ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Aaron]

falling and spinning

Yep! No magnetic interaction adding to the gravitational.



Feel free to correct my logic if I am backwards on this but, I think you mean: Objects, which are spinning [at high rpm] will 'appear' to fall slower.

And weigh less on a scale! (I believe)

And I think I know why.

It is because the frame of reference of the atoms on the outer edge of the rotating-free-fall-object must travel further than the frame of reference of the atoms in the middle of the object during the same duration of time in relativity to the external accelerating reference frame. Thus causing a frame reference torsion distortion within the object.

MagnaMoRo

When ferrous objects fall, the Earth's magnetic field induces counter currents that cause a repelling magnetic field that slow the decent. It's been known for years but it is almost never mentioned. It is very subtle but can be measured and has been in the lab using very small pieces falling in a very controlled environment to compare non-ferrous objects.

The spinning objects points to DePalma's experiments. He has his own explanation but what is consistent with the model I subscribe to is that mass displaces the aether and the aether rebounds back. So a falling object is moving along with the rebounding aether, the source of the gravitational push. It is moving at a slight angle but mostly downward.

When the ball is spinning, it is deflecting the aether 90 degrees which doesn't let the aether penetrate too much meaning as it rises, it deflects the aether that would normally cause a resistance to its rise so it goes up quicker.

When it falls, the leading edge (facing the ground) is deflecting the aether out of the way meaning there is less resistance and it can fall faster - instead of flowing with the river moving towards the ground, it is swimming faster in the same direction.

The experiments have already been proven in and out of a vacuum and this is just my explanation of why, which is seamless with the whole model.

[Ufopolitics]

Really?

Hi Ufo,
[...]
As for the rest of your post, thanks, but I still think that the voltage shown on the scope is due to magnetic induction. When you drop the iron cylinder onto the magnet you alter the magnetic flux cutting the coil. I do not have FEMM capability but have found an image of a cylindrical magnet on a steel plate. Notice how the lines of flux pass through the space where your coil would be. When the iron cylinder is placed on top of the magnet, these flux lines will move thereby inducing voltage in the coil.

[IMG][/IMG]

Yes, I know. But the iron plate wasn't the point.

Really the plate was not the main reason you brought over in previous post?

The flux lines were. And placing iron on top of the magnet will alter those flux lines which cut through the coil. That is what causes the voltage spike when you drop it onto the magnet.

Then it have been such a wasted time and money by building Home and Industrial Generators for over 200 years where either the exciter fields move or the generating fields move while the other component stays static...much easier and cheaper would have been to build them with just iron rotors...yes, I know reluctance generators do that, and also the QEG...and the other guy in another forum...however, different than my demonstration, still using steel rotors, besides, none of them are a majority that has been built and sold commercially for over two centuries like the Two Part Generators.

I hope You noticed and compared the difference in output when I move the Coil over magnet...versus when I just dropped the piece of bare iron over the two static main components in Faraday induction.

The difference is huge.

Anyways, I know you will not change your mind...as you will not change mine either...I am so sure of whatever am writing here...just because I have the solid proof.

Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Bistander,

I have done those tests without the iron plate. Anyone could try it, just magnet, coil then iron cylinder.

I could film this by securing that magnet to a piece of wood or plastic tomorrow...and you would watch same exact results.

I originally tested this with my hands...but there was not exactitude as if it moves a bit or not.

The attract force on this magnet to iron cylinder is huge, that is the reason why I did it with that piece of steel...so it could be firmly secured.

Ufopolitics

Yes, I know. But the iron plate wasn't the point. The flux lines were. And placing iron on top of the magnet will alter those flux lines which cut through the coil. That is what causes the voltage spike when you drop it onto the magnet.

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,

Thanks for the reply.

From your use of the word *also* you imply that the magnetic field is static. That is what I think but it contradicts the quote from Ken which you used.

You are completely right, my bad.

What I meant is that the Magnet was not moving and so the coil...my set up on video... No, it will not generate currents if there is not a displacement of the dielectric field...for the reasons I explained previously.

As for the rest of your post, thanks, but I still think that the voltage shown on the scope is due to magnetic induction. When you drop the iron cylinder onto the magnet you alter the magnetic flux cutting the coil. I do not have FEMM capability but have found an image of a cylindrical magnet on a steel plate. Notice how the lines of flux pass through the space where your coil would be. When the iron cylinder is placed on top of the magnet, these flux lines will move thereby inducing voltage in the coil.


Image from: neodymium magnet,magnet manufacturer,magnetic assemblies,buy magnets,flexible magnet Manufacturers & Suppliers - Great Magtech Electric Co., Ltd.http://www.greatmagtech.com

Regards,

bi

Bistander,

I have done those tests without the iron plate. Anyone could try it, just magnet, coil then iron cylinder.

I could film this by securing that magnet to a piece of wood or plastic tomorrow...and you would watch same exact results.

I originally tested this with my hands...but there was not exactitude as if it moves a bit or not.

The attract force on this magnet to iron cylinder is huge, that is the reason why I did it with that piece of steel...so it could be firmly secured.


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Magnetic induction

Hi Ufo,

Thanks for the reply.

A Magnetic Polarized Vortex Field will not cause an EMF by having a coil also static, wrapped around it..

From your use of the word *also* you imply that the magnetic field is static. That is what I think but it contradicts the quote from Ken which you used.

As for the rest of your post, thanks, but I still think that the voltage shown on the scope is due to magnetic induction. When you drop the iron cylinder onto the magnet you alter the magnetic flux cutting the coil. I do not have FEMM capability but have found an image of a cylindrical magnet on a steel plate. Notice how the lines of flux pass through the space where your coil would be. When the iron cylinder is placed on top of the magnet, these flux lines will move thereby inducing voltage in the coil.


Image from: neodymium magnet,magnet manufacturer,magnetic assemblies,buy magnets,flexible magnet Manufacturers & Suppliers - Great Magtech Electric Co., Ltd.http://www.greatmagtech.com

Regards,

bi

[MagnaMoRo]

Non-Ferrous metal objects fall slower than other objects.

Yep! No magnetic interaction adding to the gravitational.

Objects, which are spinning will fall faster than other objects.

Feel free to correct my logic if I am backwards on this but, I think you mean: Objects, which are spinning [at high rpm] will 'appear' to fall slower.

And weigh less on a scale! (I believe)

And I think I know why.

It is because the frame of reference of the atoms on the outer edge of the rotating-free-fall-object must travel further than the frame of reference of the atoms in the middle of the object during the same duration of time in relativity to the external accelerating reference frame. Thus causing a frame reference torsion distortion within the object.

MagnaMoRo

[Ufopolitics]

Hi all. Hi UFO.

I just looked at the opening video; read many but not all of the post, and just want to add my 2 cents.


Free falling bodies always travel in a strait line, regardless of whether that line appears strait to an outsiders frame of reference.

When we stand on earth, we may think we are standing still, but in actuality we are accelerating, in relation to the frame of reference of any free falling objects around us.

Hold out a ball and drop it! when you do, the ball is not accelerating. You are!
Proof: if you fall with the ball, you feel weightless. But,when your standing, the stress is felt by your body. This is because your frame of reference is under acceleration.

So, when you hit the ground after you jump you have to accelerate back into an already accelerating frame of reference. AND the further you free fall, the less time you have to get all your atoms up to speed with that already accelerating relative frame of reference.

Interesting MagnaMoRo,

So, let me see if I got you right...when a plane is falling...actually the Earth would be its frame of reference...accelerating towards the plane?

I believe you are basing this on the Earth being on a constant acceleration travel, (along with all other solar system planets and the sun) which we actually do not feel...just because we are all "on board"...

When UFO drops that steel, Its own frame of reference stops accelerating. Then when it comes into contact with the magnet. All of the energy required to accelerate the frame of reference of the steel happens very quickly. The magnetic field too is displaced in that same moment, as the field itself has no movement until the collision. This is why the spike is so intense and so brief.

MagnaMoRo

As Ken Wheeler writes...:

Neither pole is attracted to or repelled by the other. Or, one might as reasonably and insanely assert that houses and trees which are being sucked into the cone of a tornado are attracted by the air itself, the wind rather than by the motion of the wind. The “magnet”, or electrified dielectric mass which it properly should be called, does to the iron filings exactly what the tornado does to the houses and trees.

Well, I know objects fall vertically when dropped..., and what I meant when I said that on video...is that this effect will not take place with the same intensity, If I just pass by the magnet upper pole with the iron bar, just like it would happen in a rotary system being the iron cylinder on the rotor...it must be approached straight down or in a vertical line to do that effect.

Besides your theory of accelerating frames of reference...what I notice primarily...is that when I dropped that iron cylinder two main forces were present...gravity fall by the weight of iron plus the suction from the magnetic vortex.

Actually the spike would be much higher if I use another cylinder magnet instead of the iron...however, due to the discussion between two Theories comparison I did not showed that experiment, just because I know Bistander or someone else would have blame it to the traveling magnetic field "cutting the lines of force on coil conductors" old BS...

But the fact, the real truth... is that the spike would be much higher by using a magnet striking another standing magnet of the same volume/mass*...because the dielectric planes from BOTH Magnets would be traveling to meet each others right at the contacting plane...from their middle sections respectively...so the displacement range-distance is double than with iron.

*I wrote the same volume/mass, because displacement of both dielectric planes do not take place in a balanced way if both magnets volumes are alike. EG: Smaller Cylinder versus bigger Cylinder magnets...(I already tested that option)

All this tests could be X-Ray with viewing film.

Now about your comment:

The magnetic field too is displaced in that same moment, as the field itself has no movement until the collision.

That is negative, sorry...but this is a "progressing process" or "in crescendo"...and actually I have tested also with a cushion serving as a gap to smooth out collision...and the same effect takes place, except not as much as metal with metal...just because it takes about 1 mm less of travel distance from the 4-5 total that dielectric field moves.

The reason why not observed at simple sight is because it takes around 1/500 milliseconds for the frame time/spike...only very slow motion will show it.


Thanks for your comment, and theory...interesting though.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Aaron]

falling objects

Hi all. Hi UFO.

I just looked at the opening video; read many but not all of the post, and just want to add my 2 cents.


Free falling bodies always travel in a strait line, regardless of whether that line appears strait to an outsiders frame of reference.

When we stand on earth, we may think we are standing still, but in actuality we are accelerating, in relation to the frame of reference of any free falling objects around us.

Hold out a ball and drop it! when you do, the ball is not accelerating. You are!
Proof: if you fall with the ball, you feel weightless. But,when your standing, the stress is felt by your body. This is because your frame of reference is under acceleration.

So, when you hit the ground after you jump you have to accelerate back into an already accelerating frame of reference. AND the further you free fall, the less time you have to get all your atoms up to speed with that already accelerating relative frame of reference.

When UFO drops that steel, Its own frame of reference stops accelerating. Then when it comes into contact with the magnet. All of the energy required to accelerate the frame of reference of the steel happens very quickly. The magnetic field too is displaced in that same moment, as the field itself has no movement until the collision. This is why the spike is so intense and so brief.

MagnaMoRo

Non-Ferrous metal objects fall slower than other objects.

Objects, which are spinning will fall faster than other objects.

[Ufopolitics]

Yes, I do see your example is correct that density increases as volume decreases. It is like power increasing as time decreases for x amount of energy.

As far as how the "thing" can hold anything, might need clarification on what you mean, but I would say the molecule is in space. I believe that every bit of matter must have a constant interaction with the aether in order to perpetuate itself as matter.

It is like a living aerobic organism except that a living aerobic organism needs oxygen and without it, it will die, but will still exist - it will just be dead.

But for matter itself, it lives off the aether in order to sustain itself as matter. If there is no aether, there is no source potential to perpetuate its existence not just on the atomic level, but subatomic then down to the aetheric level. Light can't exist in the Void or true Vacuum, neither can matter so an area without aether in my opinion can hold nothing because it is nothing.

As far as counterspace goes in the context of it being the ambient existence of the aether in space... the aether is symmetrical and homogeneous in nature until there is a potential difference within space to create a potential difference such as the terminals on a battery.

The aether is bipolar so the charges are separated and are available in a polarized fashion at the terminals. If you put a bulb there, the aether moves to the terminals and over the wires through the load back to the terminal of opposite potential. So the battery never ran out of anything, the source potential came externally from the battery. When we use energy to "charge" a battery, we're simply separating and polarizing the electrochemistry in the battery in order to create a high and low point with a common connecting sitting inside of space (aether).

When the load is running, part of the polarized aether helps to power the load and the other part moves into the battery at its opposite potential terminal, goes into the battery and then repels and scatters and disorders it's like charges on the side of its like potential terminal. That scattering reduces the separation in charges in the battery and therefore reduces the voltage on the battery.

So the battery never ran out of anything, its internal chemistry simply became unpolarized and we pay to polarize it when we "charge" it up. All the potential and source charge that actually did the work came directly from the aether, it gets dissipated and disorganized and goes right back into counterspace or its default ambient existence.

I do believe the aether is bipolar. Energy is simply the organized potential encountering resistances, which causes a disordering of the polarized aether at those points of resistance and there is dissipation at that point. The dissipation of that organized potential simply goes right back into a state of non-polarization with the rest of the ambient aether. This process is the destruction of energy and polarizing the aether in order to give it a high and low point to polarize to and move over in order to do work is the creation of energy. The dissipation of polarized aether back to a symmetrical state in the ambient aetheric flux is the process of polarized aether moving back to counterspace.

Energy always is and only can be created or destroyed - it never changes form because while the polarized aether (the voltage potential) is moving over a circuit (the dielectricity), it is in the SAME FORM as it was in counterspace, it is simply separated from it's opposite charge meaning it is polarized. Energy doesn't change from one form to another, that has always been the complete opposite of reality.

1. You create a dipole or potential difference and that polarizes the aether.

2. You apply a load to the dipole and the separated and polarized aether moves over the circuit to supply the source potential to do the work, not he power supply. The power supply only creates a potential difference within the aether in order to polarize the aether so that it can enter a circuit and do work.

3. Work is done and any place in a circuit where work is done - the polarized aether meets a resistance and this disorders and unpolarizes the aether at those points and causes it to dissipate right back into the ambient aetheric flux of counterspace, in my way of explaining it.

Energy is just the process of taking polarized aether and disordering it. The dipole polarizes the aether, lets the aether in to do work and that work is energy - hence, we just created energy out of thin air. Then, the dissipated polarized aether, which is now disordered dissipates right back into the aether so we just destroyed energy right back into "thin air." There is no changing forms for the energy because it is in the same form, just polarized or non polarized. When it is polarized, it is all like charges on each end of the dipole and condensed, but it is still the same form that it was. This is why there is no such thing as conservation of energy because nothing is conserved in the system itself, energy is created out of thin air, which is the work it does and it dissipates right back while the energy is destroyed.

The only thing that ever happens normally is that a dipole is created, polarized aether comes in to do work and it is dissipated right back into an unorganized state.

That is how something seems to appears from and disappears into counterspace.

I think aether is space and therefore "fills" up space. In the area of a void or true vacuum, I don't believe either dielectricty or magnetism can exist. We see galaxies accelerating away instead of slowing down as a normal big bang entropic model would suggest at the far edges of the Universe. Space is stretched so thin there between the galaxies that the density of the aether is abnormally low or non existent. In those areas, I don't believe light can transmit through those areas, but CAN transmit around those areas wherever the aether is at. The aether causes gravity and the lack of it causes antigravity or the repulsion of matter and this repulsion is what causes the negentropic acceleration of the galaxies at the far edges of the Universe, in my opinion.

It would make sense to explore gravitational attraction first so the above makes more sense.


That is a diagram from Chapter 7 of my book The Quantum Key.

If you have 2 large bodies floating in space (in the aether) and they are off by themselves away from each other, their mass displaces a certain amount of aether that is rebounding back to the center of the mass that displaced it to begin with.

However, if 2 large bodies are near each other, the amount of aether that is BETWEEN them is divided between each proportionate to their own mass. That means that since the aether available between them is divided and shared with another mass, there is no longer a symmetrical push all around the object. You have the weakest push on the object on the side facing the other object. Since that is the case for both of them, the aether is strongest on the other sides and the aether will push them together and that is what causes gravitational attraction.

If you have a wet bar of soap in your hands and you squeeze on it symmetrical all the way around, it will just stay there. But squeeze it on one side harder than the other and it will be pushed in the direction of the weakest push on it and it will fly out of your hand. That is what the aether is doing to each object - pushing them towards each other.

For another example, if you have 2 plates, those plates displace a certain amount of aether proportionate to the mass of those plates. If you bring those plates together close enough, you cross a threshold where the amount of aether between the plates is less than the aether on the outside of both plates. Therefore, these 2 plates will be pushed together. This is what causes the Casimir Effect. It is a form of small scale gravitational attraction and the effects are measurable. There are all kinds of long winded explanations that are lost in insanity of why this happens, but if you look at it for what it is and see how it is in alignment with natural principles, it is common sense.

Without the literal fabric of space to be there surrounding those galaxies, there is nothing to cause inertia and those runaway galaxies can accelerate under negative resistance in a way that would follow an exponential curve instead of complying with anything remotely close to the inverse square law.

Excellent Aaron,

I agree 100% to all above...if you read Ken's Book it may use some different terminology, but the essence is exactly the same...and applied to magnetism, which the part am interested on.

For example He says that Energy occurs (runs) or Electrification takes place when the Ether is "disturbed" from its natural state and you write "disordered"...to me both are the same thing, different terms.

Now related to the batteries, which is not my stronger field...but it makes sense as well, chemicals get unpolarized and battery cease to output power...then comes "the charge" and restores back polarization, except -of course - when there has been serious deterioration of the metals involved, like the Lead and acid or the alkaline with the zinc or alloy...with very old batteries.

And I believe there should be a freaking way to make/design a battery where its compounds will "automatically" trigger the polarization back when there is a certain percentage of unpolarized chemical starting to take place...then something like a "Catalyst" will start making the opposite process, just like a charger does.

Something similar is what I believe Arie DeGeus did back in the eighties...and got him killed as well...an Energizer Bunny shot him...

sorry, black humor.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[MagnaMoRo]

My observations.

Hi all. Hi UFO.

I just looked at the opening video; read many but not all of the post, and just want to add my 2 cents.


Free falling bodies always travel in a strait line, regardless of whether that line appears strait to an outsiders frame of reference.

When we stand on earth, we may think we are standing still, but in actuality we are accelerating, in relation to the frame of reference of any free falling objects around us.

Hold out a ball and drop it! when you do, the ball is not accelerating. You are!
Proof: if you fall with the ball, you feel weightless. But,when your standing, the stress is felt by your body. This is because your frame of reference is under acceleration.

So, when you hit the ground after you jump you have to accelerate back into an already accelerating frame of reference. AND the further you free fall, the less time you have to get all your atoms up to speed with that already accelerating relative frame of reference.

When UFO drops that steel, Its own frame of reference stops accelerating. Then when it comes into contact with the magnet. All of the energy required to accelerate the frame of reference of the steel happens very quickly. The magnetic field too is displaced in that same moment, as the field itself has no movement until the collision. This is why the spike is so intense and so brief.

MagnaMoRo

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,

Exactly. Movement of the coil or movement of the magnetic field; makes no difference to the Faraday relation. So back to my original question. If as Ken says, the magnetic field is not static, then why is there no voltage induced in the coil before you move it? Obviously it is in the magnetic field.

Regards,

bi

Bistander,

A Magnetic Polarized Vortex Field will not cause an EMF by having a coil also static, wrapped around it...just because it needs to have a forward movement over time, in order to generate a Gradient or a "Wave" to be transferred at different coil levels to the end terminals-destination point.

I can try to explain the above with two examples...both very similar.

One, you get a Drill with a bit on it...no matter how long or how fast you spin it...IF You do not put at least some forward force (push) towards the metal or whatever material you are trying to drill, the drill bit will never penetrate the material.

The same thing for a sheet-metal or wood screw...if you do not press the screw driver or power driver you will not get the screw in.

Of course, above examples don't apply for Hammer-Drills tools or if there is already a hole to be made bigger or to screw it...

Magnetism is the same exact thing...it doesn't matter if it is spinning with the coil around it...the spinning will remain in the same levels (turns) of coil and repeat...and will never reach the end terminals, much less will show a signal on scope.

Now about the Video I uploaded on first page...I am not moving either magnet nor coil or copper conductors...however, when the iron approaches the magnet the Dielectric is displaced towards iron...and since the Dielectric Field is what generates the spatial polarization (pole) therefore, it also displaces the polarized end towards iron...and this is the required push force that "pumps" the wave forward...

If You noticed (as I also mention it) the total displacement was only around 5 mm or less.

In other words...a differential gradient (or a Wave Potential Variation) through Time/Space.

Hope you understand it now.


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Hi Ufo,

Quotes from Ken Wheeler...1

magnetism has but one movement not two, ..... a singular movement of the magnetic field itself. There are no static fields.

So in your experiment (post #1), if the magnetic field of the magnet is not static, it must be moving, or changing all the time. Why doesn't this changing magnetic field induce a voltage in the coil all the time, not just when you drop the iron slug on it?

That movement of the larger coil over the seating magnet was JUST to demonstrate Faraday's Induction.

Exactly. Movement of the coil or movement of the magnetic field; makes no difference to the Faraday relation. So back to my original question. If as Ken says, the magnetic field is not static, then why is there no voltage induced in the coil before you move it? Obviously it is in the magnetic field.

Regards,

bi

[Aaron]

gravitational attraction

It would make sense to explore gravitational attraction first so the above makes more sense.


That is a diagram from Chapter 7 of my book The Quantum Key.

As a side note, in one of the Tesla Society lectures Eric gave, he actually shows a virtually identical diagram talking about gravitational attraction! He uses some different terminology, but the principle is exact. I put it in my book in about 2006-2007 and that lecture of Eric's wasn't even available until a couple years ago even though it was filmed earlier, the Tesla Society never released it. I don't recall the lecture or where it was, but it is one of the long presentations in the Free Videos link on Eric's website Eric P. Dollard - Official Homepage - The only man who has replicated Tesla's wireless transmission technology. - blew me away when I saw that.

[Aaron]

energy, dissipation, gravitational attraction, etc.

zoom-level I would call "ether-plane", but that is probably not what Ken means, as it is just 'normal space zoomed in a lot'.
And on Aaron's idea, since there is no space without ether, what is the point of talking about it? Also how can something disappear into or appear out of this thing that does not exist? Come to think of it, didn't you actually say that counterspace does not exist?

Now, if ether were not filling up all space, how can magnetic and electric forces and light pass through space?



Ernst.

Yes, I do see your example is correct that density increases as volume decreases. It is like power increasing as time decreases for x amount of energy.

As far as how the "thing" can hold anything, might need clarification on what you mean, but I would say the molecule is in space. I believe that every bit of matter must have a constant interaction with the aether in order to perpetuate itself as matter.

It is like a living aerobic organism except that a living aerobic organism needs oxygen and without it, it will die, but will still exist - it will just be dead.

But for matter itself, it lives off the aether in order to sustain itself as matter. If there is no aether, there is no source potential to perpetuate its existence not just on the atomic level, but subatomic then down to the aetheric level. Light can't exist in the Void or true Vacuum, neither can matter so an area without aether in my opinion can hold nothing because it is nothing.

As far as counterspace goes in the context of it being the ambient existence of the aether in space... the aether is symmetrical and homogeneous in nature until there is a potential difference within space to create a potential difference such as the terminals on a battery.

The aether is bipolar so the charges are separated and are available in a polarized fashion at the terminals. If you put a bulb there, the aether moves to the terminals and over the wires through the load back to the terminal of opposite potential. So the battery never ran out of anything, the source potential came externally from the battery. When we use energy to "charge" a battery, we're simply separating and polarizing the electrochemistry in the battery in order to create a high and low point with a common connecting sitting inside of space (aether).

When the load is running, part of the polarized aether helps to power the load and the other part moves into the battery at its opposite potential terminal, goes into the battery and then repels and scatters and disorders it's like charges on the side of its like potential terminal. That scattering reduces the separation in charges in the battery and therefore reduces the voltage on the battery.

So the battery never ran out of anything, its internal chemistry simply became unpolarized and we pay to polarize it when we "charge" it up. All the potential and source charge that actually did the work came directly from the aether, it gets dissipated and disorganized and goes right back into counterspace or its default ambient existence.

I do believe the aether is bipolar. Energy is simply the organized potential encountering resistances, which causes a disordering of the polarized aether at those points of resistance and there is dissipation at that point. The dissipation of that organized potential simply goes right back into a state of non-polarization with the rest of the ambient aether. This process is the destruction of energy and polarizing the aether in order to give it a high and low point to polarize to and move over in order to do work is the creation of energy. The dissipation of polarized aether back to a symmetrical state in the ambient aetheric flux is the process of polarized aether moving back to counterspace.

Energy always is and only can be created or destroyed - it never changes form because while the polarized aether (the voltage potential) is moving over a circuit (the dielectricity), it is in the SAME FORM as it was in counterspace, it is simply separated from it's opposite charge meaning it is polarized. Energy doesn't change from one form to another, that has always been the complete opposite of reality.

1. You create a dipole or potential difference and that polarizes the aether.

2. You apply a load to the dipole and the separated and polarized aether moves over the circuit to supply the source potential to do the work, not he power supply. The power supply only creates a potential difference within the aether in order to polarize the aether so that it can enter a circuit and do work.

3. Work is done and any place in a circuit where work is done - the polarized aether meets a resistance and this disorders and unpolarizes the aether at those points and causes it to dissipate right back into the ambient aetheric flux of counterspace, in my way of explaining it.

Energy is just the process of taking polarized aether and disordering it. The dipole polarizes the aether, lets the aether in to do work and that work is energy - hence, we just created energy out of thin air. Then, the dissipated polarized aether, which is now disordered dissipates right back into the aether so we just destroyed energy right back into "thin air." There is no changing forms for the energy because it is in the same form, just polarized or non polarized. When it is polarized, it is all like charges on each end of the dipole and condensed, but it is still the same form that it was. This is why there is no such thing as conservation of energy because nothing is conserved in the system itself, energy is created out of thin air, which is the work it does and it dissipates right back while the energy is destroyed.

The only thing that ever happens normally is that a dipole is created, polarized aether comes in to do work and it is dissipated right back into an unorganized state.

That is how something seems to appears from and disappears into counterspace.

I think aether is space and therefore "fills" up space. In the area of a void or true vacuum, I don't believe either dielectricty or magnetism can exist. We see galaxies accelerating away instead of slowing down as a normal big bang entropic model would suggest at the far edges of the Universe. Space is stretched so thin there between the galaxies that the density of the aether is abnormally low or non existent. In those areas, I don't believe light can transmit through those areas, but CAN transmit around those areas wherever the aether is at. The aether causes gravity and the lack of it causes antigravity or the repulsion of matter and this repulsion is what causes the negentropic acceleration of the galaxies at the far edges of the Universe, in my opinion.

It would make sense to explore gravitational attraction first so the above makes more sense.


That is a diagram from Chapter 7 of my book The Quantum Key.

If you have 2 large bodies floating in space (in the aether) and they are off by themselves away from each other, their mass displaces a certain amount of aether that is rebounding back to the center of the mass that displaced it to begin with.

However, if 2 large bodies are near each other, the amount of aether that is BETWEEN them is divided between each proportionate to their own mass. That means that since the aether available between them is divided and shared with another mass, there is no longer a symmetrical push all around the object. You have the weakest push on the object on the side facing the other object. Since that is the case for both of them, the aether is strongest on the other sides and the aether will push them together and that is what causes gravitational attraction.

If you have a wet bar of soap in your hands and you squeeze on it symmetrical all the way around, it will just stay there. But squeeze it on one side harder than the other and it will be pushed in the direction of the weakest push on it and it will fly out of your hand. That is what the aether is doing to each object - pushing them towards each other.

For another example, if you have 2 plates, those plates displace a certain amount of aether proportionate to the mass of those plates. If you bring those plates together close enough, you cross a threshold where the amount of aether between the plates is less than the aether on the outside of both plates. Therefore, these 2 plates will be pushed together. This is what causes the Casimir Effect. It is a form of small scale gravitational attraction and the effects are measurable. There are all kinds of long winded explanations that are lost in insanity of why this happens, but if you look at it for what it is and see how it is in alignment with natural principles, it is common sense.

Without the literal fabric of space to be there surrounding those galaxies, there is nothing to cause inertia and those runaway galaxies can accelerate under negative resistance in a way that would follow an exponential curve instead of complying with anything remotely close to the inverse square law.

[Ernst]

zoom-level I would call "ether-plane", but that is probably not what Ken means, as it is just 'normal space zoomed in a lot'.
And on Aaron's idea, since there is no space without ether, what is the point of talking about it? Also how can something disappear into or appear out of this thing that does not exist? Come to think of it, didn't you actually say that counterspace does not exist?

Now, if ether were not filling up all space, how can magnetic and electric forces and light pass through space?



Ernst.