This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Originally posted by ldrancer View Post
    wouldnt it make sense if you guys are incapable of proving your own theory that one that can use your own words to show an idea itself is the actual real idea and you guys are selling just bull to people?

    like the picture that you think explains a magnet and free energy. your magnet vortex which has no real pictures its your own drawings and you in no way can prove it. https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cLWjk3Tb4RM/maxresdefault.jpg that deal there. you have no evidence of it. sort of like a oh whats that thing called, oh right, a BLACK HOLE.
    Don't act like a retard...
    No one is selling absolutely NADA here.
    This Theory WILL BE ABSOLUTELY AND DEFINITIVELY PROVEN, just seat back and relax...

    Evidence?...Of course:

    A MAGNETIC FIELD IS A NATURAL PHENOMENA, AND LIKE SO, IT HAD TO BE ANALYZED AND STUDIED FROM THE NATURAL APPROACH, BY COMPARISON TO NATURAL MODELS AND ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ELSE!

    when my theory about this, idea is that its a TRANSMISSION. i showed the video of the gear that does it.

    The transmission model is working. your guys model is NOT. plus the transmission model takes everything you say and sucks it in an dproves it as a transmissio more and more. and more and more.
    [IMG][/IMG]

    Ken Wheeler shows this Model as well, (page 69)from Maxwell's approach of the "Idling Wheel"...except that Dielectric Field is the one Driving from inside out and NOT from outside inwards, that be that "Center Idling Wheel" approach.

    You gotta understand what the idea of free energy is before you go trying to tell peple what it is first. we all got to know. the idea of free energy is a MOTOR. concept. not a transmission. Your drawing isnt feasible its not demonstratable and you are making up half of it and it is shown working and can use any of the made up ideas you say cause their half thoughts and put it into the description of the transmission model. you guys dont even kow what yoru talking about.

    first we got to have the idea of free energy. and htat would be a motor. becuase a MOTOR does work. and thats what energy is is work. we agree that energy is work. work being, moving things makign things happening. and we can agree that that, is a MOTOR. so its easy simple to explain and to understand any ideas on, free energy or a magnet or something we dont understand.

    we might not explained how the magnet works but we can relate it to models, and we dont have to explain to understand that it works. free energy would be a motor cause if i could have my car just start going, motor just runs turns on and goes right, i dont add, do anything to it. that would be free energy. free energy has nothing to do with a transmission. i then use my cars motor to power different things off of it. but i have to have power or a motor.

    but a motor always like a car's, needs fuel. until we get free energy right. so its not running like in a circle.

    I have to at least turn the key on the thing to make it go right, so thats not free energy.
    A Motor is NOT free energy...even though it could release energy while it is running like I have demonstrated in MY ASYMMETRICAL MACHINES...A Motor is a LOAD, A CONSUMABLE OF ENERGY, just like a Light Bulb...

    your model you guys make has been modelled already. in that metal wire deal that was shown that time in one of them videos. and it unfolds then what? it locks into itself, it wil not run, in a circle.

    there end of discussion. your idea proven wrong. make that little ideal, your drawing which makes no sense, its false, you cant see or show or prove your theory, and show the transmission like i did with the gears, the part that shows the transmission precisely like where the rubber meets the road, is the part you cant, show or prove.

    there you go. argue with taht one or something.
    Many ways to prove this Theory, Magnetic Field VORTEXES AND SPIRALS...SAME AS MUST NATURAL PHENOMENA, and YES, just like GALACTIC JETS...QUASARS,etc, same exact thing as a Magnetic Field but at small scale...enjoy images of OUR REALITY OUT THERE...

    [IMG][/IMG]

    [IMG][/IMG]

    [IMG][/IMG]

    [IMG][/IMG]


    And finally I will repeat what I wrote before...so it is "printed" in your small brain.

    A MAGNETIC FIELD IS A NATURAL PHENOMENA, AND LIKE SO, IT HAD TO BE ANALYZED AND STUDIED FROM THE NATURAL APPROACH, BY COMPARISON TO NATURAL MODELS AND ABSOLUTELY NOTHING ELSE!

    [IMG][/IMG]

    [IMG][/IMG]

    [IMG][/IMG]

    [IMG][/IMG]

    [IMG][/IMG]

    MAGNETIC FIELDS SHOULD HAVE NEVER, EVER, BEEN STUDIED AND ANALYZED BASED ON THE STUPID IRON FILINGS METHODS TO BUILD ALL THE BS EXISTING SO FAR FOR OVER 200 YEARS.

    And finally...an example of FREE ENERGY IS A SPINNING FREE, NO LENZ OPPOSITION, NO MAGNETIC DRAG, NO COGGING ELECTRO-MAGNETIC GENERATOR

    MAGNETIC FIELDS DRIVE ABSOLUTELY EVERY SINGLE THING IN OUR PLANET...AS IN THE WHOLE UNIVERSE...IS A FACT, AND WE MUST LOOK AT THE "PICTURE" THIS WAY ONLY!


    Ufopolitics
    Last edited by Ufopolitics; 02-04-2016, 01:40 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • ldrancer
    replied
    wouldnt it make sense if you guys are incapable of proving your own theory that one that can use your own words to show an idea itself is the actual real idea and you guys are selling just bull to people?

    like the picture that you think explains a magnet and free energy. your magnet vortex which has no real pictures its your own drawings and you in no way can prove it. https://i.ytimg.com/vi/cLWjk3Tb4RM/maxresdefault.jpg that deal there. you have no evidence of it. sort of like a oh whats that thing called, oh right, a BLACK HOLE.

    when my theory about this, idea is that its a TRANSMISSION. i showed the video of the gear that does it.

    The transmission model is working. your guys model is NOT. plus the transmission model takes everything you say and sucks it in an dproves it as a transmissio more and more. and more and more.

    You gotta understand what the idea of free energy is before you go trying to tell peple what it is first. we all got to know. the idea of free energy is a MOTOR. concept. not a transmission. Your drawing isnt feasible its not demonstratable and you are making up half of it and it is shown working and can use any of the made up ideas you say cause their half thoughts and put it into the description of the transmission model. you guys dont even kow what yoru talking about.

    first we got to have the idea of free energy. and htat would be a motor. becuase a MOTOR does work. and thats what energy is is work. we agree that energy is work. work being, moving things makign things happening. and we can agree that that, is a MOTOR. so its easy simple to explain and to understand any ideas on, free energy or a magnet or something we dont understand.

    we might not explained how the magnet works but we can relate it to models, and we dont have to explain to understand that it works. free energy would be a motor cause if i could have my car just start going, motor just runs turns on and goes right, i dont add, do anything to it. that would be free energy. free energy has nothing to do with a transmission. i then use my cars motor to power different things off of it. but i have to have power or a motor.

    but a motor always like a car's, needs fuel. until we get free energy right. so its not running like in a circle.

    I have to at least turn the key on the thing to make it go right, so thats not free energy.

    your model you guys make has been modelled already. in that metal wire deal that was shown that time in one of them videos. and it unfolds then what? it locks into itself, it wil not run, in a circle.

    there end of discussion. your idea proven wrong. make that little ideal, your drawing which makes no sense, its false, you cant see or show or prove your theory, and show the transmission like i did with the gears, the part that shows the transmission precisely like where the rubber meets the road, is the part you cant, show or prove.

    there you go. argue with taht one or something.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Originally posted by Ben2503 View Post
    Hi UFO.
    Glad you're alive and kicking.
    Thanks Ben, yes I am...

    My point wrt to mudslinging is that it doesn't bring anything. IMHO it even blocks the 'open mind' as the mind is focused on the wrong creativity and may not appreciate what is correct and could be helpful.
    You are quite right, trying to "drive" both lines (teaching & mudslinging) at the same time could add noise to the main stream of new knowledge.

    I have big problems understanding Ken's book because of the lack of simple language explaining cause and effect. Add some mudslinging and my brains lock-up.
    I agree that Ken utilizes a lot of new conceptual terms that try to compact the new actions-reactions shown...He is trying to drive us completely away from a very wrong Theory established for too long...and that has grown very deep and with very solid roots...However, I find all this new terms as part of a new discovery based on a very Natural Phenomena which is Magnetism.

    Actually Ken's Theory gathers a bunch of previously shown magnetic models plus theories...like Davis Rawls, Walter Russell, Viktor Schauberger, etc,etc...to render a more complete approach to understand the real deal.

    Not a simple job at all.

    For this reason I am so happy you take the time to make these wonderful graphics and videos and do some real experimenting as well. Thanks again for that.
    My pleasure...

    About Einstein and (some of) the others: they are dead, water under the bridge, past tense, finito.
    Yes, they're all dead indeed...however and unfortunately, their theories are still prevailing in our Global Educational System...very conveniently so for the Oil Industry...

    1-If Ken's theory appears to be correct, it will still take decades before it's recognized and has found it's way into the schools.

    2-But I am quite sure, that if you can show a way to actually put his theory into something useful. Man, that would be a huge breakthrough.
    I had to divide your above text in two, since they are both interconnected and dependent one for the other...

    Number 1 is quite correct, it could take decades, if not another Century to reach "Official Schooling System" EXCEPT, if it can be PROVEN TO BE RIGHT...like your number 2 above...

    A huge Catalyzing to RUSH such Theory into recognition IMMEDIATELY...would be to demonstrate with Machines which are completely based on the Magnetic Mechanical Architecture of such new concepts.

    This Machines will radically set Lenz Law in vectors positioning which will never affect the main Generator performances no matter what loads are applied.

    Free wheeling Generators...producing supreme amounts of energy...with minimal or even ZERO Mechanical effort...

    In other words...what we call FREE ENERGY.

    I believe so...

    Anyway, I can't wait to see your next video.

    Best regards,
    Ben
    You will see it soon...

    Regards


    Ufopolitics

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben2503
    replied
    Hi UFO.
    Glad you're alive and kicking.

    My point wrt to mudslinging is that it does't bring anything. IMHO it even blocks the 'open mind' as the mind is focussed on the wrong creativity and may not appreciate what is correct and could be helpful.

    I have big problems understanding Ken's book because of the lack of simple language explaining cause and effect. Add some mudslinging and my brains lock-up.

    For this reason I am so happy you take the time to make these wonderful graphics and videos and do some real experimenting as well. Thanks again for that.

    About Einstein and (some of) the others: they are dead, water under the bridge, past tense, finito.
    If Ken's theory appears to be correct, it will still take decades before it's recognized and has found it's way into the schools. But I am quite sure, that if you can show a way to actually put his theory into something useful. Man, that would be a huge breakthrough.

    Anyway, I can't wait to see your next video.

    Best regards,
    Ben

    Leave a comment:


  • aljhoa
    replied
    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    I am VERY GLAD it is just Not me only...viewing all this Theory as the CORRECT AND REAL ONE.
    Ufopolitics
    Sorry UFOpolitics,
    the "WebPage" won't let me give you another Five-Star rating.

    Al

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Ufopolitics View Post
    Hello Everybody!

    @Mikey: Thanks Bro for bringing this jerk with long hair, "Peter Frampton style" here...

    If anyone here wants to get REALLY CONFUSED about Magnetism Theories...watch this Guy's Concepts about Magnetism Interactions below:

    Regards

    Ufopolitics
    Let me explain. For some reason I saw Ken's youtube channel for
    the first time and he had just made some sit down video's with
    him at a desk. Ken gave out and invitation for a "Rebuttal" for
    his present theories.

    I thought no one cares, right? No one will respond. But wait, I
    looked in the youtube column for video's to the right hand side
    of the page and there was a response for making a "REBUTTAL"

    I figured the guy would at least bring up some of the book
    discussion of Ken's material but nothing very deep was dealt
    with.

    It seems like with KEN giving out this challenge to prove him wrong
    that THEY would send someone that understand his writings. I
    guess not, that's the best mainstream has to contradict KEN.

    I thought your assessment was pretty funny for the best detractor

    "Frampton Comes Alive at the Science Fair"

    That's it, just a mass of conflicting university dogma.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    An excellent video I highly recommend!

    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gd2IyoBl2ag[/VIDEO]

    Excellent Video!, Beautiful, Lovely, perfect information about Magnetism...and I am VERY GLAD it is just Not me only...viewing all this Theory as the CORRECT AND REAL ONE.

    I highly recommend to watch it, if You all want a closer approach to Magnetism.

    Same exact North South Rotations...as has been stated here.


    Regards


    Ufopolitics
    Last edited by Ufopolitics; 01-27-2016, 02:23 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Originally posted by Ben2503 View Post
    Al, Bob, Little Bro.
    Please help me to understand how this advances us???
    Mudslinging is just a sign of weakness, that's why American politicians love to do it . Free and independant minds do not need that. It's so F****g pathetic.

    Come up with something that really explains the universe and helps us to 'tap into the pool of energy that surrounds us'

    Speed is relative, the question is relative to what?

    I surely hope every thing is OK with UFO and can't wait for his constructive contribution.

    Regards,
    Ben
    Last edited by Ufopolitics; 01-27-2016, 01:47 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ufopolitics
    replied
    Hello again...

    Hello Everybody!

    @Mikey: Thanks Bro for bringing this jerk with long hair, "Peter Frampton style" here...

    If anyone here wants to get REALLY CONFUSED about Magnetism Theories...watch this Guy's Concepts about Magnetism Interactions below:

    [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bs1XDr04kEU[/VIDEO]

    Magnetism...Slam the Dunk

    I have been extremely busy making this coming video so everybody will have a UNIFIED MAGNETISM THEORY based on Ken's Concepts.

    It is NOT SIMPLE at all, to grasp "easily" the Architecture of the Magnetic Fields Flow Rotations and Polarization's...plus the Origin and return Gates of the Counterspace Dielectric Field...So, I am building this Animated CAD plus Dynamics so it is observed frame by frame all this REAL INTERACTIONS as also tested and verified against a CRT Electron Beam Ray...

    I consider it is ESSENTIAL to understand FIRST how Magnetism Works...in order to understand what would be shown soon...Plus all the possibilities to keep going on and on towards FUTURE FREE ENERGY MACHINES CONSTRUCTION.

    Below some of the 3D Animated Models am working on for next Video:

    [IMG][/IMG]

    [IMG][/IMG]

    [IMG][/IMG]

    [IMG][/IMG]

    [IMG][/IMG]


    Regards


    Ufopolitics

    Leave a comment:


  • BroMikey
    replied
    Originally posted by Ben2503 View Post
    Little Bro.
    Please help me to understand how this advances us???
    Mudslinging is just a sign of weakness

    I posted the hair boy for one good reason, his hair that falls
    around his neck and the way he jerks his head slightly around
    so he can feel his hair like a cloak. This is a perfect expression
    of the university roll model, the house of hair so to speak
    proves how smart they are.

    But of course he just parrots mainstream dogma E=MC2 and
    pretty boy can raise his eyebrows sooo.... cool. Oh yeah and then
    there is the cursing to prove how up with it he is "F" words all
    around, sure, a perfect example of the arrogant mainstream
    high dog.

    That should give everybody hope who goes with the current
    dogma of the day. This guy is their man, while poor old KEN
    is put in the spotlight as if he were promoting Aether science
    as does a witch doctor conjuring "MOJO?

    It's the same ole dogmatic tactics coming from the university mind.

    But, hey!!! Pretty boy SEEMS much more proper in his analogies
    so who will most people believe? That's right people go with
    personality productions as they have been programmed to do.

    Who needs to think outside the box, all by themselves?

    Last edited by BroMikey; 01-26-2016, 09:59 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben2503
    replied
    Originally posted by aljhoa View Post
    :noteworthy:a quote :thumbs:great independent thinking my dear.

    My view, If you engage in mudslinging, you get dirty as well.
    Now what is your view? Not a quote of somebody else.

    Leave a comment:


  • aljhoa
    replied
    Originally posted by Ben2503 View Post
    Al, Bob, Little Bro.
    Please help me to understand how this advances us???
    Mudslinging is just a sign of weakness, that's why American politicians love to do it . Free and independant minds do not need that. It's so F****g pathetic.
    Ben
    he says.
    he says.

    Political Mudslinging: Does it Work?


    Al

    Leave a comment:


  • Ben2503
    replied
    Einstein

    Al, Bob, Little Bro.
    Please help me to understand how this advances us???
    Mudslinging is just a sign of weakness, that's why American politicians love to do it . Free and independant minds do not need that. It's so F****g pathetic.

    Come up with something that really explains the universe and helps us to 'tap into the pool of energy that surrounds us'

    Speed is relative, the question is relative to what?

    I surely hope every thing is OK with UFO and can't wait for his constructive contribution.

    Regards,
    Ben

    Leave a comment:


  • aljhoa
    replied
    Originally posted by Bob Smith View Post
    There's a large body of writing about Einstein that appears to demonstrate that Einstein lacked the mathematical ability to get into engineering school, and advanced with his theories due to
    The press promoted the
    virulently racist and segregationist Zionist, Albert Einstein, as if he were the world's
    greatest mind, a mind that had surpassed the genius of Copernicus, Galileo and
    Newton.

    The Manufacture and Sale of Saint Einstein - The Propaganda of Supremacy


    Al

    Leave a comment:


  • Bob Smith
    replied
    There's a large body of writing about Einstein that appears to demonstrate that Einstein lacked the mathematical ability to get into engineering school, and advanced with his theories due to plagiarism from the great physicists of his time such as Poincare' and Lorentz. One article among many:
    AULIS Online – Different Thinking

    Bob

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X