ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[bistander]

N & s

North-red arrow seeks the South Magnetic Pole of the Earth, which is located in the Northern Hemisphere.

Al

OK Al,

Then just reverse all my Ns and Ss. Tests are still valid. That's why I spelled everything out clearly.

N and S are just labels. Call them B and C. It doesn't matter as long as you're consistent.

bi

[aljhoa]

Time for some to update their files and generate more options with the research MrTeslonian has gifted to the world:

magnetic monopole discovered, monopole magnet, conductor, and dielectic, "key to free energy"

How to make a "monopole" magnet

Compass has a red colored arrow end which is N seeking so is a S pole.

North-red arrow seeks the South Magnetic Pole of the Earth, which is located in the Northern Hemisphere.


Al

[bistander]

?

Bi's compass has only N-poles.

Al

What do you mean? I said:

"Compass has a red colored arrow end which is ... a S pole.
Therefore the white end of the compass needle is a N pole."

Red = S and White = N

bi

[IndianaBoys]

magnetic monopole discovered, monopole magnet, conductor, and dielectic, "key to free

Time for some to update their files and generate more options with the research MrTeslonian has gifted to the world:

magnetic monopole discovered, monopole magnet, conductor, and dielectic, "key to free energy"
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rOdTDkgEdAY

Published on Apr 19, 2013

This may be the worlds first magnetic monopole discovered, I have created a monopole pole magnet, conductor and dielectric material. By using the charge separating capability of the Lord Kelvin generator, and instead of running water through the cross induction coils. I ran molten metal and then allowed the substance to cool, witch retains it singular pole or charge after it has cooled.

[bistander]

Wtf

Became a Monopole after being removed from the Field??!!

Don't try to BS me. Don't try to get me upset...by being an "ASS" UMING BS I NEVER WROTE HERE!


I never wrote here we all could make permanent Monopole Magnets back and forth this way.


I know Monopoles by it self does not exist, it is not written on Ken's Theory...nor I never wrote such stupidity.

I wrote that whenever iron was under the influence of a magnetic field near a pole it will NOT create an opposite pole in between, and that was the end of it.


What happens after iron is removed from the magnetic field influence depends specifically to its retentivity..and that was NOT part of this test or discussion at any point.

The ideal iron for this testing should be one that does not retain magnetism. So when it is removed from magnetic field goes back to zero.

We all know that if you approach a magnet to a retentive piece of iron then remove it, it will develop the two poles after is off the field...but that was not the discussion here.

Then I see that 90 percent of your pictures are based on the iron being analyzed without the magnet present??

WTF are U doing?

Are you trying to demonstrate that Monopoles don't exist?....

BS Bistander...

Ufo,

I don't know what you're going on about. I was totally referring the iron in the influence of the magnet's field. Hence my question: Why does retentivity matter?

Monopoles do not exist; in the field or outside. Or anywhere.

bi

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,

Why does the retentivity matter? I thought the issue was about this diagram and your contention that the soft iron piece became a monopole.

Became a Monopole after being removed from the Field??!!

Don't try to BS me. Don't try to get me upset...by being an "ASS" UMING BS I NEVER WROTE HERE!


I never wrote here we all could make permanent Monopole Magnets back and forth this way.


I know Monopoles by it self does not exist, it is not written on Ken's Theory...nor I never wrote such stupidity.

I wrote that whenever iron was under the influence of a magnetic field near a pole it will NOT create an opposite pole in between, and that was the end of it.


What happens after iron is removed from the magnetic field influence depends specifically to its retentivity..and that was NOT part of this test or discussion at any point.

The ideal iron for this testing should be one that does not retain magnetism. So when it is removed from magnetic field goes back to zero.

We all know that if you approach a magnet to a retentive piece of iron then remove it, it will develop the two poles after is off the field...but that was not the discussion here.

Then I see that 90 percent of your pictures are based on the iron being analyzed without the magnet present??

WTF are U doing?

Are you trying to demonstrate that Monopoles don't exist?....

BS Bistander...

[aljhoa]

Bistander.
I don't know why you have complicated so much this so simple tests!!

Compass has a red colored arrow end which is N seeking so is a S pole.
Therefore the white end of the compass needle is a N pole.
Compass needle colors and poles remain the same throughout the tests.
bi

Bi's compass has only N-poles.


Al

[bistander]

About the test

Bistander.

I don't know why you have complicated so much this so simple tests!!

First off, it seems your iron is retaining magnetism too much...NOT Good., so discard it and user one that does not retain enough for compass to even move when in front of it.

If Iron retains magnetism, when you flip it it will retain an opposite pole from previous facing opposite magnet pole...this throws off test.

And of course I MUST keep at least either Iron or Magnet FIXED during tests, otherwise they both will fly together!!


HERE IS A VERY SIMPLE TEST, WHERE MAGNET AND IRON ARE FIXED, YOU JUST MOVE COMPASS:

[IMG][/IMG]

, like supposedly happens in test at right, IF there would be an opposite pole on Iron, right next to Magnet's South Pole.

Compass behaves just like Test on Left, and depending on Iron size, and Magnet Strength needle could deflect more towards center space between both Iron and Magnet.

Keep it simple...and please, do not mark the iron...it confuses even more.


Cheers


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Bistander.

I don't know why you have complicated so much this so simple tests!!

First off, it seems your iron is retaining magnetism too much...NOT Good., so discard it and user one that does not retain enough for compass to even move when in front of it.

If Iron retains magnetism, when you flip it it will retain an opposite pole from previous facing opposite magnet pole...this throws off test.

And of course I MUST keep at least either Iron or Magnet FIXED during tests, otherwise they both will fly together!!


HERE IS A VERY SIMPLE TEST, WHERE MAGNET AND IRON ARE FIXED, YOU JUST MOVE COMPASS:

[IMG][/IMG]

, like supposedly happens in test at right, IF there would be an opposite pole on Iron, right next to Magnet's South Pole.

Compass behaves just like Test on Left, and depending on Iron size, and Magnet Strength needle could deflect more towards center space between both Iron and Magnet.

Keep it simple...and please, do not mark the iron...it confuses even more.


Cheers


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

[bistander]

Magnet Induction Test

Hi Ufo,

Here's my test from yesterday.

test 1: Red tape on magnet S pole. This does not change through test. Red tape on one end of iron bar. The red tape remains on this end of the bar throughout the tests however the N and S will change ends later. For now the magnet induces a field in the iron bar so that the red tape is on the S pole. Compass has a red colored arrow end which is N seeking so is a S pole. Therefore the white end of the compass needle is a N pole. Compass needle colors and poles remain the same throughout the tests.

Tests are conducted on a non magnetic table top in a East West orientation to minimize natural fields.



test 2: Compass re-positioned between magnet and iron bar. Red end of iron bar remains S pole.



test 4: Magnet is removed from test. Red end of iron bar remains S pole.



test 5: Magnet is returned to the test in opposite orientation from test 1. The induced field in the iron bar is now reversed and the red end is now a N pole. Magnet needle remains same color/polarity but the red arrow (S) now points towards the iron bar red end (N). The induction in the iron bar has reversed due to the magnet being reversed in orientation.



test 6: Magnet removed from test. Iron bar reverts back to previous polarity because it had been more strongly magnetized in that direction (it actually had touched the magnet in the previous orientation). The iron bar red end is S and attracts compass white (N) needle end.



To me, these test are consistent with domain and dipole theory. Magnets always have 2 poles which we call N and S.

In these tests I have a very strong permanent (N42) and the iron bar is a piece of 1/4 inch square key stock probably really cold rolled steel. The iron bar is easily magnetized by induction from the magnet and had medium residual or retentivity. The magnet's field is stronger than that which it can induce into the iron bar. And the field of the compass needle is weak but retentivity is high. It is not permanently affected by the fields from the magnet.

As Ufo posted his test I could not help but think: The compass needle is behaving the same as the iron piece except his iron piece is not allowed to rotate. But the induced field from the magnet and/or iron piece is inducing a field in and on the compass needle causing the compass needle dipole to rotate, the same as it would on any ferromagnetic piece in the field. He appears to attempt to use the very behavior which he is testing to disprove that behavior.

I'll believe the experts, text books and lessons from history that all magnets, PM, EM or induced, have 2 poles.

Thank you,

bi

[aljhoa]

Superfluid Interaction With
The Polarized Giant Plate
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4

A Frog in a Strong Magnetic Fields


Al

[MRIGuy]

Ah huh!! So the hypotrochoid pattern when looking down from either pole is the leaving centrifugal and returning centripetal magnetism! I understand exactly what that means now, thank you for the explanation!

Also, I see what your saying about like on like spin during dielectric avoidance, fascinating!

Below, would be the typical configuration used in vertical field MRI (ignoring those lines of force of coarse lol) with 2 "coliseums" of magnets used to shim the field, that's to the best of my knowledge as far as the permanent magnets go.



Regards,
Guy

[bistander]

You're kidding

Hi Ufo,

I was referring to electrical machinery like I said, which in context means electric to mechanical and mechanical to electric energy conversion devices. Devices having no moving parts don't qualify.

Regards,

bi

BTW, I conducted tests with magnet, iron bar and compass. I was able to get different results than you did. I need to sort out some photos and will post later.

[Ufopolitics]

Speaking of electrical machinery, there's no difference between motors and generators. Any motor can operate as a generator, and any generator can function as a motor, when properly excited.

Bistander,

I have to disagree on above statement.

It does not necessarily apply to "every generator" out there and "not yet out there"...

For example, Steven Marks TPU is a Solid State Generator...nothing moves...how could you make that into a motor by just "properly exciting it"?

And so on and on...like Dr Thomas Henry Moray's...etc,etc

Therefore, we can not consider such statement as unique and consistently true to every Machine out there.


Cheers


Ufopolitics