Ionization & Water Fuel

[Murlin]

the way for use endothermic engines availables on market isn't use hydrogen but only water with an properly system

I agree also, one would just need to use SS components to keep down oxidation and most of the current engineering would be good to go....


regards,

Murlin


.

[tutanka]

I'm copying over Murlin's posts...

----------------------------------------------------

There is a story behind Nitrogen Hydroxide. It might be in all those links, but I am not going to read all of them to find out but I will relay it to you guys.

At the close of WW II, when the Russians and the US were closing in on Hitler and chasing him all over Germany, there was a discovery made.

If I am not mistaken, The Americans and Russians both converged on a compound that housed allot of Hitlers experimental research.

Among these various gadgets was the HHO cell. The thing was probably on a few military cars and trucks, but during the heat of battle no one really popped the hood to admire the engine.

Since Hitlers fuel supply was dwindling, his scientists came up with the fuel cell.

I believe that there was a soldier that actually understood what he saw and brought the invention back to Australia.

The device is similar to the Joe Cell but only has one tube inside the other.

Supposedly, it uses the engines vacuum along with very low voltage to help pull apart the H20 molecule and make nitrogen hydroxide.

This process is suppose to be the missing link on processing the atomic O1 and sticking a N1 in there and creating fuel on demand.

Aaron mentioned copper in the air ionization thread. I believe copper intake tubes along with heat, helps this process to take place as the water inside the cell is heated.

Anyways, it is a good story whether it's true or not, it's anyones guess

regards,

Murlin

-----------------

Well that is what is suppose to happen.

I don't think it is as complicated a process as many believe. It just requires a tad of vacuum, some copper, water and heat and a battery....

I have done my own experiments but failed to finish the project due to getting side tracked on the TS.

I did not like the by product of Chromium I was producing by the electrolysis in the cell.

----------------

Most of the HH0 cells out there today have plastic tubes running to the intake so the gas mixture exits the magnetic field before entering the combustion chamber. I have always believed that the fracturing of the H2O with brute force was going in the wrong direction. EDIT BY Brute force I mean throwing more amps at the problem to create more HHO.

I believe the copper tubing may help keep the field around the mixture all the way to the chamber..
At least that is the theory I was subscribing to when I stopped working on my HHO project.

The current race to Hydrogen power made me realize that the atomic H was not important. It was the Atomic O.......

Cars running on Hydrogen would require total re-engineering, while everyone with half a brain knows that N20 and gasoline go great together with the ICE just they way it is...

The older engines were big enough to steal some of the HP to turn it into a vacuum pump-IEC...the newer less powerful computerized engines are useless for that...
And not many want to drive a 70 model car for various reasons.

Like I have said before, they are always one step ahead....

My 002...


regards,

Murlin

I agree in part with Mr. Murlin, if you use only hydrogen is true but the way for use endothermic engines availables on market isn't use hydrogen but only water with an properly system ..

[tutanka]

Tutanka, when you mention about plasma reactor do you mean a Paul Pantone GEET plasma reactor?


Here is what I imagine for Tutanka device:
A two part GEET device.

First part contain two parallel pipe. First pipe input is ambient air. Second pipe input is water mist from salt water spray by a carburator.

At end of first part, first pipe have hot air, the second pipe will have water steam. First pipe output is ionized with negative charge, second pipe output have steam electrolysis before ionized with positive charge.

Both pipe merge before second part. Second part use iron pipe and iron bar just like usual geet. The output of second part is combustible gas. where additional ambient air is added to regulate burning just like usual geet.


I rather confuse about this ionization thing. How can we sure that the positive ionized produce completely positive ion? Do we use something like:
+12V 0V -12V where positive ionizer use +12V and 0V, negative ionizer use -12V and 0V.

or
0V +12V with gas processor and water processor in series?


I don't have resource to build so I can only suggest. Or maybe just try positive ionized the air going to carburator and negative charging the gasoline and see what happen. I am not sure if I can use radiant oscillator though...

No GEET is used.. plasma reactor is chambre of combustion and composed from special plasma circuit and special plug.. Regards

[sucahyo]

Hello..
You have in mind every Meyer.. forget that and think simple..

Sorry, I have no clue. So you don't use GEET at all?


Regarding copper and combustible water, complicated Viktor Schauberger way, abandoned because he can not get consistent result:

contrasting polarityexplosion occurs. We have thereby achieved what we wanted, namely a mixture of explosive water, which is an exceptionally stable and safe substance, but which produces a higher dynamic effect in the pistonengine than the product obtained through the distillation of crude oil we call 'petrol' (gasoline). Electromagnetic ignition is superfluous and by means of this process we have produced a substance that can be used in diesel-engines.

[tutanka]

Hi Tutanka,

Here are some specific items about positively ionized gases in the AP.
Do I have this right?

------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Lord Rayleigh found that active nitrogen could NOT be formed in the
presence of too much oxygen.

2. The small amount of oxygen necessary was LOWER than what is
available in atmospheric levels.

3. Therefore, active nitrogen CAN be formed in an AP because the
atmospheric levels of oxygen are stripped of electrons - example -
4 electrons with enough stages - so the oxygen cannot bind to the
nitrogen until it fills up its electrons first. If it is a short distance to
the combustion chamber for mixing, active nitrogen is maintained without
bonding to oxygen.

4. UV laser appears to be the #1 ideal light for ionization of the air
intake nitrogen and oxygen.

5. Blue & Red do NOT directly ionize the gases but impart energy to
electrons cranking up their energy level weakening their bond, which
makes it easier to separate.

6. Blue and red can only assist, while UV directly ionizes.

7. A magnet on the air processor can be any polarity as long as it is the
opposite polarity of magnetism used with WFC. Therefore, when they
come together, they are attracted better, which helps to make the
"neutral" plasma. So both electrical polarities (air/pos and hho/h2o/neg)
plus opposite magnetic polarities work together in bringing them together
more effectively.

8. I'm still working on the process/reaction in my mind but when
N1 and N1 combine to form N2, a LOT OF HEAT IS GENERATED.

HI Aaron,
You are working hard
You can use UV for ionize air , is true but that light s more reactive with oxygen and not with nitrogen, this is why I use hygh HV field instead of UV lamp. Yes, the blue and red leds helps , I want only that, an little pre-excitation.. Your mind is every to meyer concepts.. if you don't clean your mind you don't reach illumination.. Regards

[tutanka]

Tutanka, when you mention about plasma reactor do you mean a Paul Pantone GEET plasma reactor?


Here is what I imagine for Tutanka device:
A two part GEET device.

First part contain two parallel pipe. First pipe input is ambient air. Second pipe input is water mist from salt water spray by a carburator.

At end of first part, first pipe have hot air, the second pipe will have water steam. First pipe output is ionized with negative charge, second pipe output have steam electrolysis before ionized with positive charge.

Both pipe merge before second part. Second part use iron pipe and iron bar just like usual geet. The output of second part is combustible gas. where additional ambient air is added to regulate burning just like usual geet.


I rather confuse about this ionization thing. How can we sure that the positive ionized produce completely positive ion? Do we use something like:
+12V 0V -12V where positive ionizer use +12V and 0V, negative ionizer use -12V and 0V.

or
0V +12V with gas processor and water processor in series?


I don't have resource to build so I can only suggest. Or maybe just try positive ionized the air going to carburator and negative charging the gasoline and see what happen. I am not sure if I can use radiant oscillator though...

Hello..
You have in mind every Meyer.. forget that and think simple..

[Aaron]

Murlin's posts

I'm copying over Murlin's posts...

----------------------------------------------------

There is a story behind Nitrogen Hydroxide. It might be in all those links, but I am not going to read all of them to find out but I will relay it to you guys.

At the close of WW II, when the Russians and the US were closing in on Hitler and chasing him all over Germany, there was a discovery made.

If I am not mistaken, The Americans and Russians both converged on a compound that housed allot of Hitlers experimental research.

Among these various gadgets was the HHO cell. The thing was probably on a few military cars and trucks, but during the heat of battle no one really popped the hood to admire the engine.

Since Hitlers fuel supply was dwindling, his scientists came up with the fuel cell.

I believe that there was a soldier that actually understood what he saw and brought the invention back to Australia.

The device is similar to the Joe Cell but only has one tube inside the other.

Supposedly, it uses the engines vacuum along with very low voltage to help pull apart the H20 molecule and make nitrogen hydroxide.

This process is suppose to be the missing link on processing the atomic O1 and sticking a N1 in there and creating fuel on demand.

Aaron mentioned copper in the air ionization thread. I believe copper intake tubes along with heat, helps this process to take place as the water inside the cell is heated.

Anyways, it is a good story whether it's true or not, it's anyones guess

regards,

Murlin

-----------------

Well that is what is suppose to happen.

I don't think it is as complicated a process as many believe. It just requires a tad of vacuum, some copper, water and heat and a battery....

I have done my own experiments but failed to finish the project due to getting side tracked on the TS.

I did not like the by product of Chromium I was producing by the electrolysis in the cell.

----------------

Most of the HH0 cells out there today have plastic tubes running to the intake so the gas mixture exits the magnetic field before entering the combustion chamber. I have always believed that the fracturing of the H2O with brute force was going in the wrong direction. EDIT BY Brute force I mean throwing more amps at the problem to create more HHO.

I believe the copper tubing may help keep the field around the mixture all the way to the chamber..
At least that is the theory I was subscribing to when I stopped working on my HHO project.

The current race to Hydrogen power made me realize that the atomic H was not important. It was the Atomic O.......

Cars running on Hydrogen would require total re-engineering, while everyone with half a brain knows that N20 and gasoline go great together with the ICE just they way it is...

The older engines were big enough to steal some of the HP to turn it into a vacuum pump-IEC...the newer less powerful computerized engines are useless for that...
And not many want to drive a 70 model car for various reasons.

Like I have said before, they are always one step ahead....

My 002...


regards,

Murlin

[Aaron]

Air Processor & Active Nitrogen

Hi Tutanka,

Here are some specific items about positively ionized gases in the AP.
Do I have this right?

------------------------------------------------------------------

1. Lord Rayleigh found that active nitrogen could NOT be formed in the
presence of too much oxygen.

2. The small amount of oxygen necessary was LOWER than what is
available in atmospheric levels.

3. Therefore, active nitrogen CAN be formed in an AP because the
atmospheric levels of oxygen are stripped of electrons - example -
4 electrons with enough stages - so the oxygen cannot bind to the
nitrogen until it fills up its electrons first. If it is a short distance to
the combustion chamber for mixing, active nitrogen is maintained without
bonding to oxygen.

4. UV laser appears to be the #1 ideal light for ionization of the air
intake nitrogen and oxygen.

5. Blue & Red do NOT directly ionize the gases but impart energy to
electrons cranking up their energy level weakening their bond, which
makes it easier to separate.

6. Blue and red can only assist, while UV directly ionizes.

7. A magnet on the air processor can be any polarity as long as it is the
opposite polarity of magnetism used with WFC. Therefore, when they
come together, they are attracted better, which helps to make the
"neutral" plasma. So both electrical polarities (air/pos and hho/h2o/neg)
plus opposite magnetic polarities work together in bringing them together
more effectively.

8. I'm still working on the process/reaction in my mind but when
N1 and N1 combine to form N2, a LOT OF HEAT IS GENERATED.

[sucahyo]

Tutanka, when you mention about plasma reactor do you mean a Paul Pantone GEET plasma reactor?


Here is what I imagine for Tutanka device:
A two part GEET device.

First part contain two parallel pipe. First pipe input is ambient air. Second pipe input is water mist from salt water spray by a carburator.

At end of first part, first pipe have hot air, the second pipe will have water steam. First pipe output is ionized with negative charge, second pipe output have steam electrolysis before ionized with positive charge.

Both pipe merge before second part. Second part use iron pipe and iron bar just like usual geet. The output of second part is combustible gas. where additional ambient air is added to regulate burning just like usual geet.


I rather confuse about this ionization thing. How can we sure that the positive ionized produce completely positive ion? Do we use something like:
+12V 0V -12V where positive ionizer use +12V and 0V, negative ionizer use -12V and 0V.

or
0V +12V with gas processor and water processor in series?


I don't have resource to build so I can only suggest. Or maybe just try positive ionized the air going to carburator and negative charging the gasoline and see what happen. I am not sure if I can use radiant oscillator though...

[tutanka]

tutanka,
You are correct in, I don't view you as a friend. But let me ask you a few questions;
"Do you see your efforts bearing fruit within 18 months time from right now?
"Will you share your information with the world or will it go to the ones that have the most money?"
"Do you think that the coal and oil industries are just going to let you and your team produce a product for sell that is going to put them out of business without a fight?
"Do you feel like you have sold your soul to the devil in that NDA you signed into?"



h2opower.

H2O..
I reply to all questions that peoples ask to me.. of course not completely and clear but because I have an NDA and I have an family to mantain.. perhaps you do not know it but there are many persons who watch these threads ready to steal the ideas. Perhaps I live in the real world, I think you not.
However no problems.. you write in your thread and I in mine.. End of transmissions with you ..

[h20power]

tutanka,
You are correct in, I don't view you as a friend. But let me ask you a few questions;
"Do you see your efforts bearing fruit within 18 months time from right now?
"Will you share your information with the world or will it go to the ones that have the most money?"
"Do you think that the coal and oil industries are just going to let you and your team produce a product for sell that is going to put them out of business without a fight?
"Do you feel like you have sold your soul to the devil in that NDA you signed into?"



h2opower.

[tutanka]

Here is the full post so my words are not taken out of context: http://www.energeticforum.com/82397-post1485.html


h2opower.

Dear H2O...

I reassume to you and your peoples that read.. you tought that reaction start only mixing oxygen destabilized with water mist, some time ago I have reply about that http://www.energeticforum.com/81446-post1331.html but you consider me only an intruder and not an friend. All we can mistake but we need also to be humble for reach illumination... and you it aren't.

[h20power]

Here is the full post so my words are not taken out of context: http://www.energeticforum.com/82397-post1485.html


h2opower.

[tutanka]

Please read all...

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/3217-stanley-meyer-explained-50.html#post82397

H2OPOWER WROTE: As you can see I am not perfect I make mistakes all the time

[tutanka]

I found this patent last night, very simple circuits to either positively
charge air, negatively charge it or both.

Ion emitting hot air blower - Google Patent Search

Very good example As you can see all start from AC and grid numbered 120 is more similar to EEC of Meyer but instead to have light bulb have only an simple resistor R1.