This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Uncovering the Missing Secrets of Magnetism. 92 pages. Free new book

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    I proved my two formulas all in one night.


    Love- ly


    Doesnt matter what SHAPE mag I have in the center of any of 3 diff LARGE ring maggies, I proved my formula

    ALL RESULTS THE SAME.
    I think they call that "incredible", both proofs in one night.














    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by tachyoncatcher View Post
    Thanks Ken for vid 51. That helped me a lot and you show some practical examples of the correct way to use magnetism and how to think about it. Yes, I learned from the beginning and end of the video then applied it to the middle. Very purposeful. Keep up the good works.
    Randy
    Woooo Hooooo




    I validated my INCOMMENSURABILITY THEORY tonight using a large precession (very large) ring magnet to view CENTRIPETAL LOBING RATIOS

    Proving my theory that took 4 years to complete from my discovery of 10 years ago of 1/Phi^-3


    proving that Magnetism must reciprocate at PHI CUBED + 1 (5.23606).



    Or, 1, 1, 1, 1, 1.23606 , or Phi^3+1 I KNEW that was the only way it could work as per my prior formula.

    Time to celebrate! PIZZA TIME!

















    Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 08-09-2014, 04:51 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • ldrancer
    replied
    you didnt understand anything i said. maybe a star pattern would work. that would tell the date and time. then show off on camera with someone there. say the date and time. you dont need an upload site that sounds the worst. where i cant change the date. yea that site that video flash site never hacks anyones views or censors them. it dont need to be uploaded a video of anywhere. a tape recording would work. tape is especially even better because of little bugs that would prove it working right. not being manipulated. but have someone in the video. then you design it and manufacture it. then go sell it to people.

    im not trying to stay in patent im trying to say how not to use that since ITS BS. but thats idea flies over you then you keep flying at it and hit it out of the park with some random idea i never said. and learn how to say my name right too.

    but that, proves you made it, and before some other jack decides to steal it and you make money.

    you somehow arent figuring out how people make money.

    but i guess since you just showed your suppost for the fiat currency, showing you dont want it absolute corrupticy shown .. because theyd have to screw over the value if you made anything worth value to amke themselves rich, exactly the amount you mjade, to make you poor.

    because their stealing off you. fiat currency is just to jack you around with. and it jacks everyone around and makes a not functional society, like ran over in england.

    theyre, all gay over there, non-gun having, and none are inventive at all and they have their national healthcare and their awesome teeth to back it up. and they suck.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by john_g View Post
    Hi All

    Many posts ago it was mentioned about Feynman's difficulty with explaining magnetic effects (I dare not say attraction /Repulsion!) For those who have not seen the video it is at:

    Richard Feynman Magnets - YouTube

    Not a very satisfactory response from a person who was held in such high regard by the scientific community IMO.

    Thanks to TheoriaApophasis - I'm still learning.

    Kind regards

    John


    watching that video ( I can never do it again) makes my blood boil and makes me want to revive his corpse just so I could kiss him with a baseball bat.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by sadang View Post
    And here can be read the entire original article:
    - Popular Science Nov. 1928

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Patents again...

    Originally posted by ldrancer View Post
    thats a stupid bunch of bs. patents are building blueprints or what purpose are they?
    Patents are supposed to be a "Protection" to the "Intellectual Property" or simply the "Idea"

    i want to patent every little silly idea I can come up with.
    Then I highly recommend to start saving bunches of "Legal Tender Notes"...

    yea so build the thing first, then sell it to someone. start selling them to make money.
    Before You sell it, you must protect your idea by open sourcing it on the net or a public domain, or public server where you could NOT change the "Uploaded Date"...like You Tube...then you have exactly 11 months to file your application with the USPTO.
    Another way is to send an envelope to yourself (Idrancer to Idrancer) date stamped through the Federal Post Office and sealed with non removable clear tape...meant to be opened at the Court only by the Judge. not too safe either.

    A Trademark is different, it works as you have written above, build it and sell it before filing application, because they will require a "specimen"...Patents don't.

    And yes, agree with you, patents are BS, just designed for big Corps...that would eat alive the poor inventor.

    The other "Big Lie" is that IF Your Patent reveals some "interest" to either one of the Two Federal Departments ABOVE USPTO...The DoD, and the DoE...Then you really have a big problem...no one could even "touch" that patent any more.

    Ever heard of the "Inventor Secrecy Act" from the 1950's?...search and read it.


    Ufopolitics

    Leave a comment:


  • tachyoncatcher
    replied
    Practical things

    Thanks Ken for vid 51. That helped me a lot and you show some practical examples of the correct way to use magnetism and how to think about it. Yes, I learned from the beginning and end of the video then applied it to the middle. Very purposeful. Keep up the good works.
    Randy

    Leave a comment:


  • john_g
    replied
    Feynman's difficulty with explaining magnets

    Hi All

    Many posts ago it was mentioned about Feynman's difficulty with explaining magnetic effects (I dare not say attraction /Repulsion!) For those who have not seen the video it is at:

    Richard Feynman Magnets - YouTube

    Not a very satisfactory response from a person who was held in such high regard by the scientific community IMO.

    Thanks to TheoriaApophasis - I'm still learning.

    Kind regards

    John

    Leave a comment:


  • ldrancer
    replied
    Originally posted by thx1138 View Post
    The value of a patent is the amount of money one has to defend it.

    Back in the late 40's and early 50's my father developed a hydraulicly driven mechanical machine to palletize packages. It was programmable through hydraulic valves to handle different sized packages and stacking patterns.

    The investors that looked at it took his plans and started building and selling the machine. When he filed a patent infringement suit against them they used the profits from selling the machine to do just what you said - exhuast his resources. Patent trolls are not new.

    All of the current automated warehousing systems of today from FedEx to the automotive industry are based off of that machine.

    So it basically doesn't matter if you leave info out of the patent. Once the design is out in the wild, it's gone and you have no control over it.

    BTW there are several countries that do not have a patent treaty with U.S. and/or Great Britain. China is one.

    So unless you have the money to build and control the manufacturing process and hit the ground running, you'll never make a dimes profit from selling your product.

    On the other hand, as long as the costs can be kept reasonable any device can be used for your personal use to help reduce your dependency on the grid and possibly get paid for feeding energy back into the grid.

    The entire patent system only feeds new ideas into the companies that already have the money to develop those ideas into functional products. If you or your investors don't have the money to fight an IBM or GE or Microsoft or whoever, filing a patent application is just a waste of time and money. Keep in mind that a patent attorney costs $500 to $1000 an hour.

    So forget about patents and get on with it.
    yea so build the thing first, then sell it to someone. start selling them to make money. a patent is a bs idea probably brought by lincoln he had ideas of changing everyone be under the us and blah blah in the national anthem in the way he changed it, which sounds exactly like this whole bs thing. so said i dont know when it came aroudn, but people didnt always do it. and thats, this, is what ive heard.

    if you make your machine first you can always prove they stole it from you. is a patent just a way for them to make money off your idea after you do it? **** a patent then. and thats all it sounds like its for. you can prove it then theyll say they got the patent. then waht is that? a means for them to lie. how about release instructions ot the world so everyone else can design their own.

    that destroys their patent bullcrap. you dont make money but if they make meoney itll of course turn into a dumbed down version.
    like the internet without internet anonimity.

    but if you build it first at least you can prove it to the world their thieves and show them. you could even do a patent search in a video for your thing you've build. If it can produce, it's proven.

    patents are SUCh a bunch of bs.

    Leave a comment:


  • sadang
    replied
    And here can be read the entire original article:
    - Popular Science Nov. 1928

    Leave a comment:


  • ldrancer
    replied
    thats a stupid bunch of bs. patents are building blueprints or what purpose are they?

    i want to patent every little silly idea I can come up with. I can see how absolutely ridiculous these are. No wonder. They arent constitutional in any way, I know that.

    The way people used to do business was someone didnt screw someone over.

    How can you patent an idea? You can't.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    Hello Thx1138,


    Ufopolitics


    Lovely !!!



    Just found the FULL QUOTE:


    Nikola Tesla November 1928 interview:

    Tesla answered:
    Dr. Tesla said with some feelings, - Nikola Tesla













    In that same article:



    Nikola Tesla November 1928 interview:
    On the whole subject of matter, in fact, Dr. Tesla holds views that are startlingly original. - Nikola Tesla
    Last edited by TheoriaApophasis; 08-08-2014, 08:16 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • TheoriaApophasis
    replied
    Originally posted by thx1138 View Post
    A little backup for this:
    Just thinking out loud here - what if the copper torus (tube bent into torus and closed with itself) containing the magnet were filled with a dielectric liquid? Would there be a way to manipulate the contained dielectric from outside the torus such that it expressed a magnetic field inside the tube to push the magnet around the tube?


    dense mercury vapor

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Missile Launching...

    Originally posted by thx1138 View Post
    A little backup for this:
    "Toward the end of the interview, we asked Tesla which arena of science most appealed to him. While we expected him to mention radios and airplanes, Tesla answered that rotating magnetic fields were dear to his heart. 'A thousand years hence, the telephone and the motion picture camera may be obsolete, but the principle of the rotating magnetic field will remain a vital, living thing for all time to come.' " - 10 Renowned Scientists Make Their PopSci Debut, Nikola Tesla, November 1928
    Popular Science, November 1928

    Just thinking out loud here - what if the copper torus (tube bent into torus and closed with itself) containing the magnet were filled with a dielectric liquid? Would there be a way to manipulate the contained dielectric from outside the torus such that it expressed a magnetic field inside the tube to push the magnet around the tube?

    Calculation of electrostatic forces in presence of dielectrics

    Consider the following in terms of a quenched spark gap.
    Water Hammer
    Hello Thx1138,

    By the way, how is your Grand Daughter doing?...hope she is perfectly well by now!

    The Dielectric liquid is a good idea...I also figure a liquid filled tube would do as a lubricant and heat sink as well.

    Now, are you familiar with Projectile electromagnetic launchers?

    [IMG][/IMG]

    It uses a pulsed signal to coil, or coils...then either magnet or simple steel cylinder would launch...

    [IMG][/IMG]

    [IMG][/IMG]

    [IMG]
    Last edited by Ufopolitics; 08-08-2014, 04:26 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • thx1138
    replied
    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    Let's imagine a Train (not Einstein Train please...)...A Train traveling within closed loop Rail Road Tracks describing a perfect circle...then we install in the front nose a very high intensity Cylindrical Neo Magnet, where front of magnet would be North (as an example,but it could be South as well)...of a radius as big as the body of train allows....then we enclose those circle tracks AND Train, within a Glass Tubing, like a full circled Tunnel...then wrap glass tubing with a full loop of coil wires...this would be our Generating Fields "Tunnel"......Now speed up that train...and watch how our wires start generating bigger and bigger amounts of energy...the faster train goes.

    By Train going faster...it would "print" more and more "stamps" of flow into passing by sections of coil, and maintaining a CONSTANT Speed would disburse the flow evenly and with constant "current pressure".

    When we apply loads to output coils, the Lenz Law would start generating "reverse fields" against train speed forward vector coming from the "left behind" sections of coils, creating like a vacuum suction behind train, that would try slow down speed...so, keeping a very high speed would get to a point the back reverse reaction would not affect speed.

    Hope you all understand what am writing here.
    A little backup for this:
    "Toward the end of the interview, we asked Tesla which arena of science most appealed to him. While we expected him to mention radios and airplanes, Tesla answered that rotating magnetic fields were dear to his heart. 'A thousand years hence, the telephone and the motion picture camera may be obsolete, but the principle of the rotating magnetic field will remain a vital, living thing for all time to come.' " - 10 Renowned Scientists Make Their PopSci Debut, Nikola Tesla, November 1928
    Popular Science, November 1928

    Just thinking out loud here - what if the copper torus (tube bent into torus and closed with itself) containing the magnet were filled with a dielectric liquid? Would there be a way to manipulate the contained dielectric from outside the torus such that it expressed a magnetic field inside the tube to push the magnet around the tube?

    Calculation of electrostatic forces in presence of dielectrics

    Consider the following in terms of a quenched spark gap.
    Water Hammer

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X