Forgot to include quote from articles.
"While there are some details of the device which the inventor refuses to make public, yet there are many general features that may be explained. It is planned that the machine, to be set up in Phoenix, will generate sufficient power to light the city, and will consist of a 200 foot tower upon which is placed the "absorber". The latter consists of a series of magnetized steel plates set in a circle (the manner of preparing them is kept secret) and this mechanism attracts the electricity from the atmosphere. This is carried by wires to a transformer in the engine house below and thence is applied to produce either power or light after the usual manner.
In an authorized statement Meyers says: "The flow of electricity is constant. When it emerges into the transformer it is in the form of a direct current. It will absorb the electricity day and night and will work whenever the wireless will work. I can put up a plant to supply such a building as the Adams Hotel for about $1500, and one of the principal items of the expense is the cost of the towers, the wires, the magnetizing of one set of plates, which is part of the secret of the treatment which makes it respond to the accumulations of the atmosphere.
"
***************
Could be describing the way Dave got magnetic lock?
Tishatang
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
gravity waves found
Collapse
X
-
This may be a stretch, buy maybe having PMH lock is the secret to the Roy Meyers Absorber device? See here:
Roy J. Meyers: Absorber (Atmospheric Electrical Generator)
In the photograph of the mockup model of a large unit, it has the same physical configuration as Leedskalnin's magnetic wheel. A large number of V-shaped magnets arranged in a circle. Perhaps Roy's secret was lockup of all magnets?
For those of you who have lockup of some kind, maybe you could experiment with zinc plates and some iron wire as per the patents and see if you collect power?
Maybe the glimmer effect is not due to radiating energy, but absorbing energy?
Who knows?
Leave a comment:
-
FWIW scribD tried to put no less than 20 cookies on my machine... 20!
Leave a comment:
-
Have gone over that video - AlienScientist in great depth. He's brushing over an awfully large number of steps to get to that conclusion - 'high frequency electromagnetic energy in - gravitational propulsion out.' Golly. If only. Also a bit strange about releasing gravity from the nucleus of the atom. Not sure what he means. Actually I'm intrigued. Very articulately presented. I think he's trying to inspire students to replicate Dr Podkletnov's? experiment. No harm there. But not at all sure about the logic to get to antigravity.
I personally have no reason to doubt the 'Hutchinson Effect' - and he does NOT seem to rely on the speed of rotation which is central to this argument. But a really interesting viewing and I've now gone over a whole lot of his videos. He's definitely a free energy enthusiast. Brilliant guy.Last edited by witsend; 07-12-2010, 06:04 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Thanks AGAIN Cloxxki. A really interesting video. I'm working on a transcript of his text just to get my mind around it. Many thanks indeed.Originally posted by Cloxxki View PostYou'll need a coffee of cola to keep up for 9:08 minutes. It's gets relevant to this discussion halfway through.
YouTube - Antigravity Physics Explained (NEW!) From AlienScientist!
Leave a comment:
-
If you're looking for consensus here GB I'm afraid I, for one, cannot see what it is that you're trying to point to. I think we're all scrambling and struggling to find answers. But I'm not sure that it will help matters to start imagining impossible rotations, with respect. It may be that the cement was not always there - is a possibility. But it is quite simply IMPOSSIBLE for these sections to rotate independently, IMHOOriginally posted by gravityblock View Postif you take a hard look at it. Condemnation before investigation is folly.
I'm not here to convince you otherwise. I'm here in search of the truth, whatever that truth may be. Don't let yourself be bamboozled and hoodwinked.
GB
Leave a comment:
-
I'm with you here Adie. I think GB is confused because of the apparent rotational differences that come with that video. Of interest is this. Could Leedskalnin have applied the cement on completion of Coral Castle? When he felt no further need for the device? Personally I doubt it because the cement is so carefully applied especially on the clover. It sort of looks 'well used and settled' if that makes sense. Does anyone know how far the hole extends underneath the rig? And where does that shaft go to? Frankly I think it would constitute a viable study for a respectable archeological dig. Perhaps that's what's needed.Originally posted by Adie123 View PostNope sorry, im not buying that. The whole thing keeps in sync with one another. The handle keeps inline with the clover/bowl, the bowl keeps inline with the bolts and the plate and the plate keeps inline with the magnets. Its all cemented together, how is this same as the Harmonic Drive System?
AdieLast edited by witsend; 07-12-2010, 06:06 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Davids Elements
Now this looks a lot like Davids Open End Elements:
YouTube - Nikola Tesla Levitation
I wonder if there is any Lambright Glow in the video that some of us just can't see
Leave a comment:
-
There is obviously two separate wheels made of concrete that mesh together via teeth, a wheel inside a wheel. Where the teeth are dis-engaged, then you can see a gap between the inner flex spline (inner wheel) and the outer circular spline (outer wheel). This is the same basic principals of the Harmonic Drive system. If you can not see this for yourself, then the words escape me to show you otherwise.Originally posted by Adie123 View Postok look, ive looked at it hard, but what your missing is theres cement all over it, look in the center. you can see the back of the magnets sticking through the cement and the cement is caked all the way upto the clover rose bowl. The cement is also all the way through to the outside of the flywheel inbetween the magnets. and above the magnets between the plate. tell me how all that cement is allowing a piece of the workings to spin independantly from the rest of the flywheel???
:P
Regards
Adie
GB
Leave a comment:
-
ok look, ive looked at it hard, but what your missing is theres cement all over it, look in the center. you can see the back of the magnets sticking through the cement and the cement is caked all the way upto the clover rose bowl. The cement is also all the way through to the outside of the flywheel inbetween the magnets. and above the magnets between the plate. tell me how all that cement is allowing a piece of the workings to spin independantly from the rest of the flywheel???Originally posted by gravityblock View PostYou can see the teeth on the flex spline. How can this be one secured piece when there are gear teeth on the inner flex spline, which is clearly shown in the video and image? The system does appear to spin differently from one another, if you take a hard look at it. Condemnation before investigation is folly.
I'm not here to convince you otherwise. I'm here in search of the truth, whatever that truth may be. Don't let yourself be bamboozled and hoodwinked.
GB
:P
Regards
AdieLast edited by Adie123; 07-11-2010, 12:13 AM.
Leave a comment:
-
You can see the teeth on the flex spline. How can this be one secured piece when there are gear teeth on the inner flex spline, which is clearly shown in the video and image? The system does appear to spin differently from one another, if you take a hard look at it. Condemnation before investigation is folly.Originally posted by Adie123 View PostNo denial here, i cant see anything that doesnt spin differently from one another. From the crank to the handle and out to the magnets is all one secured piece. Your making your own illusion for yourself :P.. All the best with that.
Regards
Adie
I'm not here to convince you otherwise. I'm here in search of the truth, whatever that truth may be. Don't let yourself be bamboozled and hoodwinked.
GBLast edited by gravityblock; 07-10-2010, 11:40 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
No denial here, i cant see anything that doesnt spin differently from one another. From the crank to the handle and out to the magnets is all one secured piece. Your making your own illusion for yourself :P.. All the best with that.Originally posted by gravityblock View PostYou're in denial. The whole thing does not keep in sync with one another.
GB
Regards
Adie
Leave a comment:
-
You're in denial. The whole thing does not keep in sync with one another.Originally posted by Adie123 View PostNope sorry, im not buying that. The whole thing keeps in sync with one another. The handle keeps inline with the clover/bowl, the bowl keeps inline with the bolts and the plate and the plate keeps inline with the magnets. Its all cemented together, how is this same as the Harmonic Drive System?
Adie
GBLast edited by gravityblock; 07-10-2010, 10:53 PM.
Leave a comment:
-
Nope sorry, im not buying that. The whole thing keeps in sync with one another. The handle keeps inline with the clover/bowl, the bowl keeps inline with the bolts and the plate and the plate keeps inline with the magnets. Its all cemented together, how is this same as the Harmonic Drive System?Originally posted by gravityblock View PostThe video above clearly shows this is a Harmonic Drive System. In the last few seconds of the video, it is easily seen there are gear teeth on the inside flex spline attached to the wave generator, which will mesh with the circular spline's teeth. Below is a picture taken from the above video showing the wave generator, flex spline, and circular spline for the Harmonic Drive System. Watch the video carefully and you will notice the inner flex spline is meshing with the outer circular spline.
This along with the pulley system, would allow one to move heavy objects with precise positioning with ease. Mystery Solved, Case Closed!
GB

Adie
Leave a comment:
Leave a comment: