This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by David G Dawson View Post
    I am here because I need to know how to make a magnet self oscillate

    you need to know about the gyromagnetic precession of magnetism which is 42.5


    also called the LARMOR FREQUENCY

    Gyromagnetic ratios, and magnetic precession is nothing of my discovery, this principle is part and parcel to all magnetic
    resonance imaging (MRI), nuclear magnetic resonance imaging (NMRI) technology, however the entire field of MRI technology
    is senseless and clueless that a permanent magnet exhibits this due to a special magneto-dielectric field geometry. MRI use enormous
    power to generate these magnetic precessions, which field contrasts are then used to image and determine what is being scanned.
    Enormous pulsing power is used in the creation of MRI images, however a single large pulse is used to create an identical precessional
    magnetic geometry in the permanent magnet. As is the case with most technology, things are discovered and perfected without
    actually understanding or caring about the principles behind them.

    This angle is 42.492 (42.5~) degrees, which is also the frequency in Mhz/T of the proton,
    however this is incorrectly published as 42.5781, it is at perfect equilibrium at 42.492, but this is a minor difference.



    with NO coincidence this frequency of POLAR PRECESSION of 42.5 is exactly HALF of 1 which = 85 degrees or Mhz/T of the circular precessional growth of everything is in nature which is 137.5077 - 137.5077 and 85


    Now, go google this :

    "137.5 golden angle"

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by David G Dawson View Post
    The Bismuth Shrine:


    Rarity:
    Very common: LEAD = 14 parts per million in the earths crust. COPPER = 60 parts per million in the earths curst.
    Moderately rare: SILVER = 75 parts per billion.
    Extremely rare: BISMUTH = 9 parts per billion. GOLD = 4 parts per billion. PLATINUM = 5 parts per billion.



    All indications are that bismuth does not exist natively whatsoever rather is the end product of depleted Neptunium. likewise is the case that most lead is depleted uranium. Additionally current plentiful presence of uranium with virtually non-existent Neptunium is further indication of this. Neptunium eventually decays to form bismuth-209, unlike most other common heavy nuclei which decay into lead isotopes. Unlike most metals bismuth expands on cooling from its molten state. It is no coincidence nor anything other than perfectly logical that the first transuranic element, Neptunium degrades into the LAST heavy stable element, bismuth.


    Bismuth does NOT naturally occur in the primordial earth rather is the "end road" of Neptunium



    Henry Moseley's experiments [using X rays] demonstrated that what distinguishes one element from another is its atomic number, the number of protons in the nucleus of its atoms, not its atomic weight, which is a measure of the total number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus. The correct way of ordering the elements in the periodic table was, therefore, by their atomic number, and not, as Mendeleyev had thought, by their atomic weight. As for bismuth, it is stable with 43 extra neutrons, but with 42 or 44 neutrons it is unstable. This key point as per diamagnetism and stability cannot be overlooked. Bismuth also exhibits overunity since its 209 nucleus has a higher energy state that the sum of its components, which would be of thallium 205 and helium-4 nucleus. Meaning bismuth breaks the rule of conservation.


    The thorium series begins with thorium-232 and ends with the stable nuclide lead-208. The neptunium series is named for its longest-lived member, neptunium-237; it ends with bismuth-209

    Ohhh, and bismuth just skyrocketed in price shortly after ordering several 100 pounds which are on a semi truck headed this way.


    (pure coincidence however)
    Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 09-01-2014, 06:02 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadang
    replied
    Hi David,

    I want to express here my appreciation for your work! I'm not alien to any of the devices you describe here, their inventors and the mentioned books! I just want to say I see an analogy between Hendershot ot TPU devices and the Linden experiment made by Paul Baumann the "father" of Testatika:

    - Testatika Linden Experiment

    Again, my congratulations for your hard work!

    SaDAng

    Leave a comment:


  • David G Dawson
    replied
    The Bismuth Shrine

    The Bismuth Shrine:

    Bismuth the Metal - Moshe's favourite element - Bismuth metallicum

    We have an extended and adapted David Lowrance Rainmaker here, two in fact that use Bismuth and I counted the number of 8x12 pellets and it added up to 36 pellets at 10 grams each = 360 grams.
    The Rainmaker consists of two TV Neck Ferrites, back to back with the lower loaded with some 80 Neos measuring 5 x 20 mm - 8 stacks of 10.



    Plastic ring behind the Magnets contain Garnets for 'calm'.
    Coil is a Mobius, Crystal Ball is Amethyst with a Calcite Pyramid on top.
    Everything is wired up but has never been needed as the device is believed to be self powering through 'Conscience Intent' (CI) - Witchdoctor stuff!.
    North out for rain in Southern Hemisphere, South out for sunshine, reverse for NH.

    Two of the Bismuth packs just sit on the outside but the melted one is in the middle of the Ferrites at the Neck and believe I had 20 pellets (200 grams) here which I melted into a 3" Aluminium tube.
    These all have coils around them for pulsing but little has been done to that effect.
    So what we have is a Bismuth pack being consistently bombarded with very strong and focussed South magnetism through the Ferrites.
    I was very much aware of where Bismuth stood in the Periodic Table and was probably then, simply fascinated why something so placid could sit in the middle of a veritable bomb and am still very unsure of Bismuth.



    This is 'Pyramid Something', similar construction but smaller and was activated to bring in a line of thunderstorms into the front right Pyramid leg (NW) and in this was a pulse curve of the storms over a set distance as yet not understood why but probably a multiple response to many combined energies.

    These Rainmakers have been here active since 2006 and the second in 2007.
    I do tend to prefer to use the ANU (Absolute Nuclear Units) or UPA (Ultimate Physical Atoms) when consulting a Periodic Table but my ANU table ends at Gold at A79 where Bismuth is A83 with Lead, Thallium and Mercury in between.
    ANU appears to be a taboo subject.
    However UPA has more information from Crookes and Occult Chemistry and tells me that Bismuth is at 3753 units and Polonium at 3789 and Thallium at 3678 - hard to read.

    Occult Chemistry Introduction



    Just to show that I am no slack:
    This is a picture of the outer Lab area and shows from bottom left, a David Wells Machine, artifacts of Nature in the Platonic Solids, Quartz Crystals (Stonehenge), Shells, pinecones, Wheels of Destiny - ring of thunderstorms, alien entities and other abnormal observations - only one of its type on the Planet, The Tesla Magnifying Transmitter (TMT) - Eric P Dollard's 'Crystal Set Initiative' (CSI) and back round to the DL Rainmakers showing their makeup.
    Do I know what I am doing, sometimes and sometimes not and its not easy at 72 when you have gone through a lifetime of electrical technology full of lies and deceit.
    The inner Lab is full of Magnets, Vacuum Tubes, a Lester Hendershot Generator and currently working on my version of the Steven Mark TPU/TEG (Torsional Energy Generator).
    Outside the Lab is full of Wilhelm Reich and TJ Constable rainmaking devices and current count is at 17 mostly different operational devices that are capable of making rain and makes current technology in Cloud Seeding look a little sick.
    Another totally new device is on the dawing boards with more planned.

    I am here because I need to know how to make a magnet self oscillate in such a way that it is able to induce voltage into coils and this being the heart of the Hendershot device in his horseshoe/iron bar/twin coil 'resonator' and probably also the Mark TPU.
    A pdf was released some time back saying not to use Iron in a TPU but I will disagree with that statement in that the phenomena can work in two ways, expansive as I believe the Mark TPU is and contractive as was the Chicago colour TV event where everything was attracted into the TV at the Neck Ferrite area - an implosion.
    The phenomena can work both ways.
    No simple problem here working out that I will be using the TV Neck Ferrites and going the contractive way.
    I am hoping that Ken may be able to assist in opening some doors into these mysteries and believe he already has and it is only going to take time and an understanding before some magic may happen.
    The hardest part is eliminating the untruths of the past and grasping a new comprehension.
    Thanks Ken.

    Smokey

    Leave a comment:


  • sadang
    replied
    And what are things idrancer? Don't tell me a kind of words! Can you make the difference between a noun and a verb?

    Try to deepen these two pages:
    - Polarization - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    - Polar - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
    and then translate the meanings of the word "polarization" in the context used by Ken to explain the magnetism, as he see it.

    Stop messing this topic with silly arguments!

    thanks,
    SaDAng

    Leave a comment:


  • ldrancer
    replied
    Originally posted by ldrancer View Post
    Your the one who said its what a magnet is and you explained magnetism.

    no to me i might as well just listen to, but i wont quantum qauackkk ery.

    becuase its still magical fairy dust.

    lets see what the definition is.

    Polarization is a concept that comes from science, and it involves light, radiation, or magnetism moving in specific directions. Outside science, polarization usually refers to how people think, especially when two views emerge that drive people apart, kind of like two opposing magnets

    oh boy i read all that.

    its a science concept. so your relying on quantum quackkk ery.

    thanks a lot thank you thank you. ohh
    right after you wrote

    Originally posted by TheoriaApophasis View Post
    time to read up then Bye.
    ok. so who doesnt know the meaning of the word polarization? who is talking without even knowing what theyre saying?

    polar means the sun which ive already said. theres no other definition.

    except mine i just told you.

    your inventions have been stolen and your langauge was stolen too, to get you to not produce anything.

    think of what polarization means. thats what I want. since you have no understanding of magnets then quit giving me this jigger jabber. words are things.

    or definition of words, are things.

    Leave a comment:


  • ldrancer
    replied
    word means to define something.
    polar is the sun
    now define magnets again.

    im the one who put the definition... according to that up here. why don't you grow up.
    and start using language. people who use words to communicate with.
    Last edited by ldrancer; 08-31-2014, 10:41 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by ldrancer View Post
    polorize isnt a real word
    you spelled it wrong son.


    Yes, polarize IS a word

    Polarize - Definition and More from the Free Merriam-Webster Dictionary



    Grow up

    Leave a comment:


  • ldrancer
    replied
    polorize isnt a real word

    Leave a comment:


  • sadang
    replied
    Hi Ken,

    After all these explanations, what about the Sun and its created space (centrifugal dielectric field) in which the Earth is sunk like a boat? And what about the Earth's own created space? And what about the all other spaces created by our galaxy or the entire Universe? Is the magnetic field of the Earth only a native one, only an induced one, or both? What is the ratio between the Earth's native magnetism, and that induced by the sun? What are we humans after all? And why? Just a bunch of few rhetorical questions from many, many others floating in my head!

    And I would like to see a personal point of view of you Ken, in the context of last messages about the conversion of bismuth in a radioactive element, about the people which leave with/in radioactivity, like the spouses Iradia! Which relevance have the common terms such as alive, live and life in this new context?

    - Interviews - Spouses Irradia

    Thanks,
    SaDAng

    Leave a comment:


  • Dog-One
    replied
    Confusing me with the facts

    Originally posted by TheoriaApophasis View Post
    Spatial vectorization of loss of inertia in discharge (ala Poincare' disk model which dielectricity MUST follow necessitatively) is not a termination, only a (posterior creation of space as both meant , implied, and connotated by the term polarization) vector of reintegration to 're-initialize' the loss of inertia to maintain a stasis of the Ether-modality of dielectricity denotated as magnetism in its polarized state of 'resetting' its own pressure mediating inertia by spatial vectorization and radial assimilation to its original radial inertia.


    otherwise centripetal magentism could not exist, nor would there be any logical reason or necessity for its existence.

    in which case magnetism would be like ANY OTHER radiation which goes out and STAYS out.

    but we of magnetism as per "going out and staying there"........

    1. know this is not true

    2. likewise know that no Ether modality CAN or HAS ever terminated "in space"

    3. Space itself is a posterior attribute of polarization and IS not , CANNOT be a terminal of discharge of any Ether modality.
    Yes, I knew that. I was testing you.


    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by Dog-One View Post
    Therefore,

    Bismuth is one example of a material that illustrates magnetism terminating as dielectricity. Are there any more...?


    Spatial vectorization of loss of inertia in discharge (ala Poincare' disk model which dielectricity MUST follow necessitatively) is not a termination, only a (posterior creation of space as both meant , implied, and connotated by the term polarization) vector of reintegration to 're-initialize' the loss of inertia to maintain a stasis of the Ether-modality of dielectricity denotated as magnetism in its polarized state of 'resetting' its own pressure mediating inertia by spatial vectorization and radial assimilation to its original radial inertia.


    otherwise centripetal magentism could not exist, nor would there be any logical reason or necessity for its existence.

    in which case magnetism would be like ANY OTHER radiation which goes out and STAYS out.

    but we of magnetism as per "going out and staying there"........

    1. know this is not true

    2. likewise know that no Ether modality CAN or HAS ever terminated "in space"

    3. Space itself is a posterior attribute of polarization and IS not , CANNOT be a terminal of discharge of any Ether modality.




    Moseley's experiments [using X rays] demonstrated that what distinguishes one element from another is its atomic number, the number of protons in the nucleus of its atoms, not its atomic weight, which is a measure of the total number of protons and neutrons in the nucleus. The correct way of ordering the elements in the periodic table was, therefore, by their atomic number, and not, as Mendeleyev had thought, by their atomic weight.


    The appalling scandal of such a theory is easily exposed in the case of the final stable element bismuth. It is stable with 43 extra neutrons, but with 42 or 44 neutrons it is unstable. Similar cases can be found for many other elements."

    High mag fields over bismuth should create extremely tiny amounts of polonium 210



    Logically polonium , while an element is NOT really an element at all, but a hyper-state of de-stabilized Bismuth


    ALL Polonium is created from nuclear radiation, which is why the Russian SUB crew were poisoned, NOT from Uranium etc, but the Bismuth coolant which some had been transformed into Polonium from nuclear radiation and turned into wicked deadly as living fried hell Polonium
    Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 08-30-2014, 08:54 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Dog-One
    replied
    Add one more to that...

    Originally posted by TheoriaApophasis View Post
    Apparently less than a dozen people on earth or so have considered deeply that the universes MOST dense STABLE element has some "magic" properties far yet still UNdiscovered.
    A permanent magnet is a dielectric object.
    Dielectricity terminates as magnetism.
    A PM has a dielectric inertial plane.
    A PM has three centripetal (entry) and two centrifugal (exit) locations, with the dielectric inertial plane located at the third centripetal entry location.

    Bismuth has high dielectric inertia.
    Bismuth displays dielectric counter-voidance to centrifugal magnetism and dielectric voidance to centripetal magnetism.

    Therefore,

    Bismuth is one example of a material that illustrates magnetism terminating as dielectricity. Are there any more...?
    Last edited by Dog-One; 08-30-2014, 08:30 PM. Reason: Fix me.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Smith View Post
    Ken,
    I can't help but consider what value bismuth might have in circuits in terms of negative resistance, given its high dielectric permittivity.
    Bob




    cast some bismuth ingots, each 24 ounces



    a bit ugly but still 99.99% pure


    it ships in CAKE FORM, which is refined, but it melts and cools more dense than the "fluffed" cake form its refined in.





    working my ASS OFF on the newest edition of UNCOVERING THE MISSING SECRETS OF MAGNETISM.


    I have some real stunning stuff to add i havent talked about in here.






    NOTICE THE MIDDLE OF THE B
    on the bar, where the Bismuth cooled in a vortex against the depression of the "B"


    same premise of the "hopperized crystals of bismuth", but this is NOT an explaination, only a description. What is going on it so much important.


    Apparently less than a dozen people on earth or so have considered deeply that the universes MOST dense STABLE element has some "magic" properties far yet still UNdiscovered.


    100% of everything heavier than bismuth is both absurdly unstable and deadly and usually both.





    The next stable element, uranium, used in D.U. (depleted uranium) armor etc, is still 'very' unstable relatively and all eventually depletes itself into lead.

    The primary radiation danger from pure depleted uranium is due to alpha particles, which do not travel far through air, and do not penetrate clothing. However, in a matter of a month or so, a sample of pure depleted uranium will generate small amounts of thorium-234 and protactinium-234, which emit the more penetrating beta particles at almost the same rate as the uranium emits alpha rays. This is because uranium-238 decays directly to thorium-234, which with a half-life of 24 days decays to protactinium-234, which in turn decays in a matter of hours to the long-lived uranium-234. A quasi-steady state is therefore reached within a few multiples of 24 days





    However it did dot the "I" for me on its own

    Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 08-30-2014, 06:06 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Smith
    replied
    Originally posted by TheoriaApophasis View Post
    bismuth only repels centrifugal magnetism, not centripetal.
    Just trying to understand what this means... I'm going to assume that bismuth attracts centrifugal magnetism (while repelling the centripetal), and this is what is meant by dielectric inertia?
    Bob

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X