron piece would not follow an organized polarity distributional rotation. Then the output Sinewave will get scrambled and random spikes output.

[IMG]Outer connectors, so it is understood that the "in between" coils are energized in series as well, closing the circuit between the two Positive-Negative Brushes on left.

And so on the right side South (Red) Coils are attached to the two outer commutator segments at switch (magenta comm segments).

I know this setup could create some confusion, as we are not used to spin brushes, ever...but, see it from the Geometrical Plane defined by the Positive-Negative Brushes, which in this case is a "V" like Plane to open the North (Blue) Coils, and another "V" Plane to open the South (Red) Coils. Therefore, when we rotate Brushes, we are rotating this geometrical plane.

Remember that Commutator is Static at Switch, where all its connections attach to the Static Armature windings. So, we rotate the Brushes and the copper slip rings.

Copper Slip Rings Brushes are Static and they connect to the Self Exciting Circuit from Generator Head. Represented in the lower right side of drawing.

Every Generator Head must have a Running Capacitor connected to the Exciting Coils at Stator, if it is a Brushless type gen head, it would have an AC Cap, and, if it is the old style brushed type, it would have an Electrolytic Type Cap receiving the DC from the Diode Bridge, which sometimes, it is based just on Two Diodes, connected to the self exciting coils.

A Brushless Generator transfer the energy to the Rotor Field by Induction, (it is a reversed induction process from stator exciting coils to rotor field coils) then the Field Coil must have the Diodes connected in a loop to coil terminals, along with a Varistor (connected in parallel to diode), in charge to keep regulated induced current values.

[IMG][/IMG]

Above Diagram is from a Brushless Type Generator Head. This Gen have two separate Coils at Rotor, disposed in a N/S-N/S Magnetic Chain. Note the Varistor and Diode looping each coil's terminals.

This set up I am displaying here is from an old, brushed type generator which is much simpler to hook to the Rotary Switch as I am showing on the first diagram.

I have not tested a brushless type generator into this System as of now, but I see absolutely no problems at all, and it should be even simpler, since we would not need the slip rings or its brushes, but just looping each positive-negative brushes by diodes and varistors should work...again, I do not know as I have not tested this type yet.

In the case self exciter reverse induction to field coil will not work, we could just connect diodes bridge after the AC cap terminals and feed it the "old style" through the brush-slip rings...so, no big deal at all.


Regards to All


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

The final cad design...

Hello to All,

[IMG]

[Ufopolitics]

The Power Switch Assy...

Hello to All,

Ok, below are couple of pictures (actually they are frames from one of the video testing) of the Rotary Power Switch I designed and built.

It is a rough one, but it works, as you can not just go out there and get one that fits your needs...

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

Originally I started with regular linear spring motor brushes...however, they are not designed for that spinning at high speeds...so, by centrifugal forces they stop making contact to commutator...Then I had to also build this kind which have a weight that the more it spreads open due to centrifugal forces...the more they attach to commutator...simple and very old Archimedes "Law of the Lever Principle"... so they work beautiful at very high speeds (3600-4600 RPM's for this little Radio Shack Motor...)


So, simply, this very small motor...would be spinning the Virtual Field inside Generator Head...and getting an Induced EMF out...just as spinning the Original and Heavy Rotor would do...

[IMG][/IMG]

Now, honestly, did you ever, in your wildest dreams about Free Energy...ever thought that such small little motor could TURN a Home AC Generator Head and produce power out?





Regards


Ufopolitics

[interdesign21]

OK Thank you !!
regards
Alvaro

[Ufopolitics]

YES the ring core sandwiched between the two rotors. from a salvaged trafo made of steel tape. It is in two halves with two air gaps.
In fact, I am waiting for an iron powder toroid from china to make a better setup.

Your help would be very much appreciated with the wiring etc.
regards
Alvaro

Ok, Laminated steel won't work as well as a solid rod of plain, solid iron tubing (which is what I am using...cheap. , recycled materials...

Except from the Neo's which I designed and ordered from China.

Just make a simple testing...attach a channel from your scope Probe to just one core without coils and spin the field...from there you could play to start increasing that signal.

Measure both types, laminated versus solid rod and watch the difference.

Group magnets closer then watch the difference...

This signal is the rough Amplified result from the Spatial Field to the iron core. As it would be greater when you transfer it to coils then measure their terminals...

Coils you also need to group them closer in two parts which is more or less the same length as the magnets whenever you get them closer...in order that each compressed field sweeps majority of coils-core in shorter time ...understand?


Regards


Ufopolitics

[interdesign21]

Yes, pretty similar, and the same concept...

So, you are "sandwiching" the static coils between two spinning discs having all north poles facing towards coils...right?

Now, do you have an iron core inside coils, in a ring shape which passes through all of them?

If You don't...then try installing one, but it must be split(cut with a small gap) at least in on one end where there is no coil.

Then You will see the difference...


Regards


Ufopolitics

YES the ring core sandwiched between the two rotors. from a salvaged trafo made of steel tape. It is in two halves with two air gaps.
In fact, I am waiting for an iron powder toroid from china to make a better setup.

Your help would be very much appreciated with the wiring etc.
regards
Alvaro