Originally posted by ldrancer
View Post
No one is selling absolutely NADA here.
This Theory WILL BE ABSOLUTELY AND DEFINITIVELY PROVEN, just seat back and relax...

Evidence?...Of course:
A MAGNETIC FIELD IS A NATURAL PHENOMENA, AND LIKE SO, IT HAD TO BE ANALYZED AND STUDIED FROM THE NATURAL APPROACH, BY COMPARISON TO NATURAL MODELS AND ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ELSE!
when my theory about this, idea is that its a TRANSMISSION. i showed the video of the gear that does it.
The transmission model is working. your guys model is NOT. plus the transmission model takes everything you say and sucks it in an dproves it as a transmissio more and more. and more and more.
The transmission model is working. your guys model is NOT. plus the transmission model takes everything you say and sucks it in an dproves it as a transmissio more and more. and more and more.
[/IMG] Ken Wheeler shows this Model as well, (page 69)from Maxwell's approach of the "Idling Wheel"...except that Dielectric Field is the one Driving from inside out and NOT from outside inwards, that be that "Center Idling Wheel" approach.
You gotta understand what the idea of free energy is before you go trying to tell peple what it is first. we all got to know. the idea of free energy is a MOTOR. concept. not a transmission. Your drawing isnt feasible its not demonstratable and you are making up half of it and it is shown working and can use any of the made up ideas you say cause their half thoughts and put it into the description of the transmission model. you guys dont even kow what yoru talking about.
first we got to have the idea of free energy. and htat would be a motor. becuase a MOTOR does work. and thats what energy is is work. we agree that energy is work. work being, moving things makign things happening. and we can agree that that, is a MOTOR. so its easy simple to explain and to understand any ideas on, free energy or a magnet or something we dont understand.
we might not explained how the magnet works but we can relate it to models, and we dont have to explain to understand that it works. free energy would be a motor cause if i could have my car just start going, motor just runs turns on and goes right, i dont add, do anything to it. that would be free energy. free energy has nothing to do with a transmission. i then use my cars motor to power different things off of it. but i have to have power or a motor.
but a motor always like a car's, needs fuel. until we get free energy right. so its not running like in a circle.
I have to at least turn the key on the thing to make it go right, so thats not free energy.
first we got to have the idea of free energy. and htat would be a motor. becuase a MOTOR does work. and thats what energy is is work. we agree that energy is work. work being, moving things makign things happening. and we can agree that that, is a MOTOR. so its easy simple to explain and to understand any ideas on, free energy or a magnet or something we dont understand.
we might not explained how the magnet works but we can relate it to models, and we dont have to explain to understand that it works. free energy would be a motor cause if i could have my car just start going, motor just runs turns on and goes right, i dont add, do anything to it. that would be free energy. free energy has nothing to do with a transmission. i then use my cars motor to power different things off of it. but i have to have power or a motor.
but a motor always like a car's, needs fuel. until we get free energy right. so its not running like in a circle.
I have to at least turn the key on the thing to make it go right, so thats not free energy.

your model you guys make has been modelled already. in that metal wire deal that was shown that time in one of them videos. and it unfolds then what? it locks into itself, it wil not run, in a circle.
there end of discussion. your idea proven wrong. make that little ideal, your drawing which makes no sense, its false, you cant see or show or prove your theory, and show the transmission like i did with the gears, the part that shows the transmission precisely like where the rubber meets the road, is the part you cant, show or prove.
there you go. argue with taht one or something.
there end of discussion. your idea proven wrong. make that little ideal, your drawing which makes no sense, its false, you cant see or show or prove your theory, and show the transmission like i did with the gears, the part that shows the transmission precisely like where the rubber meets the road, is the part you cant, show or prove.
there you go. argue with taht one or something.

[IMG]
[/IMG][IMG]
[/IMG][IMG]
[/IMG][IMG]
[/IMG]And finally I will repeat what I wrote before...so it is "printed" in your small brain.
A MAGNETIC FIELD IS A NATURAL PHENOMENA, AND LIKE SO, IT HAD TO BE ANALYZED AND STUDIED FROM THE NATURAL APPROACH, BY COMPARISON TO NATURAL MODELS AND ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ELSE!
[IMG]
[/IMG][IMG]
[/IMG][IMG]
[/IMG][IMG]
[/IMG][IMG]
[/IMG]MAGNETIC FIELDS SHOULD HAVE NEVER, EVER, BEEN STUDIED AND ANALYZED BASED ON THE STUPID IRON FILINGS METHODS TO BUILD ALL THE BS EXISTING SO FAR FOR OVER 200 YEARS.
And finally...an example of FREE ENERGY IS A SPINNING FREE, NO LENZ OPPOSITION, NO MAGNETIC DRAG, NO COGGING ELECTRO-MAGNETIC GENERATOR
MAGNETIC FIELDS DRIVE ABSOLUTELY EVERY SINGLE THING IN OUR PLANET...AS IN THE WHOLE UNIVERSE...IS A FACT, AND WE MUST LOOK AT THE "PICTURE" THIS WAY ONLY!
Ufopolitics









Leave a comment: