ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[bistander]

Hi MRIGuy,

Can you please give us the source for this image? Thanks.

bi

[ldrancer]

how is it insulting to you to show you a physical object and tell you see your model doesnt function.

whatever i aint got time for this. heres 3 stills from a movie that makes no claims as you do, you pretty much claim to know how the sun works. heres someone who doesnt do that and uses workign models to explain it and leaves me asking no questions.

your drawing a 3d object and saying its real. 3d is pyhsical. you havent made a workign model of what you claim.

it has to do with drawing a infinity sign. you have to know how to draw them.

Lets argue over that one huh/ isnt it just letter 8 turned sideways? see your claim this theory, your pretty much claiming an infinity sign you draw, is real infinity. Actual infinity. its no more than a number 8 turned on its side. a 2d object. like your theory. working would be 3d.

here are the 3 pics from this movie about dark energy. actualy its called What really is dark matter? bill gaede

ok, pic 1

simple 2d and it is a galaxy and you cant argue that thats a real actual object. the lines drawn across it are from teh rope hypothesis. connecting every atom of everything to every atom of everything else, via ropes. this is an arguement against what they say in dark matter, that mass connects the seperate parts together. They claim dark energy and figments, keep the galaxy from spiraling in on itself.

they claim black holes spit out jets of energy out of the middle of them.
well, according to the video, thats the magnetic lines of force coming out of the center of the wheel, the middle of the galaxy,
pic 2

a 2d model isnt that? you understnad that this can be understood without any problems if you take and cut this down to 2d? you cant claim 3d objects on a theory like you guys do without proving it with a model. what you claim is impossible.

ok take the 2 pictures, and between the 2 pictures while i was watchign the movie and thinking about this, this scene came up, and kind of gives me an idea you know kinda about this.. pic 3


put them together. take the 2 object,s and add tehm to theirselves. i dont know.

and high strung?, what? ive asked wheeler question and question and never got one answer from him on anything. he spams to me his, book, or website. this forums msging isnt enough for him to talk to anyone? anybody smart can explain their theory, and would accept critissm. id hate to be wrong and continue doing what ever im doing.

my arguemtn comes down pretty much to the infinity symbol. its a 2d object, but its just a number 8 on its side. when did a 8 on its side become infinity. ok so, what does an 8 on its side, signify of infinity? thats what sign means, to signify, how does, then an 8 on its side, whe i heard of it i didnt really believe all this, signify .. infinity? what relates? nothing at all whatsoever they want you to look, at 2d wirting and symbols as a 3d object. i see it as the same thing your trying to do and explain and not explain on this theory.

bam boom thats all. mwaahahaha

[Sputins]

Your lyign and making stuff up that isnt there.

draw it and i already PLAIN AS DAY SHOWED YOU GUYS but too STUPID.

it doesnt matter anyway its not me its you guys. making me absoilutely sick. get off this forum.

youve proven nothing your movies dumb.

your wasting time just like, black holes and warped space, dark matter wastes everyones time. when you have no arguements against me you bring up time wasting topics like that dumb movie up there, that dark oooh ghosts and apparitions energy video.

you guys are believing in religion and saying your seeing things. THis topic is ****ed up. i told you guys plain as day nose on your face, ken wheeler had a analog version of that in his hands in a video and it locks in on itself. you guys are trying to claim an infinite sign is free energy or how a magnet works.

[Ufopolitics]

My Two Cents...

Ken Wheeler, thank you sir for the time and dedication you put forth in search for a deeper and more correct understanding of magnetism!!! Ive watched all your vids and read most of the 4th edition and my head fell right off my shoulders lol.

Id like to continue the discussion with some observations, thoughts, and questions. UFO, maybe you can chime in, Ive ready many of your posts, you're brilliant!

Ive done some testing using the ferrocell for a deeper understanding of magnetism and Ive been stuck on a thought. Photo below shows a cube magnet under a ferrocell, notice either points of inverse spin.

[IMG][/IMG]

Hello Guy, and thanks for your kind words.

Now let's start by first image above, a cube magnet under a Ferrocell.
You've got it right as your interpretation, and below is the Dielectric Plane in green as the two polarization holes:

[IMG][/IMG]

One hint about looking at magnetic fields through ferrocell lens...

First, you have to realize you are looking at a 3D Spherical Volume of the magnetic fields, while the lens are completely flat...so, if the magnet is too close to the lens you will be seeing only fragments of the optical intersection between a 2D Plane (your ferrocell lens) and the spherical lines of the magnetic field vortexes-spirals...and a lot of distortion would occur at the closer lines to the lens.
Here it all has to do with the LED Ring lighting the fields and the positioning of a separate lens until you could see the spherical volume in Focus at the proper distance.

Now see pic below of iron dust over a bar magnet. Notice the field lines and the difference from the above pic, they are 90 degrees apart from each other. Looks to me more like a representation of the dielectric field in the iron dust.

[IMG][/IMG]

Negative about your bold/underlined statement above.

The "Iron Dust" does NOT represent, NOR show Dielectric Field at all.

First off, the Iron Filings/Dust only show "straight lines" (of force I suppose...) just because all this loose, ferromagnetic pieces/fragments are becoming N/S tiny Magnets...therefore, aligning/bridging along the High Pressure lines traveling back and forth from BOTH Magnetic Poles, and not showing any break down center line of the Counterspatial Dielectric Field. Remember that Dielectric Field is in Counterspace, not Space like the iron particles are...

So, this is how it is:

[IMG][/IMG]

Interesting how the cheap Magnetic Viewing Film DOES depict the Dielectric Field in any magnet:

[IMG][/IMG]

The Red Rectangle depicts the square magnet contour, and poles are above and below.

Now, see pic below of the electric field. Its understood the red lines below represent the magnetic field and the blue lines the dielectric field. The magnetic field is trying to pull apart the blue spheres (conductors) and the dielectric field is trying to pull them together.

[IMG][/IMG]

So here's where Im stuck. Ken, you say if you draw a line from left to right in the pic of the electric field that will be the dielectric inertial plane. However, I see the dielectric plane drawn from top to bottom separating the conductors (blue spheres) of inverse spin ie the poles. Whats going on here???

Respectfully,
Guy

[MRIGuy]

Clarifying Field Lines

Ken Wheeler, thank you sir for the time and dedication you put forth in search for a deeper and more correct understanding of magnetism!!! Ive watched all your vids and read most of the 4th edition and my head fell right off my shoulders lol.

Id like to continue the discussion with some observations, thoughts, and questions. UFO, maybe you can chime in, Ive ready many of your posts, you're brilliant!

Ive done some testing using the ferrocell for a deeper understanding of magnetism and Ive been stuck on a thought. Photo below shows a cube magnet under a ferrocell, notice either points of inverse spin.



Now see pic below of iron dust over a bar magnet. Notice the field lines and the difference from the above pic, they are 90 degrees apart from each other. Looks to me more like a representation of the dielectric field in the iron dust.



Now, see pic below of the electric field. Its understood the red lines below represent the magnetic field and the blue lines the dielectric field. The magnetic field is trying to pull apart the blue spheres (conductors) and the dielectric field is trying to pull them together.



So here's where Im stuck. Ken, you say if you draw a line from left to right in the pic of the electric field that will be the dielectric inertial plane. However, I see the dielectric plane drawn from top to bottom separating the conductors (blue spheres) of inverse spin ie the poles. Whats going on here???

Respectfully,
Guy

[ldrancer]

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZhETcDHDRY[/VIDEO]

MAGNETISM PARTICLE DYNAMICS

Enjoy and Regards


Ufopolitics

everywhich way you follow that line your model is broke, all over.
and you dont need movies either why dont you debunk me on the model the actual real life model he had that one time? huh? instead of these fake users and you still going on on a fake model.

[ldrancer]

Your lyign and making stuff up that isnt there.

draw it and i already PLAIN AS DAY SHOWED YOU GUYS but too STUPID.

it doesnt matter anyway its not me its you guys. making me absoilutely sick. get off this forum.

youve proven nothing your movies dumb.

your wasting time just like, black holes and warped space, dark matter wastes everyones time. when you have no arguements against me you bring up time wasting topics like that dumb movie up there, that dark oooh ghosts and apparitions energy video.

you guys are believing in religion and saying your seeing things. THis topic is ****ed up. i told you guys plain as day nose on your face, ken wheeler had a analog version of that in his hands in a video and it locks in on itself. you guys are trying to claim an infinite sign is free energy or how a magnet works.

[solitech]

Thanks UFO!

I really appreciate the work you've put in to make it possible to give a visual understanding of the aether flows in magnetism, it's helped me to get a much better grasp on the theory. Keep up the great work!

[Ufopolitics]

Magnetism particle dynamics video

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZhETcDHDRY[/VIDEO]

MAGNETISM PARTICLE DYNAMICS

Enjoy and Regards


Ufopolitics

[aljhoa]

Dark matter is a lie. you win the big lie spammer award in this topic. unless ken comes back.

Researchers Claim To Have Found Evidence of Dark Matter In Inner Milky Way | IFLScience

Al

[ldrancer]

Aether is a concept. or you dont know what, a concept is? like the definition.
Dark matter is a lie. you win the big lie spammer award in this topic. unless ken comes back.
..why the big reverse in the thread for. who cares about dark matter thoughtwe wanted to talk about how magnets, pull things. right the only thing about them we dont get? or push?

anywayyy me trying to make sense here made me realize the whole concept heree. Dark matters only ****ing thing that matters about it, is it argues about push which is something that they cant come up with why it happens. screw dark matter retarded crap, you think things are floating out there?

[aljhoa]

A Concept?

(2) Dark matter is exactly like the aether. The inferences are unsound because the assumptions are unwarranted, and
we are waiting for the discovery of a new fundamental principle of physics, a new annus mirabilis from a new Einstein if you like,
to tell us what that new, previously unknown, principle is.

My money is on (2), because for all of the elegance and explanatory power
of the standard model (at large scales) and quantum mechanics (at small scales), we can be absolutely certain about one thing.
They are wrong (or at least incomplete) in at least one particular. How can I be so sure?
Easy, because even the most ardent supporters of the theories admit that certain of their conclusions are currently irreconcilable.
This means that one is wrong or the other is correct or they are both wrong. As a matter of simple logic, they cannot both be correct.
Is Dark Matter the 21st Century Aether?


Al

[mikrovolt]

Harold Johnson's diagram depicting a width of what he calls zero possibly means that
the dynamic nature of that zone is variable with respect to the boundry or square.
This is to help us to see that calculating this uses probability. The self centering
as the temperature decreases eventually changes the resistance and pinning seen in
superconductors.

The anomalies do exist and have been repeated so that there is a basis to
investigate them as artifacts. They do not have to be magnetic but are an entity
of what we call magnetic.

The rigid wire model having only two ports is insufficient at this level.
The artifacts can reside outside the glass when the magnet is present
just as a residue when water evaporates.

[ldrancer]

The aether is a concept. what is 0 if aether is everything??? that is nothing, like, you know? what, is 0? i mean then? there isnt one. unless then you gotta have big bang black holesand that concepts, but.. or you know retarded ideas, but,
if you say aether is a concept and odesnt explain this, great.

[Ufopolitics]

The Key to Everything...We ever dreamed off...

There is a less complicated approach but it is Howard Johnson.
If you don't mind Ken, I am bringing up magnet flipper video.
I think your book is really incredible work.
Reference can be made to publication "Uncovering the missing secrets of magnetism" page 86
The pictures of a dielectric plane (Johnson labels it zero) in both a strong and weak magnet. A helpful distinction.

magnet flipper video:
There are 4 vortices that lead somewhere ?
This video trys to explains an opinion by Howard Johnson in simple terms.
Here is the point trying to be made by Magnet flipper and raises question why has science not taught this ?
Howard Johnson makes this statement:

" Here is really what the magnetic particles look like !! "

The diagram shows a line perpendicular to the pole N and S that is labeled zero and
is there are width measurements indicated and 4 vortices; north has 1 CW and 1 CCW and the south has same.

Later in video he shows the N S flux is spinning.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wR7c4iXum-A

Nice video Mikrovolt,

There are absolutely NO FOUR (4) Vortexes on a Magnetic Field, Each Polarized End have a Main ONE (1) Spiral.

Like when He does the first part of video on Color Monitor...This below is what actually we are observing:

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

So, what happens is that Color CRT Screen serves as a splitting surface that cuts a SINGLE VORTEX in TWO(2) Parts, so it looks like two vortexes, but they are absolutely NOT!

A closer approach (right On) he shows with a Single Electron Beam TV (B&W):

At minute 2:51 He is actually showing the North Pole which when projected against a B&W TV it shows CCW Spin, on a SINGLE VORTEX/SPIRAL.

At minute 3:00 He shows CW Spin which is the South Pole.

Once he loads more magnets the image gets distorted...lots of magnetic strength for the Electron Beam Vector of force...so it goes crazy and makes that Black Hole on screen...however, still sees the rotation sense clearly.

What about the width of the bloch wall ?
the round or elliptical or egg shaped anomolies possibly distorted by the monitor ?
these 4 vortices are inside the inscribed square ?

We are trying to view a Three Dimensional Field with a Flat 2D Screen...so a lot of distortions are going to take place...while a lot of "artifacts" will merge as wrong imaging.

What are they good for in better using magnetic energy ?

The understanding of the REAL MAGNETIC FIELD will lead Us all to horizons we never, ever expected to walk through, my friend...NOT only Free Energy, MPM, Gravity Control...BUT, Healing ourselves...fixing our DNA...Repairing Terminal Diseases/Sickness in every Biological entity...we can ever think off...

Other words...Paradise on Earth..."Tomorrow's Land..."

Hang on am making a video where it shows the real MAGNETISM PARTICLE DYNAMICS...


Regards


Ufopolitics