ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[ldrancer]

It can be expected that graphic representation is difficult at present level.

This is not a surprise when you try to draw a concept on paper. Oh man i could burn yuo guys, all day with this.

Thats what the black hole guys say, too.

You guys stop, your just drawing these, weird pictures to ooh and aw people, to trick them into your little scam.

Let's see here have I any thing else to say. .. hmm.

See if your trying to .. lets do this, you need objects to do a test with. your trying to prove a concept, with no objects in it. And you'd stop if you realize your not even trying to show howwwwwww a magnet works, which you guys dont know.

so your not testing anythign at all whatever, none. zero. Your trying to prove a concept, a vortex, with Nothing. There is nothign to test. You;ve seen nothing done nothing and you guys PUSH the black hole crap more than ANythign else that you do. This topic should be shut down talking about ****ing vortexes. Your wrong and you guys are stupid. Espeically Wheeler.

Vortex, fake. Anything related to a vortex, not a funnel, is fake. Fake vortex hard drives- Fake vortex grass cuttting fueling with burned grass vortex- both of these, where spewed with this idea, of a magnet works with a vortex by Wheeler.

You guys are fooled by that idiot. I could care less about how many books he writes, i was a kid once and had a crt and a magnet. OOh ahhh. Ive done all that. really you could of not made teh book.

Really where is this you guys think vortexes are real coming from? see i just proved everythign you've hyeard about them are fake. there is nothign real about a vortex. you cant even see it. ive never believed in them. bye.

[Ufopolitics]

Thanks Ufo,



Here is the shape, what I called rectangular, off the K & J web site. And the iron vice was 3 or 4 inches below the magnets. Basically I saw no difference in the pattern when holding the magnets and when the separater was clamped in the vice. I just needed my hands to snap the photo.

Thanks,

Did you watch the video I posted?, did it helped?

Do you have any other type where the Dielectric Plane is located in a wider area?...like I showed the cylinders at equator for example.

I suspected unequal strengths on the magnets. Also the radius corners and coating on the magnets, as well as the lighting and camera angle all affect the patterns on the viewing film. It is not easy to get clear repeatable results.

bi

Through the Lens. (The more sensitive the darker the amber color in lens).

It is tricky to do this in the beginning...but once you get it right, then it is just a matter of clicking and done deal.


Cheers



Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Magnet Tests

Thanks Ufo,



Here is the shape, what I called rectangular, off the K & J web site. And the iron vice was 3 or 4 inches below the magnets. Basically I saw no difference in the pattern when holding the magnets and when the separater was clamped in the vice. I just needed my hands to snap the photo.

I suspected unequal strengths on the magnets. Also the radius corners and coating on the magnets, as well as the lighting and camera angle all affect the patterns on the viewing film. It is not easy to get clear repeatable results.

bi

[Ufopolitics]

Some Dielectric Testing Video

Ok, here is a quick video I put together for you...about Dielectric Displacement.

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wu2256XN_ig&feature=youtu.be[/VIDEO]

VIEW FILM DIELECTRIC DISPLACEMENT



This video is set as Unlisted, so it will not appear at YT Chanel.


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,

Here are some photos of my tests. I am no photographer.



Magnets separated by .25 inch fiberglass sheet.



Magnets separated by .015 inch Nomex paper.



No separation between magnets.

Viewing film and magnets bought from K & J Magnetics. Magnets are coated N-42 rectangular magnetization axis thru the thickness (shortest dimension).

bi

[bistander]

Magnet Tests

Nice post Ufo, thanks. I used Nd magnets. Maybe I can get pictures later today and post them.

bi

Hi Ufo,

Here are some photos of my tests. I am no photographer.



Magnets separated by .25 inch fiberglass sheet.



Magnets separated by .015 inch Nomex paper.



No separation between magnets.

Viewing film and magnets bought from K & J Magnetics. Magnets are coated N-42 rectangular magnetization axis thru the thickness (shortest dimension).

bi

[mikrovolt]

It can be expected that graphic representation is difficult at present level.
It is good to try to isolate a basic magnet in an unmolested state.
The most basic form always having the same charecteristics can serve as an anchor.
We can also try to follow along with electromagnetic space weather.
The models are natural, The integration of concepts. Seeing simularities.
The filamentous tentacles nature of the magnetosphere.

The coronal mass being one entity and the magneto sphere is another.
The approach also trys to isolate the two entities. Even artifacts having both.
So the question: What impact does one have on the other ?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uc8K5n1PjQU

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b5ooqQjE1ro

[Ufopolitics]

I find this video https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5GY...&nohtml5=False from this new thread from this forum (http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...tex-motor.html) quite useful to the discussion.

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=s5GY2PXd4dc&nohtml5=False[/VIDEO]

UFO don't you think ?

[bistander]

Magnet test

Nice post Ufo, thanks. I used Nd magnets. Maybe I can get pictures later today and post them.

bi

[Ufopolitics]

You did all tests wrong then...

Hi Ufo,

A short while ago I replicated this using magnetic viewing film and bar magnets. The magnets were identical. I was able to get results looking like lines 1 and 2 in your diagrams. The lines you drew in yellowish green appear as light lines on the viewing film right over the center of each magnet and centered between the two magnets as shown in the center frame of your last posted image. However I could not get these center lines to move off of magnet mid-point no matter how close together I brought the magnets, even touching. In other words, I was unable to replicate lines 3 & 4 in your diagrams.

This was repeated numerous times using two different sets of bar magnets. I haven't seen you do the actual experiment. Perhaps you could do it when you get a chance.

Regards,

bi

Bistander,

This Tests has been seeing/done from many different other people/sources including Ken's Book...and His Thread...

However, now you are attempting and it happens it don't work (for you)...

So, first, let me say that Magnets MUST BE BALANCED as strength, even being identical, and normally ceramics are lousy magnets to do this kind of specific testing since they are not as compact in magnetic strength as Neo's are.

But, no matter what, here I did a sequence on the same cheap, Unbalanced Radio Shack old Ceramic rectangle cubes:

1-TWO MAGNETS TOGETHER (TOUCHING EACH OTHERS) RENDER A SOLID, SINGLE DIELECTRIC BETWEEN BOTH (NO MORE SEPARATED DIELECTRIC PLANE FOR EACH)

[IMG][/IMG]

2-A SMALLER GAP...YOU COULD SEE CLEARLY HOW DIELECTRIC FIELD ON RIGHT STARTS SEPARATING)

[IMG][/IMG]

3-A WIDER GAP THAN #2..

[IMG][/IMG]

4- A LARGER GAP THAN #3..

[IMG][/IMG]

5- A LARGER GAP THAN #4...

[IMG][/IMG]


This tests must be done precisely, gaps could be measured separators, or non magnetic bolts/nuts with a flat surface adaptors, etc,etc...
Some magnets when they are not IDENTICAL in strength, the stronger one would be the one which dielectric move less (prevailing one) than weaker one.

Obviously on Tests above, Right Magnet is stronger than Left one.



Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Replication

The CAD below show the magnetic steps involved in an Attraction:

[IMG][/IMG]

The Image above is a Link to my Photobucket Acct, there it could be zoomed and scrolled for better viewing of each step.

A Brief description:

LINE 1 IMAGES - Two Magnets approach from South>><<North

LINE 2 IMAGE- At certain distance which depends upon magnet strength, size, or spec's in general as composition etc,this stage could develop at longer or shorter distance.
What develops here:

PRIMARILY TAKES PLACE THE HIGH PRESSURE EXCHANGE BETWEEN CLOSER POLES OF THE TWO MAGNETS:

A) Left Magnet South HP Vortex starts connecting with Right Magnet HP South Gate (at center of North Pole)

B) Right Magnet North HP Vortex also connects with Left Magnet HP North Gate (at center of South Pole)

The way this takes place is by a Common Center Spiral exactly at the mid space between both magnets faces, this dual vortexes spinning at the same direction create a Higher Counterspace Accretion Disc.

SECOND, IMMEDIATE MID PRESSURES FROM BOTH MAGNETS STARTS CONNECTING ALSO TO THE NEW HP GATES LINKS EXCHANGE

A) Left Magnet South MP Vortex brakes connection with magnet center accretion disc to start entering Right Magnet Higher Pressure Gate.

B) Right Magnet North MP Vortex does exactly same process as above...

I represented the old MP connections in faded colors red and blue.

THIRD, FURTHER MP STARTS CONNECTING TO NEW FORMED CENTERED ACCRETION DISC

A) Left Magnet North MP Links with Center Spatial Accretion Disc.

B) Right Magnet South MP also links to new formed Center Spatial Disc.

This two latest MP connections assists HP Attraction Forces as each magnets center accretion counterspace disc starts approaching Main Center Spatial Disc from both ends and reducing immediate MP Vortexes into "voidance".

LINE 3 (THIRD IMAGE) is a closer approach not making physical contact yet, small gap still, to notice the shrinking of Inner MP Vortexes as both dielectric fields from each magnet get closer to Main Center one.

In 3D this connections looks like two spheres shrinking.

The old method with loose Iron dust model can not define but one single sphere forming between both magnets, however, color CRT Imaging , Viewing Film and Ferrocell Lens depicts this center separation/compression of the two spheres perfectly well.

LINE 4 (FINAL IMAGE) is the full new magnet formed, it has added the strength from both, and the original structure as a single magnet is finished.

You know All this steps takes only fractions of seconds.

This process is completely reversible, meaning, as we brake both magnets apart, the whole process will be reversed also in fractions of seconds.

There are two ways to visualize this interaction...one expensive method and another one cheaper.

HD Cam on tripod filming in slow motion, while magnets run inside a clear plastic tubing...

Or cheaper, get two identical magnets with holes running from pole to pole...and using fine long brass or 100% stainless bolt & nuts to separate air gaps while taking pics...then screwing them together in steps...

CRT SCREENING:

[IMG][/IMG]

MIXED UP VIEW FILM AND CRT:

[IMG][/IMG]


Regards


Ufopolitics

Hi Ufo,

A short while ago I replicated this using magnetic viewing film and bar magnets. The magnets were identical. I was able to get results looking like lines 1 and 2 in your diagrams. The lines you drew in yellowish green appear as light lines on the viewing film right over the center of each magnet and centered between the two magnets as shown in the center frame of your last posted image. However I could not get these center lines to move off of magnet mid-point no matter how close together I brought the magnets, even touching. In other words, I was unable to replicate lines 3 & 4 in your diagrams.

This was repeated numerous times using two different sets of bar magnets. I haven't seen you do the actual experiment. Perhaps you could do it when you get a chance.

Regards,

bi

[bistander]

Magnetic flux is not flow

Red and Blue lines represent the two different polarized fields...North is Blue, Red is South.

Flux Meaning (Physics):


The rate of flow of a fluid, radiant energy, or particles across a given area.
synonyms: continuous change, changeability, variability, inconstancy, fluidity, instability, unsteadiness, fluctuation, variation, shift, movement, oscillation, alternation, rise and fall, seesawing, yo-yoing
"the flux of vapor in the tube"

antonyms: stability

the amount of radiation or number of particles incident on an area in a given time.
the total electric or magnetic field passing through a surface.

a substance mixed with a solid to lower its melting point, used especially in soldering and brazing metals or to promote vitrification in glass or ceramics.

a substance added to a furnace during metal smelting or glass making that combines with impurities to form slag.I really get goose bumps whenever any of you guys start using old terms as baptized in the Classic Physics...lol

According to above definition, the basic Flux Meaning bolts down to Flow

No, magnetic flux means this:

the total electric or magnetic field passing through a surface.

That is right out of the definition which you quoted. Magnetic flux is not flow.

bi

[ldrancer]

hey bromikey this is your zionist antiwhite hate comment here, https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3_deFJD2hNI
your the kind of guy who would never state somethign by yourself and only mob attack like those punks in that video did. you are a zionist i can see your comments on that video bro mikey.

but anyway ill never step into a temple, a building you worship.

[aljhoa]

how is that, Professor Eric Laithwaite gives a demonstration of a large gyro wheel , a magnet?

"two magnets on a tread"

"vortex on a tread"


Al

[ldrancer]

https://<span style="font-size:20px"... tread"</span>


Al

how is that, Professor Eric Laithwaite gives a demonstration of a large gyro wheel , a magnet?