Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[vidbid]

magnet:?xt=urn:btih:XYSPCSXRK7QZS5IHWI4ODRQWNM4SHUWD&dn=magnetism1small&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fbt1.archive.org%3A6969%2Fannounce&tr=http%3A%2F%2Fbt2.archive.org%3A6969%2Fannounce&xl=243906084

or

https://archive.org/download/magnetism1small

[trahedron]

He's still cranking out the videos:

https://www.youtube.com/user/kathodosdotcom/videos

[Ufopolitics]

Found the links...

Found the links to Ken's book...thanks to Vidbid Post!!

[Ufopolitics]

What happened to all Ken's Book links?

Anyone knows what happened to ALL Ken's Links to his Book?

Kathodos is Off...

And Kickasstorrents has been seized by Homeland Security, plus all other related departments, the Treasury...the Dept of Justice...International Organized Crime Intelligence Operation Center...bla,bla,bla...but then I saw this weird one, never seen before..."National Intellectual Property Rights- Coordination Center"...at bottom right:

[IMG][/IMG]

As I am trying to route someone to his book...



Regards


Ufopolitics

[Russellreader]

Ken thanks for posting the Walter Russell notes on your recent YouTube video.

https://youtu.be/aX1SablN-Jg

I am curious how you would draw the string of alternating cathodes and anodes described by WR where the cathode is magnetic stillness with no motion (the black suns?) and the anode is the sun much like you have drawn in your great book. Eric Dollard describes the sun as a converter converting the primary energy (magnetic stillness?) into secondary energy (dielectricity?). The Oort cloud would not be there if there were not two black suns connected with the sun. WR says one side connects to us on the male side and the other connects on the female side. Application of your theory to electricity generation and transmission would require incorporating the cathode as shown by WR with your drawings of the anode would it not? I am especially curious how you would draw and describe the cathode as described by WR. Why does he place helium at the cathode and hydrogen (together with carbon which I understand) at the anode? How does hydrogen connect with the ether and the anode and helium with the ether and the cathode?

I am also curious how your work ties into Karl Welz and Wilhelm Reich's description of orgone energy. Karl Welz's devices are supposed to convert DOR into POR by pulsing POR. Radiation either electrical, microwave or radioactivity create DOR which harms living things. Is the POR/DOR male/female (I think not as they don't seem to void each other) or are they the same thing like hot and cold which are relative measures. I think the latter because isn't the pulsing POR analogous to adding hot water to cold? I ask because to apply your work more fully to gardening or health you need to incorporate orgone/prana/chi. Is orgone a biproduct of the creation of space made visible sometimes by Cherenkov radiation where the etheric radiation is slowed down emitting light, coming as POR with a frequency and energy determined by the element or elements involved? The light elements would have POR fast and weak and the heavy elements slow and powerful as indicated by Walter Russell. Electrical generation as you explain is magnetism acting on a conductor like copper creating a torsion in the ether which resists and restores balance by emitting electricity. Perhaps some of the energy comes from POR (perhaps via the ether) converting it to DOR to restore balance? Pulsation POR converts DOR to POR usually by the pulsations of the black sun radiations (male and female) or by alternating vortices like in weather systems or by action of water such as alternating vortices in streams or by trees or by shapes like pyramids or mountains or towers or star forts? Is this because a torsion in our dimension created by vortices or differing pressure conditions draws in energy from the ether (perhaps first by creating a torsion in the ether) to restore balance? The thread on Hermes Trimagestus and Walter Russell gives numerous examples where alchemical transformations provide energy which might be explained by your model using ether as a fulcrum and driver. I will have to re-read that thread and your book. PS I love your advice to study and read instead of watching TV and your advice to use the retroductive logic is invaluable. It reminds me of this quote from Ed Leedskalnin:

Education

You know we receive an education in the schools from books. All those books that people became educated from twenty-five years ago, are wrong now, and those that are good now, will be wrong again twenty-five years from now. So if they are wrong then, they are also wrong now, and the one who is educated from the wrong books is not educated, he is misled. All books that are written are wrong, the one who is not educated cannot write a book and the one who is educated, is really not educated but he is misled and the one who is misled cannot write a book which is correct.

The misleading began when our distant ancestors began to teach their descendants. You know they knew nothing but they passed their knowledge of nothing to the coming generations and it went so innocently that nobody noticed it. That is why we are not educated.

Now I will tell you what education is according to my reasoning. An educated person is one whose senses are refined. We are born as brutes, we remain and die as the same if we do not become polished. But all senses do not take polish. Some are to coarse to take it. The main base of education is one's "self-respect". Any one lacking self-respect cannot be educated. The main bases of self-respect is the willingness to learn, to do only the things that are good and right, to believe only in the things that can be proved, to possess appreciation and self control.

Now, if you lack willingness to learn, you will remain as a brute and if you do things that are not good and right, you will be a low person, and if you believe in things that cannot be proved, any feeble minded person can lead you, and if you lack appreciation, it takes away the incentive for good doing and if you lack self control you will never know the limit.

So all those lacking these characteristics in their makeup are not educated.

Ed Leedskalnin, 1936.

[ldrancer]

i was watching an eric dollard video on heating up neodymium magnets with plutonium, like you where. and made a video about, and yo8u guys where saying it was overunity and you wher egoing to turn it into a heater. so anyway, eric says its not enough its not feasible.

i do know what the difference between not enough, and feasible means.
what the hell ever. and i guess you remember me telling you that too. or maybe you'll just say you ignored it, until you yelled at me like i was bugging people.

so most, of your stuff, besides being pictures is a bunch of hot air. pictures. that stuff. your not discovering things. you arent the first person to see it. yea but its not worth stealing the idea of images over. this concept is bad.. anyway.

wrong post. but it has its own topic, this disussion does. as i cant find it. but i think i remember it was its own topic. its there. anyway

[solitech]

Where to start?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L0CB9GVjLH8

Here. I'd like to start here.

*siiiiiiiiiigh* I need money. And big ass $800 magnets to play with.

[trahedron]

...
The only thing that causes me pause is not fully grasping the basic building blocks. Since magnetism relies on dielecticity and obviously the Aether, it would be nice to fully grasp what this is, how it moves, why it moves as it does, etc. It's easy to accept that it is there; it is a lot more difficult to be one with it and see it from its vantage point. From there, understanding electricity would be far easier and once electricity is really understood, as they say, the sky is the limit.

I think from his diagrams that there is some level of understanding that facilitates action at this point, but we need to really put our minds and a pencil to it. These two diagrams lead me to this belief:





For example, in his antigravity video, he appears to have a (even if a slight one) working knowledge of this relationship that facilitates some actionable results. Likewise with the polar usage to evoke different results in life growth.

It seems that we do need a comprehensive dialogue regarding how these recent videos fit together with longitudinal (Instantaneous Action at A Distance or "stinging waves" as Tesla noted) vs transverse waves. There is some cohesion that we are missing that I think may actually be possible to tie together at this point, but I haven't put my finger on it yet.

If we start talking about the (a)ether, then maybe we need to also draw into this discussion what Eric Dollard has referred to. I don't have the exact reference, but I recall how he was talking about how he and others have seen a "green gas" form in high voltage experiments inside of glass containers / bulbs. I guess the bulb broke in his case, but even then the green gas seemed to remain for a number of seconds. It seems the logical hypothesis is that somehow the high voltage coaxed / coerced / retarded the ether in such a way as to manifest it in a "lower" observable state. Perhaps a high powered magnetic field in conjunction with this would have allowed the experiment to go further and thus "retard" the ether further into a dew of sorts from it's higher energy states.

It seems that there are some things that we need to consider in this area now and I think that thanks to Ken's work here that we are able to start to hypothesize in this direction and to actually experiment.

Thoughts?

[Dog-One]

Really looking forward to the 4th edition. Great job Ken! We are forever in your dept.

Anyone else have thoughts on this?

The only thing that causes me pause is not fully grasping the basic building blocks. Since magnetism relies on dielecticity and obviously the Aether, it would be nice to fully grasp what this is, how it moves, why it moves as it does, etc. It's easy to accept that it is there; it is a lot more difficult to be one with it and see it from its vantage point. From there, understanding electricity would be far easier and once electricity is really understood, as they say, the sky is the limit.

[trahedron]

4TH EDITION DUE OUT "SOON"
WHAT IS SOON?????? WELL, I HAVE TONS TO ADD.....SOON MEANS SOON!
...

Great work TA! Can you give us some indications of what is doable (actionable) with your findings?

You have spoken of antigravity, for one small example, by using your unification diagram.

You have also spoken of growth, such as the plants, chickens, etc. and how those can be modified in some fashion either encouraged or discouraged.

It would be great if we could get some discussion and presentations going that relate to these various implications and how to act on them collectively. I think there are many of us who want to take your findings to the next level. To expound, I think that many of us are "close" to seeing things through your vision or perspective, but we need a more concrete "push" over that edge now.

Anyone else have thoughts on this?

[Ufopolitics]

4TH EDITION DUE OUT "SOON"
WHAT IS SOON?????? WELL, I HAVE TONS TO ADD.....SOON MEANS SOON!



...

IT IS SOO GRRRREAT TO SEE YOU ARE BACK HERE!!


Very glad to see you back and recharged/reloaded...

Let's get to work and change this whole World once and for all!


Warm Regards


Ufopolitics

[TheoriaApophasis]

4TH EDITION DUE OUT "SOON"
WHAT IS SOON?????? WELL, I HAVE TONS TO ADD.....SOON MEANS SOON!





video for pics below here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uJi_2Viexng

CHECK THIS:

DISCOVERY: PUBLISHED COPYRIGHT as to be published 4TH edition 2015 “Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism”


first time ever seen on earth, phase shift of light using magnetic polarization and FERROCELL




WITH MOVEMENT.........trailing pole is always RED SHIFT


WITH MOVEMENT........LEADING POLE is always BLUE SHIFTED
always 8)




IMAGES BELOW COPYRIGHT 4TH edition 2015 “Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism”

4TH edition 2015 “Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism”

[solitech]

Hey T.A., could you explain what the difference is between a permanent magnet and an electromagnet? I know that the permanent magnet has reciprocating processional centripetal and centrifugal magnetic fields as well as the dialectric inertial plane and that it works because all of the fields are aligned within the magnet. Is the electromagnet only a flow of dialectricity along the copper wire that terminates as magnetism along the outer edges? If so then does the electromagnet only have one reciprocating field on either "pole"? This would explain why it can "repel" and "attract" permanent magnets but it will not produce the same effects shown here https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UIlijUSJMmg

[Russellreader]

[QUOTE=TheoriaApophasis;268634]I made an
1. i know WHY its there
2. I know HOW its there
3. I now know why after 100 biological experiments (more actually), why there is a radical shift in polarity affect that goes far beyond the H2O molecule geometry.


Excellent work Ken, thanks to you when I look at plants I now imagine the dielectric plane. Carbon and water are both dielectric permissive so I seek enhance the dielectric plane of the plants mostly by using mulch, wood chips or cardboard. Keeping the dielectric plane moist with ground cover seems to speed growth and develop deeper roots and bigger plants. Your seed trick works, but for plants which bolt like lettuce, cilantro and parsley using the north pole reduces bolting probably by slowing maturation.

I look forward to reading your edition to help explain why.

[trahedron]

New Videos

It appears that he has also gained a little new insight (see his most recent videos: Video 1 & Video 2) and I am very much looking forward to seeing how this is conveyed.