ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[BroMikey]

The easiest (for me) way to embody this idea it to think of a capacitor. When you reduce the distance between the plates, the volume (i.e. the space) shrinks, but the capacitance increases. The only way this could happen is if space itself has an opposite, a reciprocal. When you squeeze out space, it seems likely you are actually filling the void with counterspace. Because of the Aether, a true void cannot exist--it must contain space or counterspace; empty is not an option. So I suspect some sort of membrane exists between the two. Mathematically I have no idea how this membrane would be described, but it must be there, it must separate space from counterspace.

Aaron, this would be a great question to formulate for Eric, since it is so fundamental to our understanding.

Hey Dog, "Sup"? Long time no see.

Good brain pattern display as always. The void Aaron is talking about?
It is the absences of the SELF EXISTENT ONE, I don't want to know or
experience any of that. I/m gonna stick with good stuff.

However I do know people who talk about moving the Aether around to
form more of a void in front of their crafts while the pressure of Aether
on each side and behind the craft move it forward.

Moving at 2X the speed of light can only be realized by the use of Aether
space so negative and positive Aether must exist.

As we continue to go more toward the negative or absence of Aether we
might eventually reach a void?

Pure speculation. I'm done.

I give you Eric

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kkfiM4fDV44[/VIDEO]

[Aaron]

This does bring up the possibility of having space and counterspace exist simultaneously in the same "space" and it doesn't contradict what I mentioned above.

My mention of counterspace is not the same as Eric's because I used the term to define a true vacuum - void of aether and Eric's is a reference to the aetheric realm so to speak. That is why I said nothing I'm talking about contradicts what Eric is talking about. I should use another term rather than counterspace - such as Vacuum or Void because that is what it is, but too many people have their own ideas about what Vacuum means but they forget that the existence of the aether means it is not a vacuum. People say vacuum when they should be using the term Plenum...

plenum (n.) 1670s, "filled space" (opposite of vacuum), from Latin plenum (spatium) "full (space)," neuter of adjective plenus "complete, full" (see plenary). The meaning "of a full assembly of legislators" is first recorded 1772.

[Aaron]

density of the aether

Are there any UT video's on his experiments? (BroMickey will probably be able to find it )



Really how can you be so sure? Did you device some experiments that support that theory. I f you did, man you can rock the Scientific Scene.



Ok so if I understand correctly. Aether is like a gas that compresses the 'bodies' that are submerged in it. Like a balloon in a vacuum chamber (= low pressure) that expands when you pump the air out. Then the aether inside the 'body' will cause the 'body' to expand. The mass of the body will remain the same, the density of the aether becomes less, and therefore the volume of the body becomes bigger?




In outer space the resistance of the aether must be very low, because the planets have incredible masses and move at incredible speeds, thus the time must move a very high speed. Right?

So if the time moves fast then everything else must be moving slower when speed is expressed in delta distance / delta time? Or faster because also distances change? Or both and cancel each other?

You have an interesting theory Aaron.

Best regards,
Ben

Start with these videos just to get a feel for what Eric is getting at: Transverse & Longitudinal Electric Waves and Tesla's Longitudinal Electricity - Eric P. Dollard - Official Homepage

The pictures you see here: The Landers Facility of Eric Dollard and Walter Deroche - Eric P. Dollard - Official Homepage is an Alexanderson type network, which is a transmission network for receiving Earth signals for earthquake prediction. This kind of network uses electrostatic (longitudinal instantaneous/extraluminal) signal propagation instead of electromagnetic (transverse) that is limited to light speed. Watch those videos above first.

RCA Marconi station in Bolinas, California was a massive Alexanderson network used for ship to shore communication with Naval ships during the war. There is no time delay between the transmitter and receiver getting the signals. At Landers in the pics above, signals on the Alexanderson type network were received FASTER THAN (before) normal electromagnetic antennas received the signals.

If electromagnetic is limited to light speed and the longitudinal transmission is instantaneous and it is measurable, then that shows Eric has more credibility than those who cannot perform such experiments. dR_Green showed some of his crystal radio tests using a Tesla resonant transformer version of a crystal radio and received signals from the AM station through the ground BEFORE the antennas received electromagnetic signals through the air.

Counterspace in the context of what Eric's work is about is theoretical of course, but there are many experiments that suggest his theory is correct more than the evidence available against it meaning any theory that does not allow extraluminal propagation of signals is simply wrong and can no longer be a theory. So, I'd have to say his model prevails above others since he has hard core experimental results that demonstrate just what his theories predict.

As you mention, the aether in a way does compress the bodies in it but instead of compressing them, I'd say it pushes down on them and that is the effect of gravity - mass displacing the aether and the aether moves back in the direction from where it was displaced in dynamic fashion and exerts the push and that holds things to the ground. Like a bowling ball in a bathtub of water, the water pushes back on all sides of the ball. Of course that example is inside of gravity itself, but it makes the point.

As far as the compression you mention in the context that all objects' absolute size is dependent on the density of the aether - everything is becoming smaller and larger from an absolute viewpoint but what causes the change in the density - the more massive an object is, the more aether is displaced per volume of space so the gravity would be higher on the surface of that object than a less massive object. Density of the aether can be manipulated with electrostatics as well as by higher mass.

You said, "The mass of the body will remain the same, the density of the aether becomes less, and therefore the volume of the body becomes bigger?."

The ABSOLUTE volume of the object changes meaning let's say you had God's perspective that is not subject to the jurisdiction of a local reference point within any particular area of aether at various densities, what would you be able to witness?

You would see 2 identical objects in different areas of density. In high density, the object would be smaller and in low density the object would be bigger. HOWEVER, if you were in the area of high density, your perception, speed of light is slower, your ruler is shrank down, time ticks slower, but to you since everything is subject to that same effect, you will measure the object at 3x3x3 inches for example.

If you were in a lower density area, from an absolute perspective, you would be larger, the object is larger, your ruler is larger, etc... time ticks faster and light moves faster. You will in that area still measure the object at 3x3x3.

It is an fluid dynamic aetheric relativity model. The observer in those areas cannot see a difference since they are subject to the same changes in the density of the aether. All light leaving remote areas of the universe traveling to Earth is slowing down and speeding up and slowing down and speeding up as it moves through the aether at various densities. When it gets to us, we're measuring it from our own aetheric density and will measure it at light speed even though using that to calculate the distance is an effort in futility because we are unable to realize that it was not at a constant speed during its trip but moved with great variability.

In outer space as you mention, the aether has low resistance, that is to low mass not moving or away from all mass where it is at a baseline density if you want to call it that. But, if you take an object with mass and accelerate it through the aether, that object interacts with MORE aether per unit of absolute time meaning an apparent increase in the density of the aether is created relative to the object moving through it so for the person moving with this object, the clock would slow down as there is more resistance to the movement of the object through the aether as it accelerates - again, because it encounters more aether per unit of absolute time, which means that the density of the aether relative to the mass is increasing greatly.

When the object slows and moves at a constant steady slow snail's pace, it experiences much less aether per unit of absolute time and therefore the clock ticks faster since there is less resistance to the movement of that mass moving through it, light moves quicker, etc... all compared to an absolute reference point but the observer moving with that mass can't tell a difference.

I have spent many years looking for common ground between the ideas put forth by Bearden, Bedini, Dollard, DePalma and others - and I see that those who have results that I have witnessed are basically all explaining the same things in their own language. Bearden sharing the ideas of breaking the symmetry of the flux in the quantum mechanical vacuum with a dipole is the same thing as polarizing the aether - it is 100% identical but are explained with different vocabulary, etc... based on everything that I have witnessed with people that have experimental results that most people don't have, I would say that my perspective on this is a very valid legitimate theory because the entire thing as a whole fits seamlessly together and nothing has shown to violate what it predicts. It predicts the Bifeld-Brown effect (before I ever knew about that effect), it predicts the Casimir effect, relativistic effects of mass/aether interchanges, gravity, gravitational attraction, all results in Bruce DePalma's experiments, etc... it accounts for what conventional theories don't so therefore, they're wrong in my opinion.

My perspective doesn't contradict what Eric is talking about. There are communication differences between all these commonalities and I'm doing my best to verify that the best I can because I'm not attached to my own beliefs and want to know what needs more clarification, etc. or what might be dead wrong. So far by doing this in an intellectually honest way with myself, I have only seen that the model is becoming strengthened with each new revelation that I pick up from Eric or others.

[Ufopolitics]

About this Thread...

Hello to All,


The way I planned to discuss and write this Thread is as follows:

First Part we will be discussing the Attraction Modes, from iron to steel and from Magnet to Magnet...and the Dielectric Field displacement differences generating a charge...

Plus other experiments to demonstrate Dielectric Field Plane difference from just a "Bloch Wall" or Domain Wall.

On the Second Part (SCIFI Induction) I will be demonstrating the "Counter-Voidance" or Repulsion Interactions between Magnetic Fields like Polarizations. This part is far more complex than attraction, and I will be showing first experiments through videos and the development and construction of the first ever known...Repulsion Field based Generator...

As Ken Wheeler describes on that same page 71 about Repulsion...:

Two likewise spin fields causing deflection; this is mirror membrane Ether deflection, this is
literally extremely high-pressure space

So far, based on Faraday's Induction...we have considered that only in Attraction mode there are the famous "lines of force" or a "Field of Force"...while the Repulsion shows as "No Field"...so, let's see that...

In this Part 2 it should be understood, that Ken Wheeler's Theory is fully proved, since "Previous Art" has never recognized the Repulsion as even a Field, nor as a method to Induce any currents or voltage in any conductor.


However...I will keep going forward...

The Final Part Three (Spirits in the Machine), is fully about Counterspace, Dimensions and Magnetic Field "Ghosts" through Ferromagnetics...I call this part "The Grace Shot" to end this games about the wrong Magnetism Concepts...

It is extensive material, not only from the writing and CAD images, but the building of models (in Animated 3D CAD plus the Real Deal) plus the originating simple experiments to prove what I write, then to batch render all in Videos...meaning, not a "piece of cake" at all...so, please be patient with me here...


Regards



Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Sent you a PM.

Got it, thanks!

And I responded...

[Ufopolitics]

The easiest (for me) way to embody this idea it to think of a capacitor. When you reduce the distance between the plates, the volume (i.e. the space) shrinks, but the capacitance increases. The only way this could happen is if space itself has an opposite, a reciprocal. When you squeeze out space, it seems likely you are actually filling the void with counterspace. Because of the Aether, a true void cannot exist--it must contain space or counterspace; empty is not an option. So I suspect some sort of membrane exists between the two. Mathematically I have no idea how this membrane would be described, but it must be there, it must separate space from counterspace.

Aaron, this would be a great question to formulate for Eric, since it is so fundamental to our understanding.

Hello Dog One,

That was an excellent comparison to a Capacitor!, thanks!

Every appearance of magnetism in the macro, or extra-atomic volume, has a reactive recoil wrongly conceived of as a conjugated pole, however this is not the case as the dipole nature of magnetism is a spatial abstraction. Its appearance is both an action and recoil from the inter-atomic counterspatial dielectric capacitance resultant from a magnets creation in electrification of a ferrous or quasiferrous (neodymium composite or otherwise) mass.

Now some words from Ken on Counterspace...:


Regards



Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hi UFO.
There are 2 things that puzzled me:
1. You placed the permanent magnet on a steel plate, so the blochwall or dielectric thingy must have been pulled downwards. Below the centre of the magnet right? Then you put steel on the top, thus I expect that the dielectric thingy moves back to the center.
So if the movement of dielectric thingy induces the voltage, I would expect that the maximum induction would be in the middle of permanent magnet and not on the top.

Hello Ben,

Friend, you are forgetting a very essential part of video...the very first observation I show...that when iron cylinder is approaching magnetic field (or when iron is under the influence of a polarized field, could be N or S) there appears a secondary dielectric field right on the tip-surface of iron, Ken calls it a "projection" .

Now, this newly formed counter field on iron cylinder, together with the existing magnet dielectric establish what Ken calls a self voidance or attraction as we say...

On page 71 of Wheeler's Book writings about the attraction (Center Picture) between two magnets separated by an air gap powdered with iron filings (the typical image that has lasted for 200 years):

Ken Wheeler's Book P71...whereas the middle picture is a negative pressure counterspatial voidance sink. Since the center picture is diagramming the Ether returning to counterspace, that picture is showing the formation of the new dielectric inertial plane between two inverse spin fields and two separate magnets about to become one single magnet.

Now, between iron-magnet that formation of the new field does not take place right in the middle space between them, but instead, like I showed on video...right on the end surface of cylinder...but, no matter what, the effect described is exactly the same as with another magnet's pole in attraction mode.


The point here is that the Range from both Dielectric Fields displacing towards a voidance plane is what generates that spike charge...so, it must be higher on the top section of magnet, because that is where both dielectric planes are moving towards until final contact.

2. Now if I put a piece of steel on one of the poles, What would happen to the shape of the magnetic vortex and why?

thanks for your time.
Best regards,
Ben

If any piece of steel would be approached or contacted any magnet, that contact end pole would expand towards the iron mass.

If it is a South....then that iron mass would become an extension of that south pole...and so on with North.

AND, NOT the entire pole though!...but another part of that pole would remain at magnet.

why?

First you must understand what happens to dielectric field under viewing film when two magnets approach by alike poles...I have shown that image here a lot...they become one magnet and both dielectric planes from each magnet rushes towards the center or contact gap surfaces.

Then with iron occurs a very similar process, except that the highest force is on magnet, not on iron, therefore dielectric still remains within the magnet, but displaced off center towards the iron mass...I showed that on the first part of video Ben.

This Voidance acceleration is higher from two alike poles than it is between iron and magnet.


Hope is clear now!


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Thanks for the reply Ufo,

I understand this to say that in your experiment (post#1) when you moved the large coil up and down on the magnet that you were actually moving a dielectric field in counterspace against the magnetic field in real space. And that it was the these two fields moving against each other which caused the plus-to-minus sine like wave to appear on the scope (induced alternating voltage).

O.K.

bi

Nope,

That movement of the larger coil over the seating magnet was JUST to demonstrate Faraday's Induction. There are absolutely no movements of both spatial and counterspatial fields there...it is simple, if we do just like microwatt did on his experiment...dumping a magnet through some copper tube, there would not be fields movement within magnet...therefore, no dielectric displacement/no electrification.

As am sure you do not need any further explanation on Faraday Induction...right?...even the wrong one but Iknow you agree with it.

[Ben2503]

Really??

The idea of counterspace however offers a seamless and sensible explanation for all of these effects, which cannot be explained by conventional terms. Basically, I have yet to see anything debunk any part of Eric's theories, meaning they actually are theories that have stood the test of time and based on many experiments on the bench, math on paper, etc. they all suggest that Eric is incredibly right on. Any theory to the contrary would have to fall to the side and not just be relegated to a postulation, but would have to simply be erased as a mistake.

Are there any UT video's on his experiments? (BroMickey will probably be able to find it )

The aether exists in various densities, which determines the speed that light is propagating through it. The more dense, the slower and the less dense, the faster. The idea that aether is incompressible is not a fully defined concept and does not exclude the possibility for aether to be more or less dense. Therefore, aether is more dense in a higher gravity environment and less dense in a lower gravity environment.

Really how can you be so sure? Did you device some experiments that support that theory. I f you did, man you can rock the Scientific Scene.

Space with aether offers the ability for objects to exist at different sizes. An object would be smaller under high aetheric density and would be larger under lower density aether - from an absolute perspective. To an observer in each area, they couldn't tell the difference since they are subject to the same size fluctuations caused by the density of the aether, their perception is subject to it and the light in that area is subject to it.

Ok so if I understand correctly. Aether is like a gas that compresses the 'bodies' that are submerged in it. Like a balloon in a vacuum chamber (= low pressure) that expands when you pump the air out. Then the aether inside the 'body' will cause the 'body' to expand. The mass of the body will remain the same, the density of the aether becomes less, and therefore the volume of the body becomes bigger?

The rate at which time ticks is solely based on one factor and that is the density of the aether. In high density aether, there is more resistance to the movement of the mass through it and therefore time ticks slower and in a lower density area, time ticks faster since there is less resistance to the movement of the mass through the aether. These relativistic type effects are very real, but BECAUSE OF the aether, which Einstein was too much of a narcissistic egomaniac to ever admit, but he did come close when he commented many times on the work of Dayton Miller.

If there is no aether, there is no time since there is no space.

In outer space the resistance of the aether must be very low, because the planets have incredible masses and move at incredible speeds, thus the time must move a very high speed. Right?

So if the time moves fast then everything else must be moving slower when speed is expressed in delta distance / delta time? Or faster because also distances change? Or both and cancel each other?

You have an interesting theory Aaron.

Best regards,
Ben

[Dog-One]

So what does the term "COUNTER=SPACE" mean? It is our way of saying
we found a cause and effect that is not yet found on the books so this
is our best stab at adding a new idea into the ever growing mix.

The easiest (for me) way to embody this idea it to think of a capacitor. When you reduce the distance between the plates, the volume (i.e. the space) shrinks, but the capacitance increases. The only way this could happen is if space itself has an opposite, a reciprocal. When you squeeze out space, it seems likely you are actually filling the void with counterspace. Because of the Aether, a true void cannot exist--it must contain space or counterspace; empty is not an option. So I suspect some sort of membrane exists between the two. Mathematically I have no idea how this membrane would be described, but it must be there, it must separate space from counterspace.

Aaron, this would be a great question to formulate for Eric, since it is so fundamental to our understanding.

[Ben2503]

Puzzled.

Hi UFO.
There are 2 things that puzzled me:
1. You placed the permanent magnet on a steel plate, so the blochwall or dielectric thingy must have been pulled downwards. Below the centre of the magnet right? Then you put steel on the top, thus I expect that the dielectric thingy moves back to the center.
So if the movement of dielectric thingy induces the voltage, I would expect that the maximum induction would be in the middle of permanent magnet and not on the top.
2. Now if I put a piece of steel on one of the poles, What would happen to the shape of the magnetic vortex and why?

thanks for your time.
Best regards,
Ben

[bistander]

Induced Voltage

The answer is simple, as Ken has written on his book...and I have quoted here on the first post of this Thread:

Magnetism is dimensional, the dielectric is intradimensional, or in counterspace, and only when these two Ether fields move against each other over time is there electrification, which is the Ether in a modality of dynamic polarization.

Thanks for the reply Ufo,

I understand this to say that in your experiment (post#1) when you moved the large coil up and down on the magnet that you were actually moving a dielectric field in counterspace against the magnetic field in real space. And that it was the these two fields moving against each other which caused the plus-to-minus sine like wave to appear on the scope (induced alternating voltage).

O.K.

bi

[BroMikey]

Trying to go over terms is like trying to reason why we used
the field lines of force for magnetism, for the last 100 years
as a way of expressing what we thought it was. But it is always
more than we thought so we come up with more terms to explain
what we saw in an experiment.

Of course this is not the end.

Since the 1800's we have accumulated more experimental data so
our need to explain effects is growing and so are the term lists we
have chosen to call it.

We put the guys name on his discovery, but that is only the start
not the end. After 50 men with definitions of their findings are all
placed at the same table we must find out how they can all be
knitted together into one big happy family.

As a for instance when men from the 1800's gathered experimental data
they might have used a cup of water with 2 electrodes in it to show
bubbles of gas and their explanations for the gas. They didn't have many
of the devices we have today so we have more results.

Results that do not line up with present theory so terms will be replaced.

Just look at how many men with their documented effects were thrown
out of the scientific arena. we need to call our new found data something.

We will never arrive, forever we will learn new things and never come
to a full understanding of the SELF EXISTENT ONE. Learning and growing
time without end. Now having said that, how many new terms do you
figure we will have accumulated in another 400,000 years, or 400 billion
time without end?

We are created in the image of the limitless SELF EXISTENT ONE.

The few terms we have today are just a tiny list though we find them
almost impossible to retain. We will grow as will our new list of explanations
will, time without end.

That is the wonder of our created being.

Enjoy it, you are they only one. There are no others like you a tiny
piece of the larger picture, a chip off the old block as they say.

And just one man can and will change the world.

So what does the term "COUNTER=SPACE" mean? It is our way of saying
we found a cause and effect that is not yet found on the books so this
is our best stab at adding a new idea into the ever growing mix.

A better explanation than the old one that allows everyone's effects
to fit together more perfectly. Well, the best we can for now til another
50 effects are introduced.

[Aaron]

Counterspace

Now I see that even here people have different definitions of counterspace.
Ufopolitics seems to follow Steiner. Aaron says (?) to follow Eric, but doesn't. Eric describes it mathematically as something with a unit of 'per meter' (as I did in my countertime example, which is NOT time in reverse, plse reread my post) but in words he describes it more like the opposite of space (which is completely different from his mathematical description): bring two plates closer together then the space between them decreases and the counterspace increases.
The latter is in the direction of what Aaron says but 'space devoid of ether' (if my interpretation is correct) again is something else.

Can you have space without ether?
Theoretically (mathematically) yes! no problem. And I would call that space. Why would it be the opposite??? Is a car without gas the opposite of a car?
Physically, no! as that would conflict with the definition of ether.
Ether does not reside in counterspace (wherever that might be) it is here everywhere filling up space. It conveys electric and magnetic forces which could not exist without a medium filling up the space (not counterspace!) between objects that act on each other without physical contact. (so in a way you could say that ether creates that physical contact)
Back to the car without gas, space without ether would be dysfunctional space. It has all the properties to call it space (it can hold objects), but it does not function in a physical sense as 'normal' physical space would (light can not pass). Exactly as the car, it is still a car, only it does not drive.

I do not believe that we (mankind) invented space by inventing a way to describe it (Cartesian or polar coordinates), nor did we invent time by inventing a clock and calendar.
Time and space were there already and we invented ways to measure and describe it.
It could be possible that there are more than the 3 (space) dimensions that we perceive and it is possible that time, as we perceive it, is part of a larger multidimensional system, we can not possibly know for sure.
So now I am out of that established BOX, ready for a deeper analysis?
How does this relate to counterspace?

Well... you guys sure keep me busy this Saturday!


Ernst.

I do recommend that people pay attention to Eric's work on the subject even though I see counterspace as something different because if people stick to his work, it is all engineerable and it works. A belief in counterspace isn't necessary to demonstrate the unaccounted for disappearance of a large amount of RF energy between two coils on a Cosmic Induction Generator (energy desynthesis or destruction of energy).

The idea of counterspace however offers a seamless and sensible explanation for all of these effects, which cannot be explained by conventional terms. Basically, I have yet to see anything debunk any part of Eric's theories, meaning they actually are theories that have stood the test of time and based on many experiments on the bench, math on paper, etc. they all suggest that Eric is incredibly right on. Any theory to the contrary would have to fall to the side and not just be relegated to a postulation, but would have to simply be erased as a mistake.

Lines on paper - those are simple analogies to give the idea but show what counterspace is for simple comprehension. Counterspace does apply there, but is not the same counterspace as space and counterspace in terms of energy disappearing into counterspace.

A car isn't defined by the gasoline in the tank, but space is defined by the existence of the aether so I don't believe your comparison is valid.

Space without objects can only hold objects if space can exist without the aether and I don't believe it can.

The aether exists in various densities, which determines the speed that light is propagating through it. The more dense, the slower and the less dense, the faster. The idea that aether is incompressible is not a fully defined concept and does not exclude the possibility for aether to be more or less dense. Therefore, aether is more dense in a higher gravity environment and less dense in a lower gravity environment.

Space with aether offers the ability for objects to exist at different sizes. An object would be smaller under high aetheric density and would be larger under lower density aether - from an absolute perspective. To an observer in each area, they couldn't tell the difference since they are subject to the same size fluctuations caused by the density of the aether, their perception is subject to it and the light in that area is subject to it.

Therefore, space with aether is what is responsible for distance to exist. From an absolute perspective, higher density a certain distance is shorter and high lower density it is longer. Everything in space with aether is subject to this compression and decompression but to the observer in each area, they can't tell the difference. Inside of the space with aether, the space can be measured with a coordinate system of x, y and z to determine the size of an object.

Time is simply the progression of movement of mass through the aether. We happen to believe we are measuring time by simply looking at periodic movements of an object moving in the aether that we count in certain divisions called a clock. A child on a swing - if swinging 24/7 with a consistent periodicity, we can count those swings and it is just as much of a clock as any other. When we measure time, all we're doing it simply measuring movement through the aether.

The rate at which time ticks is solely based on one factor and that is the density of the aether. In high density aether, there is more resistance to the movement of the mass through it and therefore time ticks slower and in a lower density area, time ticks faster since there is less resistance to the movement of the mass through the aether. These relativistic type effects are very real, but BECAUSE OF the aether, which Einstein was too much of a narcissistic egomaniac to ever admit, but he did come close when he commented many times on the work of Dayton Miller.

If there is no aether, there is no time since there is no space.

If the aether diminishes to the point where the density is so low that it is basically non-existent, there is no longer any ability for distance to exist because there is no more space. Light cannot move through that area because the aether is not there, an object cannot exist in that area because there is nothing to sustain its existence and there is no longer any measurable space for any object of any size to exist.

That is the only true vacuum in my opinion because it is quite literally, empty in the most absolute sense of the word. It is a complete void and is the lack of space.

This does bring up the possibility of having space and counterspace exist simultaneously in the same "space" and it doesn't contradict what I mentioned above. We can create localized areas that are void of the aether that deflect the aether around it and such an object could move without inertia since the aether is not able to penetrate and induce the counter force to resist its movement. That would be an example and still may be different than the counterspace Eric is defining. I'm definitely going to be asking him some questions and I'd encourage anyone that wants to ask Eric to send him a letter to his Lone Pine address - he will write you back.

[Dog-One]

@ufo

Sent you a PM.