Originally posted by Mark
View Post
a recommended video and he comes in lecturing me on what I should or
shouldn't do? Preaching to me about honoring that video when I ALREADY
gave accolades about the math? Preaching to me about providing an
answer when pointing out something wrong when I ALREADY pointed out
what the image is in the center of the sun? Basically, from what he is
lecturing me about completely indicates that he did NOT even read what
I wrote! Therefore, if he wants to lecture me based on not even having
the courtesy to read what I wrote, the I will spell it out for him.
I have NO problem whatsoever when someone disagrees with me and if you
think I responded because he doesn't agree with me, you're very mistaken.
What I responded to was every point that I already made about him
not disagreeing with me but lecturing me to do things that I actually
included in my comment about the video - it is completely ridiculous and
is a slap in the face - it shows he selectively read and comprehended in
my post what he wanted to comprehend, which didn't even describe
my post, period.
Originally posted by Ecoman11
View Post
is completely blind to the points that I have discussed already. Criticism
would have actually included a theme throughout his post that indicated
he read it.
"Preaching to me about honoring that video when I ALREADY
gave accolades about the math? Preaching to me about providing an
answer when pointing out something wrong when I ALREADY pointed out
what the image is in the center of the sun? Basically, from what he is
lecturing me about completely indicates that he did NOT even read what
I wrote. Therefore, if he wants to lecture me based on not even having
the courtesy to read what I wrote, the I will spell it out for him. "
I am nobody's disciple!
If someone wants to post something as ridiculous as preaching to someone
about several things they should do, when those several things were
ALREADY in the post that is being "criticized", it is not criticism, it is
stupidity and an insult to one's intelligence.
And objective views being ruled out once free energy theories are proven?
I've said it more than once and I'll say it again - THEY ALREADY ARE and
you prove my point about being able to comprehend what is ALREADY
written in this thread and throughout this forum.
Once free energytheories are proven? If you're waiting for free energies "theories" to be
proven, try harder to see what is in front of you - it's "hidden" in plain
sight.
Anyone else that absolutely feels the need to jump in on this, do everyone
a favor and keep it to yourself or have the courtesy to send me a private
message so this thread doesn't get cluttered up with a bunch of off
topic posts. Basically, I'll leave these posts as they are and any more
related to this posted in this thread will be deleted because it will just
contribute to derailing the topic at hand.


Leave a comment: