Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[Ufopolitics]

About a Spectrum 3D Screening...

Hello Ken,

Was wondering if anyone has build a 3D Screening 'apparatus' to observe/film the Magnetic Field Spectrum...

I was thinking to use some Beam Guns from an old back screen projection TV...since it has the three R,G,B Guns separated with independent circuits...and designed to project on a flat special plastic screen...so, we could set them following the x,y,z 3D axis, enclosed within a clear plastic volume and fill it with smoke (from a smoke gun)...creating a holographic effect.

As I believe using six guns from two TV sets, will render out even better results by axis alignment of blue with blue, green to green and red to red face to face equidistant from center placement of field...or:

BlueGun(x axis)>>>>(magnetic field here)<<<<(x axis)BlueGun

RedGun(y axis)>>>>(magnetic field here)<<<<(y axis)RedGun

GreenGun(z axis)>>>>(magnetic field here)<<<<(z axis)GreenGun

In order to intersect all beams at center space (0,0,0) where field would be set...

Maybe somebody has done it by now...

I believe it would be very interesting to test this...



Regards



Ufopolitics

[Dog-One]

thats the dumb mistake everyone makes

nothing doesnt = NOTHING (nihil ex nihilo)

I have a hunch W.B. didn't actually mean Nothing-At-All. If someone would have whispered in his ear, "Counterspace", I'll bet it would have made sense to him.

If we can accept the possibility he did have communications with advanced living creatures from other worlds, it's very easy to assume he had difficulties understanding what they were telling him. A perfect example is me trying to understand everything you say Ken. I want to know what you know as well as you know it, but it's going to take time and while that is happening, you will continue to advance beyond what I can keep up with. I can take every mental pill there is and still never be your peer in this research. The only chance I have is if you are able some day to find the set words that I fully grasp, where everything actually does become simplex. Something that just clicks and puts all the pieces together. I'll keep trying and hopefully you'll do the same.

[TheoriaApophasis]

He states everything comes from Nothing-At-All. The first Quadrature from nothing, is spin.

Sounds very similar to me.

thats the dumb mistake everyone makes


nothing doesnt = NOTHING (nihil ex nihilo)


Not a THING (NOT PHENOMENA)........doesnt mean "nothing", rather NOT-phenomena.


Negation only serves to posit something, NOT ABCDEF........... but X



not this not that not that not that (.......therefore its 'this').

[Dog-One]

COILS YES, Ive got more coils than a dog has fleas

that and spools and spools of copper wire.

( I HATE WINDING COILS)

Ha! Good, now we're getting somewhere.

Counterspace SHOULD have you "thinking",

Most certainly.

ALL GEOMETRY IS PROJECTIVE GEOMETRY

meaning it "all begins with counterspace/ inertia".

I'll go back to W.B. Smith's Quadrature Concept. He states everything comes from Nothing-At-All. The first Quadrature from nothing, is spin.

Sounds very similar to me.

[TheoriaApophasis]

I wish Ken played with coils, diodes, capacitors as much as he has with magnets.

COILS YES, Ive got more coils than a dog has fleas


that and spools and spools of copper wire.


( I HATE WINDING COILS)






Counterspace SHOULD have you "thinking",



ALL GEOMETRY IS PROJECTIVE GEOMETRY


meaning it "all begins with counterspace/ inertia".

[Dog-One]

@Dog-One:
Is it like accelerating to full throttle, a very fast vehicle...developing high speed to end up hitting a dead end street where a solid steel wall awaits...(dead end wall= counter-space= dielectric plane)

I wish Ken played with coils, diodes, capacitors as much as he has with magnets.

Now counter-space, that one has got me thinking...

Here's my from-the-gut reason why I think it must be so.

Consider the design of a capacitor. More surface area means larger capacitance. That one is easy. Putting the plates closer together (making the volume of the dielectric smaller) also increases the capacitance. Hmmm. Less is more. That could only mean one thing. Less space must equate to more counter-space. Hence, the so-called charge we think of lives in a different dimension.

Yes, no, maybe so?

[TheoriaApophasis]

Is it because it was first employed by the fool of Einstein=One Stone?...

Ufopolitics

dont mention that demon

[Ufopolitics]

increasing acceleration = DECREASING MOTION

That's going to take some work yes, as it appears to be in conflict to the well known kinematic equations. So are there two definitions of acceleration and we are using the incorrect one? Or is it because we assume acceleration means increasing speed, i.e. increasing change in position over time?

Simplex in comprehension if you look at it from curvilinear reduction where increasing acceleration = decreasing divergent motion.


Ahhhhhhh the simplex stuff is to "complex" to comprehend.


We dumb humans equate speed with speed, and speed has NO qualification really.


Just as WEIGHT HAS NO MEANING,


weight is LOCATION SPECIFIC and MEDIUM SPECIFIC


A 5 year old can, for example, move around a 800 pound lard-ass with ease if both are in the water.

@Dog-One:

To 'interpret' T.A properly...we will need a lot of 'abstract mind' as a lot of 'surrealism' as well...

Even with all of that...am still far away...

Let me see...

Is it like accelerating to full throttle, a very fast vehicle...developing high speed to end up hitting a dead end street where a solid steel wall awaits...(dead end wall= counter-space= dielectric plane)

Is there a 'formula' to calculate from a 200+ MPH MASS accelerating towards a >>>FULL DEAD STOP before calling it a 'terrorist"?...

We were taught to simply calculate acceleration along with speed developing towards an open straight drive...or a circle, where we see acceleration vectors traveling away at certain angle...while speed keeps developing within the circular path...

@T.A: Now...I made some mistakes in the example above...and am writing it before you call it...like 'speed'...which 'has no qualification here'
As well as Mass related to Weight considered to 'increase speed'...Nonsense!!
'weight' is another 'Medium and Location Specific' term.

Now, T.A...why don't you like to use the simple term..."Relative" here?

Is it because it was first employed by the fool of Einstein=One Stone?...

However, it is easier to understand from 'Weight Relativity' depending on location and medium...

Now watch how fast T.A says am completely wrong here...

Take care Guys!


Ufopolitics

[TheoriaApophasis]

That's going to take some work yes, as it appears to be in conflict to the well known kinematic equations. So are there two definitions of acceleration and we are using the incorrect one? Or is it because we assume acceleration means increasing speed, i.e. increasing change in position over time?

Simplex in comprehension if you look at it from curvilinear reduction where increasing acceleration = decreasing divergent motion.


Ahhhhhhh the simplex stuff is to "complex" to comprehend.


We dumb humans equate speed with speed, and speed has NO qualification really.


Just as WEIGHT HAS NO MEANING,


weight is LOCATION SPECIFIC and MEDIUM SPECIFIC


A 5 year old can, for example, move around a 800 pound lard-ass with ease if both are in the water.

[Dog-One]

CONTRARY to sensible "logic", increasing acceleration = DECREASING MOTION (what????? yes, think about that).

That's going to take some work yes, as it appears to be in conflict to the well known kinematic equations. So are there two definitions of acceleration and we are using the incorrect one? Or is it because we assume acceleration means increasing speed, i.e. increasing change in position over time?

[TheoriaApophasis]

I understand the 'not linearity' or not perfectly 'directional' attributes to the interactions or actions-reactions from convergence-divergence...however, if we try to 'feel' a magnetic force whether voidance or counter-voidance we notice it has a 'center' where accumulation of stronger forces are located, and of course is easier to 'feel' it at counter-voidance...and this 'center' is actually a sphere-like volume, like you cite in your excellent book.
Ufopolitics

There is no "center to/of force", rather the INVERSE , a privation of force, counterspace.


You still havent thought LONG and HARD about the term "polarized" .


A magnet does not have "poles", rather the necessitated antinomy of force, the 'center' of which is inertia or counterspace.



Likewise, youre making the same error others do in thinking of a sphere, the magnetic / dielectric geometry is a Hyperboloid.

The sphere is LONG "after the fact" as 'drawn' out by the force reciprocations.

You need to mentalize the hyperboloid to 'get' what magnetism and the magnet is.

On the 'reciprocation' of two magnetic forces...say at voidance ("attraction")
Ufopolitics

There arent two magnetic forces, only one which is inverse to counterspace, anything which is FORCE = "creating space" (incorrectly thought of as "in space"), by which denotatively it is "of a dual/ polarized nature".


once again, the hardcore hardass definition of polarized is not defined in the minds of human critters.

Now, it is very well known that when we set them on voidance through an air gap, they BOTH increase strength at the opposite ends of 'bridge' or air gap, I denoted as F>1, just because I could not exactly say the magnitude of increase (have not measured it...yet), but I am SURE is higher than original forces=1.
Obviously as we close the air gap towards a complete voidance of sphere, where they will contact or stick together...then forces will increase to Max values.
Ufopolitics

all forces are eliminated in voidance, Mirrored force cancellation is increasing inertia and decreasing space/ force / motion.


CONTRARY to sensible "logic", increasing acceleration = DECREASING MOTION (what????? yes, think about that).


in the same fashion as this, gravity is NOT A FORCE, rather the inverse.

no FORCES are involves in "gravity". Gravity has no qualification as a force.


No force is applied in letting a ball drop off a cliff, etc etc.


Gravity doesnt exist, its simply a misnomer for Ethero-static tension, an expression of the equilibrium of inertia



Gravity doesnt exist as some autonomous or unique Ether-modality, nor is Gravity a field, and NOT a force.


The co-gravitational field equations of Dr. Jefimenko and others prove that logically Gravity is just a human BS term given to an expression of counterspatial acceleration INHERENT to matter.

In your 'vocabulary' could we say that centripetal forces from one pole are 'networking/channeling' to centrifugal forces from other end pole?
Ufopolitics

there exists no centripetal forces, thats the opposite of force.

Now, if we would only have a 'One Way' flow/exchange...considering 'North' as rarefaction or 'vacuum' and 'South' as opposite...then only one end 'should' become stronger than the side 'sourcing' right?...
Ufopolitics

such a scenario is impossible.

As I also understand that while the two magnets are closing air gap, the inner 'poles' at bridge are acquiring the properties of becoming closer to a 'future' common dielectric plane/point to become one at full contact, so this poles at bridge are traveling to become null/extinct/gone... .
Ufopolitics

increasing potential, = inertia = acceleration = decreasing motion

not really, but youre close enough.

[Ufopolitics]

Making some testing...

testing...... this site has issues.

I keep getting this::::

Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 25956601 bytes) in /home/esmforum/public_html/dbtech/dbseo/includes/class_core.php on line 4436






ANYWAY::::


I WOULD have posted this to the OTHER thread on Krafft, but this website is messed up, I keep getting this::::

Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 25956601 bytes) in /home/esmforum/public_html/dbtech/dbseo/includes/class_core.php on line 4436







anyways:::::


Thank Sandag for these::::


never before digitized works of Carl F. Krafft !!!


I just scanned them in


[B]Hey!!!!!! here it is:




I WOULD have posted this to the OTHER thread on Krafft, but this website is messed up, I keep getting this::::

Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 25956601 bytes) in /home/esmforum/public_html/dbtech/dbseo/includes/class_core.php on line 4436







anyways:::::


Thank Sandag for these::::


never before digitized works of Carl F. Krafft !!!


I just scanned them in


[B]Hey!!!!!! here it is:


KATHODOS DOT COM / KRAFT.pdf


THIS IS THE ONLY WAY I COULD POST THIS::<<<<

Hello,


This is a test...

Just testing robot for memory allocation at command <4436> run out of RAM

Processing FTP Transfer>>>>completed


Over>>>


Textbot

[TheoriaApophasis]

testing...... this site has issues.

I keep getting this::::

Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 25956601 bytes) in /home/esmforum/public_html/dbtech/dbseo/includes/class_core.php on line 4436






ANYWAY::::


I WOULD have posted this to the OTHER thread on Krafft, but this website is messed up, I keep getting this::::

Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 25956601 bytes) in /home/esmforum/public_html/dbtech/dbseo/includes/class_core.php on line 4436







anyways:::::


Thank Sandag for these::::


never before digitized works of Carl F. Krafft !!!


I just scanned them in


[B]Hey!!!!!! here it is:




I WOULD have posted this to the OTHER thread on Krafft, but this website is messed up, I keep getting this::::

Fatal error: Allowed memory size of 33554432 bytes exhausted (tried to allocate 25956601 bytes) in /home/esmforum/public_html/dbtech/dbseo/includes/class_core.php on line 4436







anyways:::::


Thank Sandag for these::::


never before digitized works of Carl F. Krafft !!!


I just scanned them in


[B]Hey!!!!!! here it is:


KATHODOS DOT COM / KRAFT.pdf


THIS IS THE ONLY WAY I COULD POST THIS::<<<<

[Ufopolitics]

Dual or One Way X-Change?

Hello Ken,

Thanks for the answers...even though I "see" most of the 'complete picture'...is still not really a 'full screen' yet...

I am trying to create a 3D Model, animated of the whole thing...meaning all dynamics of this spectrum, in order to simulate a 'possible' projection(s) on the fluorescent screen of a color CRT...based on the magnetic deviations that the 3 guns (RGB) Deflect into it.

I understand the 'not linearity' or not perfectly 'directional' attributes to the interactions or actions-reactions from convergence-divergence...however, if we try to 'feel' a magnetic force whether voidance or counter-voidance we notice it has a 'center' where accumulation of stronger forces are located, and of course is easier to 'feel' it at counter-voidance...and this 'center' is actually a sphere-like volume, like you cite in your excellent book.

On the 'reciprocation' of two magnetic forces...say at voidance ("attraction")...we have:

[IMG][/IMG]

A Magnet A and A' of identical properties in strength and volume/shape...strength given by a force F=1 on both ends (poles)

Now, it is very well known that when we set them on voidance through an air gap, they BOTH increase strength at the opposite ends of 'bridge' or air gap, I denoted as F>1, just because I could not exactly say the magnitude of increase (have not measured it...yet), but I am SURE is higher than original forces=1.
Obviously as we close the air gap towards a complete voidance of sphere, where they will contact or stick together...then forces will increase to Max values.

From this test... could we conclude that within that 'bridge', there is an even exchange of forces between both ends taking place?...since both 'poles' increase equally in strength greater than one (F>1)...

Now,taking this 'exchange' into electronic circuits vocabulary...we have "Drain" and "Source" NOT ONLY at one point on each face (pole)...BUT, we have Drain and Source constantly exchanging, switching from one point to the other?

In your 'vocabulary' could we say that centripetal forces from one pole are 'networking/channeling' to centrifugal forces from other end pole?

And 'viceversa'?...meaning the centrifugal from previous end is flowing through centripetal of the other side?

Meaning:

Centrifugal 1>>>>Centripetal 1'
Centripetal 1<<<<Centrifugal 1'

Centrifugal forces are flying away from center point, while Centripetal are 'sucking' towards a center (point)(in dielectric of course.

while understanding that rotations and counter-rotations are 'included' in this 'translational exchange' from one pole to the other...

Say this exchange occurs at very high speeds...very high.

Now, if we would only have a 'One Way' flow/exchange...considering 'North' as rarefaction or 'vacuum' and 'South' as opposite...then only one end 'should' become stronger than the side 'sourcing' right?...

however, it is not so, both ends become stronger equally to a full contact(max value) where they will add both magnet strengths to form one stronger magnet than a single one. As well as Dielectric Plane would be 'moved' at the 'seam' from the two surfaces in voidance...like you show on page 91 Image:

[IMG][/IMG]

As I also understand that while the two magnets are closing air gap, the inner 'poles' at bridge are acquiring the properties of becoming closer to a 'future' common dielectric plane/point to become one at full contact, so this poles at bridge are traveling to become null/extinct/gone...

I see this as only two possibilities...dual exchange or single (one way) exchange, of course, looking in 'black and white'..

I am sure you could 'picture' all this events taking place...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[TheoriaApophasis]

The Counterspace defined by the Dielectric Plane...is the one having the 'choice' of seeking alignment in only one direction to another dielectric plane?

DIRECTIONALITY is a quality said of spatial/ temporal things, which is the opposite to the Field / Ether/ inertia / counterspace, .....

ergo it has no application to same.


As for the rest, no......you need to look into and think about the Poincare' disk model.

likewise understand that all geometry is PROJECTIVE geometry.

Euclidean geometry applies to phenomena, now you have to understand the "point" from which ALL GEOMETRY emanates.

According to Dielectric Plane Counterspace... it acts as an Implosive force inwards a radical gravitational center...trying to nullify field
Ufopolitics

Gravity doesnt exist as a 'unique' or autonomous field modality,

Gravity is a BS term applied to counterspatial inertia/acceleration.

No forces are involved in the BS we call gravity.

About Space, Magnetism and Compression (of field) in counter-voidance...is it wrong to express "Spatially Compressed Field"?

Ufopolitics

Pressure mediation phase differentials between "poles" are necessitated to the system of which is expressing a spatial divergence.


Tesla talks about this as well, .....ill find his quotes on same and post them.