Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[Ufopolitics]

Wow...

Thanks Ken for the fast and detailed answer...

So...could we define all this text in a 'simplified' way?...

Just kidding, I believe I am just starting to understand...

Then, (trying to summarize just some parts of what you wrote)

The Counterspace defined by the Dielectric Plane...is the one having the 'choice' of seeking alignment in only one direction related to another dielectric plane?

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hello Ken,
From where we could call (as you do on page 30)...A Convergent Voidance where we include the 'acting force' to effect an Attraction or by 'tendency' to dissipate motion by increased motion...right?
Ufopolitcs

No, the dissipation of force and motion (= magnetism) is increasing inertia / acceleration, said voidance is the 'erasure' of space/force/ motion.

As for dielectric voidance, there is no force involved, just the inverse.


there is no force involved in a falling object (to earth, etc), rather the elimination of the posterior attribute of force and motion, ie space, as expressing Counterspace.

only 2 principles in the universe, Force/motion (divergence) and inertia(the Field/Ether)/acceleration (convergence).

So, Convergent forces generate Voidance (Attraction), while Divergent Forces create Counter-Voidance or Repulsion. Ufopolitcs

Its a bit diff. than your implication, its mirrored cancellation (M.C.) of which Im writing much about currently.

like on like you have force and motion (incorrect BS deemed "magnetic repulsion") .

and of course the inverse of that.......

Now, going back to previous Diagrams...if this EM Field Spectrum is Symmetrical in all Dynamics given a dielectric center plane...

My question is...how is it possible the 'permanent status' of a magnet side off the symmetric plane always acting with Convergent Forces...while the other side of this 'apparently identical' sides...always acting with Divergent Forces?
Ufopolitcs

Not always symmetrical, obviously, but that is SIMPLEX phase shift as also seen in magnetic reciprocation.

Even tesla talks about this and co-eternal INSTANT action-reaction, a see-sawing of transverse EM phenomena around a dielectric 'center'

LIkewise as spelled out in the book, light IS NOT, CANNOT be "electromagnetic", additionally the Photoelectric effect for the first time is accurately and logically and hyper-rationally explained as contrary to the BS conclusions of that mental midget einstien.

According to your Diagrams every magnet should have both forces acting within the same spaces on both magnetic poles, meaning in every North Pole there is always a South side within its inner space...and viceversa?
[/B] Ufopolitcs

All space is a posterior attribution of the EXPRESSED (past tense) force(s) of magnetic divergent reciprocation.

remember that NO field nor field divergence can or MAY HAVE space as a terminal for themselves, its illogical and impossible.


There is rarefaction on the N "pole" and compression on the S "pole", but this is simplex phase shift due to gyromagnetic precession necessitated to the polarized system of either an atom of a coherent MASS we deem the "magnet".

So, in order to define a North or a South pole will consist on which Force (Convergent or Divergent) would be stronger than the other?
Ufopolitcs

nope, nothing like that at all. All is defined by either force cancellation or force compounding, remember simplex ADDITIVE or CANCELLING wave analogies, M.C. or mirrored cancellation is very simple if you think about same.

But then...it would not be a Symmetrical System from the Dielectric Plane point of view...
Ufopolitcs

Its pressure symmetrical, but not TEMPORALLY symmetrical due to the necessitated phase shift of spatial (in creation) reciprocation.

I will get a bit 'surrealistic' about this...so, say we found a mass less material that carries a magnetic field within...so we approach two pieces of this exotic material and suppose they are approaching in voidance mode or by attraction sides...and we let them collide each others to a 'null space' of the sphere...now, since material is mass less...they will exactly become one single piece aligned exactly by their center dielectric plane...taken there by the convergent forces.

So actually a mass magnet is actually 'trying' to do just that...but the body or mass does not allows it to intersect dielectric planes perfectly but getting as close as body dimensions would allow.
Ufopolitcs

You have to mentally consider why counterspace is counterspace by definition and what SAID definition DOES, its just simplex like fluid and pressure dynamics, or why "water flows downhill", or why the dielectric inertial plane will ALWAYS self-seek to the "center" or opposite of both "poles" Its very simplex.

So tell me, without any hesitation...am I just completely out of my mind...or is this the way it takes place...
Ufopolitcs

No, rather people just werent brought up to THINK about / IN such terms...........however I was due to intense study of Platonic dialectic (not dielectric!, a diff. term here) retroductive thinking methodology


Ufopolitcs[/QUOTE]



copyright 12-15-2014 Ken L Wheeler

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hello Ken,


In all your drawings showing the true magnetic field spectrum and dynamics, if we use the Dielectric Plane to establish what is above and below it...we see a perfectly symmetrical structure, where dielectric plane 'mirrors' same above as below,including its rotations and counter rotations, centripetal and centrifugal emanations and returns to center plane...:

We/you/etc. need to know the TRUE definition of POLARIZED.


There is no "mirror(ed)" S vs. N "pole". Rather that magnetism is FORCE and divergence OF WHICH inertia, the coherent FORCED AT, not located dielectric inertial plane of said magnet is always, obviously so OPPOSITE of ALL FORCE and divergence.

i.e. the center and OPPOSITE to all space ( that 'center' of course =counterspace).


One/anyone needs to spend 20 mins. thinking about the fact there there is NO SUCH thing as a "N pole" vs. a "S pole", rather the necessitated opposite of space and divergence = inertia and counterspace.


Natures "sphere" begins with the hyperboloid. A sphere is already = space, a posterior ABSENCE of both inertia and the Field.


space is nothing, is neither force nor field , and can "have no properties" - TESLA




LIKEWISE we/you/etc. need to define what a magnet is, its a mass of polarized atoms (as are ALL atoms) that are likewise COHERENT and operating in polarized unison.

[Ufopolitics]

About a North and South definition?

Hello Ken,


In all your drawings showing the true magnetic field spectrum and dynamics, if we use the Dielectric Plane to establish what is above and below it...we see a perfectly symmetrical structure, where dielectric plane 'mirrors' same above as below,including its rotations and counter rotations, centripetal and centrifugal emanations and returns to center plane...:

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

[IMG][/IMG]

And believe me, I have read your book many, many times, and still doing it, lots of respect for your excellent work friend!, as I agree 100% with your proven theory about EM Fields...meaning, I know Voidance and Counter-Voidance as "Attract" and "Repulse" known terms...as what causes it to effect both:

[IMG][/IMG]

From where we could call (as you do on page 30)...A Convergent Voidance where we include the 'acting force' to effect an Attraction or by 'tendency' to dissipate motion by increased motion...right?

So, Convergent forces generate Voidance (Attraction), while Divergent Forces create Counter-Voidance or Repulsion.

Now, going back to previous Diagrams...if this EM Field Spectrum is Symmetrical in all Dynamics given a dielectric center plane...

My question is...how is it possible the 'permanent status' of a magnet side off the symmetric plane always acting with Convergent Forces...while the other side of this 'apparently identical' sides...always acting with Divergent Forces?

According to your Diagrams every magnet should have both forces acting within the same spaces on both magnetic poles, meaning in every North Pole there is always a South side within its inner space...and viceversa?

So, in order to define a North or a South pole will consist on which Force (Convergent or Divergent) would be stronger than the other?

Better said...'predominant' than the other force?

But then...it would not be a Symmetrical System from the Dielectric Plane point of view...

I will get a bit 'surrealistic' about this...so, say we found a mass less material that carries a magnetic field within...so we approach two pieces of this exotic material and suppose they are approaching in voidance mode or by attraction sides...and we let them collide each others to a 'null space' of the sphere...now, since material is mass less...they will exactly become one single piece aligned exactly by their center dielectric plane...taken there by the convergent forces.

So actually a mass magnet is actually 'trying' to do just that...but the body or mass does not allows it to intersect dielectric planes perfectly but getting as close as body dimensions would allow.

So tell me, without any hesitation...am I just completely out of my mind...or is this the way it takes place...

Regards Friend and thanks in advance for your answer!


Ufopolitcs

[TheoriaApophasis]

And what if I ask "Therefore how can we have space if we don't also have counter space ?" Sense the difference! It is real or apparent?

I will be done late morrow on the scans,.....alas due to some awful creature that gave me a deathly case of the FLU that barely kept me lucid the past 5 days.


some disease ridden subhuman creeping with cooties.


Im already halfway done.



yes yes on counterspace, however such a term is mere contrivance, as is space.


Space is nothing, is a privation, by which we define "something", ie inertia, or energy, the "Field", etc.

space being neither force nor field, it is nothing by which we measure that which is 'something' which IS NOT part nor parcel to space which = nothing.


Space, like a shadow, is NOTHING but the contrivance we deem as a boundary and region where LIGHT IS NOT (= shadow).

such too is space, of course.

[sadang]

Therefore how can we have counter space if we don't also have space ?

And what if I ask "Therefore how can we have space if we don't also have counter space ?" Sense the difference! It is real or apparent?

[ionfuture]

WHERE defines a topos (a place, a 'where'). Such a denotation contradicts the premise of counterspace.


a sphere is already 4 levels from counterspace (point line circle sphere).

inside what? inside and outside have no meaning.

To my limited thinking capacity in order to have counter space you would also need space.

So I don't see a (point, a line or a circle) as having space. These appear as 2D objects, in order to have space I would think u need a 3D object and the sphere is a most simple 3D object.

Therefore how can we have counter space if we don't also have space ?

Anyway u got me thinking, back to Gyroscopes.

ionfuture

[ionfuture]

Thanks for your answers.

If we magnetize a hollow iron sphere and end up with what is normally called ( N and S poles) I'll use that loosely to describe what we call poles. Will the dielectric inertial plane still be halfway between these poles ?

And will it cross the center of the hollow sphere ?

Hope u don't mind me asking questions ?

Also have u seen this? Proof of the Longitudinal Magneto-Dielectric Wave.

Superluminal Scalar Waves for Communications

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjz-5Lqtxow

ionfuture

[TheoriaApophasis]

Where is counter space located in a hollow sphere with a vacuum inside ?

WHERE defines a topos (a place, a 'where'). Such a denotation contradicts the premise of counterspace.


a sphere is already 4 levels from counterspace (point line circle sphere).

inside what? inside and outside have no meaning.

[spacecase0]

Where is counter space located in a hollow sphere with a vacuum inside ?

the way I see it is that it is where things are when they are not here,
if something is more than half in our reality we can see it, (even quantum physics knows of this)
when it is not here, it is in counter space

I wonder if someone else has a better explanation

[ionfuture]

Where is counter space located in a hollow sphere with a vacuum inside ?

[TheoriaApophasis]

How is everything going?

kicking ass and taking names.

[David G Dawson]

Tesla Video

Ken,
Gee that was quick!
Yes. I erred and should be:

Eric P Dollard confronts a "C is max" idiot from the Cult of Quantum in the crowd - NickTube - Hight speed video experience with HD Quality

After a bit more sleuthing found it to be part of the SBARC video which I do have here and will view.
Sorry to trouble you.

How is everything going?

Smokey

[TheoriaApophasis]

Ken,
Saw a video that you had downloaded to You Tube but does not appear to have the second part where Eric is demonstarting the actual Tesla apparatus.
This is the first video - the 'C Max idiot':

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HaqcuRCsEE

Do you have the continuation video?
Thanks.

Smokey

that link isnt that video, youve messed something up somehow.

[David G Dawson]

Tesla Video

Ken,
Saw a video that you had downloaded to You Tube but does not appear to have the second part where Eric is demonstarting the actual Tesla apparatus.
This is the first video - the 'C Max idiot':

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2HaqcuRCsEE

Do you have the continuation video?
Thanks.

Smokey