This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Ionization & Water Fuel

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • pengrove
    replied
    Originally posted by tutanka View Post
    If the case is closed can be simple for you start an functional prototype
    case still open sorry. I will wait for more advice from you sir before I proceed.

    Leave a comment:


  • tutanka
    replied
    Originally posted by pengrove View Post
    Tutanka does your system use the Stark effect?

    So steam under small amount of pressure in a magnetic field and exposed to the correct wave length of light will produce thermal explosive energy. Case closed.
    If the case is closed can be simple for you start an functional prototype

    Leave a comment:


  • pengrove
    replied
    Originally posted by tutanka View Post
    Fabio,
    Im only an inventor but not crazy no nitric acid, glycerine or liquid tnt.. all is based in simple but genial chemical formula..
    Tutanka does your system use the Stark effect?

    So steam under small amount of pressure in a magnetic field and exposed to the correct wave length of light will produce thermal explosive energy. Case closed.
    Last edited by pengrove; 04-18-2010, 05:53 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    ionization

    Originally posted by kick-bak View Post
    Ionization is the process in which one or more electrons are removed from an atom or molecule.

    If they carry a positive charge, they are known as cations
    RIGHT! Now, that is the oxygen example. The cation reference was posted
    here in this thread before but what kind?

    HMS-776 gets 5 stars for taking it upon him/herself to go out and start
    to figure it out. Sure, a lot of people do but not many people can I search
    in Google to see what people are trying to figure out - I follow a LOT of
    people because I find it fascinating what paths people take to learn
    these things:
    How could the Oxygen atom be multiply ionized and excited to at least it's 4th level? [Archive] - Physics Forums

    Those questions are specific to Oxygen (in that thread).

    Here's the thing... A good part of the Meyer camp REALLY likes to discuss
    removing one or more electrons from oxygen. Some almost worship this
    concept and I have to say that it actually is a pretty profound concept
    as simple as it is, in my opinion. However, why miss 78% of the boat
    as so many people have clearly done?

    What else could be affected by the ionization of air besides oxygen -
    not including trace gases?

    And I'm very anxious to hear an explanation spelled out on the ionization
    process of it - as the oxygen example was so very, very clearly spelled out.

    Leave a comment:


  • kick-bak
    replied
    Ionization

    Hello Aaron

    Ionization is the process in which one or more electrons are removed from an atom or molecule.
    Oxygen atom have eight protons & eight neutrons so is Neutral. If Oxygen atom lose electron it
    becomes positively charged & if it gains an electron it becomes negatively charged.

    These charged atoms of Oxygen are no longer called atoms. They are called Ions.
    If they carry a positive charge, they are known as cations, and if they carry a negative charge
    they are known as anions.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    ionization

    Originally posted by pengrove View Post
    Ozone is O3 which means that three atoms of oxygen have been electrically charged and causes them to stick together

    Ionization happens when one sufficiently energetic photon hits an atom and knocks an electron free.
    You're explaining in the first part how to get them to cluster together, but
    we want the opposite.

    The second quote, yes photon or just another electron moving to the positive
    pin/plate/screen/grid of an ionizer that hits another electron - typical
    ionization by collision.

    If you do what you mention in the 2nd quote, you won't get O3, you'll
    get atomic oxygen when you start with O2.

    Ozone has nothing to do with any of this. I wondered about that early
    on but it is not what is wanted or needed.

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    nothing to do with my point

    Originally posted by ourbobby View Post
    His method of cascading ions and particles would ensure this. Understanding this point will take you leaps and bounds beyond the current proposal that you suggest you are making. I think that you might find that his process converts the Nitrogen back to a usable state.
    Rob, you are mistaken. You have no idea what I am proposing - as I said,
    you're not even addressing the point I'm making.

    I don't understand how you can have no idea what I'm talking about, yet
    you want to tell me how your opinion will take me leaps and bounds beyond
    my understanding, which you don't even know what my opinion is.

    That makes absolutely no sense whatsoever. You're welcome to post your
    ideas here about ionization based on your own perspective, but please
    don't force or overlay your ideas on top of mine as if you knew what they
    were, because you don't.

    Leave a comment:


  • pengrove
    replied
    Originally posted by Aaron View Post
    Thanks Billy - and I will confirm the responses straight up if I see the
    "right" answer.

    Just fyi for everyone, I'm not part of any mentioned projects going on.

    There are several schools of thought for the NH3 on demand process.
    There are a few different methods that lead to the same final result. It
    can be had by starting with steam, water mist, hho, etc... Some people
    'could' see some contradictions in some of the hints in this thread but
    they aren't - there are simply different routes that can be taken for this
    entire process. Some might ionize and mix air with water cell contents later,
    some might pump ionized air into cell directly, etc... but they all do share
    some common key concepts.

    Pengrove - yes electrically charged - what polarity and what does it mean
    to be ionized - we can say it is electrically charged but what is the
    definition of this, literally? What is the sequence of events of what is
    happening to O2 for example?

    One example is ozone. Ozone is O3 which means that three atoms of oxygen have been electrically charged and causes them to stick together for about 20 to 30 minutes. The photon energy of the sun, lightening, air movement or other activity that causes excess electrons to collect on oxygen atoms causes them to form O2 (ozone). When ozone comes into contact with active chemicals they can become oxidized (basically burned or broken down)

    Ionization happens when one sufficiently energetic photon hits an atom and knocks an electron free.
    Last edited by pengrove; 04-17-2010, 03:34 PM. Reason: donno

    Leave a comment:


  • ourbobby
    replied
    Originally posted by Aaron View Post
    Rob,

    That may be your viewpoint but doesn't really touch
    anything at all in regards to what I'm bringing up.
    Hi Aaron,
    Its actually more than a viewpoint. And, if I am not mistaken, when there is a discrepancy regarding the source of information which might lead to misinformation, then the relevance is in the integrity of the topic. The use and generation of Hydrogen as utilised by Meyer would inevitably generate Nitrogen. His method of cascading ions and particles would ensure this. Understanding this point will take you leaps and bounds beyond the current proposal that you suggest you are making. I think that you might find that his process converts the Nitrogen back to a usable state. Also, nitrogen is a contributor to his "firing" process as this is an external process: i.e. using air as the catalysing medium.

    Regards

    Rob

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    not on same page

    Rob,

    That may be your viewpoint but doesn't really touch
    anything at all in regards to what I'm bringing up.

    Leave a comment:


  • ourbobby
    replied
    Re Nitrogen

    Originally posted by Aaron View Post
    So Meyer ionizes oxygen.

    Selective ionization is wrong, I agree with you. I have never said that
    oxygen does not get ionized but I can see that some people think I am
    implying that by mentioning ionization of nitrogen - that's fine. Some people
    see things as they are other make up stories in their own mind about
    what they think they are seeing. I think you're seeing things pretty clear.

    Avoiding nitrogen ionization is wrong, I agree with you. Not only is it
    wrong, it is naive for some to believe that nitrogen turns into Ninja
    molecules that stealthily sneaks through an ionizer without getting
    ionized - and some that believe that hydrogen won't bind to the ionized
    nitrogen is doubly or actually triply naive.

    Sucahyo, you're seeing things pretty clear.

    I'm hoping you will spell out the sequential steps of what happens to an
    oxygen molecule as it enters an ionization process and exits.
    Hi there Aaaron,
    Just stumbled on this thread again, and would like to offer a short comment regarding Nitrogen and Meyers devices. Nitrogen is formed from the "Atomic" process that Meyers uses in his electrolysing process. I do not think that the Nitrogen is an asset to the delivery or the combustion of the hydrogen in an ICE. Nitrogen is formed from the compression of Hydrogen not Oxygen. Nitrogen is an impolar variation of Hydrogen. It is a constituent of "air" or our surrounding atmosphere. Meyer would have to vent this from his system to maximise the effectiveness of his process. So the big clue is how is the Nitrogen formed during the Meyer process?

    regards

    Rob

    Leave a comment:


  • Aaron
    replied
    water fuel process

    Thanks Billy - and I will confirm the responses straight up if I see the
    "right" answer.

    Just fyi for everyone, I'm not part of any mentioned projects going on.

    There are several schools of thought for the NH3 on demand process.
    There are a few different methods that lead to the same final result. It
    can be had by starting with steam, water mist, hho, etc... Some people
    'could' see some contradictions in some of the hints in this thread but
    they aren't - there are simply different routes that can be taken for this
    entire process. Some might ionize and mix air with water cell contents later,
    some might pump ionized air into cell directly, etc... but they all do share
    some common key concepts.

    Pengrove - yes electrically charged - what polarity and what does it mean
    to be ionized - we can say it is electrically charged but what is the
    definition of this, literally? What is the sequence of events of what is
    happening to O2 for example?

    Leave a comment:


  • vrand
    replied
    Originally posted by pengrove View Post
    Any gas which is electrically charged can be said to be ionized. ion energy is when molecules are electrically charged so that their properties are changed.

    A word to the wise men here, get the show on the road. Before long electromagnetic reactions will give different effects.
    Yes!

    Tutanka, Rosco1 and group, its been 10 weeks since your February 6th announcement.

    We would like to say that we have confirmed the processes required to make any engine run on this new fuel(essentially water).

    We are currently in the process of putting together a proof of concept disclosure.

    Please allow us a few short weeks to get that done
    , at which time, we will go viral and make a general media announcement.
    Any update on when you will publish your proof of concept disclosure?

    Regards, Mike R.

    Leave a comment:


  • pengrove
    replied
    Originally posted by Aaron View Post
    Forget about all the confusing stuff.

    Simply, what does it mean to ionize oxygen?

    Any gas which is electrically charged can be said to be ionized. ion energy is when molecules are electrically charged so that their properties are changed.

    A word to the wise men here, get the show on the road. Before long electromagnetic reactions will give different effects.

    Leave a comment:


  • BillyHydrogen
    replied
    Skeptical

    Hello, I just finished reading this whole thread. It is very interesting as many threads on this subject are. I remain very skeptical and yet optimistic. I can`t tell you how many times I have seen people post that they have the answer but cant reveal anything due to nda`s and various other reasons, then they continue with supposed clues and riddles to a ever lasting puzzle that never gets solved. Hope the truth is being told here by the guys supposedly to have a answer.......I am VERY suspicious.......just my 2 cents.Aaron I admire your quest and tenacity.....you are one of the few real deal`s I have seen in a very long time.

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X