Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[TheoriaApophasis]

This sentence makes me think to the 2 elements which are before hydrogen in the original periodic table of elements of Mendeleev, from 1906. I know he made the mistake (so far as I read about him and his work) to assimilate the ether to matter and/or chemical substances, but on the other part he was right when assumed the ether as the generator of everything, being the quintessence of everything in this world, and from which results the formation of all matter.

Finally I received the linear Hall sensors, so next week I hope to have time to make the measurements of the strenght of N and S poles of different magnets.

not only N and S but as ANY gauss meter will show you have wholly diff readings on

1. centripetal

2. centrifugal / the edge

3. the intermediate


all hyper-logical and completely expected as per the accurate model of magnetism.

[sadang]

Harmonics below hydrogen are attributional motions of the Ether that cannot be defined, except for 2 that I know of.

This sentence makes me think to the 2 elements which are before hydrogen in the original periodic table of elements of Mendeleev, from 1906. I know he made the mistake (so far as I read about him and his work) to assimilate the ether to matter and/or chemical substances, but on the other part he was right when assumed the ether as the generator of everything, being the quintessence of everything in this world, and from which results the formation of all matter.

Finally I received the linear Hall sensors, so next week I hope to have time to make the measurements of the strenght of N and S poles of different magnets.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Two back to back 4" TV Neck Ferrites with 60mm Ferrite Magnets attached N&S for experiment and I would swear that when I load a 12 pack of the 9mm Bismuth pellets down their throat, I can feel some sort of attraction or opposition.
Something going on there but not understood nor obvious - yet!

See video 89

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3SaW2otbxAE

bismuth is AS attracted to a magnet , centripetally and along the dielectric inertial plane as is another "magnet"

bismuth only repells centrifugal divergent magnetism , as such the concept of bismuth being "extremely diamagnetic" is only HALF accurate


nothing like laying out 180 POUNDS of bismuth for testing.



Noted your references to photons and your description but how would you explain what we had prior as the 'electron' flow from Cathode to Anode in a Vacuum Tube and the release of 'secondary electrons' from the Anode/Plate.

as per what? the photoelectric effect?

secondary discharge is as expected as flying concrete is when shooting the pavement beneath your feet on the road with a machinegun.

both logical and to be expected.

Also of interest is how you would now describe what 'plasma' is as I feel this phenomena is the last visible electrical manifestation before the unseen Aether comes into the picture.

ionized gas,..... cart before the horse, plasma is already the phenomenal, the 'seen'.

Can we say that the unseen Aether is actually 'counterspace'?

that and dielecticity is, yes.

4 Ether modalities,

dielectricity
magnetism (dielectricity in vectorization/ polarization/ creating space)

and 2 Ether hybrids

electricity and gravity


ole' Eric P Dollard is most assuredly right on one thing (far more than one of course), that being the comprehension of electricity and magnetism and Electrical theory is 100% IMPOSSIBLE without grasping counterspace.

Hes more right than even HE HIMSELF knows.

It never ends - Walter Russell in all of the 25 unseen Elements below Hydrogen which I associate as Aether forms - what is your best guess as to what they actually are?
Smokey

Russell was working on harmonic deduction of what is "to be expected" along his line of reasoning of what "should be there".

Russell was 90% or more correct on things, however he makes more than a few errors.

but compared to everyone elses 20%, hes a genuine example of what is best to strive for.

The fundamental particle is the neutron, of which 'free' becomes , due to its own acceleration/ perturbation necessitates it become a proton within, as i recall 7 to 9 mins. as an autonomous particle.


to say "hydrogen" is just to say " a free neutron that becomes a proton and therefore hydrogen within a few mins."


Harmonics below hydrogen are attributional motions of the Ether that cannot be defined, except for 2 that I know of.

one I wont talk about, it would take to long, the other is expressed by: 1/Phi^-3

discovery I made 12 years ago that I have 100s of pages of notes on.

it and its byproducts (phi, 1/phi/ 1/Phi^-2, Phi squared) pop up everywhere

including gyromagnetic precession, divergence and field pressure mediation, growth on and on and on.

[David G Dawson]

TPU & Vacuum Tubes & More Questions

Ken,
Two back to back 4" TV Neck Ferrites with 60mm Ferrite Magnets attached N&S for experiment and I would swear that when I load a 12 pack of the 9mm Bismuth pellets down their throat, I can feel some sort of attraction or opposition.
Something going on there but not understood nor obvious - yet!
Have made these up for some experiments for my TPU version.

Noted your references to photons and your description but how would you explain what we had prior as the 'electron' flow from Cathode to Anode in a Vacuum Tube and the release of 'secondary electrons' from the Anode/Plate.
Can you please put that into words to match your equivalent expressions of a Magnet.
I am into Tubes for reason of the Steven Mark TPU and many other similar projects where pristine pulses are required without the 'noise' and lack of harmonics of solid state.

Also of interest is how you would now describe what 'plasma' is as I feel this phenomena is the last visible electrical manifestation before the unseen Aether comes into the picture.
Can we say that the unseen Aether is actually 'counterspace'?

It never ends - Walter Russell in all of the 25 unseen Elements below Hydrogen which I associate as Aether forms - what is your best guess as to what they actually are?
I only ask these questions because of your deductive ability and will assist in the overall understanding.
Thanks.

Smokey

[TheoriaApophasis]

@TA


That pyramid magnet reminds me of the work of Karl Schappeller, I read most of the literature I could find on his work almost ten years ago now. At the time I was also reading Victor Schabergers work and I found both to be very in-depth and abstract...enlightening. Maybe that was when I lost my mind...or possibly gained it... sometimes it is hard to say relatively speaking.

In any case I have probed most magnet geometries with hall effect senor arrays I have designed and all are not created equal. In the far field maybe so but the near field is quite another matter...interesting stuff.

AC

I know that guy in the video, hes close friends with my associate.

He USED to be the biggest maggie seller in the USA

now hes invented some top secret stuff for cleaning pollution using magnets


Hes been making a fortune in China doing work.

hush hush.




Pyramid maggies work as a dielectric constriction portal for centrifugal divergent magnetism, its nothing "incredible", and yet it is at the same time.



someone asked me "why do pyramid maggies have such HIGH GAUSS fields?"

explain it they asked.....


so I posted this:

[Allcanadian]

@TA

3 TESLA perm. maggies can be made by stacking magnets into a pyramid, theyre used in special needs, medical testing etc etc etc.

see here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNtZ...QsEFmAh-TAWwrw

That pyramid magnet reminds me of the work of Karl Schappeller, I read most of the literature I could find on his work almost ten years ago now. At the time I was also reading Victor Schabergers work and I found both to be very in-depth and abstract...enlightening. Maybe that was when I lost my mind...or possibly gained it... sometimes it is hard to say relatively speaking.

In any case I have probed most magnet geometries with hall effect senor arrays I have designed and all are not created equal. In the far field maybe so but the near field is quite another matter...interesting stuff.

AC

[TheoriaApophasis]

So, density and concentration has nothing to do with magnetic strength?

I said no such thing. I said there is a threshold.

Even the premise of "magnetic" strength is pure nonsense.

Gauss ratings tied to mag flux,.... "magnetic flux density" or the "magnetic induction" is nonsense.

There is no such thing AS "just magnetism", ....all is tied to dielectricity in discharge and resultant spatial vectorization, the reciprocating polarized "dielectric field"


To speak about "mag strength" is like talking about "how much horse poo". without any consideration of the horse and what/how much its being fed

well, its meaningless and only a posterior referent.

I guess what I am really wanting is to find a substance, alloy, which is so dense that the magnetic potential is many times stronger than what we presently have in permanent magnets.

Highest dielectric inertia is supra-stable, that element is bismuth.

its capacity for LOSS of said inertia is ONLY obtained when changing its nucleus.

it has incredibly high magnetic reluctivity (i.e. hates external applied magnetism).


You keep referring to magnetism , which is very common, but it doesnt exist as an entity unto itself. ............., its a posterior attribute of dielectricity's loss of inertia and resultant change as another Ether modality, that being magnetism.

[Stealth]

Thanks. What I really meant was not to capture the aether but to concentrate the aether. So, density and concentration has nothing to do with magnetic strength? I guess what I am really wanting is to find a substance, alloy, which is so dense that the magnetic potential is many times stronger than what we presently have in permanent magnets. I have tried several already. Short of breaking off a piece of a burned out star, which is too dense to work with anyway, there must be a substance or a combination thereof that is yet undiscovered that would quadruple the magnetic potential. I understand the pyramid shape, and have built a few to experiment with, and I do believe that design and relationships in numeric values also play a huge role in how a device/structure/machine works. Sorry for the ramblings. Thanks. stealth

[TheoriaApophasis]

I like you analogy of magnetism, and have so far been able to, at least partially understand your view point, with which I do somewhat agree. But I have a question, Doesn't density play a large role in magnetic strength(gauss)? It seems the more dense a substance is, the more potential magnetic strength it will attain and hold. Is the denser material able to better capture aether , possibly by slowing it down a bit as it travels through it? Is this why the denser stars, which have burned out have become so dense that their magnetic strength is off the charts? When we super cool a magnet, aren't we really just causing the molecules to become more restrained/denser? These are questions I have always had, but couldn't get any factual verification from someone who knows. I know you have done a lot of experiments with magnetism, as have I. Thanks. stealth

you dont supercool the maggies, you cool the ceramics which makes them become super-diamagnetic.

Ive been playing with superconductor sets for ages. Yttrium barrium copper oxide disks.

however they are NOT superconductors at all, theyre ultra high diagmagnetic objects due to virtually eliminating the inter-atomic magnetism

making the disks magnetically reluctive.

magnetic reluctivity.

or ultra low magnetic permeability.


No, there is a magnetic threshold that cannot be surpassed without PERPETUAL INCOMING POWER

even then, there is a threshold at which matter is created out of dielectricity.

See GALACTIC JETS (google it etc.....) where the fundamental particle is created and ejected trillions and trillions of miles out due to immense power.


Gauss in perm. magnets has a threshold that cannot be breached, also the HIGHER the gauss, the more shallow the mag field


3 TESLA perm. maggies can be made by stacking magnets into a pyramid, theyre used in special needs, medical testing etc etc etc.

see here:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yNtZUFhjquw&list=UUh3cY-IW8QsEFmAh-TAWwrw

there are many factors, in perm. magnets factors such as neo iron boron lattice, and composition, and capacitance dump applied charge.

LOTS of factors in perm. maggies.



capture the Ether? dielectricity and magnetism are ALL Ether. Everything is the Ether, there is nothing to capture.

[Stealth]

I like you analogy of magnetism, and have so far been able to, at least partially understand your view point, with which I do somewhat agree. But I have a question, Doesn't density play a large role in magnetic strength(gauss)? It seems the more dense a substance is, the more potential magnetic strength it will attain and hold. Is the denser material able to better capture aether , possibly by slowing it down a bit as it travels through it? Is this why the denser stars, which have burned out have become so dense that their magnetic strength is off the charts? When we super cool a magnet, aren't we really just causing the molecules to become more restrained/denser? These are questions I have always had, but couldn't get any factual verification from someone who knows. I know you have done a lot of experiments with magnetism, as have I. Thanks. stealth

[TheoriaApophasis]

Ken,

In video #89, you indeed stirred up my grey matter. I could probably post a page of questions, but will limit myself to just one statement you made.

You gave the example of the big magnet used in a junkyard to pick up cars and said that electricity gives up dielectricity and terminates as magnetism. If that's not what you actually said, I apologize, that is what I heard.

Something screwy about this. Doesn't magnetism REQUIRE a dielectric inertial plane to even exist? Did I misunderstand that a dielectric inertial plane is composed of dielectricity?

.

the dielectric inertial plane is the conjugated formation IN and OF a magnet where dielectricity has a field modality that is COHERENT.

however the pathetic conception of this is "aligned domains" but that doesnt really MEAN a damn thing and it EXPLAINS NOTHING


electricity cannot exist without BOTH dielectric and magnetic

Phi x Psi = Q plank (electrification)....................... Electricity doesnt terminate INTO magnetism, rather AS magnetism by losing its dielectric component.


like saying water terminates into OXYGEN if you rob it of its hydrogen.

magnetism is dielectricity in discharge, or as Faraday referred to same as the "dielectric field"- Faraday


divergent magnetism follows the Poincare' disk model with pure perfection.

loss of inertia necessitates polarization, ie spatial divergent vectorization.


the dielectric inertial plane of a "magnet" (ie a coherent dielectric inertia object) is FORCED AT, concentrated AT , NOT NOT NOT located at the midpoint of every "magnet".


If you have a plastic ball half full of liquid and spin it up, you will see the liquid hug the midpoint PERIPHERY (inside wall) of the ball


however dielectricity is the same but in sharp contrast to the "ball and liquid" it would and does "hug" the midpoint CENTER and absolutely NOT the periphery

same fluid dynamics at play.


all a "magnet" IS or DOES is create OBVIOUS resultant maco-magnetic phenomena RESULTANT to creating COHERENCY (or the BS called "aligned domains" which really really is just some meaningless BS) of the inter-atomic magneto dielectricITY.


Its like having a pile of GRAY NONSENSE........., of black faced one side and white faced other side pile of dominos....... (random atoms) and stacking them ALL THE SAME so WOW!!!!! now its stark black (invisible of course dielectricity) and the WHITE (magnetism) .

Creating a magnet EITHER FROM dielectric coherency ONLY (like stroking soft iron with a magnet and creating a soft magnet) OR zapping a neodymium iron boron PRE MAGNET with a charge and causing BOTH DIELECTRIC COHERENCY AND INCREASED DIELECTRIC CAPACITANCE .




you should download the book and read the section about the conjugate nature of TWO OPPOSITE field modalities, magnetism and dielectricity which are 180 opposite each other and how they mediate out their own pressures in opposition.

they do so with an inertial plane and TWO HYPERBOLAS

an inverse sphere is a double hyperbola. that is an ABSOLUTE FACT that is hardcore.

Ken,
What I thought you were going to say is that dielectricity concentrates into a dielectric inertial plane, creating magnetism. Even this though leaves me pondering. If electricity is a hybrid Ether modality composed of both dielectricity and magnetism, what form must it take relative to a permanent magnet? Geometrically, where is the magnetism and where is the dielectricity? And by going around a loop of copper wire (a dielectric reflector), how does it arrange itself with similar characteristics to that of a permanent magnet? Such that it can pick up a metal car?

.

As for the 'loop' or solenoid....in SIMPLE, its forcing LOSS of dielectric inertia and enormous appearance therefore (obviously) of magnetism.

The Ether is the Ether is the Ether....... magnetism is the expression of inertia loss resultantly therefore polarization (= creates space). .......spatial vectorization of an Ether modality in LOSS OF ITS INERTIA.

i.e. magnetism = radiation , divergence , polarization.

Geometrically is meaningless, CONCENTRATED AT......not LOCATED AT.

point NON SPECIFIC self similarity

this is FIELD INCOMMENSURABILITY , or F.I.


I was going to say it but i cannot say everything in EVERY VIDEO, ......720P video takes up too much space to upload.




<<<<<what form must it take relative to a permanent magnet? >>>>>

remember a magnet (so called) is NOT a magnet (wait, what the hell does crazy statement mean???????) it means what you are seeing (rather not seeing) in a "magnet" is 1 part magnetism to 3.23606 parts dielectricity (in a perfect example which never exists ultimately).

The kiddies (us dumb humans) see the PUPPETS (magnetism),.......not the 300 pound fat man (dielectricity) behind the curtain pulling the strings




What form? easy, Inter-atomic dielectric COHERENCY (trillions and trillions etc. of atoms in and of the 'magnet')

if you want to think of a "MAGNET" as a "FIELD LASER", stick that in your brain.


5 watt light bulb (INCOHERENT LIGHT) = cannot read by, useless...,.......worthless

5 watt laser however (COHERENT LIGHT) ........will BURN A HOLE IN YOUR ASS



Whooops, whats powering the LASER LIGHT (in the analogy of our "magnet" the light = magnetism) ???????

Thats right, that would be the IMPORTANT and unseen BATTERIES (in our analogy, the coherent dielectric).


In making a "magnet" we have "piled" (so to say) , or as meant concentrated BOTH magnetism and dielectricity into UNISON in the creation of a magneto-dielectric COHERENT inter-atomic object (ie the 'magnet' as we pathetically call it).



obviously a laser has several components, however the VERY SIMPLE gas laser use a 100% mirror and 95% mirror and BUILD light coherency by reflectance and resultantly coherent laser EMISSION.

but, dont take the analogy too far........... as such that would be a fallacy of "taking the analogy too far" .






vintage old SIMPLEX gas HeNe laser like i used to play with.

which BUILDS light coherency and THEN emission

[Dog-One]

Video #89

Ken,

In video #89, you indeed stirred up my grey matter. I could probably post a page of questions, but will limit myself to just one statement you made.

You gave the example of the big magnet used in a junkyard to pick up cars and said that electricity gives up dielectricity and terminates as magnetism. If that's not what you actually said, I apologize, that is what I heard.

Something screwy about this. Doesn't magnetism REQUIRE a dielectric inertial plane to even exist? Did I misunderstand that a dielectric inertial plane is composed of dielectricity?

What I thought you were going to say is that dielectricity concentrates into a dielectric inertial plane, creating magnetism. Even this though leaves me pondering. If electricity is a hybrid Ether modality composed of both dielectricity and magnetism, what form must it take relative to a permanent magnet? Geometrically, where is the magnetism and where is the dielectricity? And by going around a loop of copper wire (a dielectric reflector), how does it arrange itself with similar characteristics to that of a permanent magnet? Such that it can pick up a metal car?


Oh by the way, I like the term you used: Conservation of the Ether. I'm sure I will hear that one again a time or two.

[ewizard]

I bought a small piece of Bismuth a while back to try this type of experiment (about 1 ounce) and used a very small flat disk magnet. I think I put Bismuth above it also and the magnet seemed like it was sort of floating or sliding around but not really any space between it and the Bismuth below it. What I found most interesting about bismuth and largely why I really bought it was the 2 guys that had a some sort of suitcase power unit (I forget their names at the moment) which involved some Bismuth panels. Not sure if it was real but it supposedly created energy without any input from outside sources like batteries or AC power.

Thanks for the fascinating test TA as you saved me from thinking mine failed due to it's small size - LOL.

[TheoriaApophasis]

"All that bismuth is half for investment, since its just skyrocketed in price (before i bought it that is) and also because of 2 big discoveries i made in 'programming' it with a charge and or field and charges in casting."

Have you made some sort of real breakthrough that would warrant that we should be stocking a little for experiments?

Indeed yes. But 2 other people I have been in contact with have done so as well.

here is just a hint:
Future Solar Cells Made of Bismuth Ferrite Could Yield Higher Voltages - The Green Optimistic

but that is old news, but something exciting is branching off that discovery

A: Chinese are shutting down some major mining of lead, and China supplies 85% of the worlds bismuth.

B; Bismuth is not mined anywhere, its always a byproduct of lead and copper mining, mostly lead.

C: There is a new invention coming out that uses Bismuth ferrite BiFeO3, ....its potential is rather mind blowing.

D: What I discovered has , so to speak, blown my socks off; as per applied charge and or field to bismuth and resultant effect in application of X.

E: I dont know if YOU, or most anyone really KNOWS how rare bismuth is, but its right alongside gold and platinum in rarity , parts per billion.

BISMUTH = 9 parts per billion. GOLD = 4 parts per billion. PLATINUM = 5 parts per billion.


F: As i deduced in testing, the END product of the FIRST transuranic element, Neptunium has extremely interesting applicative properties if you know what to do.

......as meant bismuth doesnt occur naturally, its the final product of

Id suggest buying a ton from a Chinese supplier.

Or even a 1000 pounds wouldnt cost that much (relatively)


Metal-Pages - Bismuth prices


Bismuth prices continue to rise; outlook strong | Metal Bulletin


Bismuth prices outperform in minor metals markets

August 27, 2014
Bismuth prices outperform in minor metals markets | Metal Bulletin



Obviously, all investment is a risk, always do so based upon logic and study and 'doing your homework'


I put a TON of money where my mouth is.

that TON is a grossly enormous pile of bismuth.



As i told the seller "its good doing bismuth with you"

[Netica]

"All that bismuth is half for investment, since its just skyrocketed in price (before i bought it that is) and also because of 2 big discoveries i made in 'programming' it with a charge and or field and charges in casting."


Have you made some sort of real breakthrough that would warrant that we should be stocking a little for experiments?