Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Originally posted by dyetalon View Post
    Wow. Its been over 3 years since I posted here.
    The cell has a new name and many more people all over the world are experiencing the 3-d imagery of magnetism these little particles provide.
    I'm grateful to many of you folks out there who have not only given me credit for this lens, spent time and money trying it out for themselves and last but not least: re-created my work on their own! That is fantastic!!!!!

    Too bad it took 13 years.

    So, what's all this talk about NEW magnetism?
    If you are referring to Ken's writings, remember he has brought concepts and theories made by scientists and discoverers from the PAST. He just 'coordinated' their work the best he could.
    That makes it OLD magnetism.
    So, it's just magnetism. There are more theories going around than STD's!

    I'd like to see any other forum members complete such a comprehensive and well illustrated piece of work on their own. Geeze, give the guy a break. It took a lot of effort and research to pull that one off.

    Discussions do turn into heated arguments. That's one of the reasons I got away from forums (that and being banned from a few).

    And what you see in the Ferrocell is still up for debate.
    13 years later, many scientists around the world are doing independent experiments in their labs using my cells.
    I have my own theories, and that's what you read on my website. So far, no one from the scientific community has challenged my hypothesis'.
    No one but Markoul
    Because of his disagreement, I've decided to take another shot at identifying the 'ring of light' we see thru the cell.

    Its good to be back here. I have no idea how long it will take me to back-track this topic, but I've reached a stopping point for a couple of days @ Ferocell and in my life (so far).
    Always a pleasure and great to see you around again Timm!!

    Please enjoy your stay here for as long as you like!


    Kind regards


    Ufopolitics

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Originally posted by bistander View Post
    So, Ufo, tell me.

    How does a line on a plane contain information about all other lines on the plane?

    How does a plane in a volume contain information about other planes in the volume?

    No light, no magnetics, just geometry.

    Thanks,

    bi
    Bistander,

    In order to properly answer your two questions above, which, relates -I assume- to Ferrocell, which is the topic under discussion now....

    Originally posted by bistander View Post
    How does a line on a plane contain information about all other lines on the plane?
    In Geometry, "a line" does not "contains info" about 'other lines' in that same plane..it is a non sense question.

    Closest answer to your question is an INTERSECTION between Two Lines within a plane...However, that is NOT "information" about either lines.

    A Line STICKS OUT from the rest of lines by its COLOR, SHADES and SIZE.

    Now, in OPTICS, there are REFLECTIONS, REFRACTIONS and BACKGROUND SHADOWS which DEFINE LINES on a PLANE.

    In OPTICS, a LINE is made from a STRAIGHT ALIGNMENT OF POINTS...

    In Geometry, a LINE could be made from just TWO POINTS in a PLANE.

    Originally posted by bistander View Post
    How does a plane in a volume contain information about other planes in the volume?
    First off, a PLANE does NOT necessarily need to be a FLAT, 2D PLANE...A PLANE COULD BE, EXIST ALSO IN 3 DIMENSIONS.

    Same as previous question...no "information" is "stored" from either one.

    Only when we go into OPTICS PLUS GEOMETRY then REFLECTIONS render "information" about an object's positioning FROM 3D TO 2D Space.

    An Imaging Sensor from a Digital Cam, makes a 2D REFLECTION from the 3D WINDOW, OPENED through the LENS and SHUTTER MEANS.

    Ferrocell CAPTURES exactly the same way, a 2D REFLECTION from a 3D Magnetic Field, except no shutter is required...only to illuminate Field so Ferrocell can define -FOR OUR VIEWING- dark from light to render an image.

    In Photography, if we have a completely dark room, no lights, no "Flash"...and we take a pic...absolutely NADA will come up on image...but BLACK OUT.

    Ferrocell needs light on the Field in order that WE CAN SEE FIELD...However, Ferrocell can "see" field without any light on Field.

    This is all that simple to understand...


    Ufopolitics
    Last edited by Ufopolitics; 05-14-2018, 01:16 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Markoul
    replied
    Master Timm it's good to have you back here!!

    Welcome

    Leave a comment:


  • dyetalon
    replied
    new magnetism/old magnetism/magnetism

    Wow. Its been over 3 years since I posted here.
    The cell has a new name and many more people all over the world are experiencing the 3-d imagery of magnetism these little particles provide.
    I'm grateful to many of you folks out there who have not only given me credit for this lens, spent time and money trying it out for themselves and last but not least: re-created my work on their own! That is fantastic!!!!!

    Too bad it took 13 years.

    So, what's all this talk about NEW magnetism?
    If you are referring to Ken's writings, remember he has brought concepts and theories made by scientists and discoverers from the PAST. He just 'coordinated' their work the best he could.
    That makes it OLD magnetism.
    So, it's just magnetism. There are more theories going around than STD's!

    I'd like to see any other forum members complete such a comprehensive and well illustrated piece of work on their own. Geeze, give the guy a break. It took a lot of effort and research to pull that one off.

    Discussions do turn into heated arguments. That's one of the reasons I got away from forums (that and being banned from a few).

    And what you see in the Ferrocell is still up for debate.
    13 years later, many scientists around the world are doing independent experiments in their labs using my cells.
    I have my own theories, and that's what you read on my website. So far, no one from the scientific community has challenged my hypothesis'.
    No one but Markoul
    Because of his disagreement, I've decided to take another shot at identifying the 'ring of light' we see thru the cell.

    Its good to be back here. I have no idea how long it will take me to back-track this topic, but I've reached a stopping point for a couple of days @ Ferocell and in my life (so far).

    Leave a comment:


  • bistander
    replied
    I know 3-d

    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    Hello Bistander,

    It "was" a good and quiet Sunday evening!!...

    Just kidding...



    Wrong conception...

    Magnetic Field is invisible to our eyes, BUT NOT to the Ferrocell.

    Ferrocell "sees" the whole 3D Field Volume, and I mean the whole thing...even the further layers...then print its view into a 2D Image.

    Ferrocell is sensitive to Magnetic Field, it reacts and realigns according to the magnetic Field positioning based on its Viewing Capturing Angle.




    Bistander, if my analogy of "wireframe" was bad...your "Transparent Pages Book" is even worst.

    First off...a book is a reading object, always based on 2D Text and Images.

    A 3D Wireframe is much closer to a 3D Field.

    But I agree that the wireframe is not that good of an explanation to understand how Ferrocell works...so here is another analogy, which I have mentioned before...

    PHOTOGRAPHY AND LIGHT SENSITIVE CAPTURING DEVICES

    The sensitive film captures a 3D Image of reality through the camera lens and then takes it into a 3D Flat Print.

    On a Photograph you can clearly see/define in depth images which are further away from first plane images.

    If you set your lens adjustment to "infinite" capturing, then ALL objects will appear "in focus", no matter how far away from the camera they are.

    However, if you adjust lens to Focus on first planes only...then all far away objects would appear blurred or "out of focus"...and there would be a point, where the furthest objects would just appear as "blemishes, or spots" which contour lines are not defined, but faded away.

    Ferrocell does exactly this second adjustment, where only immediate second planes would be "in focus" while the furthest away would be blurred out and darker, because of the reach of light as well.

    And so even a best analogy would be the "Imaging Sensor" from a Digital Camera...
    ...

    Only thing...is that above sensor is only sensitive to light...and Ferrocell is only sensitive to Magnetic Fields.




    How could you be so sure...that we are wrong and you are right?

    What or Who gave you such info?

    Your lack to interpret Magnetic Fields True 3D Imaging...simply relies in your very low knowledge about Spatial Geometry plus Imaging Perspective Basics and Fundamentals Interpretation...mixed up with a very low capacity to build in your mind 3D Models, before taking them into prints, 3D CAD's...or paintings.

    And just because you have a very low perception about 3D Volumes Interpretation...does not grants you the right to deny others who can clearly do, plus show others how to understand it.

    First Career I took when I was a kid...was Architecture...and it does helps a lot for this job.


    Regards


    Ufopolitics
    So, Ufo, tell me.

    How does a line on a plane contain information about all other lines on the plane?

    How does a plane in a volume contain information about other planes in the volume?

    No light, no magnetics, just geometry.

    Thanks,

    bi

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Originally posted by bistander View Post
    Hi Ufo,
    Hello Bistander,

    It "was" a good and quiet Sunday evening!!...

    Just kidding...

    Originally posted by bistander View Post
    Big difference on that wire frame analogy. The wires are visible. The magnetic field is not. So how do the invisible magnetic field layers or levels not in contact with the ferrolens become visible?
    Wrong conception...

    Magnetic Field is invisible to our eyes, BUT NOT to the Ferrocell.

    Ferrocell "sees" the whole 3D Field Volume, and I mean the whole thing...even the further layers...then print its view into a 2D Image.

    Ferrocell is sensitive to Magnetic Field, it reacts and realigns according to the magnetic Field positioning based on its Viewing Capturing Angle.


    Originally posted by bistander View Post
    It is like a book where the ferrocell is page one. It has information (words, diagrams, etc) printed on it and that information is visible to the reader. Page two is hidden (assume single sided printing) since the paper is opaque. Now make the pages from transparent film. So the information on page two can be seen through page one, or page one appears overlaid on page two. Now do the same with pages 3, 4, and the rest; print the information of each page on transparent film. So when the reader opens the book cover, he sees all the information, layer on layer, all at once.

    This is how I perceive your explanation. Like the book printed on transparent film pages. But the big problem is that with the ferrocell, only page one has visible printing. Pages 2, 3, 4 and the rest use invisible ink. With the ferrocell, the only layer of the invisible magnetic field which imparts any information to the ferrocell is the layer in contact with the ferrocell. All other layers or levels of the magnetic field are invisible and cannot possibly be represented by images on or projected by the ferrocell.
    Bistander, if my analogy of "wireframe" was bad...your "Transparent Pages Book" is even worst.

    First off...a book is a reading object, always based on 2D Text and Images.

    A 3D Wireframe is much closer to a 3D Field.

    But I agree that the wireframe is not that good of an explanation to understand how Ferrocell works...so here is another analogy, which I have mentioned before...

    PHOTOGRAPHY AND LIGHT SENSITIVE CAPTURING DEVICES

    The sensitive film captures a 3D Image of reality through the camera lens and then takes it into a 3D Flat Print.

    On a Photograph you can clearly see/define in depth images which are further away from first plane images.

    If you set your lens adjustment to "infinite" capturing, then ALL objects will appear "in focus", no matter how far away from the camera they are.

    However, if you adjust lens to Focus on first planes only...then all far away objects would appear blurred or "out of focus"...and there would be a point, where the furthest objects would just appear as "blemishes, or spots" which contour lines are not defined, but faded away.

    Ferrocell does exactly this second adjustment, where only immediate second planes would be "in focus" while the furthest away would be blurred out and darker, because of the reach of light as well.

    And so even a best analogy would be the "Imaging Sensor" from a Digital Camera...



    Only thing...is that above sensor is only sensitive to light...and Ferrocell is only sensitive to Magnetic Fields.


    Originally posted by bistander View Post
    The story you and EM give about layers and levels of the 3-D magnetic field bring projected in, or on, or by the 2-D ferrocell is false. It is your imagination or optical illusion.

    Regards,

    bi
    How could you be so sure...that we are wrong and you are right?

    What or Who gave you such info?

    Your lack to interpret Magnetic Fields True 3D Imaging...simply relies in your very low knowledge about Spatial Geometry plus Imaging Perspective Basics and Fundamentals Interpretation...mixed up with a very low capacity to build in your mind 3D Models, before taking them into prints, 3D CAD's...or paintings.

    And just because you have a very low perception about 3D Volumes Interpretation...does not grants you the right to deny others who can clearly do, plus show others how to understand it.

    First Career I took when I was a kid...was Architecture...and it does helps a lot for this job.


    Regards


    Ufopolitics
    Last edited by Ufopolitics; 05-13-2018, 11:26 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Originally posted by Markoul View Post
    ...

    That's not fear!

    Where are you?

    I came for my daily debate!...

    kou kou!!

    You must have run out of arguments!!? he!...

    bye

    EM
    Markoul,

    Why did you do that!!!???

    I was having a very quiet Sunday evening!!....till now...

    See, now you waked up Bistander!!


    hahahahahahaha


    But is ok...am going there, now


    Regards


    Ufopolitics

    Leave a comment:


  • bistander
    replied
    2d 3d

    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    Hello,

    Ferrocells show a 2D Image which is from a 3D Field, this results that all different depth levels of lines seems like they "cross over" with each others.



    Like Markoul wrote SEVERAL TIMES HERE before, 3D Field Layers OVERLAP in 2D.

    Any WIRE FRAME IMAGE of any volume, when reflected in a mirror, shows like all wires are "overlapping".
    ...
    Hi Ufo,

    Big difference on that wire frame analogy. The wires are visible. The magnetic field is not. So how do the invisible magnetic field layers or levels not in contact with the ferrolens become visible?

    It is like a book where the ferrocell is page one. It has information (words, diagrams, etc) printed on it and that information is visible to the reader. Page two is hidden (assume single sided printing) since the paper is opaque. Now make the pages from transparent film. So the information on page two can be seen through page one, or page one appears overlaid on page two. Now do the same with pages 3, 4, and the rest; print the information of each page on transparent film. So when the reader opens the book cover, he sees all the information, layer on layer, all at once.

    This is how I perceive your explanation. Like the book printed on transparent film pages. But the big problem is that with the ferrocell, only page one has visible printing. Pages 2, 3, 4 and the rest use invisible ink. With the ferrocell, the only layer of the invisible magnetic field which imparts any information to the ferrocell is the layer in contact with the ferrocell. All other layers or levels of the magnetic field are invisible and cannot possibly be represented by images on or projected by the ferrocell.

    The story you and EM give about layers and levels of the 3-D magnetic field bring projected in, or on, or by the 2-D ferrocell is false. It is your imagination or optical illusion.

    Regards,

    bi

    Leave a comment:


  • Markoul
    replied
    Hello! Anybody Here?...

    ...

    That's not fair!

    Where are you?

    I came for my daily debate!...

    kou kou!!

    You must have run out of arguments!!? he!...

    bye

    EM
    Last edited by Markoul; 05-14-2018, 12:10 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Iamnuts
    replied
    You can see how well it works at polarisation if you look at Timms video
    using a laser, beams shoot out from either side.

    Leave a comment:


  • Iamnuts
    replied
    Right, how can you make a magnetic polariser if your lines twist.
    Perhaps a bit of fuzz round a rod aerial might help?
    Hahaha!

    Leave a comment:


  • Markoul
    replied
    Only thing is...some "minds" can not do this Operations because they will overheat...and may blow main fuses...

    ahahahahahahahaha...hahahahahahahaha...hahahahhehe heheahahahah! aaaahh

    Leave a comment:


  • Iamnuts
    replied
    Screenshot_2018-05-11-11-59-48.png
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:


  • Iamnuts
    replied
    Do you agree that really the tiny particles would line up with the field
    if they could.

    Leave a comment:


  • Iamnuts
    replied
    Screenshot_2018-05-11-11-59-48.png
    Attached Files

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X