ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Ufopolitics]

Ufo, are you saying that Magnetic field is divergent for all the surfaces in space ? Or you mean it is divergent for some specific surfaces in space ?

nathan

Hello Nathan,

We will have to start looking (imaging) Magnetic Fields as a Spatial Volume completely away from its embodiment (I call it "carrier" as a general term, as it could be a magnet or an electromagnet)

The Divergence as its curvilinear forces being propagated away from each others in the Effective Spatial 3D Volume located exactly Above each of the poles. These are the strongest part and is due to its Centrifugal Forces.

Two main Dynamic Spatial Geometries Displacements coexist in every Magnetic Field Polarization.

1- Singular Curvilinear Spatial Divergences (Centrifugal), which together conforms a 3D Spherical-Ellipsoid Volume.

2- The sum of each singular centrifugal curvilinear divergence generates the Spiral of Motion, which seats "apparently static" in Space.

Divergence is in charge to propagate this forces in a 3D Spatial Spherical Volume, away from magnetic embodiment (carriers) in front of each polarization (poles)

The Rotational, Spiral Effect is formed by the simultaneous centrifugal forces (from center outwards and away) from all the divergent curved lines.

Both Geometry Displacements are involved (together as one) in the Influence over ferromagnetics, transmitting this rotational-advancing movements to the inner particles within ferromagnetic cores.

Influenced Ferromagnetic Cores then transfer this forward rotational effect into the copper wires in the coils.

This is the way we obtain an EMF Induction in every Generator out there.

Some conceptual errors from the past would have to be rectified here:

When a Magnetic Field start entering into proximity to a ferromagnetic core (Air Gap in a Generator), this magnetic rotational and divergent forces iso facto start influencing the core, then the iron particles start this rotational inner alignment. And this Rotational Influence is just effected from the polarization approaching, whether a North or a South. MAGNETISM PARTICLE DYNAMICS

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZhETcDHDRY[/VIDEO]

...am working on more graphics (actually I have been doing it for a very long time)


Regards


Ufopolitics

[nathan97]

Hello to All,

Well, according to all my work and developments so far...I am definitively sure about some Magnetism Properties or Attributes:

1- Magnetic Fields are Rotational.

2- Magnetic Fields are Divergent.


...

Ufopolitics

Ufo, are you saying that Magnetic field is divergent for all the surfaces in space ? Or you mean it is divergent for some specific surfaces in space ?

nathan

[Ufopolitics]

A helping post for this Forum Projects...

Hello to All,

Well, according to all my work and developments so far...I am definitively sure about some Magnetism Properties or Attributes:

1- Magnetic Fields are Rotational.

2- Magnetic Fields are Divergent.


And, yes, I know it differs from the very old statements from Hendrik Lorentz, who completely denied this two facts above.

In time I will be supplying all testing videos with the evidence this is completely and definitively true.

This two facts above changes radically the way we have been conceiving EMF Induction for 200 PLUS years.

EMF Induction does not takes place by "cutting" absolutely any "Imaginary Lines of Force" (I did a "typo" and wrote "Imaginary Lies of Force"...and I laugh...just because it is true, is a lie.

Induction takes place by the forward motion of the magnetic field, entering a coil (with or without core), if it has a ferromagnetic core, then the spatial field will be expanded, spatially to that core, and the curvilinear divergent, centrifugal forces from field will Influence an electron curvilinear flow within the copper wires, or in the case of a laminated or even a solid iron core, this circular influence will develop first on core, then transferred to copper wires.

There is no need of the physical, material magnet, or electromagnet to penetrate absolutely any coil when it has a ferromagnetic core. This happens every time in every Electric Generator out there...only problem is, we have been figuring all this take place by "cutting imaginary lines of force with coil wires"......

Big difference guys!!

I want to add, based on my discovery, that all your actual development searching for Free Energy, that involves any kind of devices which work based on Coils and Magnetic Fields, as the primary source to ever find the truth in those "mysterious" myths machines and circuits...

Just like in the Don Smith case...or any other that right now does not pop in my mind...let me just say this fact:

If you are trying -based on an electronic pulsing sequence- to excite any coil(s), to obtain an output...I just want to tell you one thing...do not Fully Collapse that Field to zero values!!

If You collapse Magnetic Field, then try to turn it back on, no matter how many milliseconds it is off...the new generated field will definitively be restored back to its initial state...meaning, if that curvilinear sequence, was following a pattern, a cycle...you, by pulsing feeding to zero, are just destroying that sequence and restarting another field exactly at the same Space/Time point where the previous Field was created...meaning, you are just doing one, zero, one, zero...meaning absolutely nothing, nada!

There is "something" called a Cycloid...and that means just what I mentioned above...Cycloids must be progressive and evolutive in your designs, otherwise no energy will be generated...

You may get very strong and sharp spikes...for milliseconds...but they are not usable and very hard to keep them "tamed"...not after you burn hundred of FET's and expensive diodes.

So, You must leave at least a very small amount of power to that coil, so you do not collapse that Cycloid sequence where all this secret is.


Respectfully


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Redirecting My Posts to the right Thread...2

About the "Dancing Spiritual Fields"...We have demonstrations on record that dates back from the Nineteen Thirties...

Dr Thomas Henry Moray(1930's)

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZrRuS4Pis-k[/VIDEO]

Don L. Smith 1996 Presentation:

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Q_ApR2IxBcY[/VIDEO]

Steve Marks TPU (1997)

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0aDViLnziT8[/VIDEO]

Tariel Kapanadze

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qVUN3GsekKQ[/VIDEO]

There are many, many more like this kind of demonstrations all over in You Tube...


Now, were all this guys Scammers, a Fraud that have been conceived for Decades?....absolutely NOT!

It is "the other way around" friend, We (the rest of the whole World) are the only ones who have been scammed for over 200 years!

And there is a Very Plain and Simple explanation for ALL their discoveries...together.

They All use Spatial Magnetic Field Mutations Method to obtain Energy...A very different Conceptual Method as the Only One we all know from the Old Faraday Discovery back in 1831...But We will need to Re-Write Magnetism in Full, in order to understand how all these Machines work...

All Solid State demonstrations use electronics to achieve this Method.

Tariel Kapanadze (in above video) uses a 9V operated Small Motor to run the Com-Mutation Sequence,(Mechanical Trans-Mutation) and once the 3KW Generator develops the proper RPM's.., it is very simple to understand the 9V Battery could be removed and replaced by a self feeding, small voltage circuit (Buck Converter) from the big generator.

At this time Kapanadze is also working in Solid State Devices (Electronics) that do the same work, except that the only moving parts..are the Virtual, massless, weightless Magnetic Fields..

What we all know as "Motion Less Generators"...and is still a "Mystery"...


Unfortunately, all this guys decided to "Patent" each of their Specific Inventions, and giving some explanations that made nonsense like gathering energy from the vacuum...or from Radiant Energy...or from the Quantum...or from the Aether, etc,etc...which all were true...but they all failed to pay attention to the wonderful Common Physic Phenomena being discovered here (The Big Picture in Common)...and fall in the Academia already set Traps for whoever try to Patent whatever has been hiding in front of our noses for so long...so...We know the end of the stories behind...and they are not exactly "Happy Endings"


It is only in our Minds...to either believe in this phenomena is real...or simply deny it...like it has been done for over two Centuries.


And I tell You, it is not an easy piece of cake to make one of these machines...there are Natural "Rules" for Magnetism (we could call them "Natural Laws") that must of us ignore their existence (thanks to Academic Dogma)...but they must be obeyed and followed very precisely otherwise devices will not work...And there are absolutely no "consulting" text books that can tell us about this either...only our own experimentation would give us the answers.


I, myself, have decided to pursue this line of work, and so far it is very successful as it is very exciting...Although it takes tons of hours and tons of money...

Same way I know, many here would write about all this posts is just plain BS...oh well, they have their right to do so...only time will tell...in the mean time I take "brakes" to rest my brain and post here...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Redirecting My Posts to the right Thread...1

This are a couple of posts I wrote at http://www.energeticforum.com/renewa...odynamics.html

However, I want them to be here as well, so all material is displayed in only one source.

Hello SidL,

My pleasure friend to welcome you here and also encourage to proceed in your work, you are definitively going in the right direction and right reasoning!

I have a perfectly working and pretty new electric motorcycle...and the Controller is programmable through my Laptop, I have redesigned its BMS (Battery Management System and the Motor Controller) so I can switch the Regenerative braking up to 20% as Max (Mine does not activate when braking, but whenever I stop accelerating...Normally Open/Normally Closed SPDT (Single Pole Double Trow Micro Switch) at accelerator) ...and when I do so (20%), this "enhanced option" will work like putting the bike on first gear...when going 65 MPH on fourth. Meaning, it just brakes/stops the movement to almost a full stop. The best working percentage is around 12%...but then again, when I have an 80Amps, 5000 Watts consuming Hub Motor...it is just a big joke to think that the batteries would ever be "regenerated".

The point above is just to explain that the actual (Only Known) type of Electrical EMF Induction Generators (in General, talking about ALL Generators in the market as of today) that we all know is also a Big Fraud.

And no matter how much we all try to get them installed or connected (wired)...We will still be fighting the Reversed Forces (Lenz Law) in a "face to face" arrangement...so no matter how much we try to generate electricity...Lenz will literally "take it all away" from Us...plus leave us in negative values...why?...just because it is a perfectly conceived Mirror Geometry...a Symmetrical Induction, The biggest Scam ever done to Mankind...

So why we have not developed a better way to generate electricity from magnetic fields for over 200 years?

Is the Human Race so stupid?

Nope, we are not stupid...we are all just trained by the Academia (I love that name you call them, thanks!) in the wrong way, the wrong model... about How Magnetic Fields really are and how they really work, plus the way they are structured...that is absolutely the whole "secret" behind all this fraud that have lasted over 200 years.linearlyAnd the most, the top knowledge we are all missing here...:

Magnetic Fields can go through the Mass of any material in this Universe...just the Magnetic Field, not the "material field carrier" meaning whether a Magnet or an Electromagnet...and an EMF Induction WILL BE Generated.

So...a "Dancing Spiritual Field" going through a previously wired steel core sequence, just like water runs in a river...or clouds move in the sky by the wind forces...effortlessly...we can also obtain electricity...and the effort to do so?...almost no force required to move such a massless, weightless field through any material mass.

But absolutely no one would believe me when I write this things...all over this Forum...why?

Just because it does not "fit" with the "Academia Model" we all were trained to know about Magnetic Fields...


And yes...I am building this Machines...


And I will "Welcome You All to the Machine" very soon...


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

The Workings of the Universe are “Elegantly Simple” as Wal Thornhill would say.

I’ve had a few sleepless nights with my brain stewing on the implications and actions of all this… Without question there is internal compression and external expansion of the magnetic flux, depending upon the interacting spins. This could be viewed as an inter and outer oscillation.

Playing with more magnets and washers, one can make two opposing sets, (same magnets, with the steel washers in between) N,N and then a second opposing set S,S, four magnets in total. Now when these two opposite, opposing magnet sets are brought together, now in attraction to each other, - I can hardly pull them apart again!

It is several times more force than the four magnets just all put together in standard attraction fashion.

Just how much can one compress the magnetic flux within a given medium or mass?

One could take opposing magnet process, two fold, take an opposing set and another “like spin” opposing set and force those together, to create an even more compressed, “highly pressured space”.

Then the question arises on how these concepts can be applied Electo-magnetically and what happens to electric flux when interacting with highly pressurised space?

Damn, more sleepless nights ahead...

Sputins,

Start by a simple fact...a North and South magnetic fields in one magnet are both spinning in the same direction, same axis...but this is not like a motor spinning...but, in space this curvilinear spectrum describes like a cork screw shape, not spinning, and what is moving are the magnetic particles within that spatial curvilinear spiral, basically the centrifugal which is the strongest end.

Now, when we face N-S from two different magnets, say same spec's, then both cork screws from N and S embrace within same particle spin, say you keep a gap...whether air, plastic or iron...the same spin prevails there no matter what you insert in between. This is exactly the same Interaction that takes place in the very center of every magnet.

When two magnets are attracted together they configure (add) into a newly formed magnet, stronger than the original two...double the strength.

Looking from the dielectric wall...once the two magnets are bound together, those two poles in the attraction gap literally disappear...(actually they bridge from one side to the other, meaning the South will enter the other magnet's South, as the North at gap will enter into the second magnet's North) this process that Ken calls "voidance" means just that...both poles at gap "disappear" strengthening outer extreme poles...and so, the new formed dielectric would be now at the gap where the two magnets were bound together.

Spatially, this new formed magnet will be stronger than just one...so the CRT captures exactly the right image...field increases spatially

[Ufopolitics]

Simplicity...blocked for 200 plus years

Hi Ufo,

Or, if you consider the facts, "classic theories" are valid...

Regards,

bi

But they are not valid, not to the real magnetic Field, they could be "valid" for a theoretical, mathematical formula which is only true within that wrong model of a dynamic field under arrest and rusted out by iron particles sprinkled all around it...and the completely non sense Single Flow Theory only from North to South...

Then the way to look at Induced EMF is -of course- also wrong...deriving from this twisted theoretical model based on "Imaginary Lines of Force"...

Lorentz concluded that magnetic fields are not rotational, nor divergent...and man, was he wrong about this...but of course...he was paid to do so.

To keep believing all this was and still is fine, perfect and "valid" keeps blocking you from seeing the simplicity of the real thing.


That simple!


Time will tell...soon.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Reality & truth

The thing here is so simple...so much SIMPLICITY (like Feynman said on that video...)...and ALL is blocking US ALL from understanding and reaching the pure white light...is this darn old "classic theories" about magnetism...otherwise the entire world would be making their own energy anywhere...

Ufopolitics

Hi Ufo,

Or, if you consider the facts, "classic theories" are valid, then your statement looks like this:

The thing here is so simple...so much SIMPLICITY ...and ALL is blocking US ALL from understanding and reaching the pure white light...is this darn old "reality" about magnetism...otherwise the entire world would be making their own energy anywhere...

Or:

The thing here is so simple...so much SIMPLICITY ...and ALL is blocking US ALL from understanding and reaching the pure white light...is this darn old "truth" about magnetism...otherwise the entire world would be making their own energy anywhere...

Regards,

bi

[Sputins]

highly pressured space

[Ufopolitics]

Crt...

OK, to both Ufo and Sputins,

I think I saw agreement between the three of us over the last several posts (an unlikely event) that the external magnetic field is greater when the two magnets are brought together with like poles facing, N-N. And a weaker external field when N-S.

The CRT pattern shrinks when he moves to the N-N and expands with the N-S. Seems to me that the larger external magnetic field produces or has a smaller influence on the CRT. This is interesting because it supports my reasoning that the CRT doesn't display patterns representing magnetic fields, but patterns which opposes the magnetic fields placed on the outside of the screen.

Just an observation and opinion.

And I did not follow that fellow's talk about the coils. You say there's a pdf. Link?

Thanks,

bi

[Ufopolitics]

Hey Sputins, my pleasure.

Take a look at Ken's Book page I brought up below...and before as well...

[IMG][/IMG]

From the right image (repulsion under iron dust) He writes:

"Far right are two likewise spin fields causing deflection; this is mirror membrane Ether deflection, this is
literally extremely high-pressure space,...

[Sputins]

Hi Sputins,

Thanks for the links. From the second pdf:
I'd say that is pretty unlikely. Are you going attempt to replicate it?

bi

I have not tried the configuration shown within the said pdf as yet, but I have been playing around with some microwave oven transfomer (MOT) cores and rewinding them to suit.

I'm not after OU as such but for use with a particular application I have in mind.

[bistander]

Bi,
.....
Here are the links I hinted at, found when you expand the description on the video:
http://www.hyiq.org/downloads/guidel...ng%20Coils.pdf
http://vixra.org/pdf/1204.0084v1.pdf

Hi Sputins,

Thanks for the links. From the second pdf:

The power can be delivered with zero input current ...

I'd say that is pretty unlikely. Are you going attempt to replicate it?

bi

[Sputins]

Internal and External

OK, to both Ufo and Sputins,

I think I saw agreement between the three of us over the last several posts (an unlikely event) that the external magnetic field is greater when the two magnets are brought together with like poles facing, N-N. And a weaker external field when N-S.

The CRT pattern shrinks when he moves to the N-N and expands with the N-S. Seems to me that the larger external magnetic field produces or has a smaller influence on the CRT. This is interesting because it supports my reasoning that the CRT doesn't display patterns representing magnetic fields, but patterns which opposes the magnetic fields placed on the outside of the screen.

Just an observation and opinion.

And I did not follow that fellow's talk about the coils. You say there's a pdf. Link?

Thanks,

bi

Bi,

Not sure if there is a total agreement as yet, but almost... But at least we can discuss it like gentlemen.

The CRT pattern I think is displaying correctly. Not opposing the actual magnetic fields. - Here's why I say that:

The two like poles, N,N or S,S shows a weaker external field on the screen and an expanded magnetic field on the screen with N,S or S,N. - All true.

But the N,N or S,S is the set that has the concentrated magnetic flux density, ie put it on some metal and it "sticks" with two or three times the force than the N,S or S,N.

That is because the like pole's field is an internal concentration, or compression within the metallic lattice. While the the opposite poles have an expanded external magnetic field.

Proof is via a very simple experimental test: The opposite pole magnet set attract another magnet or steel washer from a further distance away than like pole set do. - By a reasonable amount of distance too. So it is an expanded magnetic field.

The like pole magnet set you have to bring them much closer in order to attract another magnet or steel washer. But when it does stick, it is very strong indeed.

So N,S or S,N produce an expansive external field and N,N or S,S produce a internal compressional field.

So we do seem to have one expansive direction and another contracting direction to magnetism.

It is actually fairly simple and it is now much more clear in my mind now! The penny has dropped for me i think.


You could do these experiments yourself...


When I have time I'll document this photographically & by measurement using scales to measure the pull force of each magnetic set and also an attraction distance test...

Here are the links I hinted at, found when you expand the description on the video:
http://www.hyiq.org/downloads/guidel...ng%20Coils.pdf
http://vixra.org/pdf/1204.0084v1.pdf

[bistander]

Crt

CRT screen image with opposing fields, flux lines contract into the magnetic conducting medium: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hvUiQ3IMHMU

OK, to both Ufo and Sputins,

I think I saw agreement between the three of us over the last several posts (an unlikely event) that the external magnetic field is greater when the two magnets are brought together with like poles facing, N-N. And a weaker external field when N-S.

The CRT pattern shrinks when he moves to the N-N and expands with the N-S. Seems to me that the larger external magnetic field produces or has a smaller influence on the CRT. This is interesting because it supports my reasoning that the CRT doesn't display patterns representing magnetic fields, but patterns which opposes the magnetic fields placed on the outside of the screen.

Just an observation and opinion.

And I did not follow that fellow's talk about the coils. You say there's a pdf. Link?

Thanks,

bi