This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Don Smith A review...

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • med.3012
    replied
    Originally posted by AetherScientist View Post
    Hello med.3012
    I am researching here.

    hello AetherScientist,

    take your time, we could talk later,

    Leave a comment:


  • AetherScientist
    replied
    Hello med.3012
    I am researching here.

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    Originally posted by John.K1 View Post
    Hi Med. How r u doing?
    Yep, wasn't here for while. Working on many thinks at the same time. Working on two channel tuning device. It will find the most best combination of input frquencies and duty cycles. It will collect the ojtput data and evaluate. I am writing it in Java. 2Ch signal genetator control is done. Now have to read and analyse data from scope. When finish, I will upload it to Rapsbery pi2 and make it stand alone tuning tool. can use it to tune ETBC for best supply frequency(ies) Once u have frequency,you also know what tuning cap size to attach.

    Hi !

    nice to see you, everything is fine, look forward to see you work , i have some advancement using the mixed E-TBC , the scope gave me a strange signal when testing the oscillation, i got a square waves from it i don't know if i made an error ! so i am still thinking about tuning this device !

    ok see you later ! keep in touch

    Leave a comment:


  • John.K1
    replied
    Hi Med. How r u doing?
    Yep, wasn't here for while. Working on many thinks at the same time. Working on two channel tuning device. It will find the most best combination of input frquencies and duty cycles. It will collect the ojtput data and evaluate. I am writing it in Java. 2Ch signal genetator control is done. Now have to read and analyse data from scope. When finish, I will upload it to Rapsbery pi2 and make it stand alone tuning tool. can use it to tune ETBC for best supply frequency(ies) Once u have frequency,you also know what tuning cap size to attach.

    Leave a comment:


  • John.K1
    replied
    Originally posted by AetherScientist View Post
    What about if you replicate this effect again and again and use dozens of small solar panels to absorb that light and transform it into DC?
    Hi, with the number of bulbs the light intensity goes down. Also, fluorescent light is very weak for solar panel. My sone just created a small robot toy running on solar panel. No chance get it running under fluorescent lamp. Small halogen spot light makes it running fine.

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    Hello everyone , hi John !

    welcome back! just add something here, changing the capacitor that feed the mixed E-TBC with 10 NF each instead of 20 NF increase the performance of the system the, output power in the capacitor increased, still further enhancement is needed.

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    Thanks you AetherScientist for the effort you do, most over energy device are linked together, understanding something may give a solution to another problem, i have a theory about radiant voltage and current and how they are linked together. i think radiant current exist perpendicular with radiant voltage so it's not strange to see radiant discharge in phase with electric current, i think i have to do some experiments.

    Leave a comment:


  • AetherScientist
    replied
    med.3012 thanks for the interest.
    I have also a lot of questions and I am trying to give answer to your questions. The problem now is that we have a lot of unsolved questions and I don't know the answer.

    At the moment I am researching the possibility about how to generate some antennas to absorb background energy. We have discussed in this thread very interesting points and I have extracted some useful ideas.

    Just an observation between Smith and Barbat.

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    Originally posted by AetherScientist View Post
    MorningStar, med.3012

    I am seeing that D.Smith and W.Barbat systems are almost the same thing. They have a lot of similarities.

    Hello everyone ,

    i am comparing John Bedini charging system with the mixed E-TBC , the first image show the bright strong light ( i did something like that myself )



    the current appear after the radiant discharge :



    comparing these photo with the mixed E-TBC discharge we have both phenomena appear at the same time... in cold electricity the voltage is the equivalent of electric current, so it's normal to have the bright light in the negative leg of the capacitor, i think there's a possibility to enhance this electric current by inserting the resistance in parallel with this system.. !? what do you think ?

    Leave a comment:


  • AetherScientist
    replied
    MorningStar, med.3012

    I am seeing that D.Smith and W.Barbat systems are almost the same thing. They have a lot of similarities.

    Leave a comment:


  • AetherScientist
    replied

    Leave a comment:


  • AetherScientist
    replied
    Originally posted by med.3012 View Post
    thanks so much MorningStar, i can read these very important info :


    When more force is produced in one direction than another, a portion of that force can be used to sustain the original force and the remainder can be put to useful purposes perpetually (p. 7 of translation).
    An unlimited source of cheap electric energy can be developed by these established principles, but mankind has been kept in the Dark Ages by later scientists who were not familiar with the whole treatise. A careful reading of Helmholtz's paper shows he mistakenly included inductive and magnetic energy with faulty assumptions and a disregard for works by Ampere and Faraday.

    This overlooked energy source can be harnessed by knowing that inductive energy is not conveyed by magnetic lines of force but by directional photon energy, as in radio broadcasting and receiving. If the Princeton experiment had produced an oscillating output, it could have been transformed directly into electric power, as in a common transformer. The practical conversion of oscillating LME energy had been discovered serendipitously nearly a century ago, but no one could explain why it worked before Levitronics.

    I remember to see that when using a special single line transmission line the corona effect gets reduced drastically. So it seems that using 1 wire in the high voltage lines it's possible to reduce the corona effect.

    I think corona effect makes the fluorescent lights to light. No corona effect no fluorescent lighting. I say this about Barbat system.

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    Originally posted by MorningStar View Post
    Referring to Posts No. 190 and 191, see US 2007/0007844 by Barbat "Self-Sustaining Electric Power Generator Utilizing Electrons of Low Inertial Mass to Magnify Inductive Energy"

    thanks so much MorningStar, i can read these very important info :


    When more force is produced in one direction than another, a portion of that force can be used to sustain the original force and the remainder can be put to useful purposes perpetually (p. 7 of translation).
    An unlimited source of cheap electric energy can be developed by these established principles, but mankind has been kept in the Dark Ages by later scientists who were not familiar with the whole treatise. A careful reading of Helmholtz's paper shows he mistakenly included inductive and magnetic energy with faulty assumptions and a disregard for works by Ampere and Faraday.

    This overlooked energy source can be harnessed by knowing that inductive energy is not conveyed by magnetic lines of force but by directional photon energy, as in radio broadcasting and receiving. If the Princeton experiment had produced an oscillating output, it could have been transformed directly into electric power, as in a common transformer. The practical conversion of oscillating LME energy had been discovered serendipitously nearly a century ago, but no one could explain why it worked before Levitronics.





    in reality i am studying my system a bit more for example take the following image show the discharge in the capacitor, the bright point in the right isn't connected to the diode but it show a strong discharge! the plus + in the left show a weak discharge force ! i am just wondering if this normal ?

    Leave a comment:


  • MorningStar
    replied
    Referring to Posts No. 190 and 191, see US 2007/0007844 by Barbat "Self-Sustaining Electric Power Generator Utilizing Electrons of Low Inertial Mass to Magnify Inductive Energy"

    Leave a comment:


  • med.3012
    replied
    Originally posted by AetherScientist View Post
    Some time ago while researching on energy systems, I had a non sense idea but I haven't tried it.

    As you knwo when you have a fluorescent near a high voltage, the gas inside the tube gets ionized and it produces light. This is very known in Tesla's coil.


    What about if you replicate this effect again and again and use dozens of small solar panels to absorb that light and transform it into DC?

    the E-TBC or the mixed E-TBC absorb the electromagnetic feedback either as magnetic power or electric power according how the electrons spin inside the device, in the case of mixed E-TBC both exist at the same time, because the device receive new electrons it work as a quantum pump. so you question can be solved but instead of using solar panel we just extend the Tesla bifilar coil and make it oscillate with its center ( X) .

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X