Captret - Perpetual Light with Dead Batteries

[Inquorate]

Try, try again

@ibepointless - in the face of scepticism, automate and scale up. When people tell you to shut up, yell louder. Heretical Builders - Powered by vBulletin has a results-oriented crew of builders. You might find a more respectful response there.

[Tectalabyss]

I care !!

I have multiple captret circuits charging themselves from the standing voltage, and i have others running a Load at no cost. Not only that i have other people getting the same results that i'm getting.

I when I first discovered the captret i was a little worried about showing it, a circuit that actual has overunity or free energy is crazy. After reading many post i desided to post my captret idea to others.

What i found amazing at first was that people didn't care!

The conspiracy is that people don't care, they care about themselves more and don't want to listen to a guy who says his battery charge themselves. They just jump all over you saying that your crazy, its impossible, or you're stupid for thinking this!

As i sit looking at my circuits going over the standiing voltage and charging and watching others do the same I can't help but to smile

The captret has been a rough battle for me, especially in a world where people are so ignorant to the new ideas. Maybe in the future they will say the captret is nothing special, or it will be common place and many will think nothing of it.

And if it really is not overunity or free energy i still don't care. I've gotten people to think outside the box, do something the textbook don't talk about. I've gotten people to see somethings they've never seen before, run a load while the voltage bounces back. Who would thought that could ever happen from one simple little component? I've have spark many people into making great designs, and they better the idea everyday and i would like to thank all of you who do this! The only way to get free energy and overunity is to share it, build up from it, only the truth will set us free.


So if you come to this forum and say this is impossible, or you're crazy. Leave. I don't want to hear it, i've heard it my whole life and you mentioning it doesn't do me any good.


If you have nothing good to say that improves the captret then go away.

Hello Ibepointless2.
I was going to read the complete Forum And then post till reading this. And I Just wanted you to know ( I CARE ) and so do a lot of others.So don't give up And THANK YOU. Tec

[crackahcrackah]

Thats motors?

@Joit absolutely

Yeh, if you want to use this energy in motors use the newman approach. I mentioned him along with all the other researchers who've worked with longitundinal waves and scalar pressures in the "this is it" thread.

There's video's on youtube of people newmann replications, but they don't quite know what they've done. One guy adds in a capacitor to the coils and it clearly demonstrates that the motor speeds up as a result. This capacitor was no doubt condensing energy from the coil spikes, that otherwise would have gone to waste (pressure dissipation), and then reuses the pressure with each reaction to the magnet spinning around. That captured pressure is the radiant spike. This spike can be created separate of the coil and pumped in, to react with the magnet, giving higher torque, or any number of other things. Energy conversion/manipulation should become easier to understand for others.


As a community, I don't think I've seen so many people with so many pieces of the puzzle in one place. This is exciting .

[Magnethos]

No, that is not a motor. That is a radiant energy transformer. I've heard that the common motors cannot work using radiant energy. You need to redesign the motor to drive it with radiant energy. How? I don't know.

you can make a google to search about Konstantin Meyl, Avramenko plug, Eric Dollard, etc...

[Jbignes5]

hmmm...

Search for Tesla hairpin circuit in youtube and you'll see some demonstrations..

Thats motors?

@Joit absolutely

[Joit]

The problem becomes how to apply that to a motor. In theory it works simplistically but in practice it is much harder seeing that you need a much higher potential to get the a fraction or the same of the amount of work out of it when compared to the amperage method.

It maybe is, but i wanna say, that a Newman motor is something like this.
It is actually more moving Energy around, as really chase it through wires.
Relative thinner but long Wires, what are allways at the border from Saturation.
Actually you cant compare the arrangment with a normal Motor what we usual do know, what runs close at a short, but there are a lot of Forces created,
what plays within.

[Magnethos]

Search for Tesla hairpin circuit in youtube and you'll see some demonstrations..

[Jbignes5]

Oh yeah...

It's needed to understand that you can perform work in 2 ways, depending if you use electromagnetic energy (transverse, conductive...) or longitudinal energy (Scalar, displacement, aetheric...).

If you use the longitudinal energy (the electric part of the electromagnetic wave) then you can perform "work". You don't need amperes to run a motor or to light a light bulb. This is a big mistake that is not fully explained in the schools. And remember, if you don't extract amperes from a power source then you can extract wattless energy almost indifinitelly.

I am fully aware of the wattless energy and how to pull a potential and have it do work. The problem becomes how to apply that to a motor. In theory it works simplistically but in practice it is much harder seeing that you need a much higher potential to get the a fraction or the same of the amount of work out of it when compared to the amperage method.

[Magnethos]

more explanation

You have to understand that with the captret there is no regular current being used. It is pure voltage and in order for pure voltage to be powerful you need more of it.

It's needed to understand that you can perform work in 2 ways, depending if you use electromagnetic energy (transverse, conductive...) or longitudinal energy (Scalar, displacement, aetheric...).

If you use the longitudinal energy (the electric part of the electromagnetic wave) then you can perform "work". You don't need amperes to run a motor or to light a light bulb. This is a big mistake that is not fully explained in the schools. And remember, if you don't extract amperes from a power source then you can extract wattless energy almost indifinitelly.

[Jbignes5]

To answer your questions...

Yes running the captret in parallel increases the flow capability of the captret. You have to understand that with the captret there is no regular current being used. It is pure voltage and in order for pure voltage to be powerful you need more of it. Take for instance my high bright led. It takes 3.7 volts and 20ma to get this to full brightness. on the captret it uses only voltage and has to have more of it to push with the same force. I have measured 6-7 volts from the negative plate when the power is shuttled through the positive and o of the captret. On a freshly shorted out captret if I hook the led to the positive and negative terminals I get enough voltage to light it about 1/2-3/4 bright or so. It is soo hard to tell with a led to what level they are lit by eye.

I have not looked into the series version yet as I was really busy trying to simulate what is going on in the captret with normally used parts. For which I have not been able to do yet fully.

[Groundloop]

@Magnethos,

All I can say is that I will build the boards, test the boards, and then report
my findings here and at the other thread. It will take some weeks.........

Groundloop.

[Magnethos]

@Groundloop
To light e led with your 1000 cap setup?
1000 caps are too much to light a led. Maybe you wanted to say light bulb?

And I have understood that you can to lit the led almost forever using the advanced captret configuration (shorting the wires) without seeing a decrease in the intensity of the light emitted by the led?

[Groundloop]

@Magnethos,

No, I have not made a video but I think that ibpointless2 did?
My intentions is to try to light a LED with my 1000 capacitor setup.
It will take some time to solder all the caps. I'm also waiting for
my new printed circuits boards. My first plan was to modify each
capacitor with a new wire and heat shrink tubing. I then decided just
to solder the capacitors to the PCB first and then use a L shaped wire
that I glue to the top of the capacitor with conductive glue. I think
this method will speed up the population of the boards. In any case,
I have to wait for the PCBs to arrive. So no progress or testing
for at least a week or two.

Groundloop.

[Magnethos]

@Groundloop

I've just posted in ou.com after a long time without adding posts there.
Have you made a video showing that effect? I mean, lighting a led using the described technique in your last post?

Another important question is if you've seen an increase in the intensity of the light while using 2 or more captrets at the same time. Let me know.

[Groundloop]

@Magnethos,

Yes, that is what I'm saying. Look at the OU thread and look at the
circuit diagram and PCB layout I posted. Also see this drawing.



What I'm trying to test is if the self charging effect will last forever.

Groundloop.