Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[ldrancer]

but magnetism(check)= radiation(check) then not really your statment and heres where i got sort of like, huh? explain. =polarization(huh)
your talking quantum quackery again.

[ldrancer]

polarization, is what? the making of a magnet by the cw and ccw sides being there and their being the force in between it?

I dont understand the meaning of the word polarization. Can we just not consider it a word?

[ldrancer]

radiation is the discharge of energy.

so whats energy?

where does energy come from?

the sun? we all agree on that. you said polorization, made space. haha. ok i agree. the sun made space. it made the solar system. which is about all i understand of .. space. as in out of earths atmosphere.

but a magnet, isnt the sun, it isnt energy it seems to attract.

the sun, umm im getting confued now though.

the earth, too has a dialectric plane and two poles or cw ccw right?

its not the sun either. or is it?

--------------
magnetism=radiation=polarization

... 1+1=2 (+1)=2 .. ? no.
no you can only make a statement about 2 things in a sentence. like, that car is purple. not that car is a cat is purple.

we believe a car is a cat. ok sure. i can believe that. lets get in teh cat and go for a ride. since a cat can be made of metal or something. it can be a something constructed. is purple. firstoff your saying a car is a cat the your saying its purple. cant belive all that in one sentence.

You cant either thats one big run on sentence your making, which You, havent really made it. And since you stated it, im just saying, its something i sort of stopped and thought about. which then you use the word polorization.

its like purple, i dont understand what purple is.

just likei dont understand what a magnet is. magnetism is its characteristic. been doing this wrong.
is radiation is polarization. ok whatever. nevermind. just a little confused. .. a magnet is polarization if by your definition it pretty much is a magnet.
but you want me to tell you what that is. ? its bull****.

[TheoriaApophasis]

I dont understand the meaning of the word polarization

time to read up then Bye.

[ldrancer]

time to read up then Bye.

Your the one who said its what a magnet is and you explained magnetism.

no to me i might as well just listen to, but i wont quantum qauackkk ery.

becuase its still magical fairy dust.

lets see what the definition is.

Polarization is a concept that comes from science, and it involves light, radiation, or magnetism moving in specific directions. Outside science, polarization usually refers to how people think, especially when two views emerge that drive people apart, kind of like two opposing magnets

oh boy i read all that.

its a science concept. so your relying on quantum quackkk ery.

thanks a lot thank you thank you. ohh

[ldrancer]

i do get that a magnet is radiation. its just some rock that holds mystical powers, you energize it then it, then makes things, grabs at them

so i do understand that concept but still have no understanding of magnets.

and polorization.

just another word that I nor the dictionary understands, its words formed and made able to be heard by the mouth that has some sort of concept and meaning, sort of, attached. Not the actual what, the thing is. I wanna know.

[ldrancer]

im just replying to your statement, you said.
magnetism .. is radition. IS, then i was like ??WHAT??! what is it?
poloarization a quantum quackery word. a concept word. any sort of thing thats come out of quantum quackery or any of their crap.

Polarization seems to be just a word associated with a magnet, which was what you was trying to explain.

but i digress. Im just saying you said, magnetism is radiation, IS.. WHAT? WHAT IS IT?!.. we dont know im back to , duh magnet its a concept.

[ldrancer]

Ok the only thing I have to say is, say that it's not polarization, and stop, at magnetism is radiation.

becuase you can't describe polarization. or a magnet.

burn energy is radiation. teh sun pushes out radiation.

now, whats polarization?

[sadang]

I want to make here some associations!

- centrifugal-centripetal
- left-right
- day-night
- good-bad
- front-back
- clockwise-anticlockwise
- levorotatory-dextrorotatory
- chiral-antichiral
- sunrise-sunset
- ...

All these are also forms of so called polarization! Just illusory human interepations as opposed phenomena, being in fact one single fenomenon! All of them following the same pattern and having the same origin, all being in fact the same and the unique ONE thing!

Just my rethorical thoughts,
SaDAng

[TheoriaApophasis]

I want to make here some associations!

- centrifugal-centripetal
- left-right
- day-night
- good-bad
- front-back
- clockwise-anticlockwise
- levorotatory-dextrorotatory
- chiral-antichiral
- sunrise-sunset
- ...

All these are also forms of so called polarization! Just illusory human interepations as opposed phenomena, being in fact one single fenomenon! All of them following the same pattern and having the same origin, all being in fact the same and the unique ONE thing!

Just my rethorical thoughts,
SaDAng

The Greek Platonists had a "mental orgy" over this principle of necessitated (ananke) (seeming) duality

The ANTINOMIES

any movement from ANY fulcrum necessitates discharge, centripetal-centrifugal

life death

yadda yadda yadda.




This is where the golden ratio comes in, where is "movement" AT in the "first fulcrum" (so to speak)



I discovered that 10 years ago hidden in greek texts, the formula is 1/Phi^-3 which = Phi cubed which = 1


1 is to Phi as Phi is to 1. Phi is one "in extension" . Back to incommensurability

[sadang]

1/Phi^-3 is the building block of our own individuality and to the unicity of each one of us and also the building block of the entire so called nowaday external reality with all its variety of phenomena!

- Phi = golden ratio, golden angle, golden section... an irrational number... an asymetric manifestation of 1 ...
- Phi^-3 = volume belonging to and defined trough 1
- Phi^3 = the same volume seen as separate entity - a mirror of real Phi^-3

To reason in terms of "where is "movement" AT in the "first fulcrum"" means a complet shift of the way of thinking, from the concept of space and its 99,99 emptiness, to a full, ever dynamic, all pervading medium! A totally complet way of thinking, understanding, interpretation of things and phenomena!

The ancient greeks knew about all these from teachings older than themselves! They are a relative new civilisation on the historic scale of the actual civilisation.

Now, back to the stregnth asymmetry of the so called magnetic poles, to your theory and the most important aspect of it - the dielectric inertial plane!


SaDAng

[TheoriaApophasis]

The ancient greeks knew about all these from teachings older than themselves! They are a relative new civilisation on the historic scale of the actual civilisation.

Now, back to the stregnth asymmetry of the so called magnetic poles, to your theory and the most important aspect of it - the dielectric inertial plane!


SaDAng

I have nearly 300 pages over 11 years about merely the implications of 1/Phi^-3

It took me 4 years to combine the golden angle and the Pythagorean incommensurable into a single all-commensurable proof that nobody would understand without about 1000 hours of pre-study.


Yes, and Platos Timaeus comes from Pythagoras himself and who knows before him.


I have a wholly new method of showing the dielectric inertial plane nobody has EVER SEEN before, its so beautiful, that the 8 people that have seen it want a poster of it, its that beautiful, , but the results are so pretty and lovely , ive taken 100s of pictures of it over and over.

I even made a poster of it for myself. But I cannot release it pending possible patent etc etc with an associate. its just lovely.



nobody would or could make any sense out of it.

Its like speaking alien to people to talk about incommensurable point non-specific symmetry and self-similarity at any level.

[ldrancer]

well your back to saying that polarization is like a magent and thats like phi3 thingajigger. and back to magents are cool dude huhuh uhhh uhuhuh huhuh huhhuhh uhh huhuh huhuh.

which is where we started.

i asked you to explain your statement, which you avoided. so fine with me. magnets where never explained and your showing some pretty pictures and how things add up and some math and whatever the circles which show some geometric shape pattern. thats all great but doesnt explain A damn thing unlike what you said you where going to explain magnets.

your giving information ok yea sure. ok. magnetism is radiation. and well,

thats all youve said. the sun puts out radiation . if it is a magent. is it a magnet? but thats farther than you took it. you said its polarization a concept word. isnt that the basis of quantum qauackery? i think SO

[ldrancer]

isnt all that phi stuff just the golden ratio ? tahts all it is? and your showing how magnets has it in it. so, what? magnets magically have the same thing that everything else has then you go on about self similiarities and stuff. Nope. not buying your baloney. Youve used quantum quackery as your basis for what your saying and hence. everything just stops there. we can pound how many angles you can measure out of a magent into the ground it wont get us nowhere.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Go build yourself a model of "Saturn"

Frictionless BALL - DISK levitation / suspension


make your own for $12 ;D


Looks like Saturn?



N45 3/4 NEO BALL

N48 3/4 I.D. RING MAG NEO