Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Electromagnets Center Plane Dividing Poles...

    Hello to All,

    Here is a short Test Video in order to Enlighten what really looks like... the Structure of every single Electrified Coil out there...as well as of every single Magnet.

    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kpAb8vfah0c[/VIDEO]

    ELECTROMAGNETS DIVIDING POLES CENTER PLANE

    We must realize that no matter which model we are discussing...As a common and undeniable property of every Magnetically Polarized Ether Fields (Poles) whether obtained by Momentary Electrification (Electromagnet) or by its product, the Permanent Magnet...Both Opposite Fields contained within the Embodiment will always be aligned through a straight center imaginary axis...and it is this axis extending it to space, the actual transparent "needle" which ALWAYS will point directly to the center vortex, high pressure end region of the attracting Vortex in another Magnetic Field.

    Now...What would be the best, more accurate Sensor to seek/locate, reveal exact spatial volume coordinates as polarization type of a Magnetic Field?
    Obviously it would be a Free Spinning Magnet, containing both fields the best sensor to either attract or repulse whenever facing any singular field.
    ..It literally "paints" the Field configuration in the Air/Space.

    And...I am really sorry for those who preferred the ancient, obsolete...Model 1 from 1831...based on Iron Filings Methods...My must sincere condolences...:

    [IMG][/IMG]

    THE RIGHT PATH:

    [IMG][/IMG]

    Of course there IS "something" right in the middle/center of every single Magnet or Electromagnet...A Plane...a Dividing Plane between Both Ether Bubbles projecting towards Space their Polarized and Opposite Fields!

    [IMG]
    Last edited by Ufopolitics; 12-14-2015, 05:00 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Ben2503 View Post
    You consider this a fight? Man you're sick. Modern Germans and Irish don't think in this way anymore as they experienced the terrors of war and came to the conclusions that it brings nothing but destruction and losers.

    Agreed

    I was just joking cause I know how you people are up there Now Now
    Ben stay cool.


    I think the US is still one of the countries that still glorifies war.


    Yes this is true the media can get these Americans to do anything
    THEY want done, WE are a WAR-Mongering nation. My Grandad by
    mariage the only one I know left over from the war came from Finland,
    he taught me a lot about stuff. He was smart with electronics.

    So as a German Jew taught by a Fin I learned to much.









    .
    Your educational system, in my view, produces narrow minded individuals that need some kind of Guru, which they place on a pedestal. When this guru falls of it's pedestal, they find a new one.

    Ben
    Well you hit the nail on the head with the "ding bats" running around in our schools. They act like transcendental closet
    clones if you ask me.
    I guess I'll have to change my mind about you Ben. There might be some
    hope after all to find someone who actually can see things for the way they
    are.


    I gotta run and I'll be back to clear up the rest of your math or one of the
    guys who are smarter than me can do it.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben2503
    replied
    Originally posted by Aaron View Post

    mgh (mass x gravity x height) is used to determine the potential energy in an object of a certain weight at a certain height. In the popular conventional model, the context that is used it to show how much potential energy is claimed to be stored in the object as it was lifted to that height.
    .

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben2503
    replied
    Dutch disease.

    Originally posted by BroMikey View Post
    Hi Ben ready for round 2?
    You consider this a fight? Man you're sick. Modern Germans and Irish don't think in this way anymore as they experienced the terrors of war and came to the conclusions that it brings nothing but destruction and losers. I think the US is still one of the countries that still glorifies war. In my view, in this respect a severely underdeveloped country, similar to some African countries.
    Your educational system, in my view, produces narrow minded individuals that need some kind of Guru, which they place on a pedestal. When this guru falls of it's pedestal, they find a new one.

    The Dutch (from the Netherlands, not the Germans) are notorious in Europe for having an opinion on all almost everything and do not hesitate to express this opinion in a very direct manner, preferably in the open, and tend to embarrass their leader whenever they can

    To clarify the Dutch disease:
    Back in the 1970ties. The majority of the US people, represented by their Government, came to the conclusion that the 'Cold War' had to lead to a nuclear World War 3. So they devised a very cunning plan that would turn Western Europe into the nuclear battlefield and that would make the US some nice profits in the proces.
    The only thing the NATO partners had to do, was to buy nuclear cruise missiles and install them in their countries. Then the Russians would have to attack Western Europe first, before the first missiles would reach the US. The US would of course supply and operate these cruise missiles in countries that didn't have nuclear arms.
    The Dutch 'Peace Movement' understood this and successfully opposed against these plans. After that Belgium, the UK, (the Germans were one of the last!!) etc followed. It was the beginning of the end of this cold war.
    The Americans (as we call them) referred to this opposition against their nuclear strategy, "The Dutch disease".

    The other guy was Hendrik Lorentz (yes that one) he was the one that gave Einstein the idea that C was the maximum speed in the universe. But like Tesla he also dismissed Einstein's space - time theories as pure nonsense.

    In MHO any theory that addresses time, which is invented by men, as a dimension and not as a Scalar, is a waste of time and I am not going to spend a minute on it as these are exactly as Telsa indicated: Mathe-magical theories that have no foundations in the real world. Tesla also said something that had to do with "thinking deeply" and "Thinking clearly". I call it 'common sense'.

    What I understood from Dollard's theory (with my limited capacities, I know) is that he introduced a mathematical transformation, similar to the J-operator which we use to calculate electrical AC circuits. Instead of calling it the "imaginary space", he calls it Counter space. Fine with me.

    Like there is no 'imaginary' current, (we have voltage and current and an angle between them) there is probably also no "counter-space"
    I don't see the practical use of Dollard's theories, nor have I seen the math being used to simplify difficult problems.

    Finally:
    In one of the letters from Tesla (published by Ernst in his thread), Tesla admitted that there were 4 critical errors in his Wardencliff design (which caused further delays in the construction)!! This shows me once again, that we are all just humans and hence we all make mistakes and are all looking for the right path through the maze.
    In my view me can learn from our own and each others mistakes.

    Best of luck
    Ben

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Ben2503 View Post
    Unlike you, the Dutch are taught to be independent thinkers.
    Remember the "Dutch disease"?

    It was also a Dutch scientist that opposed to Einsteins views from the very start.
    Hi Ben ready for round 2?

    No I don't know what you are saying here.

    Did you see model 1 and model 2? What is your take on the two
    models? Yes the dutch are very smart people I have some. And
    the fightin Iris too. But Grandad's last name was GOLDIE

    And I got the prize fighter nose to prove it.

    Grandma spoke German to me, she and granny were German dutch.

    So what did you say your name was?

    Does HASLOCK ring any bells? Well I goofed the spelling.

    My choice is to think free yes. No Norris gOds 4 me.

    Anyway, what's your take on the two models? Or don't
    you understand the question either? You guys are stubborn
    you know that? That is the opposite of smart.

    The wind mills from the 1600's always caught my eye up there.

    You better stick to the models for now cause we got your work
    cut out for you. Better look at it and realize the old model is flawed
    which is a foundational block and that will soon bring down the house.

    You guys should know better than to mess with the best after
    year of complacency. Your work/fun is just beginning

    The current model center on burning energy but it's time to recycle.

    Model 1 is game over.
    Last edited by BroMikey; 12-13-2015, 11:58 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben2503
    replied
    dutch disease

    Originally posted by BroMikey View Post
    Aaron this post is so right on I will have to applaud you
    There is perfect harmony in every line, both of the post below
    deal with a suggestion that free thought outside the Gov run box=
    mentally ill.

    This is a battle for position in the public eye, not a display of a genuine
    thirst from learning. Just one trick sentence after another to keep
    those listening in off balance, stopping them from timely progress.

    Always planting seeds of doubt. This is the same distraction all over again.

    Keep up the charge, hold up that sword. Below are my favorite quotes
    from you that made my day.
    Unlike you, the Dutch are taught to be independent thinkers.
    Remember the "Dutch disease"?

    It was also a Dutch scientist that opposed to Einsteins views from the very start.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    agreed

    Originally posted by Ernst View Post
    Aaron, I think it is best for the both of us and for this thread that we stop this conversation.
    I agree - it's not worth playing into the viscous cycle you present and will ignore the rest of your comments.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ernst
    replied
    Hi UFO,

    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    Negative, that is true NOT just for "1 point in space" but for a WHOLE straight line alignment (Both Magnets Center Axis alignment) considering both polarized fields being identical in spec's.
    And the closer they get, the higher the compression levels, the density of the field, etc...and so the opposite.
    ...
    You are right, but I meant it in a different way.
    I meant this: Given these two magnets in these positions, I move around them measuring the field. And I do this by using an imaginary monopole and check with forces are acting on it in every location. Then I must conclude (from my theoretical understanding) that there is only one point between those two magnets where the forces from one are exactly cancelled by forces from the other.
    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    The main point there is that THE IMAGINARY LINES OF FORCEONLY GENERATED between N-S or S-N Arrangements.

    Between N-N or S-S THERE ARE ABSOLUTELY NO LINES OF FORCE SHOWN...

    Of course...based on the ancient method to view fields...Iron Filings.
    Agreed, that is, with the addition of that last line. I believe there are many more lines of force than shown with iron filings. But in the case of opposing fields the iron filings would prefer a location where the fields do not cancel out so much.
    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    Negative, in Repulsion you will NEVER Balance/Neutralize absolutely nothing, nada, no matter how much you move them around each respective Like Polarization Volume, you will always experience Repulse Forces, different angles, different vectors of force strength...but they NEVER get to "Neutralize".

    The only way you would Neutralize (Mechanically) Magnetic Forces is with Dual Interactions (as minimum requirement) from opposite vectors, like One Repulse and One Attract. However that would NEVER neutralize Magnetic Existence...ALL Magnetic Forces will still be present even in a "Mechanical Balance".
    I think this is the same misunderstanding that I pointed out in the beginning of this post. Imagine 2 south poles, one left and one right, repulsing eachother. Now I take a 3rd south pole and I move it in between these first two poles. The left one will push it to the right, the right one will push it to the left. There is one point in between these magnets where these forces are equal and opposite, so they are cancelling eachother out.
    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    Ernst, let me ask you...Have you ever been able to get out from Wardenclyffe Projects to do any other kind of experiments, basically referring to the field of Electric Generators or any kind of Electrodynamic Machines at all?
    Hardly. I did build an electromotor once. DC-type.
    I did some other experiments when I was younger, but I do not really recall much about those.
    Originally posted by Ufopolitics
    So, resuming the above...It means that you are also in denial about the existence of a Main Domain Wall at the center of every Magnet or Electromagnet?

    Meaning that Model 1...where all domains are arranged in a very pretty and neat straight line from North to South is the way it is...?
    I think you could call it that ("in denial"). I don't think that, when "walking through a magnet" from N to S you will see something changing around you. This thought is based on the fact that you can break a magnet in two and both halves act as complete magnets, also the other way around if you put two magnets together, you'll get one bigger magnet, both halves remaining as they were.
    The term domain wall makes it sound as if there are two domains where things are essentially different. If I may refer to single layer coils, I do not see any reason to assume that a winding on one side would produce a different effect than a winding on the other side. Even less that a winding in the middle would not do anything.

    I don't know if model 1 is correct, but it does seem more in line with my observations.


    Ernst.

    Leave a comment:


  • bistander
    replied
    Model 2

    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post

    I also have shown a Google Search Link...to so many images*...that would actually not fit on this Thread...

    However, I will still show some new ones...plus some previously displayed ones...in order to see if they will awake your mind...:

    [IMG][/IMG]

    [IMG][/IMG]

    [IMG][/IMG]

    [IMG][/IMG]

    Nice Images Uh?
    Hi Ufo,

    Of course I recall those images and said this:
    Originally posted by bistander View Post
    Most, nearly all, of those domain wall pictures are of microscopic scale, ....
    So in model 2 you show a coil around a couple of domains which are 5 to 10 micrometers in size. What wire gauge did you use?

    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    [IMG][/IMG]
    I thought Ernst had a good observation about model 2 also. And that is not the only thing confusing about it and why I asked:

    Originally posted by bistander View Post
    Is model 2 your own handiwork or did it come from someplace else? What do the arrows in model 2 represent?
    Regards,

    bi

    {edit} * Do any of those images show a coil around 2 domains and a wall?
    Last edited by bistander; 12-13-2015, 04:09 PM. Reason: * question added

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Originally posted by Ernst View Post
    Sorry Ufopolitics

    Then on your reconciliation question, I would join with bistander. We probably do have the same 'disorder' . But let me explain. In model 2, if I rotate the magnet around its axis by 180 degrees, I seem to have swapped north and south. That does not match with my limited experience in this field.


    Ernst.
    So, resuming the above...It means that you are also in denial about the existence of a Main Domain Wall at the center of every Magnet or Electromagnet?

    Meaning that Model 1...where all domains are arranged in a very pretty and neat straight line from North to South is the way it is...?




    Ufopolitics

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Model 3

    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    Ernst,


    It is very hard to accept that a guy like you, that plays with pretty big sized Tesla Coils, Corona's of Light Discharges, Transverse and Longitudinal Waves, etc... And you did not know that Light could be Polarized as well as Waves...having absolutely no relation whatsoever to either magnetic nor electrical polarization.
    Are you kidding? Ernie like all wild rockers have one plus a chicken
    wire fence Tesla coil. Of course he understands everything just fine.

    Him and "Bi" are Aeither or, polarized or Non-polarized makes no difference.
    For all other inquiries delays due to finding the correct copy and
    pasted exert, our apologies.

    Originally posted by Ernst View Post
    Can you restate the question.
    .............. analysis of Tesla's work, ...................................
    ..................... If it is possible to simply cut and paste you an answer I might do so....

    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DsrUaMzie08[/VIDEO]
    Last edited by BroMikey; 12-13-2015, 04:28 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Originally posted by Ernst View Post
    I am not sure where this is going or if this is relevant but in the above images where is written "no field"... that is true for only 1 point in space.
    Negative, that is true NOT just for "1 point in space" but for a WHOLE straight line alignment (Both Magnets Center Axis alignment) considering both polarized fields being identical in spec's.
    And the closer they get, the higher the compression levels, the density of the field, etc...and so the opposite.

    Move slightly towards either magnet and the forces of that magnet will be greater than the other, hence they will no longer neutralize eachother.
    Move slightly sideways and you will experience an acceleration or deceleration in that direction (if you are a magnet...).
    So moving in any direction away from this one neutral point will result in experiencing a nett force (created by a field).
    "No field" actually refers to "two fields neutralizing eachother".


    Ernst.
    You don't have to move absolutely NADA in order to keep the Status: NO FIELD in the reference point shown on those images.

    It is obvious (Duh) that if you move either Field related to the other the 3D Field Volume caused by BOTH BALANCED repulsion forces (Causing Misalignment) would alter/deform the "Countervoidance Membrane" of Ether Deflection...(some of Ken's Vocabulary so you start warming up...) As if you move them on Attraction as well.

    However, the point there was not about to change/move around either fields in any way...

    The main point there is that THE IMAGINARY LINES OF FORCEONLY GENERATED between N-S or S-N Arrangements.

    Between N-N or S-S THERE ARE ABSOLUTELY NO LINES OF FORCE SHOWN...

    Of course...based on the ancient method to view fields...Iron Filings.

    Originally posted by Ernst View Post
    So moving in any direction away from this one neutral point will result in experiencing a nett force (created by a field).
    "No field" actually refers to "two fields neutralizing eachother".
    Negative, in Repulsion you will NEVER Balance/Neutralize absolutely nothing, nada, no matter how much you move them around each respective Like Polarization Volume, you will always experience Repulse Forces, different angles, different vectors of force strength...but they NEVER get to "Neutralize".

    The only way you would Neutralize (Mechanically) Magnetic Forces is with Dual Interactions (as minimum requirement) from opposite vectors, like One Repulse and One Attract. However that would NEVER neutralize Magnetic Existence...ALL Magnetic Forces will still be present even in a "Mechanical Balance".

    Ernst, let me ask you...Have you ever been able to get out from Wardenclyffe Projects to do any other kind of experiments, basically referring to the field of Electric Generators or any kind of Electrodynamic Machines at all?


    You could write UFO...I don't mind.


    Ufopolitics
    Last edited by Ufopolitics; 12-13-2015, 04:01 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ernst
    replied
    No Field?

    I am not sure where this is going or if this is relevant but in the above images where is written "no field"... that is true for only 1 point in space.
    Move slightly towards either magnet and the forces of that magnet will be greater than the other, hence they will no longer neutralize eachother.
    Move slightly sideways and you will experience an acceleration or deceleration in that direction (if you are a magnet...).
    So moving in any direction away from this one neutral point will result in experiencing a nett force (created by a field).
    "No field" actually refers to "two fields neutralizing eachother".


    Ernst.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ernst
    replied
    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    Ernst,

    You are starting to present very similar symptoms as Bistander does.

    Does POLARIZATION applies ONLY to magnetic or electric fields according to your views and learned concepts?

    So, Waves can not be polarized?

    Light can not be Polarized?

    Or are you expecting to find some "negative or positive signs" or North-South Polarization when they tell you it is "Polarized Light"?

    It is very hard to accept that a guy like you, that plays with pretty big sized Tesla Coils, Corona's of Light Discharges, Transverse and Longitudinal Waves, etc... And you did not know that Light could be Polarized as well as Waves...having absolutely no relation whatsoever to either magnetic nor electrical polarization.

    POLARIZE (General Meaning): To arrange, to organize, to filter or to align in a Specific Pattern (Isotropic behavior), rather than manifesting randomly, not following specific and determined values or directions (anisotropy).




    Ufopolitcs
    Sorry Ufopolitics (is it OK to shorten that name?), but you missed the second "or" in
    magnetically or electrically or ....?
    I am perfectly aware of various types of polarization, I just mentioned the two on top of my mind and added an "or ...." for you to add whatever other polarization you wish.
    The point is that ether, in my book, is a homogeneous continuous medium.
    How do you polarize such a medium?
    BTW this is ether like the vedic akasha, the definition that lord Kelvin used and was initially used by Tesla. Later, roughly after 1892, Tesla began to see more and more evidence that electricity could not be the result of such an ether and he began using the term "the medium" referring to a gaseous medium 'dissolved' (as it were) in this vedic ether.
    But in a gaseous medium, polarization would mean alignment of the constituting particles, so these particles must have some unequal distributed quality to align them by. Hence my question, what property do you align them by.
    I am asking because this property would probably become noticeable/measurable so this gives us something to relate to.
    I am trying to get some grip on your/Ken's theories.

    Then on your reconciliation question, I would join with bistander. We probably do have the same 'disorder' . But let me explain. In model 2, if I rotate the magnet around its axis by 180 degrees, I seem to have swapped north and south. That does not match with my limited experience in this field.


    Ernst.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Originally posted by Ernst View Post
    Sorry Ufopolitics, I was trying to understand Aaron's counterspace to which I thought you subscribed. Ok.... new definitions again, we start from scratch...

    Originally posted by Ernst View Post
    On counterspace. What I have learned so far:
    - it is space without ether and there for it does not exist.
    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    -Negative, Ether IS Counterspace, lives there, however when disturbed by specific processes it could come into Space, Polarized.
    Originally posted by Ernst View Post
    Wait... wait.... wait...How? magnetically or electrically or ....? What poles are created in this ether?

    Ernst.
    Ernst,

    You are starting to present very similar symptoms as Bistander does.

    Does POLARIZATION applies ONLY to magnetic or electric fields according to your views and learned concepts?

    So, Waves can not be polarized?

    Light can not be Polarized?

    Or are you expecting to find some "negative or positive signs" or North-South Polarization when they tell you it is "Polarized Light"?

    It is very hard to accept that a guy like you, that plays with pretty big sized Tesla Coils, Corona's of Light Discharges, Transverse and Longitudinal Waves, etc... And you did not know that Light could be Polarized as well as Waves...having absolutely no relation whatsoever to either magnetic nor electrical polarization.

    POLARIZE (General Meaning): To arrange, to organize, to filter or to align in a Specific Pattern (Isotropic behavior), rather than manifesting randomly, not following specific and determined values or directions (anisotropy).




    Ufopolitcs
    Last edited by Ufopolitics; 12-13-2015, 01:31 AM.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X