gravity waves found

[teslaproject]

Viewing angle

exactly...but what i am asking is a hot piece of metal will distort the image behind it, correct?..how much heat does it take to do this?....to say blur a photographic image?....david

Here again, sorry if my answer seems frustrating but it is a 'how long is a piece of string' query.

It really depends on your 'plane' of view and how much distortion 'depth' you are looking through. The greater the depth, the LESS heat required....it's proportional. Let me illustrate...Mirage effects (the silver sheen that looks like water on a dry hot lake)....if you squat really low to the ground (increasing the depth of view through the distortion), you can actually see mirage effects close up on a relatively 'cooler' day. However, if you jump on a high step ladder or into a helicopter for a birds eye view, the sheen will vanish and only be visible far on the horizon if it is a REALLY hot day.

Regards

TP

[rave154]

David,

i think the best/easiest way to determine wether or not it is the camera alone producing the odd optical effects is as follows...

take a piece of card, circular, roughly the same diameter as your rig, using a thick marker pen just roughly draw the same shapes as you have when looking down at your rig, ie :- the circle of outward pointing "U" shapes....mount the whole thing on a nail which is pointing upwards....to enable you to spin it... doesnt matter if it wobbles ( your rig wobbles too )...

spin it & film it.

Hope this helps

[witsend]

how much heat energy does it take to "bend" light?.....?did i win the darwin award?

I am sorry that you didn't get more interest to view your rig. I think it is sad and sorry truth that people just don't care enough about science.

You ask how much 'heat' it takes to bend light? I don't know that 'heat' CAN bend light. I rather doubt it. Light always travels in a straight line. It can be deflected off different materials and, from different densities such as water. This may give the appearance of a 'bend' I suppose. But light itself always travels in a straight line. The only thing that is understood to 'bend' light is gravity - and then the understanding is that light will follow the line of gravity. This much of Eistein's theory has been conclusively proven and was the very test that rocketed him from relative obscurity to immediate international fame.

There is nothing between your camera and your rig other than air. If there were 'heat' being generated anywhere between these two then the air molecules - atoms - would be dispersed and agitated that one would see interference. This would - at it's most - cloud and obscure the sight of the rig. It would be a rare 'heat' phenomenon that first put any such photographed objects into clear focus let alone give them a 'shape distortion' with the clarity that both your photographs and your videos do.

The simple fact is that unless light is actually being 'bent' there is no known explanation for the distortions that you are both seeing and showing - and that with such extraordinary clarity. To me the example that defies all sense is the 'lambright wobble'. Sounds like a dance step. LOL. There - not only is there a distinct interference but that interference seems to generate a kind of 'resonance' all of itself.

Then regarding the anomalies of weight. I take it that there is a tangible 'pull' of heavy objects towards the centre of the rig. You do not need to weigh in on the degree of 'pull' - but it would be nice. Meanwhile I trust to your reporting of this as well as others. Such 'values' are subtle. One does not doubt that one magnet can pull another magnet towards itself. Nor does one doubt that metal objects can be 'drawn' towards a magnetic field. Neither event change the apparent 'weight' of either object. Yet no-one in their right mind would deny that 'pull'. What is intriguing here is that the 'pull' is not confined to magnetisable material. It seems to 'cross all boundaries' which, in itself - speaks to a gravity field rather than a pure magnetic field. If this same field is also changing the molecular distribution of air around the rig it would speak to the effect even more strongly. But that 'bending of the light' that would be required to give those distortions? That cannot be explained by the redistribution of molecules and atoms in that 'atmosphere'.

So take heart David. You're at an early stage of something. Don't be persuaded that the effects are trivial. If we were to ignore all such events as trivialities then I very much doubt any scientific progress would ever have been made. I think I know something of how you feel. You have definitely NOT won the Darwin award.

[Freezer]

i cant find the power supply for my printer?....its gotta be around here somewhere!?......but the still i posted looked the same but the dist is on the other side?.. so do i spin the print and video IT??....the vids from today are ready i will post the link

We can see that in the video #3 it appears the size of the pipes change from skinny on the right and wide on the left, has it been explained already? Are you seeing the pipes width change with your eyes? I have no idea how that could be a camera effect. In your optical video the distortion seems to reverse as you spin it in the opposite direction. Maybe it's some weird optical illusion I have no idea..Can anyone explain this?

More interesting parallels - Leedskalnin and GREBENNIKOV

Best regards,

IndianaBoys

Interesting that you posted about Grebennikov. The pipes reminded me of the CSE. Interesting video as well showing the bee attracted to the paper clip. Not sure why it seems to suspend in the air like that. I was under the impression that Grebennikov said that only a particular rare type of bee could be used, but it seems like other bee's could exhibit the same effects. I guess now I'll go in my back yard and look for some dead bees..

His book "My World"
My World by Victor Grebbenikov | Scribd

[david lambright]

school

when i was in high school, the chemistry teacher said he would rather quit than have me in his class.....humorous....david

[david lambright]

exactly...but what i am asking is a hot piece of metal will distort the image behind it, correct?..how much heat does it take to do this?....to say blur a photographic image?....david

[teslaproject]

Light

how much heat energy does it take to "bend" light?.....

Truly bend light or bend light from the perspective of where YOU are looking at it??? Don't confuse these two things. PLUS....how long is a piece of string? By this I mean, it really doesnt take a lot to bend light David.

You always hear egghead scientists talking about massive planets or black holes being required to bend light but this is bone headed. Physics is actually really simple and has been made complex by folk like Einstein who barely conducted a single lab experiment their entire life but rather postulated erroneous equations using 'Gedankenexpirments' adnauseum (German for 'Thought experiment'). Einstein loved these and its where he came up with his theories on red shift, time travel and E=Mc2 which are very HEAVILY flawed.

Light travels at approx 186,000 miles per second. View each particle of light like a light emitting transparent bullet. Like any projectile, you can bend it's course or completely stop the trajectory dependent on what you place in it's path. Solid objects will obviously kill it cold. Glass, water, and similar transparent items will slow, bend or defract light depending on thickness and clarity. Even AIR density will slow or speed up light. In a vacuum, light travels its fastest, in cold air, slower and warm air which is LESS DENSE, light will pick up speed and bend as though it is going through a glass lens. THIS is why you get heat shimmer (waves) on a warm day. YOUR VIEW of the light has been distorted through the hotter portion of air.


Regards

TP

[Harvey]

how much heat energy does it take to "bend" light?.....?did i win the darwin award?

Not much at all really. What is needed is a density differential in a material, such as air. When light moves between the boundary of those two densities, it bends. theoretically, you could setup a density bubble with air of the same temperature but different pressures and get the same result.

See refraction here:refraction: Definition from Answers.comthis video.

The large round ball that levitates on Johns video is probably the most dramatic. On a coast to coast radio show, John stated that this was a 6 to 8 pound cannon ball - but later, on an internet radio show with Bill Alek he said it was between 70 and 80 pounds. I asked for confirmation to see which was correct, and John indicated it was the later. I never did do a dimensional comparison between that ball and its environment to see if we could see what size it was for a mass comparison, because it wasn't important to me. But electrostatically elevating 8 pounds or 80 pounds is just as impressive in my honest opinion. One theory suggests that an interruption of space and time in that vicinity by the intersecting of two different radio signals in that zone, contributed to the levitation.

Of course getting levitation and controlling it are two different things

[Harvey]

@Indianaboys,

Great video of the bee shell there! It looks very much like flux pinning.

I imagine you put the glass between the shell and the tweezers - if you did, was the effect still there?

Interesting research on the Scarabs and ancient civilizations as well.

[david lambright]

question?

how much heat energy does it take to "bend" light?.....?did i win the darwin award?

[david lambright]

lost

On the video "mikes house 3" shows the distortion pretty well. I'm not sure how this could be an optical illusion, as I've never seen a camera do that before.



Cloxxki suggested using a printed picture and film it, so I drew up a simple image to print out and see. Not sure if you have a printer handy, but it should show if it's a camera effect or something else.

http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/9726/temp1h.jpg

i cant find the power supply for my printer?....its gotta be around here somewhere!?......but the still i posted looked the same but the dist is on the other side?.. so do i spin the print and video IT??....the vids from today are ready i will post the link

[Freezer]

On the video "mikes house 3" shows the distortion pretty well. I'm not sure how this could be an optical illusion, as I've never seen a camera do that before.



Cloxxki suggested using a printed picture and film it, so I drew up a simple image to print out and see. Not sure if you have a printer handy, but it should show if it's a camera effect or something else.

http://img256.imageshack.us/img256/9726/temp1h.jpg

[david lambright]

hi

this is the stuff dreams are made of.........

[david lambright]

what if you were to suspend as much iron oxide as you could in a metal that melts at an extremely low temperature, such as lead. This might help since you'd have metal contacting metal, perhaps strengthening the magnetic alignment of the aggregate. You could first coat the wires with something like clay, or a high temp epoxy to prevent the liquid metal from burning through the insulation and shorting it. Maybe even JB weld would work well.

ferro fluid......i have already checked ....yes it works ..i told you,i have been working on this for a while.....there is more!...lots more...david...PS i WAS the only one at the demo today!...not to worry..hi solrey......next saturday at saturday market in salem........david

[Psyclic]

Other interesting experiments

I wonder if anyone here has done any experimenting with the Hutchison Effect?

Here's a old video showing how everyday objects appear to escape the acceleration of gravity. And at 1:00 in the video, John Hutchison is showing a block of wood in which a stainless steel butter knife has apparently merged molecularly. Other objects have just come apart.

The "Hutchison Effect"
YouTube - The Hutchison-Effect The New Philadelphia Experiment
Crazy Scientist John Hutchinson - Video

John Hutchison
John Hutchison -- "The Hutchison Effect" -- Antigravity & disruption effects -- articles & movies