Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

[d3x0r]

more wisdom required......


1. wave is not a THING, but what a "thing" DOES. a WAVE OF WHAT BY WHAT.

There are NO SUCH THINGS AS WAVES.


There (for example) is WATER only, .....and what water (might) does ...i.e. wave(s).

2. FIELDS? NO BRANCH OF ANY SCIENCE HAS EVER defined what a FIELD is.


NEVER , EVER., NEVER.

A field is a behavior of a volume... a 1 or more dimensional (a variable or defined constant parameter is a dimension) and a representation of all perumtations of variables...

ex: a volume of gas (a cloud in the sky) has a water density per volume, which is a 4 dimensional differential equation... but since it changes in time it's really a cover of 5 dimensions. And then you get to the class 'diff EQ' which is just more of the same.

ex2: A quaternion is a 4 dimensional quantity that describes orientation in a 3 dimensional space(hmm domain would be a more generic term for space) but says nothing about it's position or velocity which are yet more field equations. (this describes a field of rotation)

right... there are things 'like' particles and *like* waves though... there are things that behave in such a way that a wave model fits... much like inertia does to induction, and spring physics to capacitance.... that doesn't mean a capacitor IS-A spring, but they can share the same base classes.

[TheoriaApophasis]

Way to be dismissive
Entanglement is a descriptive term for something which does happen; if you want to call it yadda-yabba it's still going to be the same effect...

Quantum Mechanics does not deal with particles; but rather is entirely fields... and models 'particle-like' things and 'wave-like' things..

more wisdom required......


1. wave is not a THING, but what a "thing" DOES. a WAVE OF WHAT BY WHAT.

There are NO SUCH THINGS AS WAVES.


There (for example) is WATER only, .....and what water (might) does ...i.e. wave(s).





2. FIELDS? NO BRANCH OF ANY SCIENCE HAS EVER defined what a FIELD is.


NEVER , EVER., NEVER.
ONLY 2 FIELD modalities exist, convergent dielectric and divergent magnetic


the former is counterspatial, the later is spatial and HAS THE ATTRIBUTE of its properties of space and time.


space NOR time are fields, NOR exist as entities that are self-sufficient with properties. Space NOR Time either forces OR fields, as such they are posterior attributes of other Subjects (divergent magnetic fields and hybrid field modalities, such as transverse electromagnetism and mass aggregates).


the FALSE and BULLSH*T reificication by the cult of Quantum of both Space or Time, or Space and Time is a titanic fallacy.

Space NOR time are either fields or forces,. likewise they have of themselves NO POSSIBILITY to act on anything, they are posterior measure of and between divergent field modalities.

[d3x0r]

There exists NO SUCH thing as "quantum (X)". Its a farce creation of modern pseudo-science.


"entanglement" is a BS term used to describe things that are not comprehended.

Quantum is as much a real science as Scientology is 'real'.


The Cult of Quantum is particle mysticism BS of the MOST VERY HIGH ORDER.

Its rooted in BS, ignorance, academic buffoonery, and pseudo-intellectual hubris.

Way to be dismissive
Entanglement is a descriptive term for something which does happen; if you want to call it yadda-yabba it's still going to be the same effect...

Quantum Mechanics does not deal with particles; but rather is entirely fields... and models 'particle-like' things and 'wave-like' things... but is not particles or waves itself.

So again; replace 'quantum' with 'theo magnetics' and you're still on the right path.

And quantum mechanics is more of a math framework than a science... so you're right; it's a very bad science.

[TheoriaApophasis]

a bizarre quantum mechanics property called entanglement.
Al

There exists NO SUCH thing as "quantum (X)". Its a farce creation of modern pseudo-science.


"entanglement" is a BS term used to describe things that are not comprehended.

Quantum is as much a real science as Scientology is 'real'.


The Cult of Quantum is particle mysticism BS of the MOST VERY HIGH ORDER.

Its rooted in BS, ignorance, academic buffoonery, and pseudo-intellectual hubris.

[ldrancer]

what is the difference between the speed of 600mp/sec and doing something. and how it works. hold? so it holds at that type of speed, action? what?

what is what would you explain it? nevermind.

[ldrancer]

im the one asking the questions. ok?

[aljhoa]

What "binds" a milky way?


Al

[ldrancer]

dont really get it. if you travel with the milky way, wouldnt it be even slower since your speeding then? i dont know kind of got this stuff all mixed up, if you do something then go at 600 mph your still sitting there doing it, and then it has to go at 600 mph to catch up. whats so special about the milky way

[Dog-One]

Instantaneously while speeding at 600mi/sec with the Milky Way.

Al

Sounds familiar to the writings of David Fincher, The Living Cosmos. I'll bet Ken has that one too.

[aljhoa]

In a recent experiment, the quantum state (the direction it was spinning) of a light particle
instantly traveled 15.5 miles (25 kilometers) across an optical fiber, becoming
the farthest successful quantum teleportation feat yet.

Physicists can't instantly transport matter, but they can instantly transport information
through quantum teleportation. This works thanks to
a bizarre quantum mechanics property called entanglement.

Beam Me Up: Bits of Information Teleported Across Computer Chip


Al

[aljhoa]

i thought this would be a good starter image for your topic here. i just found this. thought, it was pretty, funny.

Instantaneously while speeding at 600mi/sec with the Milky Way.

Al

[SYDERA]

Yes, very funny ))))

[ldrancer]

i thought this would be a good starter image for your topic here. i just found this. thought, it was pretty, funny. and if that don't work, then it came from here. http://giphy.com/gifs/icp-****ing-magnets-4yf7NeS5PK4dG

[SYDERA]

You asked----Could I use my body energies ( in a high state of creativity) to charge a cell



thats already a KNOWN technology, so yes obviously, havent you heard of same. Energy from electrical impulses from muscles are harvested from body pads to charge a CELL


They developed that technology almost, what, 20 years ago.


Efficiency however is another matter.

Thanks, that's all I asked. Ive spent the last 25 years doing alternative research, stuff you might not comprehend, with respect, so if you wish a 6 year old to comprehend, treat me as such, they ask fundamentals, as we all should.

Your reply is encouraging. Might you point me in the right direction of current research

[TheoriaApophasis]

Yeah, cheers for that.

You dont want to answer my questions, why is that?

If I am talking bunkum and it's not your thing, then let me know and I will cease.

You do a good quickstep, how about a waltz? rolls eyes sarcastically icon

You asked----Could I use my body energies ( in a high state of creativity) to charge a cell



thats already a KNOWN technology, so yes obviously, havent you heard of same. Energy from electrical impulses from muscles are harvested from body pads to charge a CELL


They developed that technology almost, what, 20 years ago.


Efficiency however is another matter.