Captret - Perpetual Light with Dead Batteries

[electricity]

What has Eric Dollard said about Electricity?

Ok everyone, my actions may have been a little bit over done but it is the disruption that creates energy. I was hoping to aggravate those PTB and be quoted from the higher authorities but guess they are too busy with their indoctrination of the devotees.

Forget the Inductance story, I was playing games just like how they do. You all bought it,

So, What is Electricity.?.

To keep it simple, we shall say that is the flow of electrons not through but over the surface of the conductor. This is half of the potential energy. The other half flows over the dielectric.

It is that simple. You are all only tapping 50% of your produced energy. Tap the die electric and there comes the rest of your energy.

For you Tesla Coil builders, a True Tesla Coil is flat pancake, tapped exactly at 90 degrees on both conductor and dielectric, and your coil needs to be immersed in fluid to avoid loss.

That is exactly what is happening with the captret. Efficiency is achieved with induction, not conduction.

The fluid has lesser value in impedance and resistance.

This circuit works, do replicate it. You need 200v 1000 uf at least to see fast charging. Rig up the 4 caps I mentioned and you'll be blown away.

[wetissues]

not really...

Hi JB, Dragon ad Dude,

I think this tapping reminds me of the youtube where, the guy is charges a
cap to a higher voltage through the use of a coil in series. He then proceeds
to show this has more energy than the battery, because he can discharge
across a spark gap with this, but not with the battery alone.

Penno

cells feed out constant current and the capacity is measured in mAh. Capacitors are made to store this current according to the capacity. The battery always has more power than donated, one rule. Current is always equal anywhere in DC circuits, so you are a fool saying that a cap charged by a cell has more energy than the doner, you need to do your homework....

[penno64]

Hi JB, Dragon ad Dude,

I think this tapping reminds me of the youtube where, the guy is charges a
cap to a higher voltage through the use of a coil in series. He then proceeds
to show this has more energy than the battery, because he can discharge
across a spark gap with this, but not with the battery alone.

Penno

[wetissues]

Skepticals!

I say for all of the skeptical people out there saying that this topic is all bollocks, this captret thing is bollocks! Forget all of this stuff, DC current has the same effect as AC with this AV plug. This is based on oscillators, drastic calls need drastic evidence to stop these non-believers. A cap is a cap and cannot oscillate. I think that most people on this forum do not even know how to make a darlington transistor or even know what one is. How about the collection of triads? Learn the basics and then you can go onto this stuff. Now people like Dr. Stiffler knows quite a bit about electronics, according to his work. Petty replications and claims mean nothing, in school thats a level 2. Creations and other circuits, circuit modding and bending is all more great. Once you have actually done something, make a hypothoses or an accurate explination. Thats all I ave got to say.

[Jbignes5]

Pulsing slowly.

I've seen this as well even in small caps but there is a time variant between taps or pulses for a reasonable output. The cap does discharge over time so I guess the question would be can you pulse more energy out this way than that placed in the cap originally.

Yeah we need to pulse it slowly. I think this is due to the rather weird setup we are using. There seems to be a polarization between both plates of the caps and the housing. With the real cap plates have a charge as well. It seems like there is 3 different polarizations that happen when we use the cap in the captret fashion.

Now how do we use this effect?

[dragon]

I have 2 470uf caps in parallel I charge the cap up in the captret style then take it completely off the battery. Now hook the positive of the led to the neg of the caps then tap the housing with the neg of the led. It seems that you can do this till the end of time. Can someone replicate this effect...

I Am thinking this is what is the effect we are seeing from the captret. Non usable charge purely static in nature.

This captret is really an awesome find. Could this be the splitting the positive concept?

I've seen this as well even in small caps but there is a time variant between taps or pulses for a reasonable output. The cap does discharge over time so I guess the question would be can you pulse more energy out this way than that placed in the cap originally.
________
CLEAR TRICHOMES

[Jbignes5]

Noooo....

What an annoyance! Right now its a experimental principle not a finished circuit at all. By the way, where is your circuit? What are you really doing? Why would Ibpointless2 owe you anything to the effect of credit of the Captret at all?

You speak as though you have already resolved the worlds energy problems. How old are you Electricity? Your use of the little laughing emoticon and your stating that any of us lack consciousness or lack natural sensory is a deep insult to me and i would imagine many others here too.

I can't come back to this thread as it is making me angry. You win Electricity! Thanks for nothing my friend.

Just ignore him dude. Please we need you here....

[thedude]

Anyway, it is usable, Use it, Dumb it, I don't care, heck I don't even want my name on your circuit.

What an annoyance! Right now its a experimental principle not a finished circuit at all. By the way, where is your circuit? What are you really doing? Why would Ibpointless2 owe you anything to the effect of credit of the Captret at all?

You speak as though you have already resolved the worlds energy problems. How old are you Electricity? Your use of the little laughing emoticon and your stating that any of us lack consciousness or lack natural sensory is a deep insult to me and i would imagine many others here too.

I can't come back to this thread as it is making me angry. You win Electricity! Thanks for nothing my friend.

[electricity]

You may never smell FREE ENERGY

Guys, I don't need to sugar coat nothing, so here it is plain.

You CAN NOT think. You CA NOT create, you lack creativity.

You, all of you refuse to learn the truth. What you hold as knowledge is all false. You Logic is all wrong.

It started with Heavyside and Lorentz, and later Einstein. I don't give a grab for what you say. You analyze your thought based on your values. And who gave you those values?.

What a waste of my time. And FYI, I am not a paid dis-info.

Heck, I don't care if this is my last post. Ban me if you wish.

Have fun with the Stiffler, you're all being manipulated.

[Jbignes5]

Another puzzling effect...

I have 2 470uf caps in parallel I charge the cap up in the captret style then take it completely off the battery. Now hook the positive of the led to the neg of the caps then tap the housing with the neg of the led. It seems that you can do this till the end of time. Can someone replicate this effect...

I Am thinking this is what is the effect we are seeing from the captret. Non usable charge purely static in nature.

This captret is really an awesome find. Could this be the splitting the positive concept?

[electricity]

I think you may already have a charge inside of the big capacitor and that left over charge could be charging the 9 volt battery.

Please short out the capacitor and captret for at least an hour and then hook it up. I believe you because i have experience the same effect, i think i have a youtube video of it too where i say the - to top have a recharging effect. The only reason why my circuit is the way it is is because people don't like simple, i had to put a LED on it to show it can do other things.

Like i said before i started the captret i had a capacitor hook directly to a 9 volt and it would charge, but took a long time to do so. I just had to make something useful like make a LED go before people would recognize me, before i did no one cared.

Keep on experimenting!

Dude, it was your idea. Grab some large caps and replicate. You have to create a large push, small caps ain't gonna do it. Only you will convince yourself.

Anyway, it is usable, Use it, Dumb it, I don't care, heck I don't even want my name on your circuit.

I am after real usable power, Tesla Style.

And why are you all acting surprised, haven't some of you been coming here for years? .... Where is your FREE ENERGY. I've been doing this 2 months and I can see all the Dis-Info. They are your very own authorities. Bearden, Linderman, Bedini.

You lack conscious, you lack natrual sensory.

God Sped.

[electricity]

The Bedini/ Bearden Falsehood

Electricity! Just stop it! You are painting with very, very broad strokes! You are in the company of many very non-linear thinkers here at the energetic forum.

If your accusing John Bedini of causing confusion then you haven't properly observed the effects of radiant energy being produced in a bifilar coil. He agrees in the existence of a zero point field. Where do you think the vacuum flux is coming from? Even quantum physicists agree to a great extent on this. You don't need to argue with this forum or make accusations regarding some sort of generalized dogma we are all in, excluding yourself.

You have no idea how much time and effort John Bedini has put forth to helping. He releases his schematics to us freely and asks for little or nothing in return. Before you get too high and mighty, you should ask yourself, exactly what have you contributed that gives you the right to criticize so openly. Not even a schematic of what your currently doing? I know this Captret is simple, but with out a schematic no one can follow your procedures whatsoever.

I'm sorry to have gotten worked up about this. I just wish everyone could be a bit more considerate of one another. Its lines of discussion such as this that drive me away from these forums, and i do so very much want to stay and contribute.

I'm sorry Ibpointless2. I won't try to moderate this discussion anymore. People can do what they like. not like i can change that.
Love and light to all.

I did not say this quote, Eric Dollard did.

Start with the so called G-field generator.

I have studied the SSG, a waste of time. Transistors is a closed loop.

Open your eyes, Does it really take 30+ years to develop real WORLD USABLE SSG or Monopole in KW/hr output. I have replicated the Jim Watson and saw all the engineered flaws. Keep following blindly if you wish.

[miki02131]

About Miki's post, where she thinks that the capacitor is somehow receiving ambient RF. Would the area of that tiny capacitor be large enough to capture enough ambient RF to power a LED? You would have to be very close to a transmission source, or use a near field antenna idea, but even then I don't think it could happen that way.

To be honest it looks like Miki joined here just to dispute the captret effect, and on several peoples videos there are extensive debunkings by people who have no videos... If we were outright wrong in doing something, sometimes people let them go ahead and be wrong, but if we are onto something right, then maybe paid people will come along and try to throw knowledge around and discredit what is happening???? I don't know.

It does seem to be a vary small amount of voltage gain, but that's why we need to have a very long test done. Its analogous to ground power research, where you need to have a log book of weeks to totally understand something, instead of just hours.

Say what you want if you have to. As to your misinformations they are so obvious, suffice to point them out:

1- There is my join date listed right under my username

2- I did not debunk. I provided an experimental approach to clarify the source of the self-charging effect. This experiment is so simple anyone with captret can check it out instantly. This is not negative debunking. My statement came with an experiment to prove its veracity.

The paid informant could also be someone who knows the truth and tries to keep the flock on the wrong path.

You call me a paid agent. That's fine if that makes you feel better. In time, everbody wiill know who was right. Time will tell who the true paid agent is. This is the last time you will see me posted on this thread.

Miki Out.

[thedude]

Stop it!

For Aether clarification, go hassle Peter Lindermann. He knows all about it, but you may not be qualified or privliged enough to know.

Then go ask John Bedini to answer all of your questions as he owes EVERYONE here big time for keeping you all confused.

Electricity! Just stop it! You are painting with very, very broad strokes! You are in the company of many very non-linear thinkers here at the energetic forum.

If your accusing John Bedini of causing confusion then you haven't properly observed the effects of radiant energy being produced in a bifilar coil. He agrees in the existence of a zero point field. Where do you think the vacuum flux is coming from? Even quantum physicists agree to a great extent on this. You don't need to argue with this forum or make accusations regarding some sort of generalized dogma we are all in, excluding yourself.

You have no idea how much time and effort John Bedini has put forth to helping. He releases his schematics to us freely and asks for little or nothing in return. Before you get too high and mighty, you should ask yourself, exactly what have you contributed that gives you the right to criticize so openly. Not even a schematic of what your currently doing? I know this Captret is simple, but with out a schematic no one can follow your procedures whatsoever.

I'm sorry to have gotten worked up about this. I just wish everyone could be a bit more considerate of one another. Its lines of discussion such as this that drive me away from these forums, and i do so very much want to stay and contribute.

I'm sorry Ibpointless2. I won't try to moderate this discussion anymore. People can do what they like. not like i can change that.
Love and light to all.

[ibpointless2]

I have been watching my little 9v captret lighting non stop for 3 straight days. As usual, I want to get down to the TRUTH. So I let the LED drain the battery for a whole day.

Finally, It was @5.6V. Dead as Dead.

I pulled off the 9 led and 400v captret and swap for 250v 2200 uf electrolytic capacitor with fast switching diode, Volt sarted rising. hmmm, It's not LED Photon or what ever mambo jambo that everyone loves to hallucinate. Then I pulled off the diode and attach the negative from capacitor directly to the battery negative attached to the capacitor housing. Ahhh ..there lays the Magic. Volts across the capacitor jumped from 2.54v to 5.8v and Volt goes up fast.

There you have it, Nothing special here. It is FREE ENERGY via electrochemical induced currents, self charging the source. Nice and simple.

Look at the picture, the Cap is at least 4x the size of the battery. Now build some large electrolytic capacitor as I had instructed and charge your Lead Acid for free, and quickly. I am charging mine as I write this.

Nature is simple, Lets forget the moronic mambo jumbo such as scalar, photon or what ever that's loaded in your head. Get back to basic, Nature is Simple, let's keep it that way.

I now wonder why I never did learn about Elecrochemical Induction.

Volt climbed to 6.9 within 1 hour. I added another 250v 2200 uf in series, now it's singing. Fast cheap charging.

I think you may already have a charge inside of the big capacitor and that left over charge could be charging the 9 volt battery.

Please short out the capacitor and captret for at least an hour and then hook it up. I believe you because i have experience the same effect, i think i have a youtube video of it too where i say the - to top have a recharging effect. The only reason why my circuit is the way it is is because people don't like simple, i had to put a LED on it to show it can do other things.

Like i said before i started the captret i had a capacitor hook directly to a 9 volt and it would charge, but took a long time to do so. I just had to make something useful like make a LED go before people would recognize me, before i did no one cared.

Keep on experimenting!