This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Bedini Ferris Wheel Regauging Motor

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Aaron
    replied
    @Mark & Ecoman

    Originally posted by Mark View Post
    Erfinder deleted post was also out of line but Aaron you need to relax and not be so offended when someone doesn't agree with you. Erfinders original response did not deserve your demeaning comments.

    Mark
    His post was extremely condescending and demeaning. I make a post about
    a recommended video and he comes in lecturing me on what I should or
    shouldn't do? Preaching to me about honoring that video when I ALREADY
    gave accolades about the math? Preaching to me about providing an
    answer when pointing out something wrong when I ALREADY pointed out
    what the image is in the center of the sun? Basically, from what he is
    lecturing me about completely indicates that he did NOT even read what
    I wrote
    ! Therefore, if he wants to lecture me based on not even having
    the courtesy to read what I wrote, the I will spell it out for him.

    I have NO problem whatsoever when someone disagrees with me and if you
    think I responded because he doesn't agree with me, you're very mistaken.
    What I responded to was every point that I already made about him
    not disagreeing with me but lecturing me to do things that I actually
    included in my comment about the video - it is completely ridiculous and
    is a slap in the face - it shows he selectively read and comprehended in
    my post what he wanted to comprehend, which didn't even describe
    my post, period.

    Originally posted by Ecoman11 View Post
    @Aaron

    I told you once and I'll say it again. Stop being a Free Energy Officer and learn to take criticism about your views. If you're a true spiritual entrepreneur and have some faith, you would trust that any objective views will eventually be ruled out once the free energy theories are proven.

    I'm sure many would agree here that your defense mimics the preaching of a disciple. Get real man.

    Ecoman
    Criticism has nothing to do with posting a response to my post, which
    is completely blind to the points that I have discussed already. Criticism
    would have actually included a theme throughout his post that indicated
    he read it.

    "Preaching to me about honoring that video when I ALREADY
    gave accolades about the math? Preaching to me about providing an
    answer when pointing out something wrong when I ALREADY pointed out
    what the image is in the center of the sun? Basically, from what he is
    lecturing me about completely indicates that he did NOT even read what
    I wrote. Therefore, if he wants to lecture me based on not even having
    the courtesy to read what I wrote, the I will spell it out for him. "

    I am nobody's disciple!

    If someone wants to post something as ridiculous as preaching to someone
    about several things they should do, when those several things were
    ALREADY in the post that is being "criticized", it is not criticism, it is
    stupidity and an insult to one's intelligence.

    And objective views being ruled out once free energy theories are proven?
    I've said it more than once and I'll say it again - THEY ALREADY ARE and
    you prove my point about being able to comprehend what is ALREADY
    written in this thread and throughout this forum. Once free energy
    theories are proven? If you're waiting for free energies "theories" to be
    proven, try harder to see what is in front of you - it's "hidden" in plain
    sight.

    Anyone else that absolutely feels the need to jump in on this, do everyone
    a favor and keep it to yourself or have the courtesy to send me a private
    message so this thread doesn't get cluttered up with a bunch of off
    topic posts. Basically, I'll leave these posts as they are and any more
    related to this posted in this thread will be deleted because it will just
    contribute to derailing the topic at hand.

    Leave a comment:


  • alexandre
    replied
    Signor Bedini, this is off topic, but I must say something on behalf of many brazilians. We are ashamed of the keppe gang and their motor, which is clearly based on your work, that you generously shared, and they call it their own.

    Truth will prevail

    Leave a comment:


  • John_Bedini
    replied
    Big Bedini Machine

    My question to this group,
    What does ED's machine look like and what parts go in it? He told you about magnetic streams and how they work, you would never believe what it is. I know that some pieces are missing from his workshop never found but hidden somewhere. maybe in one of those big blocks of coral. What does it look like? I'm going to make one and will show it to Aaron.
    John B

    Leave a comment:


  • Mark
    replied
    Originally posted by Raui View Post
    If he just told us everything then, when a day comes that the man is unfortunately no longer with us, we'd be out fending for ourselves and we mightn't be able to figure things out because our minds aren't used to working in the ways that they are required to in order to understand this stuff.

    @Jetjs,
    I agree with Armagdn03, very nice!
    Raui

    I find it much easier to understand how something works If I actually have a working model. Have you ever worked on a car engine before. It breaks down, you take it apart and fix it. Tear the whole engine down and rebuild it. You'll understand how it works. If you never worked on an engine before and someone just threw all the parts in a box and said here put it together, you'd never figure it out! No one is going to hand us a working model, we'll have to put it together. It's great if we understand the theory too but if we're never able to build a working model then understanding the theory wont do us much good.

    I hope all of us or at least some of us are able to figure the whole thing out and replicate this machine, but what if we never do?

    Mark

    Leave a comment:


  • Armagdn03
    replied
    Originally posted by qvision View Post
    Wouldn't a more helpful approach be for JB to post circuit diagrams ??

    At the moment this is looking like a puzzle-solving contest, with everyone having to spend money to solve it.

    I thought forums like this were for sharing information ...
    It is diffucult because....

    Most are trained to view the potential centers (electrons) as the end all and be all of electromagnetic theory. These centers, which the radial system of potential point towards (like the spokes on a wheel point towards its center (except in this case with an inverse square quality)) are one half of the coin. In reality they are a one dimension point, which defines an entire sphere of space surrounding the point. This sphere becomes more and more B field dominant (S field in my favorite cosmology) the further from center you move. The spherical system and the radial system (potential and B field) are inverses of one another, and at the same time, cause one another. You can view the potential centers as causing the spherical system, or the spherical system as causing the radial potential system. We tend to use only one of these choices.

    The circuit diagrams depict only the potential center pathways. This machine plays with the spherical system of S field which can define the potential centers, not the other way around like classically thought.

    How do we want to shape and play with the B (S) field, how should our electronics follow suit to accomplish this? Theory is waaaaaaaay more important at this point than diagrams. I personally don't care to build a damn thing I don't understand.

    Just my thoughts.

    Leave a comment:


  • Raui
    replied
    Originally posted by qvision View Post
    Wouldn't a more helpful approach be for JB to post circuit diagrams ??

    At the moment this is looking like a puzzle-solving contest, with everyone having to spend money to solve it.

    I thought forums like this were for sharing information ...
    If he just told us everything then, when a day comes that the man is unfortunately no longer with us, we'd be out fending for ourselves and we mightn't be able to figure things out because our minds aren't used to working in the ways that they are required to in order to understand this stuff.

    @Jetjs,
    I agree with Armagdn03, very nice!

    Leave a comment:


  • Armagdn03
    replied
    Originally posted by Jetijs View Post
    Hi John,
    Which iron do you mean, that lets you collect the phi field?
    Here is my wheel so far:
    Hot damn, thas purdy.

    Leave a comment:


  • qvision
    replied
    Wouldn't a more helpful approach be for JB to post circuit diagrams ??

    At the moment this is looking like a puzzle-solving contest, with everyone having to spend money to solve it.

    I thought forums like this were for sharing information ...

    Leave a comment:


  • Jetijs
    replied
    Originally posted by John_Bedini View Post

    Armagdn03
    Yes that would be fine with me and some of what I just posted may help you understand Ed's work. The best is his flywheel as that magnetic arrangement is using north and south pole magnets pushed together to form magnetic beams and narrow beams. that would make the switching very sharp, more like spikes. by doing that Ed has moved the Bloch wall of the magnet to where the iron on the top is collecting that Phi field. and one of my investors has gone and looked under the flywheel and yes you can connect a wire to that point. So what was Ed doing with that current is to be discover buy us as his notes were all burnt up in a fire, like Tesla.
    John B
    Hi John,
    Which iron do you mean, that lets you collect the phi field?
    Here is my wheel so far:

    Leave a comment:


  • Ecoman11
    replied
    @Aaron

    I told you once and I'll say it again. Stop being a Free Energy Officer and learn to take criticism about your views. If you're a true spiritual entrepreneur and have some faith, you would trust that any objective views will eventually be ruled out once the free energy theories are proven.

    I'm sure many would agree here that your defense mimics the preaching of a disciple. Get real man.

    Ecoman

    Leave a comment:


  • John_Bedini
    replied
    Big Bedini Machine

    Aaron give me a call.
    JohnB

    Leave a comment:


  • Mark
    replied
    Originally posted by Aaron View Post
    Erfinder,

    I can appreciate what you're saying but you did NOT comprehend my post.

    Obviously it is his impression - that needs to be pointed out? You should
    go back and read my message instead of posting that something should
    be done that I already did!

    I posted my opinion of the video in addition to presenting one blatant
    FACT, which seems to have popped your kool-aid balloon.

    I SAID - he is a wiz and I think that he has the most accurate decryption
    of the numbers. I'm not sure what you find in that statement that does
    not honor him. I think credit should go
    where it is deserved but he CLAIMED that this particular Lodge is designed
    to display this knowledge about magnetic current when it is NOT. Some
    things he asks if they are not mere coincidences for example and in others
    he is stating them as facts, when they are NOT.

    And if we know something isn't factual it is our duty to point it out and
    show what the correct answer is?? First of all that is YOUR life philosophy
    and I don't know who you are to think that anyone else in the world should
    abide by it. I'll point something out that is blatantly wrong even if the
    right answer isn't known as I don't have to subscribe to what you think
    is any one else's duty or not. I happen to mostly agree with that life
    philosophy of yours, but you're out of line telling me what my duty should be.

    However, in light of your flawed comprehension of what I posted, I stated
    a correct answer
    that what was in the middle of the sun is a LEVEL! What
    part about that correct answer giving do you not understand, which
    happened to immediately follow what was pointed out as being
    incorrect? You gripe about me not doing something that I actually DID!

    Please don't answer - we're not turning this thread into a debate on
    something that you think needs to be done, when I did it but you obviously
    didn't comprehend that in my post.



    The Immovable Jewels of the lodge - Unzipped - Square, Plumb and Level

    A Mason cannot discredit the 144 story? Basically, showing that the
    image was a Level and not a Bell has ALREADY discredited his story
    IN REGARDS TO COMPARING IT TO THE DESIGN OF A LODGE
    . And if you
    comprehend it - that has NOTHING to do with his idea about the
    numbers. One point doesn't necessarily have to do with another and for
    real critical thinking, the distinctions between these matters should be
    comprehended.

    And you do NOT know if any Mason is in the position to verify or discredit
    the code144 story or not! And if you think you can make that claim, you
    are confusing your beliefs with facts that can be verified. These blanket
    claims are a pitfall and are out of touch with reality.

    And that being said... by the way, there IS a Masonic connection to all
    of this but sorry, this Lodge design has nothing to do with it.

    Now is not the time for discussion? You're not going to tell me what it
    is time for me to do or not. I watched the
    recommended videos, point out some flaws and showed a correction and
    I'm interested in the truth - not a delusion. Actually, I am interested in
    the wild imagination part of it because that is pretty fun but I'm not going
    to sit by and let people believe something false when I know the answer.

    Again, I think the presentation is awesome, which - um, I think I already
    said but I just said it again. I think he (again) has the most accurate
    decryption of the numbers mystery of Coral Castle. And I am a person
    interested in the FACTS, I have pointed out a FACT and have given a
    FACT - one of many FACTS that can be pointed out about his claims that
    that Lodge is build to embody the magnetic current principles, which is
    FALSE. A MASONIC LEVEL is what that image was and NOT a bell. That
    is quite a HOLE that got punched right through his analogy. Numbers -
    yes, he seems to be right on, but his revelation of what the Lodge
    is emblematic of is WRONG.

    Bottom line is that you can be high on the kool-aid all you want, but I'm
    interested in the FACTS and will continue to point them out as I see them
    and if I don't, I'm guilty of letting people move down a a path with rose
    colored glasses that could be avoided. I did the RIGHT thing by pointing
    out what I pointed out - at least that is what my value system leads me
    to believe and evidently you want people to shave their heads and slap
    a tambourine.
    Aaron

    I believe we are all allowed to have our own opinion whether they're write or wrong. Why do you have go on a such a long winded tagent when someone doesn't agree with you.

    I posted my opinion of the video in addition to presenting one blatant
    FACT, which seems to have popped your kool-aid balloon.

    Don't look in the mirror here partner I think it was your ballon that got popped.

    Erfinder deleted post was also out of line but Aaron you need to relax and not be so offended when someone doesn't agree with you. Erfinders original response did not deserve your demeaning comments.

    Mark

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    @Erfinder & @All

    Thanks ERfinder for revealing EXACTLY who you are and what you stand
    for and that you're post talking about honor and so on are completely
    hypocritical and contradictory to your recent post which has been
    deleted that clearly displays that you have serious cognitive dissonance
    and that your internal struggle between two opposing frames of mind
    has gotten the better of you. Preaching about honor and then turning
    around and intentionally dishonoring someone is a sad place to be.
    Good luck to you!

    @All, this is in reference to a wonderfully colorful post with pornographic
    references - and in a forum that people of ALL ages read - and this is
    why he is no longer a member.

    Leave a comment:


  • John_Bedini
    replied
    Big Bedini Field

    Another thing here is the Axial Motor with pie cut magnets, What did ED say about his Perpetual motion holder, except Ed clamped it shut I did not do that I took advantage of the forces between poles in a series configuration and only needed to switch two little pulsed or what is called Re-gauging, read the Radus work pull the patents and see if you get it. In some of them Radus called that Buck, Boost, Westinghouse did not let all the information out but enough if you were ingenious enough you could build a permanent magnet motor. You only need one switch and not two for a motor. Look at his BH curves. You have all the answers here to build this machine.

    Armagdn03
    Yes that would be fine with me and some of what I just posted may help you understand Ed's work. The best is his flywheel as that magnetic arrangement is using north and south pole magnets pushed together to form magnetic beams and narrow beams. that would make the switching very sharp, more like spikes. by doing that Ed has moved the Bloch wall of the magnet to where the iron on the top is collecting that Phi field. and one of my investors has gone and looked under the flywheel and yes you can connect a wire to that point. So what was Ed doing with that current is to be discover buy us as his notes were all burnt up in a fire, like Tesla.
    John B

    Leave a comment:


  • Armagdn03
    replied
    @ Mr. Bedini & others.

    Here is a statement, or thought, which pertains to a couple threads, but I believe has relevance here.

    If one were to travel to a distant Galaxy and land on a distant planet, would he find the same periodic table of elements in this new location?


    Answer: No.

    One could view atoms as harmonic divisions of the parent overtone known as our sun. Our sun is but a harmonic division of the parent overtone known as our galactic sun. Hence the transcendent saying "As above so below". This is one of the fundamental reasons for the "quanta" of energy we experience. One might also say the sun is an electron (or eddy current) of the galactic sun, and that our planet is an electron of our sun.

    Furthering this train of thought one might say that our sun would not exist were it not being continually fed by the galactic sun. To that extent, our planet would not exist were it not being continually fed by our sun, and on and on down the line.

    If all elements of a system are harmonically related, and can be reduced to a fundamental quanta both on the macroscopic and microscopic world (planks constant)... And these elements MUST be this way, or else they stop existing... Then in order to successfully interact with this energy, we must build devices which are in and of themselves a harmonic division of the grand overtone of our planet (sun or galaxy) and a multiple of the undertones known as our fundamental quanta of energy. (which is a redundant statement, since what is a fundamental quanta on the micro, is the same as a overtone on the macro, as above so below remember?)

    This is my current train of thought in order to understand how the work of Leedskalnin and the sweet 16 plays into this device.

    It would appear to me that 16 represents the fourth division of unity.
    (first division of one =2, second = 4, third = 8 fourth = 16. )

    (Mr. Bedini,I would be interested to discuss further along these lines, but It seems that most are more interested in the blueprints to the device rather than theory, so I wont derail the popular direction of this thread further. Hope to hear from you.)

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X