Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[TheoriaApophasis]

Even without thousands of pounds of Bismuth:

The Jeff Cook Effect - YouTube

Jeff Cook Effect - Wizard Wand - YouTube

Ken, you need to get this little squirt some tatoos.

what is that video? Science humor? Does he have FLUTES glued to the side of that thing?


Very funny

[Dog-One]

Jeff Cook Effect

Even without thousands of pounds of Bismuth:

The Jeff Cook Effect - YouTube

Jeff Cook Effect - Wizard Wand - YouTube

Ken, you need to get this little squirt some tatoos.

[TheoriaApophasis]

How does the shape of the pole of a magnet affect the field and/or its precession? Say I have a horseshoe magnet with rectangular ends. Does that configuration have an affect on the shape of the field emitted from the ends of the magnet?

Creates a sphere of field pressure voidance, if you could pull the horseshoe ends together youd see a shrinking sphere

no diff than the ends of 2 diff maggies.

As I understand your work, the dielectric plane would be perpendicular to the back center of the horseshoe and thus parallel with the legs of the horseshoe? Is that correct? If so, how far would the dielectric plane extend out from the back of the magnet? As far as the ends of the legs of the horseshoe or would it be contained in the body of the material at the back center of the magnet?
What I'm really trying to visualize is the precession of the fields at the ends of the horseshoe. I hope I made that clear enough.

[/QUOTE]

You can see same here:



now rotate that image 90 degrees LEFT

same as a vertical bar magnet

get it?

[Dog-One]

My Attempt

How does the shape of the pole of a magnet affect the field and/or its precession? Say I have a horseshoe magnet with rectangular ends. Does that configuration have an affect on the shape of the field emitted from the ends of the magnet?

As I understand your work, the dielectric plane would be perpendicular to the back center of the horseshoe and thus parallel with the legs of the horseshoe? Is that correct? If so, how far would the dielectric plane extend out from the back of the magnet? As far as the ends of the legs of the horseshoe or would it be contained in the body of the material at the back center of the magnet?

What I'm really trying to visualize is the precession of the fields at the ends of the horseshoe. I hope I made that clear enough.

I'll try to answer this THX, but Ken is the authority and most certainly will correct me if I'm off-base. He better anyway.


For one, the dielectric inertial plane is a 2D surface and since it is dielectricity here we are talking about, it is counter-spatial, so it doesn't "extend out" at all. It extends inward.

Now with that said, there is still centripetal magnetism entering into the horseshoe shaped magnet where the dielectric inertial plane intersects the actual material that composes the horseshoe magnet. This centripetal magnetism entering the edge of this surface must come from somewhere and that somewhere would be from the tips/poles, specifically the centrifugal magnetism radiated most abundantly from the edges of the poles.

This unique shape of a horseshoe magnet raises an interesting question. What if the area around the dielectric inertial plane was completely "shielded" with Bismuth? Recall the Bismuth "pot hole" experiment Ken did.

[thx1138]

Precession question

How does the shape of the pole of a magnet affect the field and/or its precession? Say I have a horseshoe magnet with rectangular ends. Does that configuration have an affect on the shape of the field emitted from the ends of the magnet?

As I understand your work, the dielectric plane would be perpendicular to the back center of the horseshoe and thus parallel with the legs of the horseshoe? Is that correct? If so, how far would the dielectric plane extend out from the back of the magnet? As far as the ends of the legs of the horseshoe or would it be contained in the body of the material at the back center of the magnet?

What I'm really trying to visualize is the precession of the fields at the ends of the horseshoe. I hope I made that clear enough.

[TheoriaApophasis]

SaDAng

found something new, well, not new but something nobody has seen before. Of course proved it was there a dozen diff ways, but now a NEW WAY to see inverse polarity spin by concentrating the field inside a ring magnet

several 3mm cube maggies inside the I.D. of the ring maggie.


I get inverse spin in movement off either side in rotation under the FERROCELL.

So, can now I / you / anyone / see inverse polarity spin with LED light

[TheoriaApophasis]

Ken,

Can you help Russ out with this video demonstation?

“Oh Nuts!” Magnetic Lock.Your Going To Like! Using The Principles Of Ed Leedskalnin PMH.Must Watch - YouTube

DONE AND DONE

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hello Ken,

Of course, this experiment does not invalidate nor confirm in any way your theory.
SaDAng

Its all fine, its all about being a truth seeker.


The difference isnt much, it should average around .23606 between poles.

[Dog-One]

Oh Nuts!

I can only do so much at one time.

Ken,

Can you help Russ out with this video demonstation?

“Oh Nuts!” Magnetic Lock.Your Going To Like! Using The Principles Of Ed Leedskalnin PMH.Must Watch - YouTube

[TheoriaApophasis]

Hi Ken,
The picture on the page 234.... I don't want to be a spoil sport but Is it ice?

Anyway I am reading and trying to understand your book.

Many years ago I got turned on to "free energy" after reading the patent by Heinrich Kunel (DE3024814). He is using inter-action of permanent magnet and electromagnets to achieve overunity.

I would really appreciate you explaining the difference of the two. I see a permanent magnet as a sponge that mops up environmental energy but an electro-magnet must be used to extract what is gained.

I believe the explanation of the differences might even be a candidate for a chapter in your book.

Best regards- MB

There will be a chapter on same, I have about 200 pages or more to add.


I can only do so much at one time.

[MasterBlaster]

Page 234 MAKES A GREAT POSTER

It shows dielectricity, magnetism, life, the golden section, and a few other 'things'

Hi Ken,
The picture on the page 234.... I don't want to be a spoil sport but Is it ice?

Anyway I am reading and trying to understand your book.

Many years ago I got turned on to "free energy" after reading the patent by Heinrich Kunel (DE3024814). He is using inter-action of permanent magnet and electromagnets to achieve overunity.

I would really appreciate you explaining the difference of the two. I see a permanent magnet as a sponge that mops up environmental energy but an electro-magnet must be used to extract what is gained.

I believe the explanation of the differences might even be a candidate for a chapter in your book.

Best regards- MB

[sadang]

Hello Ken,

Great work with this third edition! You steal my spare time, but in a pleased manner! I'll also give the proper attention to this new edition.

I found time to do a new experiment with the Hall sensor, and the conclusion is now more clear. What I thought initially that represent a change in the polarity of the magnetic field of the permanent magnet is really just a change in direction of the field lines that intersect the plane of the Hall sensor. This aspect is more clear after I made a measurement of the field strength and polarity at the center of the magnet on the Z axis, which correspond to the dielectric plane or bloch wall.

Almost the same as in the case of measurement made at the height of 50mm, the magnetic field increases steadily towards the center, without changing the direction of magnetic field lines which intersect the plane of the Hall sensor. They retains the same direction on the entire distance of displacement of 200mm on X axis, relative to the plane of the Hall sensor, when the measurement is made (the sensor is placed) at the center of the magnet on the vertical axis Z.

Now, I have to apologize for my previous assumptions that magnetic field is changing twice its polarity towards the center of the magnet. It was just my misinterpretation of the entire phenomena! I considered in the initial interpretation, only the readings of voltmeter and strictly relative to the Hall sensor only, without considering the closed loop shape of the magnetic field lines and their interaction with the plane of Hall sensor. And yes, relative to the Hall sensor there is a shift of polarity, a change in the direction of magnetic field lines that intersect the plane of Hall sensor, with his approach towards the magnet. But not a change in polarity of the magnetic field lines.

Of course, this experiment does not invalidate nor confirm in any way your theory. It was made only from my desire to confirm to myself that there exist or not any difference in magnetic field strength between the two poles of a magnet, but somehow initial goal derailed in this type of experiment. My final conclusion and according to the measurements and the results obtained there is still an average difference in strength of the two poles of a magnet, ie the North pole is stronger than the South pole. This is just and average appreciation, in specific points of measurements each one could be stronger than the other one.

I have in my head other types of experiments with Hall sensors, and hope to find time to make. I will keep you up to date with the evolution of the experiments.

Try this free software. It produces Point Of View 3d ray tracing which is how light reflects from an object.
POV Ray

It's what I used to do the PHI fractals I posted earlier. And it will do animation snapshots but you have to use another tool to create the animation from the snap shots.

Here's a simple one I did for magnetism and dielectric plane. The animated GIF didn't work once uploaded so here's another frame from the animation.

Thank you very much for this suggestion. This is a great program and hope to have time to learn it.

Now back to reading, study and experiment. That among other those of everyday life!

Regards,
SaDAng

[TheoriaApophasis]

Great books. All three of them! Thanks.

Page 234 MAKES A GREAT POSTER

It shows dielectricity, magnetism, life, the golden section, and a few other 'things'

[TheoriaApophasis]

Nice job Ken. The illustrations provide much more clarity.
Thank You!
Randy

All the (very) nitty gritty stuff is going to have to go into the 4th edition
(by that I mean 'hardcore').

There is a taste of that in the section: The magneto-dielectric hyperboloid, or defining field inertia vs. magnetism / space / movement



If people dont like this section in the current edition:
The magneto-dielectric hyperboloid, or defining field inertia vs. magnetism / space / movement


.....Then Id be SHOCKED.


But someone somewhere always hates something


Yes yes yes yes.......3rd edition is rather "picture intensive" I know.

As they say,..... "reel them in with the pretty pictures, then pound their SKULLS with the TIRE IRON"



(Im also sure there are a handful of caffeine and sleep deprivation typos somewhere scattered about)



If someone doesnt like it, they can get a REFUND

[MasterBlaster]

Great books. All three of them! Thanks.

I got Theos book from here:

another DOWNLOAD SITE HERE (in case you have issues downloading it):

https://ia902502.us.archive.org/31/items/magnetism1small/magnetism1small.pdf