ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[Ufopolitics]

Plain and Simple Bad Experimenting....

Demonstration showing that a magnet deflects an electron beam at right angles and straight on has no effect.
[VIDEO]https://youtu.be/18-QdfoLBVk[/VIDEO]

beam deflection.
The experiment is using the projected dot traveling path

[Iamnuts]

I http://www.energeticforum.com/attach...644862bba0-jpg
That’s what I think.
The force line just goes straight through then you get Rayleigh scattering
or some such thing.
The field must be viewed from a three dimensional point of view.

[mikrovolt]

Demonstration showing that a magnet deflects an electron beam at right angles and straight on has no effect.

https://youtu.be/18-QdfoLBVk

Demonstration of an electron beam in an electric field.
Also when a permanent magnet is pointed less than straight on.

https://youtu.be/orsMYomjwIw

This shows that electrons will deflect at right angles in a uniform magnetic field.
It also demonstrates how a circular motion is possible when a magnet approaches less than straight.

Going further a charged particle in uniform magnetic fied travels in a helix pattern. The radius of the loop and the pitch (the distance between each loop)
can be set by a function. The natural flow in a magnet is conical.

I recommend that this is the correct visual imagery for introducing the electric and magnetic component's relationship
with respect to a permanent magnet.

[aljhoa]

I do find those fields interesting and maybe one day
someone will discover how to apply that science and
make it a better world here on Earth.

T'CHALLA REVEALS WAKANDA TO THE WORLD


Al

[ricards]

Hello to all,

@Ricards: I have written here many times about what Iron Filings do, and it is very simple to understand it (if you really want to)...It is all very simple COMMON SENSE...but I will repeat it again...and AGAIN...till I turn PURPLE...

Iron Filings shape up exactly as all the iron molecules (ferromagnetics in general) aligned inside the core when a Magnetic Field is present. But they do not -necessarily- represent the TRUE FULL SHAPE of what A COMPLETE Magnetic Field looks like.

Ken Wheeler refers to iron particles shape as the alignment to the higher pressure layers of the field. He further writes that ferrocell, nor view film will NOT capture them as they are higher speed and pressures than Mid Pressure Layers. And I have to admit that this statement is not strong enough, as we will need other means to visualize external HP Layers...so far we don't.

****************************

...


Regards


Ufopolitics

Some Other Facts..

Magnetic Lines of force CAN be "Manipulated" or "Guided".. to wherever is the highest permeability.. very similar behavior to "Electricity" and "conductance".
the very shape of the "Magnetic Field" or the geometry of it is actually "Flexible"..

another argument.. ()
If as you say we shouldn't trust the Iron filings depiction of magnetic field,.. why should we trust the ferocells double hemisphere?.. or the CRT Experiment?.. why?.. if the magnetic field is all so flexible..

Iron filings do not just "align".. first they are attracted. then.. "align".. that's how I see it. same thing too for the ferofluid in a singular plane.
The filings or the fluid, aligns to the "Flux" not inside the core.

again this is all geometry related topics on Magnetism..
nobody points they're attention to the Claimed "Flow" of "Aether" towards counterspace...
the claimed explanation on "Magnetic Attraction"..
yet IMO they are the very foundation of this "New Magnetism"..

this made me think people here also don't believe in this theory also.. and just absorb the "New Model".. all because it made a little sense.

[bistander]

Viewing magnetic fields

Here is an interesting article on the subject including ferrocells by K & J who know magnets.

https://www.kjmagnetics.com/blog.asp?p=light-viewer

[bistander]

Meanwhile back on Earth

I Vast Magnetic Field Linking the Milky Way to Its Satellite Galaxies --"Observed for 1st Time" - The Daily Galaxy --Great Discoveries Channel
You lot will fart about for the rest of your days looking at bar magnets
and ferrocells and all that crap.
Why not catch up with the latest developments in the very small and the
very large and let nature show you what it does.

Thanks nuts,

You know, I never needed astrophysics or quantum mechanics to get electric motors and generators to work. I do find those fields interesting and maybe one day someone will discover how to apply that science and make it a better world here on Earth.

Thanks,

bi

[bistander]

The point

no trick questions...why should have I acquired such bad reputation?

I just thought that your answer would be based on your previous diagram (shown again, below), which clearly shows the magnetic flux "one way circulation":



So, according to the direction shown by the arrows...a North (top) can only "connect" to a South...at the bottom...correct?

But never to center, that is a "side flow"...no in or out "arrows".

But anyways...you've disappointed me again...




I already did above...but basically it is all about the center (and you also did it with image above)...weaker force of either Attraction or Repulsion...

Remember this image I posted earlier in this thread? The magnet's N pole is up and its S pole is down against the steel plate. See, there is a flux line exiting the dimensional mid point between the pole face ends. So what? I don't get your point.

I just thought that your answer would be based on your previous diagram (shown again, below), which clearly shows the magnetic flux "one way circulation":

Also, there is no circulation as in flow. It is a static field, where arrows indicate the B vector direction.

Regards,

bi

[Iamnuts]

I Vast Magnetic Field Linking the Milky Way to Its Satellite Galaxies --"Observed for 1st Time" - The Daily Galaxy --Great Discoveries Channel
You lot will fart about for the rest of your days looking at bar magnets
and ferrocells and all that crap.
Why not catch up with the latest developments in the very small and the
very large and let nature show you what it does.

[Ufopolitics]

Hi Ufo,

Why do I always get the feeling these are trick questions coming from you?

no trick questions...why should have I acquired such bad reputation?

I just thought that your answer would be based on your previous diagram (shown again, below), which clearly shows the magnetic flux "one way circulation":



So, according to the direction shown by the arrows...a North (top) can only "connect" to a South...at the bottom...correct?

But never to center, that is a "side flow"...no in or out "arrows".

But anyways...you've disappointed me again...

So you going to tell me your point?

I already did above...but basically it is all about the center (and you also did it with image above)...weaker force of either Attraction or Repulsion...

Goodbye


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

N vs S

Then let's just analyze with a bar magnet...and you approach another bar magnet of same size...just around its field spatial area...then let the approaching bar "decide" where to go...

1- Will -supposedly as you wrote above- approaching bar magnet would go right to the center of magnet?

2- will it go "randomly" to any one of other bar magnet ends?

3- Or it will actually "search" for its nearest opposite pole...then line up and attach following its geometric axis?

You know exactly which one is the right answer...except that answer does not satisfies your response above.


Ufopolitics

Hi Ufo,

Why do I always get the feeling these are trick questions coming from you?

The answer depends on the magnets and conditions. Opposite poles attract. So either like this.



Or like this.



And I actually ran the experiment. I believe this results in the stronger holding force, using the same two magnets in both configurations.



Although when nudged towards each other on the tabletop, they would stick N to S like the first diagram. Wider shorter magnets seem to go to the other way when N is down on the table on one and S on down on the table on the other.

So you going to tell me your point?

Here's a couple of references because I know how much you appreciate them (really for other readers who might be interested).

https://www.kjmagnetics.com/magneticfield.asp

Magnets in Motion

K&J sent me an interesting article on Halbach arrays. https://www.kjmagnetics.com/blog.asp?p=halbach-arrays-2

Regards,

bi

[Iamnuts]

https://3c1703fe8d.site.internapcdn.net/newman/gfx/news/2014/5-measuringthe.jpg

Interaction between single electrons from Weizmann group.

[Ufopolitics]

I don't think so. It depends on what the magnetic forces are acting on. Take a steel bar and place it on the side of a bar magnet, pole to pole, and I'd say the strongest magnetic force is at the center. Take a steel bebe and it will be most strongly attracted to the outside edges of the pole face, either one. Actually go inside the magnet and the strongest field, therefore strongest force is midway between the poles.



I posted this femm a while back. I believe it depicts the field of a bar magnet very well. The magnetic force will depend on the object and position in that field.

Obviously, the weakest magnetic force is like a million miles away.

bi

Then let's just analyze with a bar magnet...and you approach another bar magnet of same size...just around its field spatial area...then let the approaching bar "decide" where to go...

1- Will -supposedly as you wrote above- approaching bar magnet would go right to the center of magnet?

2- will it go "randomly" to any one of other bar magnet ends?

3- Or it will actually "search" for its nearest opposite pole...then line up and attach following its geometric axis?

You know exactly which one is the right answer...except that answer does not satisfies your response above.


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Magnetic forces

...

@Bistander: A very simple question: Do you agree that the STRONGEST Magnetic Forces are exactly located at each of the two poles of a magnet...while the EXACT center of a Magnet is where the WEAKEST Magnetic Forces are located?
...

I don't think so. It depends on what the magnetic forces are acting on. Take a steel bar and place it on the side of a bar magnet, pole to pole, and I'd say the strongest magnetic force is at the center. Take a steel bebe and it will be most strongly attracted to the outside edges of the pole face, either one. Actually go inside the magnet and the strongest field, therefore strongest force is midway between the poles.



I posted this femm a while back. I believe it depicts the field of a bar magnet very well. The magnetic force will depend on the object and position in that field.

Obviously, the weakest magnetic force is like a million miles away.

bi

[Ufopolitics]

Some true facts first...

Hello to all,

@Ricards: I have written here many times about what Iron Filings do, and it is very simple to understand it (if you really want to)...It is all very simple COMMON SENSE...but I will repeat it again...and AGAIN...till I turn PURPLE...

Iron Filings shape up exactly as all the iron molecules (ferromagnetics in general) aligned inside the core when a Magnetic Field is present. But they do not -necessarily- represent the TRUE FULL SHAPE of what A COMPLETE Magnetic Field looks like.

Ken Wheeler refers to iron particles shape as the alignment to the higher pressure layers of the field. He further writes that ferrocell, nor view film will NOT capture them as they are higher speed and pressures than Mid Pressure Layers. And I have to admit that this statement is not strong enough, as we will need other means to visualize external HP Layers...so far we don't.

****************************

@Bistander: A very simple question: Do you agree that the STRONGEST Magnetic Forces are exactly located at each of the two poles of a magnet...while the EXACT center of a Magnet is where the WEAKEST Magnetic Forces are located?

Is there a difference between magnetic strength of North and South?...or are both EQUALLY STRONG?

Remember on the Solenoid (plunger) we could swap voltage terminals...and it will still functions same way...so guess that answer above question...yes?

So...if "Flux" travels in just one direction...as B Field guide points to North Pole orientation...as magnetic particles are all aligned following one single direction...as iron filings...then why this "weakness" right at the center of magnet, compared to pole strength?

All the above facts could be very easily demonstrated with very simple experimenting.

****************************

Now...About "our existing Science Development" related to magnetism...

We have had for over two hundred years the same method to view magnetic field based on iron filings...nothing has changed as further viewing methods which incorporate new technologies, state of the art imaging where "our existing science" have "officially" recognized absolutely NONE...now, based on those facts...couldn't we agree/conclude that we have a Dogmatic Science?...A Science that very "conveniently" have adopted just one single model, one single method...and leave it "as is" for two centuries, untouched?

It is a fact that iron filings get fully magnetized (better said: POLARIZED) under a magnetic field presence, this leads to generation of very strong links which are solely following a spatial attraction chain around the core. Following the same, exact alignment as all the inner molecules are oriented within ferromagnetic core. They just "make a U turn" at both field poles ends to go in center of ferromagnetic core.

Iron Filings just shape up fabricating a spatial structure about what an EXTERNAL IRON CORE would look like if it could be "spatially self molded" around the core portraying the magnetic field, but not the real magnetic field shape.

We need materials and technologies that could be able to reveal the FULL FIELD IMAGING WITHOUT BECOMING PART OF THE IRON CORE which carries the magnetic field...ONLY then We all will have the true shape of the magnetic field.

But so far we have a few technologies where all image the same exact Field Shape.

Ferrocell as View Film allows light to pass through their translucent materials, light then forms a spectrum related to the way light is being dispersed by the effects of the magnetic field. This is simple to understand if we know about an optical prism, which decomposes light into their main spectral colors.

A CRT Electron Beam deflects under the field influence without suffering absolutely any kind of attraction, nor becoming part of the core.

Same way as an MRI works based on Magnetic Resonance...and can image our body interior, as bones and mass tissue.

A CRT Rastered Beam into 3D Planes can also IMAGE A PROFILE of the Magnetic Field with absolutely ZERO INTERFERENCE with the Field nor with the ferromagnetic core.

And so a Three E-Beam Color CRT Full Screen will also decompose all those rays deflected by Field Influence, without just one single particle becoming fully magnetized.

All of the above are things to deeply think about Guys...not to argue if or if not...that is a waste of everyone's time here.

Another example: We can not see a normally weak LASER BEAM with our eyes traveling through space...unless we shut some smoke around the beam...then we "see it" passing through the smoke particles, particles get illuminated by Laser Beam light, just like Fluorescent-Phosphoric Screen in a CRT reveals clearly the Electron Beam...HOWEVER, these smoke particles do NOT INTERFERE NOR DEFLECT LASER BEAM...we could see it as it GOING PERFECTLY STRAIGHT traveling through space.

I only wish we could shut some smoke on a Magnetic Field...then see it clearly with plain light...Our life would have been VERY different than what we all have so far by now...


Regards


Ufopolitics