ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Ufopolitics]

Are those Idrancer hands??

That's the reason why he can't build sh**t...

[ldrancer]

why dont you guys stop repeating your bull****

[ldrancer]

[SIZE="3"]No he didn't watch the video, he, she or it, better
known as he-zhit

instead of you and your goons ad hominem attackig me try replying and challenging any of the many ways you're debunked.

you cant explain a magnet with a vortex.

the magnet is doing the work, not you guys

so conversation about concepts is over. until you prove a voirtex, youve not explained a magnet, and this topic is a bad topic. the more you think and try to get everyone else to think stuff withotu any evidence, the bigger religious fanatic you are.

**** you zionist

[Ufopolitics]

Ugly, ugly...hands rule?

You can do that.



I prefer the other hand.



Actually I do use my right hand for current and flux and visualize the fields from there for force, motion, etc.

bi

Geeez, those are really ugly hands Bistander!!

What is that called? The Ugly Hand Rules?

Kids learning with those hands diagrams for sure will have lifetime trauma...






Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Hand Rules

Let me guess...here in order to determine F Direction...we must use Flemming's Left Hand Rule right?

You can do that.



I prefer the other hand.



Actually I do use my right hand for current and flux and visualize the fields from there for force, motion, etc.

bi

[Ufopolitics]

So what? The magnetic field is just an interim step, or conversion, in our ultimate electromechanical energy conversion machinery (motors and generators). bi

Your limitation by understanding Magnetic Fields based only on the iron chained model... restricts your views and the real possibilities of an "unchained" Magnetic Field ...to the point of underestimating it big time.

But, let's leave it here for now, not complicating into heavy machinery exchange and so on and better concentrate on what we are not seeing in a Single Magnetic Field...


Better that way


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

B field is vertical. Your "disk" is liquid. The result is a force, F, as seen in Fig. 1, rotating the liquid disk around the shaft.

I left the link in native language.

bi

This is a perfect example of how we could just be so conformed (abide, obey) to such "solution" to A very clever Problem...


The Fleming Right and Left Rules...are just a REFERENCE METHOD to obtain results on one variable, knowing the other two...

But it completely lacks to give us THE REAL EXPLANATION as to WHY this takes place like it does.

And here is when no one could be able to explain the reason why of these Three Dimensional exchange of forces based on the three axis or three fingers.

I guess it would be a point where this 3 fingers/axis will not be even "applicable"...then what do we do?


This example above is just one way of many we have been "moving ahead" in evolution, thinking we did find the answer through a Reference Method, a "Patch"...but not having the right and real explanation(s).


Getting back to your example...yes, that could be a possibilityMaybe the ONLY REAL EXPLANATION...would be that the B Field is nothing more than the center Bisector of a Spiral Vortex of Force my friend.


Cheers


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

And so we have been using maybe only around 20% from Magnetic Fields full capacity, due to this wrong Iron Chained Model.

So what? The magnetic field is just an interim step, or conversion, in our ultimate electromechanical energy conversion machinery (motors and generators). And the electric to mechanical and mechanical to electric machine conversions are very efficient; on the order of 95 to 98% for higher power levels. I do not understand why you compare that to 20% fuel burners.

If you cut the losses in half for a 96% efficient 100kW electric generator, you save 2.08kW. If you cut the losses in half for a 20% 100kW gas engine, you save 200kW. You want to improve the energy consumption, maybe you should look at the real waste, not the electric machinery.

bi

[Ufopolitics]

The wrong Model

I guess it is hard for me to understand how something (our existing model) you say is "wrong" has worked so well and been so useful to mankind for the past couple of centuries. I am not saying that existing model is 100% complete and accurate, but it is far from being proven wrong and it is the most useful tool we have for this field of science and engineering at the moment. May there be more to it? Hidden surprises which enable better understanding, use and machines? I hope so. But I do not see anything which proves existing theory wrong.

As always, you're entitled to your opinion; I'm entitled to my opinion. No need for name calling. Just proceed with your proof. Thank you.

bi

It is exactly that way...Like you've said...it is not 100% complete and accurate.

The existing Iron Chained Model does give us an Outer Look of the Magnetic Field...but lacks to:

1-Show Field Vortex dynamics.
2-Show Field inner components.

There are more...but let's see just these two for now.

Out of those two "hidden and locked by iron" properties of magnetic fields...I will affirm that the worst one to be ignored is number one...the Spiraling/Vortex Properties.

The Magnetic Field could have been much more useful to mankind...than just the use we have been giving...due to this chained model as a guideline.

I could also say that the Gas and Diesel Engines have been very useful to mankind right?...They have transported mankind all over the planet...given us all kind of motoring power, tooling, home, industry...etc,etc

However, the Internal Combustion Engines are about 20-40% efficient?(Gas is 20%, Diesel is about 40%)

Most internal combustion engines are incredibly inefficient at turning fuel burned into usable energy. The efficiency by which they do so is measured in terms of "thermal efficiency", and most gasoline combustion engines average around 20 percent thermal efficiency.Apr 14, 2014

For God sake!...that is a very low efficiency!!

So, in conclusion...we have been running all this time...on a 20% efficient ICE...

And so we have been using maybe only around 20% from Magnetic Fields full capacity, due to this wrong Iron Chained Model.

Of course I do have them...I said it before.

[bistander]

Existing model is not wrong

[IMG][/IMG]

Is it that hard to understand?

I guess it is hard for me to understand how something (our existing model) you say is "wrong" has worked so well and been so useful to mankind for the past couple of centuries. I am not saying that existing model is 100% complete and accurate, but it is far from being proven wrong and it is the most useful tool we have for this field of science and engineering at the moment. May there be more to it? Hidden surprises which enable better understanding, use and machines? I hope so. But I do not see anything which proves existing theory wrong.

As always, you're entitled to your opinion; I'm entitled to my opinion. No need for name calling. Just proceed with your proof. Thank you.

bi

[bistander]

Earth's magnetic field

The field lines defining the structure of the magnetic field are similar to those of a simple bar magnet, as illustrated in the following figure.

Hi al,

Yes, I've seen the bar magnet-Earth example many times.

[
Its rotation winds up the magnetic field into a large rotating spiral, known as the Parker spiral, named after the scientist who first described it.


Al

This applies to the Sun with its Solar wind. I do not think it applies to the Earth's magnetic field. However the Earth's magnetic field is distorted by the Solar wind, obviously.

Thanks,

bi

[Ufopolitics]

A 200 + Years Arrest...

[IMG][/IMG]

Imagine an invisible Swiss watch, the finest ever built...a perfect machine, accurate movements, lot of components constantly moving...However, by being invisible, we could only feel it to the touch...but we can not see it...

So, some bright minds decide to dump some colored liquid concrete inside its machinery and outer embodiment...and yes, now we see it!...but only its outer cover...and it stop functioning...

That is exactly what we have done to the Magnetic Field for more than 200 years...

Is it that hard to understand?

[bistander]

Unipolar motor

B field is vertical. Your "disk" is liquid. The result is a force, F, as seen in Fig. 1, rotating the liquid disk around the shaft.

I left the link in native language.

bi

[Ufopolitics]

TinManPower doing similar MHD...

Bob Smith brought this link to my YT Chanel...

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-37Ecjd7FQQ&feature=youtu.be[/VIDEO]

magnetic vortex using full current loop anode

Video Description:

Published on Jul 20, 2014

In this test,i am using a full current loop anode.this will give an even flow of current to the magnet through the full 360*.The whole thread can be found in the link below,As you will see,there is much heated debate going on about the magnetic vortex theory.The work belong's to a member by the name TheoriaApophasis. I am mearly doing some reserch to see if there is any truth to the theory. So far,all my results say that the PM is what is producing the spin-but more test to come.

Regards


Ufopolitics

[aljhoa]

The images of magnetic fields are particularly interesting to me.

The field lines defining the structure of the magnetic field are similar to those of a simple bar magnet, as illustrated in the following figure.

I don't see a vortex ...

Its rotation winds up the magnetic field into a large rotating spiral, known as the Parker spiral, named after the scientist who first described it.




Al