This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bob Smith
    replied
    Ken
    I hope I'm not being a pain here. My online reading didn't seem to specify which pole should be facing the area of the body in need of healing. Perhaps they keep this secret so they can sell their "special" magnetic mats etc. I assume it should be the S pole facing the distressed area.
    Any comment?
    Bob

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Smith View Post
    Magnets and healing website:
    magnetic therapy pain relief for lower back pain
    Not the definitive word, and not free from their own commercial biases, but interesting.
    Bob

    I HAVE seen one genuine case (of course there are more) of back pain nearly eliminated using a large NEO


    and by LARGE, i mean a giant $800 30 pound neodymium.





    Ferrocell image from broken ring magnet:

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Smith
    replied
    Magnets and healing website:
    magnetic therapy pain relief for lower back pain
    Not the definitive word, and not free from their own commercial biases, but interesting.
    Bob

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Smith
    replied
    Originally posted by TheoriaApophasis View Post
    At some point in the future we will fully understand that speaking only of "positive" flow as per electricity is about as specific as speaking of being stuck in a river flow


    within which you can have near reverse eddys, transverse flow, eddy currents of stationary non-'movement', undertows, etc etc etc etc..........


    Tesla and some others grasped this, the rest of us are numbskulls trying to learn what he already learned a long time ago.
    Great analogy. Once we venture away from the incorrect notion of electricity as electron flow and begin to see it in terms of waves of charge, discharge and precession, there has to be a whole new set of accompanying phenomena and previously unacknowledged environmental effects.

    I think the subtle energies sensitives seem to recognize these phenomenna and effects. All of us are born with these energetic sensitivities, but our cultures tend to tell us what is real and what is not. If you "know" something that the established culture and its empiricist (material measurement based) scientific establishment tells you is unreal and therefore unknowable, you are labeled part of the lunatic fringe and crazy.

    How ironic that simpler cultures have retained and allowed room for these kinds of sensitivities. People from these cultures tend to see and understand in ways that show us for what we are: numbskulls - as you so eloquently exposit, Ken.

    And so we have people like Nikola Tesla whose heightened and sharpened energetic sensitivities and intuitions gave him a more correct understanding of the aether/dielectric, of electricity and magnetism than his successors who ventured away from the field of "natural philosophy" into narrow-minded, thick-headed, deluded, self-aggrandizing disciplines they had the audacity to call "sciences."

    But there is purposefulness in this deliberately constructed mass delusion. When the time is opportune, the powers that be will trot out their suppressed technologies based on this correct understanding of the dielectric, electricity and magnetism. They will use them to disassemble pollutants and radioactivity, to foster rapid bodily healing. They may even promote themselves as humanity's saviors. Those who have eyes to see and ears to hear will recognize this pseudo-benevolent display for the counterfeit mimicry of goodwill that it is.

    And so, at the macro level these kinds of apprehensions of knowledge remain suppressed, relegated to the lunatic fringe or cleverly associated with silly so-called gnostic or occult practices whilst being dismissed by the scientific mainstream. However, we know well that a groundswell of knowledge is building among people who seek after truth, whose love of wisdom is greater than their reluctance to step outside the falsely-contrived cultural constructs of group-speak and group-think.

    As the river flows, may our minds and ears be opened to its treasures, our spirits be enlighted to use them wisely, and our hearts be courageous enough to employ them in humanity's betterment.

    Hesed we emet
    Charis aletheia
    Bob

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by Dog-One View Post
    yet the majority will still continue to refer to only positive and negative polarity or AC which is crudely described as electricity with alternating polarity.


    At some point in the future we will fully understand that speaking only of "positive" flow as per electricity is about as specific as speaking of being stuck in a river flow


    within which you can have near reverse eddys, transverse flow, eddy currents of stationary non-'movement', undertows, etc etc etc etc..........


    Tesla and some others grasped this, the rest of us are numbskulls trying to learn what he already learned a long time ago.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dog-One
    replied
    Originally posted by TheoriaApophasis View Post
    So, every 360 degrees of a single cycle of the turn of a magnet you have:
    2 Ether-field modalities: dielectricity and magnetism (of course).
    6 total pressure domain fluctuations, 2 centripetal, 2 centrifugal, and 2 dielectric 10 field-boundary gradients
    And I would be willing to bet, what we call electricity has many of those same characteristics, yet the majority will still continue to refer to only positive and negative polarity or AC which is crudely described as electricity with alternating polarity.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Smith
    replied
    Thanks Ken!
    Bob

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Smith View Post
    Hi Ken
    Just to be clear, if the magnet is perpendicular to the earth's poles, then do I need to ascertain with a compass the direction of the earth's poles, and then make sure the magnet's N and S faces are up and down, rather than facing N and S? Sorry, I'm a little confused, and would like to consider this as an option for physical healing (a tooth).

    Bob
    BTW Thanks for posting the books.

    Just do your working experiments, depending on WHAT that experiment is (???) perpendicular to N and S pole of the earth



    As for your tooth goodness knows if that sensitive nerve will be affected, but the N pole retards (namely the whole body is water) growth, pain , etc etc.


    but not JUST the pole, the EDGE of the north pole.

    (same as the pole on ANY magnet).


    Any gaussmeter will show this as well, you use the EDGE of either pole you want to use (for experiments etc etc).


    People only think in terms of polarity, but ANY and ALL magnets have multiple pressure zones, centrifugal divergent, convergent centripetal,


    So, every 360 degrees of a single cycle of the turn of a magnet you have:
    2 Ether-field modalities: dielectricity and magnetism (of course).
    6 total pressure domain fluctuations, 2 centripetal, 2 centrifugal, and 2 dielectric
    10 field-boundary gradients

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Smith
    replied
    Originally posted by TheoriaApophasis View Post
    check that you're performing the experiment perpendicular to the earths poles also.

    Some of my acute experiments were flubbed because I forget I was performing the experiments in alignment with one or both poles.
    Hi Ken
    Just to be clear, if the magnet is perpendicular to the earth's poles, then do I need to ascertain with a compass the direction of the earth's poles, and then make sure the magnet's N and S faces are up and down, rather than facing N and S? Sorry, I'm a little confused, and would like to consider this as an option for physical healing (a tooth).

    Bob
    BTW Thanks for posting the books.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by sadang View Post
    Hi Ken,
    But what is more important is the measurement made revealed an astonishing structure of the magnetic field, which is according to your theory.



    there will be a gyromagnetic precession offset as necessitated, but also check that you're performing the experiment perpendicular to the earths poles also.

    Some of my acute experiments were flubbed because I forget I was performing the experiments in alignment with one or both poles.

    But you are correct as per the difference between both poles.

    The biological experiments I have performed (which are ENDLESS) show time and time and time and TIME AGAIN a serious difference.

    There are 2 other biological experiments I wont talk about with similar findings.


    The poles are pressure flux quantitatively the same, but qualitatively different

    however as per the gauss difference there is a necessitated gyromagnetic diffusement between flux density as measured by the gauss meter between the two poles in discrepancy.

    However also this can be reversed in a soft magnet.


    The polarity hyperboloid is offset in flux density between either pole, as must necessarily be the case for gyromagnetic precession to even have a pressure equalibrium, this spatial flux density difference is both measurable and quantifiable.


    and my biological experiments 'report' back amazing agreement


    I can ACTUALLY SAY WITH 10,000% CERTAINTY I CAN TASTE THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN N AND S POLES.




    See below:






    See also my discovery I expected to see,....proving and showing diff. light dispersion along polarity


    This discovery of mine has been already confirmed by 2 others.

    Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 09-13-2014, 09:35 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadang
    replied
    Hi Ken,

    Today I finally managed to complete the experiment that I told you! I mean the experiment to measure the magnetic filed strength at N and S poles. As I expected, the value are different, ie the N pole is stronger than S pole with an average of 25 Gauss. But what is more important is the measurement made revealed an astonishing structure of the magnetic field, which is according to your theory.

    If at the starting distance from the Hall sensor I read a N field, at another specific shorter distance the field suddenly changes its polarity becoming S pole having two maxim values exactly on the middle of the two arc segments, and a minim value exactly in the center of the magnet. This case is happening for both sides of the magnet. The only difference is in the strength of the poles, ie N is stronger than S pole.

    I made measurements for the types of speaker magnets and a neodymium magnet. The same astonishing structure is repeating for all three magnets, with the observation that the neodymium magnet field is more concentrated around the magnet distances where the field is changingbeing much reduced compared to the speaker magnet.


    The above image is an animation (relative dimension and not at scale) of the experiment. I can also upload an excel file with values measured and more explanations. Only for who is interested!

    however, I will need to repeat this experiment with as many magnets, various shapes, powers and composition. I need to convince myself that I'm not mistaken somewhere, perhaps setting up the experiment or the interpretation of results. Anyway, first impression is overwhelming, totally different from what can be seen with compass and magnetic film. I am open to all the suggestions and recommendations.

    Hope tomorrow to make a video file with the entire measurement. I have to find a best angle to fit the entire configuration.

    SaDAng

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by MasterBlaster View Post
    Looks like the distractors and trolls are succeeding!
    getting the flu and running into some rental property emergencies doesnt help



    some saying about "life is what happens when you're making plans"

    Leave a comment:


  • MasterBlaster
    replied
    Originally posted by TheoriaApophasis View Post
    3rd edition will be out in a week or so.

    I have about 180 pages MORE to add, but will only reach about 1/3rd of that in addition in the 3rd edition.

    but at least I have the 180 pages in my mind and also in notes, its all there and ready.
    Looks like the distractors and trolls are succeeding!

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by MasterBlaster View Post
    Theo,
    I tried downloading the latest book from the link on your first post in this thread.
    Sorry but the download seems corrupted. I tries several times.

    thank you


    3rd edition will be out in a week or so.

    but the second is here on another site:
    The missing secrets of magnetism and the geometry of electromagnetism.  20 years of research into magnetism and fields


    Embarrassingly, having made 90 videos in the past couple of months I should have been more busy on expanding the 3rd edition.

    I have about 180 pages MORE to add, but will only reach about 1/3rd of that in addition in the 3rd edition.

    Getting the fluffy easy stuff out of the way first, and then formation all the notes of the 'hardcore' tougher stuff for 4th and 5th editions.

    Im glad I have another 180 pages of genuine substance, however am utterly pissed at myself for

    1. needing to sleep every few days
    2. having spent too much time in videos and experimentation rather than 100% on the book

    but at least I have the 180 pages in my mind and also in notes, its all there and ready.

    Leave a comment:


  • MasterBlaster
    replied
    Theo,
    I tried downloading the latest book from the link on your first post in this thread.
    Sorry but the download seems corrupted. I tries several times.

    thank you

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X