Motor Generator
Speaking of electrical machinery, there's no difference between motors and generators. Any motor can operate as a generator, and any generator can function as a motor, when properly excited.
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)
Collapse
X
-
Al,Originally posted by aljhoa View Post
I was referring basically to MAGNETISM...and from the specific part to Generators, not Motors.
Thanks
Ufopolitics
Leave a comment:
-
Faraday's Electromagnetic Rotation DeviceOriginally posted by Ufopolitics View PostIt ain't the Scientific Real Method to keep repeating what the Old School,
and Old Theories have thought all of Us...
and Obviously have absolutely NOT WORKED AT ALL.
FlipyFlux
Al
Leave a comment:
-
Thats it. Nothing is accomplished without experimentation. More focus on experimentation like Ufo does rather than just theories. One of the reasons I like Ufos work. My focus is on one experimental coil. I research anything that might apply to that coil. Ive been researching for about 6 years and am close to doing the experiments. When I get the models done Ill be passing it along to Ufo for his thoughts or experiments with it If he so desires.like it is coming directly from your own experiments.
To many backstabbers here wasting time with agitating demeaning rhetoric instead of trying to work on something.
Leave a comment:
-
Magnetic Domains...the Reality.
MAGNETIC DOMAINS, THE REALITY
[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVegpoWVB64&feature=youtu.be[/VIDEO]
Hello to All,
I really do not have the time to waste on this silly arguments based on so simple stuff you guys "see" or "hear" out there, then use it to "disagree" with me...like it is coming directly from your own experiments.
It ain't the Scientific Real Method to keep repeating what the Old School, and Old Theories have thought all of Us...and Obviously have absolutely NOT WORKED AT ALL.
The day you show me a TESLA Electric Vehicle that can travel from Florida to New York...without "Refueling" or "Recharging" its Batteries...
The Day You show me an Electric Generator Ran by an Electric Motor, effortlessly...
ONLY THEN, We will have the real truth.
ABOUT VIDEO ABOVE:
A very simple , one minute and 36 seconds of testing, with components that anyone here would have laying around... is ENOUGH to see that there is ABSOLUTELY NO OPPOSITE POLE between Iron and Magnetic Pole.
Simple Results that even a Retarded could notice...and I could have made this video much longer, showing Geometries, Spatial Lines, CAD's, etc...I do not consider that necessary...not here, where we supposedly have "L'Creme D' L'Creme...
IF THE COMPASS'S NEEDLE IS ABLE TO SEEK/AIM THROUGH THE IRON, EXACTLY TO THE CENTER POLE OF MAGNET, IN A VERY, STRAIGHT LINE ...JUST LIKE IF IRON WOULD NOT EXIST THERE AT ALL...THEN WE AIN'T GOT NO "OPPOSITE POLE" AT THE END OR ANYWHERE ON THAT PIECE OF IRON AT ALL.
IF WE WOULD HAVE A NORTH POLARITY AT THE END OR ANYWHERE ON IRON, WHEN WE APPROACH A SOUTH POLE FROM A MAGNET, THEN THE COMPASS NEEDLE WILL NEVER, EVER, WILL BE AIMING THAT STRAIGHT, SEEKING EVERYWHERE THAT MAGNET'S SOUTH POLE.
IF WE WOULD HAVE A SOUTH POLARITY AT THE END OR ANYWHERE ON IRON, WHEN WE APPROACH A NORTH POLE FROM A MAGNET, THEN THE COMPASS NEEDLE WILL NEVER, EVER, WILL BE AIMING THAT STRAIGHT, SEEKING EVERYWHERE THAT MAGNET'S NORTH POLE.
ANYONE KNOWS THAT WHENEVER A COMPASS IS APPROACHED TO A DUAL POLARITY OBJECT OR POLARIZED SPACE, IT WILL AUTOMATICALLY DEFLECT THAT NEEDLE TO A WEST OR EAST READING AND NEVER, EVER WILL POINT STRAIGHT TO JUST ONE "CHOSEN" POLE.
UfopoliticsLast edited by Ufopolitics; 05-07-2016, 01:50 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
This image of a toroidal magnetic field using ferrofluid is something. Reminds me of the Rodin coil.
Leave a comment:
-
Bistander,Originally posted by bistander View PostHi Ufo,
I'll elaborate on your recent post later, but for now, I just wanted to say that I posted that video to counter your claim that the iron filings or powder method of demonstrating the magnetic field was only 2 dimensional. It obviously works in 3d. At 29-30 seconds into the video, he turns it and you can see the end view.
More on this later. Regards,
bi
Based on "Probability and Statistics"...that 3D Model on Iron Filings...submerged in a liquid solution...is ONE in a Trillions of tests done for 200 plus years...based on a raw piece of paper on top of a field as a demonstrator.
Of course it will work on 3D, the point here is that it is not revealing the whole field structure...nor its vortexes.
Iron Filings just freezes over the field in 2D or in 3D...it don't matter.
UfopoliticsLast edited by Ufopolitics; 05-06-2016, 11:17 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
So simple and yet so difficult to accept!!
Originally posted by bistander View Post
Bistander,
I agree up to certain point with above image...
I agree that Iron is Highly Influenced by being near the presence of a magnetic field polarity.
I agree that it will get "induced" by that polarity influence.
Where I disagree is that it is NOT the Opposite Pole what gets induced to that near pole. But the same Pole it is near to.
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Magnetic Fields are "EXPANDABLE" into Ferromagnetic materials molecular structures.
How is that expandability taking place?
The Field Polarity tries to expand its spatial domains into that piece of iron.
If you let that piece of iron loose, it will try "self alignment" to the top of that pole, where the main Vortex of Forces are.
Expandability final action is to adhere that piece of iron exactly at the top end of nearest pole, physically.
That old explanation is just to justify the attraction taking place between iron-magnet.
However, it is VERY EASILY DEMONSTRATED it is completely WRONG.
Why don't you test it yourself Bistander?
All you need is a cheap compass...
You do it or I will do it in a video and post it here...then I hope this concludes all this argument to keep repeating over and over.
It is obvious you don't believe me...but I do not see yourself making a counter claim against mine, except to keep searching for old stuff to instruct little kits in elementary school and posting it here.
Be more yourself!
And please take it as a constructive criticism nothing more.
Cheers
UfopoliticsLast edited by Ufopolitics; 05-06-2016, 05:06 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
-
Iron Filings in 3d
Hi Ufo,
I'll elaborate on your recent post later, but for now, I just wanted to say that I posted that video to counter your claim that the iron filings or powder method of demonstrating the magnetic field was only 2 dimensional. It obviously works in 3d. At 29-30 seconds into the video, he turns it and you can see the end view.
More on this later. Regards,
bi
Leave a comment:
-
Bistander,Originally posted by bistander View Posthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8llkHQtaOlg
[VIDEO]youtube.com/watch?v=8llkHQtaOlg[/VIDEO]
Vectors are straight, but the field isn't. This video shows a nice 3d pattern of the iron filings aligning with the lines of flux in three dimensions.
Regards,
bi
About this Video above...
Take a look at the final still frame below (10 minutes later):
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Then compare it with the Sketch below, which I did a while back in this Post:
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Don't they look similar?
Cheers
Ufopolitics
Leave a comment:
-
Repeating Old Posts...
Bistander,Originally posted by bistander View PostHi Ufo,
The flux travels S to N in straighter lines inside the magnet. And is at maximum density (maximum field) in the middle of the magnet as shown here:
I think the iron filings give a good representation of the field. And outside the magnet it is curved and 3d.
Regards,
bi
On 12/18/2015 you and I had about the same argument...
Your old post Link
My Answer at that time
And my answer is exactly the same as I wrote then...
FEMM is completely based on Iron Filings Model, Software has been written in order to comply with such method.
Anyone who could write code, could also make a software which process all data according to Ken's Theory...
So what?...it don't mean absolutely nothing.
What I do really recommend, if you could, is to load all this Geometries into an animated CAD Software of easy Interface ( or you could start from scratch, from easy geometrical shapes)...and start playing with it, like I have done...It absolutely would be of very much help to understand the architecture of this Model.
Cheers
UfopoliticsLast edited by Ufopolitics; 05-06-2016, 12:43 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
Hello Guy,Originally posted by MRIGuy View PostBelow is a pic from an excel file I created to plot what I thought was the magnetic field in the center of a vertical field MRI. When we "shim" a magnet we add or remove magnets in attempt to achieve perfect homogeneity as in the pic below, where all points along the circles measure the same frequency. What's fascinating is this looks just line the Dielectric field from Ken's book. Essentially we have 2 magnets separated in attraction mode so the result would be the dielectric inertial plane spread out from top to bottom, Im guessing.
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Regards,
Guy
Yes, that is what is referred as a Voidance Approach (Attraction)
I have done a very short video to show as well the two spirals spinning at same direction from both interacting and opposite polarizations:
[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Czbn55UnER0[/VIDEO]
ATTRACTING MAGNETS (SHORT VIDEO)
And below is the last frame (without text)
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Also have to realize that this Spiral on each pole are just a visualization from the Total Sum of all single events from Centrifugal forces.
This Two spins of high pressure generates right at the center gap, an Accretion Disk...as a spatial counterspace where the interlacing from all pressure levels start discharging to.
As we approach the two magnets, this center spatial counterspace field gains inertia, as each magnet's dielectric field starts approaching center space of interaction (loosing inertia) until it becomes one single Dielectric Field, when the two magnets are making contact (end of interaction) then we have a single, stronger magnet as a result.
In your example of the MRI, the two magnets never meet, separated by an air gap, just like in the Stator from a Motor...so all the Spatial Parameters remains the same.
Regards
UfopoliticsLast edited by Ufopolitics; 05-06-2016, 12:06 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
magnetic field
Hi Ufo,
The flux travels S to N in straighter lines inside the magnet. And is at maximum density (maximum field) in the middle of the magnet as shown here:
I think the iron filings give a good representation of the field. And outside the magnet it is curved and 3d.
Regards,
bi
Leave a comment:
-
Originally posted by bistander View Posthttps://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8llkHQtaOlg
[VIDEO]youtube.com/watch?v=8llkHQtaOlg[/VIDEO]
Vectors are straight, but the field isn't. This video shows a nice 3d pattern of the iron filings aligning with the lines of flux in three dimensions.
Regards,
bi
Hello Bistander,
I have seen that video, a nice one indeed!
Of course the Field isn't straight!!...I never said it is straight...it is All Curves, Spatial Curves.
Notice how I wrote "somehow" and "some kind" of a straight fashion...just because they are not.The Iron Filings Model somehow rendered those Lines of Force in some kind of a "straight fashion"
However, this 3D Method in water is not showing clearly the outer lines (High Pressure Lines) traveling from N<>S...Instead it is showing clearly a blank "space" or a "Gap" between both poles right at magnet's center, where it seems iron is not compacting as much...what was that now?...
Related to "more straight lines" they could be better observed when you set two magnets in attraction separated by a spatial gap.
[IMG]
[/IMG]
Regards
UfopoliticsLast edited by Ufopolitics; 05-05-2016, 04:04 AM.
Leave a comment:

Leave a comment: