This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by Netica View Post
    If you was to make a flat doughnut shape of bismuth with angled veins, to suit the diameter of magnet, so it reacts only with the centrifugal.
    Lay it on top of the magnet.
    I wonder if it hovers and spins.


    it wouldnt react to that giant beast of a magnet as per levitation, just too heavy by far.


    however I HAVE just uploaded the heaviest levitation magnet anyone has seen levitated, its 4.7 OUNCES


    most levitators use a 3mm cube magnet just a few grams,


    this one is 4.7 ounces, a 1" by 1/2" magnet. Which as per bismuth levitation set is an elephant compared to the little mice that are levitated


    uploaded those 2 vids. earlier about 8 hours ago.



    Since the bismuth is AS attracted to the centripetal as another magnet, but only expressed differently, id have to block off the center with bismuth to get better levitation, which is doable on a larger NEO, but not easy or a pleasing prospect.



    All that bismuth is half for investment, since its just skyrocketed in price (before i bought it that is) and also because of 2 big discoveries i made in 'programming' it with a charge and or field and charges in casting.

    Leave a comment:


  • Netica
    replied
    If you was to make a flat doughnut shape of bismuth with angled veins, to suit the diameter of magnet, so it reacts only with the centrifugal.
    Lay it on top of the magnet.
    I wonder if it hovers and spins.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by Dog-One View Post
    Why do I suspect you have some really good use for all that Bismuth?



    More than just financial gain.




    Looking forward to your 3rd edition.



    you suspect right


    Theres another 800 pounds UNSEEN in that video, I mean honestly, did you want me to punch thru the floor to the basement? LOL
    check out the 2 newest vids


    also a REAL NEAT ONE TONIGHT!


    Neat, as in "Ive never seen that before"
    Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 09-04-2014, 01:26 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dog-One
    replied
    Nobody can say...

    Originally posted by TheoriaApophasis View Post
    This video i just made should make you laugh your ass off

    $3400 worth of bismuth, 175 POUNDS

    and a $1000 magnet
    Geez Ken, nobody can say you don't put your money where your mouth is.



    Why do I suspect you have some really good use for all that Bismuth?



    More than just financial gain.




    Looking forward to your 3rd edition.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by sadang View Post
    SaDAng

    This video i just made should make you laugh your ass off

    VIDEO 84 WORLDS LARGEST DIAMAGNETIC LEVITATION TEST !





    $3400 worth of bismuth, 175 POUNDS

    and a $1000 magnet


    DID I SET A GUINNESS BOOK OF WORLD RECORD WITH THIS TEST (lol) ????




    Im surprised it didnt FALL THRU THE FLOOR TO THE BASEMENT!!!!




    I have 800 pounds MORE i could have STACKED UP , but that definitely would have fallen thru the floor to the basement





    You have to have a sense of humor

    Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 09-04-2014, 01:23 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadang
    replied
    @idrancer

    its a communication tool, language is. if i ask you about something you cant explain is it my fault you cant describe it?
    Both, you and me are not native speakers of english language. At least this is my first impression related to your way of writing messages. A communcation tool, could be also writing, drawing, the sign language, empathy or even telepathy are ways of transmiting informations. So, if you ask me about something that I explain using terms and words specific to that language, and you don't understand the fault is not only mine! Because in this equation are two persons you and me, and we both have to make efforst to understand each other! How many effrots did you make to understand Ken's theory? How many times did you read his book about magnetism? How many other's books about magnetism did you read over time? How many experiments did you make by yourself to prove or disprove his book, saying and videos? And at last but not least, from where this behaviour to wait for someone alse to explain something, without you having to make any effort on that way?

    As I already wrote in my first message here on this topic, the helical dynamics of magnetic field is not something new! At least not for me! What is new somehow, is his concept of dielectric inertial plane as a driver, as a prime mover, as a generator for magnetic field, instead of the materialistic and useless bloch wall (domain wall) used by actual science. And also the closed relation of this dielectric inertial plane to ether! An others apsects that I'll discuss later, eventualy!

    Let's keep this topic as clean as it can be, and come here with messages, videos and questions about his book, theory and movies! Just read them and you will be more won, than still nagging him, with questions that you repeat infinitely, and it is clear he does not want to answer. That may be a way to push yourself to deepen his theory, to read his book and to see his movies!

    SaDAng

    Leave a comment:


  • ldrancer
    replied
    Originally posted by sadang View Post
    @idrancer

    If you do not understand the terms and language used by Ken, does not mean that I or others do not understand what he wants to convey. I try to understand what is magnetism (and many others) for many years, and in Ken's theory found many of my disparate ideas placed in a logic ordinance.

    To understand the terms used by him, must have years of alternative and comparative studies. You will never understand what he wants to convey by calling the dictionary or Wikipedia. That's your problem, you do not notice or maybe do not want to see.

    When someone want to explain something new, he use natural words, normal words, day by day words, because that is human language. And eventually use jargon specific to that domain. Do you know or understand this?

    Have you ever asked what someone wants to say, when he can not make understandable to you? Have you ever thought you don't understand him due to yourself? That the problem belongs to you not to him? Reflect deeply on these issues, and do not post here nonsense, but only come with specific questions or concerns!

    SaDAng
    ive asked him, in messages to give me an understanding. he just sends me some message back saying how he discovered cetripetal and centrifugal movements of a magnet on video, is all. and im like, yea i could of showed you that.

    i do know one thing there wouldnt be no langauge at all if everybody could just use sounds and letters assembled in anyway they wanted to portray any sort of funny idea to each other.

    its a communication tool, language is. if i ask you about something you cant explain is it my fault you cant describe it?

    Leave a comment:


  • ldrancer
    replied
    your dealing with theories and assumptions. if you understand you could tear it up backwards and forwards. have an understanding of it. build it yourself. since noone understand what the sun is, its used as a fake thing to make a fake word out of it to describe it to everything you dont never know and wont using fake words.

    and noone has even argued i defind it as the sun. when polar,
    .. the poles of the earth or a magnet
    poloar, ... bear

    lots of things point to this not being and being the opposite of what polar is, but i think about and know that polar means sun.

    which is way more of a description of what magnetism is if theorasis says thats, what it is, than what he says, which is just polarization. You dont know what the sun is you dont know what the meaning of the word polarization means.

    ive at least descrbied it the best i can. and do i think magnets are polarization?

    .. like no not really. because...

    one reason. i was looking at that figure. if you can answer this question for me it would help.

    the one that shows the up and down on the wavy display of the magnet. i cant find the picuture.

    ok, question can this be build, like a machine? can i make a machine that does that, makes that kind of mechanical motion?

    actually i dont htink it can. thats what im saying cause of the weird way it acts. but can you? cuase that would be.. pretty neat and maybe usable. in some way. to propel or something plus really fun to play with.

    but it seems its your concept of what a magnet is.

    so your agreeing its not even a real feasible thing that i can grasp, hold in my hands, or make a machine into. ?

    so my theory then would be, and maybe im not adding new things maybe im not coming up with new stuff. but i am trying to make the topic move forward..

    the middle part. you have no evidence its spins around on itself in the middle like that. you can draw out the map of the waves in it. so, the middle or diaelectric plane. could be, anything. you dont know thats how it propels itself. cause the whole concept would twist in on itself doing that.

    so its not a feasible thing. its not a machine i can use to propel stuff with.

    if you could, this is the thing, if you could figure out the middle. figure out as in turn into a working diagram, machine. then you could harness the power of the magnet.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadang
    replied
    @idrancer

    If you do not understand the terms and language used by Ken, does not mean that I or others do not understand what he wants to convey. I try to understand what is magnetism (and many others) for many years, and in Ken's theory found many of my disparate ideas placed in a logic ordinance.

    To understand the terms used by him, must have years of alternative and comparative studies. You will never understand what he wants to convey by calling the dictionary or Wikipedia. That's your problem, you do not notice or maybe do not want to see.

    When someone want to explain something new, he use natural words, normal words, day by day words, because that is human language. And eventually use jargon specific to that domain. Do you know or understand this?

    Have you ever asked what someone wants to say, when he can not make understandable to you? Have you ever thought you don't understand him due to yourself? That the problem belongs to you not to him? Reflect deeply on these issues, and do not post here nonsense, but only come with specific questions or concerns!

    SaDAng

    Leave a comment:


  • ldrancer
    replied
    Originally posted by admin View Post
    Please refrain from posting in Ken's thread anymore. You're very antagonistic towards his views in his own discussion so if you disagree this much, post elsewhere. You're welcome to start your own thread and discuss your own viewpoints, but plenty of members are interested in the conversation here with the exception of your repetitive disagreements.
    quote me out of context a lot too to make me look bad.

    i quoted him and then his 2 facedness. the last thing said was an insult to me. You pretend anyone really cares what you think while you point out certain things.

    as i told you in message what hes come out with here, is repeat. people have known this stuff and its also open.

    Write a website if you want to HAVE EVERYONE LISTEN TOEVERYTHING YOU HAVE TO SAY. then you cant complain when noone comes to it. quit getting on a forum to pretend everyone has to hear the crap youve got to say.

    Im just stating what I don't want heard. Can I not hear, non-real words?
    cant you guys since you know everythign about words, telling me to read, explain what the word means? you couldnt to me. so when you used the word again

    your talking over top of me and trying to overthrow the topic. you dont own it.

    fine have your communist discussion.

    you guys wont even ask becuase you dont know. or have alterate agendas one..

    the last post i made anyway, before replying to sadang was QUOTING him. much of a post huh?

    and heres dog-ones abusive post to me.

    Dog-One Dog-One is online now
    Member

    Join Date: Aug 2009
    Posts: 43
    Arrow Secrets of Magnetism
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by ldrancer View Post
    word means to define something.
    polar is the sun
    now define magnets again.

    im the one who put the definition... according to that up here. why don't you grow up.
    and start using language. people who use words to communicate with.


    ld,

    Ken has been kind enough to share his knowledge and experiments with us. Must you continue to bash his posts?

    If you have some great insight, please start your own thread and leave Ken's alone. You are not being helpful, or even humorous. For the moment I'm asking you nicely. Please be considerate of my request.

    D1
    Forward Message

    so dog-one or moderator abuser one?? um so me asking someone to use language and real words and not assumption words, and you trying to message me to censor me is, bad?

    well ok then.

    by the way theorasis i watch your vidoes for like 1:30 then I get bored of you rambling on. Ive got the point. its neat to look at. Bored. nice lots of attacks on muslims you have on your video site thing too.

    oh yea join the other topics so ken can start to use words to talk over me then im thrown out and then not be able to talk like i am in them, no because, He'll have something... to say.

    why you guys take that like anybody has to hear the, crap you gotta say? ?

    polarization to me is not a word. it pretty much means sun. but you guys dont know what it is, i dont know what it is. and i want to know. yuo should want to know, if you don't know. what something you dont know anything about, is.

    and admin me and you dog-ones conversation i also said my other theory which i think would be the only thing you'd be relating to.

    who is exactly having a problem theorasis? ive made my claim to him.

    i cant see a reason for anybody else. except dog-one or the admin. you act like some big deal has been made. ken did state he knew everything about magnets, and polarization when i said id ont know what it means and he said read.

    like i cant read or havent read what he's read. but right off the internet.

    then he brings the arguement back up again. i just stated to use words that mean things. i already stated my case. it wasnt argued against. sO i WON by default. then you start it again.

    so now your going to have to end it by explainign and aplogizing to me or censoring your forum with your 2 facededness, and 2 fake accounts. and moderator abuse. wooh
    Last edited by ldrancer; 09-03-2014, 06:26 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • ldrancer
    replied
    Polarization Is An Assumption

    whatever an arguments something thats 2 sided and the 2 sidedness of you is you used some lacky to harass me over this then you didnt lke the outcome so you've came to attack me with moderator abuse.

    so what i dont care. i only told him to use english and this was argued before and hes talking over top of me by being owned in the arguement he took part of cause i quoted him telling me to read when i said polarization isnt a word and he said read like i didnt know how to read, then when i came up with the whatever some site described that I guess you must agree with einstein also cause they'll put his stuff wherever you guys go on with your bs where youll attack someone and youll go along with something and NOT MENTION it to anyone. what your doing. then think that YOUR RIGHT.

    LIARS. you, you know you cant' even like have a position?

    i just told him to use english he even had a mouth on him about it to me, so i took him up on his bluff and raised him. i put the definition.

    im just saying your all saying when you use that word some make believe up theories, i guess You think are real. Cause thats the exact definition of that word. Im not going along with it and asked him to use some real words.

    Like rock or water or tree or something i can understand.

    if i see a magnet it does things and i dont know why. it makes things come to it, but in a vortex type situation, I kind of get it.

    what noone else unless their licking his butt can comment? He also acted very snobby too me too in private messages instead of leaving me alone talking about how he discovered this and that.

    i can see how a magnet can attract something it acting as a vortex, up and down on top. but you might of explained to say it goes around, back around on the south. butttt then how can a tool like this be made? can a machine be made like this?

    no it cant so no its not explained, its your theory.

    so anyway I'll ask any questions I want to and if he can't explain. I dont want to hear your theories, and I'll ask any questions say what I want and tear your theories apart in anyway I can.

    OH why dont you write a website if thats what you want to do is Just tell every people, things. If you want feedback then shutup or get on a website.

    Im not going to be ingored, talked over then laughed at later by theorasis and his assumptions.

    thats all that polarization is, is an assumption. So your no better than step 0.

    People have been mean trying to get me to leave this topic. but Im totalllly being nice. Your being 2 sided by messaging me in private using 2 accounts and not liking the outcome DOG-ONE of the results as you tried to tell someone in private youd rather them not post. I told you in no unneccassary terms NO. didnt I? and now moderator abuse by yelling at me over that.

    POLARIZATION IS AN ASSUMPTION.

    Dont debate me though continue to attack anybody with relative questions.

    Hes the one who said he'd explain magnetism. Alright if you cant then, just admit it, that you can't. noone making you. But you'd rather use the word polarization then see how many people will believe you. instead.

    or maybe our other discussion fake user moderator abuse guy?
    you never messaged me back after sending me a message.

    Leave a comment:


  • admin
    replied
    @ldrancer

    Originally posted by ldrancer View Post
    no whats water? whats a rock? whats wood? things right. tools you can use to make other tools with. water can be used to cool stuff with. rocks can be used to shape thigns with. wood can be used to heat stuff up.

    things have properties. words are things. polarization has no properties. its not an actual word in the online or anywhere definition. its a word for sun.

    and sun well.

    since noone understands the sun magnets are near us and understandable to people. so when people dont understand something they use polar. so they never have to explain it and it stays, stupid.

    Please refrain from posting in Ken's thread anymore. You're very antagonistic towards his views in his own discussion so if you disagree this much, post elsewhere. You're welcome to start your own thread and discuss your own viewpoints, but plenty of members are interested in the conversation here with the exception of your repetitive disagreements.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    point non-specific self-similarity isnt that easy for most people to grasp or even deeper.


    likewise the premise of incommensurability isnt taught in any school.


    This fact of force precession and divergent/convergent 'movement' isnt studied or known or grasped.


    It was inherently grasped by the Pythagoreans and Neoplatonists, but not by modern day educated (meaning brainwashed) college ejecta.



    I wasnt looking for the gyromagnetic precession to be half of 85, which is 42.5, but it came out that way and was predicted beforehand by myself.


    For several reasons, however it was and is impossible for it to even exist any other way, its utterly impossible.


    MRI technicians know about the LARMOR frequency, but all of them are clueless boobs about what it REALLY means, and its implications, etc etc etc.


    people study stuff today, nobody LEARNS anything, they have no capacity for non-linear synthesis of comprehension.


    The world is FULL of descriptions, and DEVOID of explanations.


    College is where you go to get descriptions to memorize,


    Plotinus, Proclus, Damascius, Plato etc etc etc, are the ancient Greek texts I have went to , to learn a lost method of comprehension.

    Leave a comment:


  • David G Dawson
    replied
    How SuperMagnets are made - YouTube

    So what I got out of this was 2400 volts @ 12 amps and this for a particular Neo but what would you use for a Ferrite?
    Not a great deal of information found on the making of Magnets.
    I am actually making my own soft iron horseshoe Magnets here for an attempt at the Wesley Gary device as that was a demonstration of a Magnet self oscillating and was going to apply to the Hendershot 'resonator'.

    Wesley Gary's Magnetic Motor

    You are not able to buy thin horseshoe Magnets today as Gary used so am making my own out of thin sof iron sheets, laminated and bolted together and thus the reason for knowing just how many DC volts and amps to use to get a working product.
    I bought some horseshoe types here but accidently found out that the magnets were actually mini Neos stuck into the face of the 'U' and clearly and distictly NOT a horseshoe Magnet.

    A need now to reread your documents and bone up on the terminology used and fully understand the concepts.
    Thanks.

    Smokey

    Leave a comment:


  • ldrancer
    replied
    Originally posted by sadang View Post
    And what are things idrancer? Don't tell me a kind of words! Can you make the difference between a noun and a verb?

    Try to deepen these two pages:
    - Polarization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    - Polar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    and then translate the meanings of the word "polarization" in the context used by Ken to explain the magnetism, as he see it.

    Stop messing this topic with silly arguments!

    thanks,
    SaDAng
    no whats water? whats a rock? whats wood? things right. tools you can use to make other tools with. water can be used to cool stuff with. rocks can be used to shape thigns with. wood can be used to heat stuff up.

    things have properties. words are things. polarization has no properties. its not an actual word in the online or anywhere definition. its a word for sun.

    and sun well.

    since noone understands the sun magnets are near us and understandable to people. so when people dont understand something they use polar. so they never have to explain it and it stays, stupid.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X