gravity waves found

[Aromaz]

Leedskalnin Image Archive

Photographic reaction of chemicals. You will often find similar effects on old photos. In this photo I would say the additional shade of the tripod caused the background to have less brightness; over time it discolored to reddish.

Nothing to read in that coloring.

However there is another issue most people overlook. Leedskalnin not only moved the rocks - but he also CUT and DRILLED them with results that are even to this day difficult to achieve - including high tech water and laser cutting.

Oh yes; there is one more effect I wonder about: SOUND. It was sometimes noted that there were 'weird noises' from his place. Now add to this the Buddhist monks that moved huge boulders with trumpets and drums. Makes me wonder if sound waves might have something to do with the deflection/shielding/reflection of 'gravitons'

@Witsend: I do not believe in the gravitational pull anymore - like zero. In my theory of 'Pushing' I still have to find something that is in contradiction. The PULL theory does not work unless you change the variables, finds an obstacle and bring some new math in to make things work. In the PUSH theory there is only six variables (what I can think of): Material, Distance, Density, Size, Speed and Rotation.

There is no 90 degrees in effect - that is what confuses people. The universe and everything within is 3D. The EM radiation is also coming 3D; from all possible angles. I am thinking how to present this theory properly and easily explained in a video.

[david lambright]

here is the link

Leedskalnin Image Archive

[witsend]

What if? When looking at Leedskalnin photos, he had his device mounted on a tripod something like 6 meter high? What if that contraption actualy act to deflect gravity push towards earth? Like I stated before and still stand on: "Gravity is a result of universal EM pushing force".

Hi Aromaz. I entirely agree. But the gravitational pull on Earth - I see it as a 90 degree deflection from our earth's magnetic field towards the centre of a field. The same in space. But more difficult to find that centre without first knowing the overall shape of space itself. Be difficult to draw a map without knowing if there are boundaries. LOL.

And then, interestingly, if this is correct then antimatter would move at 90 degrees away from the centre. So. If space does have boundaries that would put antimatter at the edges and all that 'matters' somewhere in the middle. Anyway - not sure that this is still on topic. Just to let you know - your ideas definitely resonate with me.

EDIT I should add that these assumptions are based on the idea that our aether may just be vast magnetic fields.

[witsend]

ihave experimented with different toroidal shapes i will take some photos of them ..the only pipe toroid was stainless steel and did not lock....one made of steel will lock.......david

Wow Dave. You've done way more here than I realised. I would love to see some results when you're good and ready. Also, can you give us a link to that #5 number of Leedskalnin. Ashamed to admit it but I'm entirely 'link' dependent.

We're also testing variations of your device - all in stainless steel - but I'm awaiting delivery of a whole lot of shapes that I hope to photograph and test. Great fun here Dave. You've opened a whole new world. What I find exhilarating is that it's so easy to establish a magnetic field. I simply never realised this. Simply can't thank you enough. On a thousand different levels.

[david lambright]

leedskalnin

can any one tell me what causes the red in pic#5 at LEEDSKALNIN PHOTO archives

[Aromaz]

What if . . . ?

Been around but unfortunatley too occupied with making living under difficult economic conditions of world and Thailand

@David: Please try a simple experiment. Lift your device up say 150cm above ground. Now do all your experiments 'under' your device.

Also get spring/hanging scale like the use for fishing competitions. Quite cheap.
Hang your test objects on scale and observe if there are fluctuations in weight.

What if? When looking at Leedskalnin photos, he had his device mounted on a tripod something like 6 meter high? What if that contraption actualy act to deflect gravity push towards earth? Like I stated before and still stand on: "Gravity is a result of universal EM pushing force".

Imagine: The simplicity in ED L. complete operations might have been:
By having his device placed above the object he wish to relocate, he divert the EM gravity push on the object, (like a umbrella shield) thus cause the object to be 'lighter' and movable by little force.

[david lambright]

torroidal lock

Hi cody. Just something that I think you may have missed. Our mainstream scientists teach us that a magnetic field inside a cylinder simply disappears. In other words, conventional teaching here is that the magnetic field cannot be sustained. Some have proposed that it moves into the 'skin' of the material itself. But - to the best of my knowledge - there is nothing conclusive on this. Your own design - those segmented pieces - puts paid to this as it proves that the field is very much there - even though it's not measurable. I think your design is a very elegant variation on Dave's test and I am wondering how this will work on a toroid. If you can get this to 'hold' in a magnetic lock then we really do have a 'closed' magnetic field. Just to let you know that I'll be trying this - but without the segments. Just a solid pipe bent into a toroid. I want to see if it will generate an axial spin at 180 degrees to the earth's magnetic fields. It'll be interesting.

ihave experimented with different toroidal shapes i will take some photos of them ..the only pipe toroid was stainless steel and did not lock....one made of steel will lock.......david

[david lambright]

jet

the pipe is in the mail!...........david

[Harvey]

@Rick,

Why are we seeing an offset between the thermographic image and the underlay?

Just the option I have the camera on. I like that view so I can see what I am looking at. I can set it directly on top also, but then you could not see what was underneath. This is what I am using:
Infrared Digital Camera, Infrared Video Camera, Infrared Thermal Camera, tir1
If you David or anyone else wants me to test anything just say so, I am always game for experiments.

Thank you, very nice setup there.

What do you think of my suggestion back in this post?

http://www.energeticforum.com/renewable-energy/5690-gravity-waves-found-12.html#post95745

Is that difficult to do with your rig? That camera of yours could probably show us a lot in that experiment without needing all of the extra thermometer measurements.

Cheers,

[rick123]

@Rick,

Why are we seeing an offset between the thermographic image and the underlay?

Just the option I have the camera on. I like that view so I can see what I am looking at. I can set it directly on top also, but then you could not see what was underneath. This is what I am using:
Infrared Digital Camera, Infrared Video Camera, Infrared Thermal Camera, tir1
If you David or anyone else wants me to test anything just say so, I am always game for experiments.

[Harvey]

@Glen,

I need to talk with you regarding the Flux locations.

Also, I have developed a new formula for calculating the arclength of an ellipsoid. It seems to be a good approximation without the need for any integration - I'm puzzled why Euler did not spot this relationship and why I can find nothing on the internet regarding the process.


Here is something to consider:

Take the area of a circle of 100 units. Calculate the perimeter (circumference)

Now take the same area of a square of 100 units. Calculate the perimeter.

How would this differential impact shipping containers and resource materials used to build them?

More food for thought regarding gravity:
Both Electric Forces and Magnetic forces are immensely greater than the force of Gravity. Like forces repel and opposite forces attract - 3rd grade stuff right? Now, how much 'like' force would be needed to counteract a 2 Ton gravitational force? The Earth has a negative potential relative to electrozero.

How much negative would we need to pool under a two ton coral block charged to the same potential to create weightlessness? How could putting a positive potential in a Box at the top of a tri-pole aid in the levitation? If you were out in the middle of a coral field in the 1940's or '50's and needed electricity to produce those fields, how would you do it? What would be the best way to get more negative electrical charge to group together in one spot on the Earth?

Perhaps I have given away too much - but I am confident that only those who truly understand it will build it only those who build it will protect it with responsibility.

[Harvey]

@Rick,

Why are we seeing an offset between the thermographic image and the underlay?

[rick123]

Yes Jetijs, That was in the yard for about 30 minutes in direct sunlight before I took the pics. I was inside before that with my lasers, 405nm and 532nm both 200mw shinning the beams in all possible directions around the device. Also did many different rocks and metal testing. Pulled my wife in for a second opinion also.

[Jetijs]

Rick,
I was wondering when you would post any results
Is that an infrared camera?

[rick123]

i saw a pic of segments sitting on what looks like a ceramic magnet?

Guilty, Yes I used the magnet to help hold my peaces in place. I have done numerous experiments Dave. Nothing significant to report.