This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Muller generator replication by Romerouk

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Khwartz
    replied
    Asking for a summary of of the "sate of art" of the RomeoUK replication

    Hi everybody! I'm new here and I'm interested by the Muller Dynamo and Romerouk's replication I've seen on his three good vids.

    English is not too my native language and with more than 400 pages of messages, hard to go through!

    May you guys, make here a summary of the different breakthrough you made here, both in practical experiment than in the theory (understanding) of this nice self-running (!!! ) device?

    Cheers.
    Last edited by Khwartz; 01-04-2012, 01:01 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Khwartz
    replied
    Originally posted by kajunkreations View Post

    CLAMP METER-
    INPUT- 22.5v x 3.75 amp = 84.3 watts
    OUTPUT- 125v x .83 amps = 103 watts

    INLINE METER-
    INPUT- 22.5v x 3.1 amps = 69.75 watts
    OUTPUT- 125v x .4 amps = 50 watts
    Hi Nolan and thanks for sharing your results, even still in process, but good achievements.

    May I ask you if you measure your out-put through a load, especially a linear load, like a resistor? Cause if you take voltage by short-circuiting the coils, it's not the same than if it has to deliver a power to a external load. What do you think?

    Cheers, Khwartz.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dave45
    replied
    3 Phase Basics
    3 phase power is typically 150% more efficient than single phase in the same power range. In a single phase unit the power falls to zero three times during each cycle, in 3 phase it never drops to zero. The power delivered to the load is the same at any instant. Also, in 3 phase the conductors need only be 75% the size of conductors for single phase for the same power output.

    Leave a comment:


  • redrichie
    replied
    yes ive seen these videos. informative. I only have one video i made and I do have speed under short. but only in a window of RPM's. I too have a large coil with many turns of multifilar windings.
    I have stepped away from the forum for a while but have never stopped the thinking. For those that have seen the video I appologize for the repost.
    coil shorting combined multifilar coil - YouTube
    at least the end is funny

    Leave a comment:


  • qvision
    replied
    Originally posted by redrichie View Post
    Been a while since I posted here. But I've been wondering somethin lately. Is Romero's work and Thane Hines work related? If you look at thanes new vids he has motor driving a rotor over coils. he used to show shorting the larger gauge wire of the combined coil. I thought I heard him say they found a way around that in a video where he was showing the progression of his machine. Anyhow. Just asking.
    Hi richie,

    yes exactly the same principle at work. But, wheras Romero had seperate drive coils and genc coils, Thane has a hybrid drive/gen coil. It's thick, so high current, but many turns so high induction, that's why his coils are so bloody big !

    I've been following Thane's work for a while now and am making good progress myself, though on a smaller scale.

    Check out my youtube channel,the OUG archive isn't me it's a collection of OverUnityGuide's who isn't active at the moment becuse he's started a new job.

    All the best,

    DC.

    deepcut66's Channel - YouTube

    Leave a comment:


  • redrichie
    replied
    Been a while since I posted here. But I've been wondering somethin lately. Is Romero's work and Thane Hines work related? If you look at thanes new vids he has motor driving a rotor over coils. he used to show shorting the larger gauge wire of the combined coil. I thought I heard him say they found a way around that in a video where he was showing the progression of his machine. Anyhow. Just asking.

    Leave a comment:


  • qvision
    replied
    LOL Marius, is your break over already ?

    ;+}

    Leave a comment:


  • mariuscivic
    replied
    ''with occasional pauses for sleep and food''
    sounds like me!!!!!!!!!!!

    Leave a comment:


  • qvision
    replied
    I've been testing the new setup, with occasional pauses for sleep and food ;+}

    It seems that it generates more power than it uses but i will have to wait until i get a scope (new year).

    Here's a vid :

    New setup to explore acceleration-under-load. - YouTube


    Thanks for reading,

    QV.

    Leave a comment:


  • mariuscivic
    replied
    That is a good result anyway!

    Leave a comment:


  • kajunkreations
    replied
    Ok guys, My new INLINE current meters came in today and the results are a bit
    different as expected. I will say that a clamp meter is NOT accurate enough for
    small measurement. The results arent that far apart, but apart enough not to OU.

    CLAMP METER-
    INPUT- 22.5v x 3.75 amp = 84.3 watts
    OUTPUT- 125v x .83 amps = 103 watts

    INLINE METER-
    INPUT- 22.5v x 3.1 amps = 69.75 watts
    OUTPUT- 125v x .4 amps = 50 watts

    So, IT's not OU yet but I'm not too disappointed. It is really efficient and
    I'm not doing anything special for recovery, or any type of pulse out circuit. I
    have ordered more switches so that I can move forward, but I will be trying
    different things until they get here.

    Nolan

    Leave a comment:


  • ewizard
    replied
    Originally posted by kajunkreations View Post
    Thanks wizard! Yes it is noisy, but only when the "attractive" coil is being pulsed and I sure my tolerances arent NASA approved. Ive had it running at 12,000 rpm and she held together, but you are right built better would yield better performance.
    My build isnt like Romereo's at all other that being "muller" style dynamo. I think that I am closer to what Bill Muller was doing but who knows.
    Wow! 12000 rpm is impressive. I had forgotten that something about this design does tend to make some noise even with a really well balanced setup. I think it's inherent in the nature of the magnets bumping each others fields and I remember now Romerouk said something about the unusual noise if yours has some similarity in that respect. I bought most of the items to build this and got started but got stalled out before even getting it assembled due to some other projects. I still hope to give it a try but was also somewhat less enthusiastic after seeing how much trouble other very talented builders were having in getting good results. It's very encouraging to see your results. Looking forward to more results with your setup as you get more coils on.

    Leave a comment:


  • quantumuppercut
    replied
    For a long time I try to understand what could cause overunity in motors and transformers. Are motors and transformers the same? The final conclusion is yes, they are the same.

    Pulse motors are just like resonance transformer. It takes time to raise rotor speed with each pulse. This is resonant rise. Resonance is just a process of adding energy in correct direction result in a build up of momentum. Each pulse in succession is an addition of momentum while the energy of the wheel after each pulse increase exponentially. If the failure was to recognize the frame of reference which give extra energy, then every motor and transformer has always been capable of going OU if it is efficient enough. The Muller dynamo is just an... efficient dynamo.

    Leave a comment:


  • kajunkreations
    replied
    Originally posted by garrypm View Post
    Rod,

    You gotta try Nolan's system.

    Have not been able to stop playing with it.

    Garry
    So are you having any luck getting the higher output?

    Nolan

    Leave a comment:


  • garrypm
    replied
    Rod,

    You gotta try Nolan's system.

    Have not been able to stop playing with it.

    Garry

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X