ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Ufopolitics]

Hi UFO, sorry for the late response, I wrote up a nice long detailed response a few weeks ago and lost it completely, so frustrating. However, Im loving your work so far and your video on the particle dynamics of magnetism is truly amazing! I remain on the edge of my seat to see your future developments!

Hello MRIGuy!

Nice to hear from you again, and am sorry about what happen...I always back up (copy/paste) momentarily when it is a long post full text/links, etc into a Note pad...because it has happened to me...basically a crash from the Navigator...and you loose it all...I hate that.

Question, when you say the so called "North" pole has CCW spin are you referring to the centripetal return? So then the centripetal return has the same spin direction as the dielectric inertial plane (flywheel)? Therefore the centrifugal discharge is CW?

Nope, like I mentioned before on another post...CW and CCW are completely relativistic terms, and depends on the observers/clock positioning.

The "North" pole Centrifugal discharge spins CCW when mirrored and you, as the "observer" look at mirror then compare it to your wrist watch.

If you have that same magnet, and you set it on top of a table, North facing up...then look at your watch...it would be spinning clockwise (CW).

The reason why I insist on "Mirroring" Magnets to compare the spins...is just because of the new video am working on (still) which I face magnets against a B&W CRT rastering Lines at different angles...so it is clearly observed where does each polarizations really spin...

Whenever I refer to Magnet's Polarization Spin is based on the Centrifugal Discharge...because that is where the stronger magnetic force is.

Question, when you say the so called "North" pole has CCW spin are you referring to the centripetal return? So then the centripetal return has the same spin direction as the dielectric inertial plane (flywheel)? Therefore the centrifugal discharge is CW?

[IMG][/IMG]

I repeated the same question, but this time is to clear some confusion I noticed you have related to Centrifugal and Centripetal spins...

I would like you to look again at the pic above from my video...then look at lower Image for the Centripetal return.

[IMG][/IMG]

Notice that both, Centrifugal and Centripetal Spatial Curves from both polarizations spins are based around the Two white dotted circles?

Both circles centers are off main field center, passing by magnet's center in an inclined angle, and I will just quote myself from a previous post...

This Two Spatially Polarized Spirals spin in the same direction, at opposed ends of an inclined axis (axial tilt, obliquity, axial precession, etc) to balance out spinning forces.

An Axial Precession that throws off main center.

However, no matter that precessed angle for both...note that spin direction does not change for either one...Centrifugal and Centripetal...or "North" and "South"?

Those two frames from video are a transparency, looking at magnet from above, South is on Top, North at bottom. You could go to min 9:00 of video to start from beginning looking at geometry Side View turning to Top View.

So the reason why magnets attract is the same reason why AC power lines pull together? And the same reason why a balloon sticks to the wall after rubbing my head? And how gravity works? All through dielectric voidance?

It could be...

Lastly, I'm stuck on a thought, it's understood there's no magnetism at the center of any magnet. When you look at the inertial plane through magnetic viewing film you can see this. Now picture the center of a vertical field 1.5T MRI magnet where you have N-S on top and N-S on bottom. Ken says if you place a gauss meter at the center of any magnet it will show no magnetism. However, when I place the probe of a magnetometer at isocenter I measure 63.87Mhz, using the Larmour equation that equates to 1.5T field strength, what's going on here?

[ATTACH]17121[/ATTACH]

I would like to see a rough diagram showing how each N-S Magnet is positioned spatially related to each other to give you a more accurate answer. However, since you said it is a vertical field with N-S Top and N-S Bottom, (and a space between both where you measured field) I would be assuming Top Magnet South is interacting -through space- with North Bottom Magnet.

When Two Magnets in Attraction (Voidance) have not made full contact, meaning, there is a space/gap in between, the exchange of High Pressures Gates between N-S from each separate magnet going to their still existing respective dielectric fields, will deliver a very strong center Common spatial magnetic force (spin) which is probably equal to measuring either one of them, as you just did.

And like I wrote in another post here...Two Magnetic Fields in Attraction stage...with a spatial gap in between, will have both Vortexes from the two N-S Polarizations facing/approaching each others following exactly the same spin direction.

Opposite spinning Vortexes approaching each others from two separate magnets will deliver a Repulsion, it means both are like poles.

Oh to answer your question I service MRIs, everything from install to calibration and repair. Repairing them can be difficult but correctly understanding how they work is very difficult lol.

Regards,
Guy

That is awesome!...beautiful job Guy!...I will really love to see those machines inside...


Hope my answers were of some help...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Iron Filings in 3d

The Iron Filings Model somehow rendered those Lines of Force in some kind of a "straight fashion" which served as a "proof" to base those Straight Vector's Theories on.

That was it, regardless of a 2D or 3D Field...or Interactions to obtain an EM Induction.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8llkHQtaOlg

[VIDEO]youtube.com/watch?v=8llkHQtaOlg[/VIDEO]

Vectors are straight, but the field isn't. This video shows a nice 3d pattern of the iron filings aligning with the lines of flux in three dimensions.

Regards,

bi

[MRIGuy]

Below is a pic from an excel file I created to plot what I thought was the magnetic field in the center of a vertical field MRI. When we "shim" a magnet we add or remove magnets in attempt to achieve perfect homogeneity as in the pic below, where all points along the circles measure the same frequency. What's fascinating is this looks just line the Dielectric field from Ken's book. Essentially we have 2 magnets seperated in attraction mode so the result would be the dielectric inertial plane spead out from top to bottom, Im guessing.



Regards,
Guy

[MRIGuy]

Hi UFO, sorry for the late response, I wrote up a nice long detailed response a few weeks ago and lost it completely, so frustrating. However, Im loving your work so far and your video on the particle dynamics of magnetism is truly amazing! I remain on the edge of my seat to see your future developments!

Question, when you say the so called "North" pole has CCW spin are you referring to the centripetal return? So then the centripetal return has the same spin direction as the dielectric inertial plane (flywheel)? Therefore the centrifugal discharge is CW?

So the reason why magnets attract is the same reason why AC power lines pull together? And the same reason why a balloon sticks to the wall after rubbing my head? And how gravity works? All through dielectric voidance?

Lastly, I'm stuck on a thought, it's understood there's no magnetism at the center of any magnet. When you look at the inertial plane through magnetic viewing film you can see this. Now picture the center of a vertical field 1.5T MRI magnet where you have N-S on top and N-S on bottom. Ken says if you place a gauss meter at the center of any magnet it will show no magnetism. However, when I place the probe of a magnetometer at isocenter I measure 63.87Mhz, using the Larmour equation that equates to 1.5T field strength, what's going on here?




Oh to answer your question I service MRIs, everything from install to calibration and repair. Repairing them can be difficult but correctly understanding how they work is very difficult lol.

Regards,
Guy

[Iotayodi]

Its quite clear that your usage of the English language and your statements prove your not a Physicist or even an Amateur scientist. In Physics there are no north or south poles. There is only cw and ccw. You really should stop embarrassing yourself.

[ldrancer]

student training session university level. Higher learning
keeps correcting the inventor. Team players.



[img][/img]

wtf is this? You just might as well hit your keyboard and random keys post, cuase nothing you say is coherent. Moron. Ooh someone taught you how to spell words. But you are good at lookign for them pictures arent you?

Guys go make a vortex topic. Quit being off-topic and talk about what you really want to talk about.

Funny how wheeler doesnt want to speak about that middle part between teh N and S poles, he doest even want to name it. hahah but then all his, never seen anything before theories on it, surround that. It involves that, and when hes questioned on that, you guys pull out that other diagram where teh little lines you draw goign around fan out into, away into counterspace, which is pretty funny. how you avoid the topic. screw this topic. how a magnet works?

1.) u guys dont even know how to do science, the scientific method. The magnet would be the theory. the hypothesis is a vortex. You havent proved nothing.
2.) go make a vortex topic. You havent proved a hypothesis which is a concept, its not a hypothesis as NOONE has ever seen one. It can't be a hypothesis, its a concept, in any science method GO MAKE A VORTEX TOPIC

[ldrancer]

you, have no idea how magnets works is that what yuo just said?

Bromikey hey the stupid picture of the toilet and the cat, didnt you see my analogy of the tornado in 2 2-ilter bottles? are you tellign me i alrady asked, are you telling me i have a vortex in it? is that what your saying? i already asked that and you spewed up some picutre of a toilet. why not answer my question ? so you can scam up people for money more off of kens fame off of some random magnet and talking and only getting people who was interested in it to come around then you talk **** then force them with scare-tactics to listen to you're horse****?

[Ufopolitics]

Study the workings of Vortexes and what they produce. Like heat,cold and pressure. They are everywhere.




The study of magnetic fields in a magnet is one thing. The study of magnetic fields using electromagnetics/Emf/ is another. They are similar but distinct from each other. Like a house cat versus a Lion. We need to learn how to manipulate the electromagnetic spectrum. Its not an easy task.

Thanks for this post Iotayodi,

Agree that Electromagnetics is quite different from magnetics...but the difference is quite huge -I believe- in your statement..."a House Cat Vs a Lion"...

The point I see here is that we better start trying to understand and tame House Cats before facing the Lion...the basic structures are about the same.

If We can achieve something different than ever done before with magnets...the chances are we could reproduce it with electromagnets at bigger scales.

Electromagnets have a huge advantage over a permanent magnet...

We can modify or distort the field as we design different cores and coils...we can turn it on or off, pulse it, etc,etc...or we could transfer it from core to core...just like a spirit that can go within and through mass...

The problem is that if we have no idea how it really works...we will be shutting in the dark...and no infrared glasses on...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Iotayodi]

Study the workings of Vortexes and what they produce. Like heat,cold and pressure. They are everywhere.




The study of magnetic fields in a magnet is one thing. The study of magnetic fields using electromagnetics/Emf/ is another. They are similar but distinct from each other. Like a house cat versus a Lion. We need to learn how to manipulate the electromagnetic spectrum. Its not an easy task.

[ldrancer]

you guys dont know what work means. if something is a working model. nope.

you wont compare it to a single thing you attack people who ask you. why cause it doesnt even work.\\\

you guys they already done all your work for yu proving something that aint there, is there by black holes. you dont need to talk, their doing all the talking for you. we need no more talking from peons i guess such as you since the high and almighty self named geniuses are doing it.

you guys must believe ken wheeler is a genius. bwhaha thats why you gkeep going on.

only one way to rip this topic up, take their heroes out of the equation.

a black hole proves somethign in the center thats not there is. so shutup guys, just post links to black holes, wait!!! YOU ALREADY DID THAT, i mean dark matter but YOU DID. you are using false science to back your theory up. agaisnt ME.

you guys are straight up scum shut your mouths.

[ldrancer]

This is MY THREAD

I will Do what I have to DO whenever I consider it appropriated.

And YES, it is my own POLITICS...that is why it is my last name..

If I wanted credit, I would not be wasting my time here but on the USPTO Office, with my real name on it, making sure no Troll would be doing it.

What You want the beef?

Right now?

Really?

Sorry, but can't do...so you will have to relax and wait.

Please consider your insults for somewhere else. I have not insulted you!

If You like it...then stand by and shut up.

If You do NOT like it, then just vanish into Counterspace...

It is up to you



Ufopolitics

Spoken like a ****ing communist.

Let me talk about your DUMB TOILET again. that is something going straight from one place to another. you got that? it rotated, but that is NOT of any importance. the action that happened was, it went from the top to the bottom pretty much. the word vortex doesnt have any meaning either since its A CONCEPT. Im confused here is this atopic about black holes? you showed me a center, and think you are like smart. tahts not a vortex, a vortex for the most part is, its just a concept, the idea which DOESNT WORK you guys dont know wtf your talking about. its that metal ball that object that when it sprang open, it locked in the middle. ****ing found it, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AfDi89Hj0QA its not a workign model, its a concept. anything can lock up in the middle and be a gigantic piece of ****. pay attention to about 48 seconds. thats your piece of **** vortex, it locks up in the middle. thats what i been talking about, and you knew about. NOW THAT EVERYBOYD ELSE CAN SEE IT, are you gonna keep runing your mouth?

[ldrancer]

Head up ass.

Is a vortex a magnet or are you trying to prove a concept of a vortex. cause thats what yuor doing, your not showing how a magnet works.

this is the stupidest forum in the world. well, ok im done here. they cant answer simple questions but make false claims of knowing how a magnet works. state your objective you SCAM artists. scumbags is all you are. If your proving a vortex you wouldnt need to do it, something else would prove it. Thats how it works something else would do it for you. A concept is a MAN MADE thing. ok? ****ing just stupid.

[ldrancer]

By the way guys, if y8ou turn capslocks on and just type, itll do all that start of a sentence capitalize, just make sure you end with a period.

Cause who doesnt do that in .. A sen..tence.

[ldrancer]

Oh and who cares if i doulbe or tripel post when you guys wont even bother with simple questions.

Answer it or ill continue to post in your concept thread

[ldrancer]

what is yru8 retarded topic about? a magnet is a vortex? or are you trying to prove the concept of a vortex >? please explain all this **** is just that nothing but waste of everybodys time. IM ASKING SO YOU SOUND GOOD AND STUPID SO YOUR LONG BULL**** POSTS END>