gravity waves found

[Jetijs]

Hi all
Ok, I am back and have something to report. I visited some sensitive persons yesterday and showed them both of my devices, the large one and the small one mounted on a fan. We tried many different experiments and the sensitives told us how the field is affected. Anyway, the bottom line is that it seems that no matter of how you energize your coil (I mean no matter where the plus and minus of the battery goes), if you rotate it clockwise it always makes a kind of standing wave coming out from the sides of the wheel, like orbits. One was about 3m in diameter, the other was about 5m in diameter. There are more standing waves further away, but they are not so stron as the first two. Also the faster you rotate the wheel, the stronger the standing waves can be felt, but their diameter does not change. If you rotate the wheel counter clockwise, there is a beam of energy coming up from the center of the wheel and it is about the same diameter as the wheel itself and it goes up vertically. This beam seems to change the charge of a rock that is placed in the beam, this is according to the sensitive persons. Also when the rock was held in the beam for longer time, it indeed did feel a bit lighter than it should be and everyone witnessed it. But again, could be just as well be a subjective feeling because when put on scales, no decreased weight was showed.
Another thing, if you energize the coil with opposite polarity, then the same is true but with the exception that now if you rotate the wheel counter clockwise, the beam of energy goes down rather than up.

This is some food for thought, but at this time it should not be taken too serious. More experiments need to be done. I left the wheel for the sensitive persons to play around with. Will see what they will find out. Also my wheel was compared to Davids wheel on a picture I gave them, and they said that Davids wheel is much stronger than mine, this might explain why I am not seeing anything and only very sensitive persons sees and feels the field

That's it for now.
Thanks!

[witsend]

using a blue screen on my tv as a back ground this wave is visible...now i know this works i can improve upon it....please let me know if anyone can see this any better.....look at the lines on the screen....distorsion like heat wave........david....i am still having trouble posting links potatoheadist channel on youtube has any one seen these yet...........david

Finally I found this. Yes indeed. There's definite evidence of an interference pattern that seems to be applied from your rig. Very interesting indeed. It's all so amazing.

I also saw your brief video on the toroid. Frankly I'm so impatient to get my hands on the apparatus to test that I'm already exhausted. Can't wait to find out more.

[witsend]

i know you knew.....mainly for the readers david........witsbeginning?!.......

LOL More like witsending I've been rolling.

[david lambright]

David, that would be great
I was going to ask you for a small sample of that pipe anyway to make a spectral analysis of the material so that we could be sure what alloy this is. I have some friends that can make this analysis for me If you could mail me those pipes I would be glad, I will PM you my address.
Also tomorrow I will meet some very sensitive persons and show my device to them, but so far they have "connected" to the device only though a photo and they say, that there is a very powerful field around that device with some odd properties. Will learn more about this tomorrow and post the results, might be interesting
Thank you!
Jetijs

I mean STEEL. DEFINITELY NOT STAINLESS STEEL. I'm moggy and aged. Bear with me. LOL

i know you knew.....mainly for the readers david........witsbeginning?!.......

[david lambright]

building #2

David, that would be great
I was going to ask you for a small sample of that pipe anyway to make a spectral analysis of the material so that we could be sure what alloy this is. I have some friends that can make this analysis for me If you could mail me those pipes I would be glad, I will PM you my address.
Also tomorrow I will meet some very sensitive persons and show my device to them, but so far they have "connected" to the device only though a photo and they say, that there is a very powerful field around that device with some odd properties. Will learn more about this tomorrow and post the results, might be interesting
Thank you!
Jetijs

...

i am waiting for jet to recieve his mail!.....more soon.........david

[witsend]

i never could get SS to lock...but there are different types...magnetic and non.....david

I mean STEEL. DEFINITELY NOT STAINLESS STEEL. I'm moggy and aged. Bear with me. LOL

[david lambright]

stainless?

Wow Dave. You've done way more here than I realised. I would love to see some results when you're good and ready. Also, can you give us a link to that #5 number of Leedskalnin. Ashamed to admit it but I'm entirely 'link' dependent.

We're also testing variations of your device - all in stainless steel - but I'm awaiting delivery of a whole lot of shapes that I hope to photograph and test. Great fun here Dave. You've opened a whole new world. What I find exhilarating is that it's so easy to establish a magnetic field. I simply never realised this. Simply can't thank you enough. On a thousand different levels.

i never could get SS to lock...but there are different types...magnetic and non.....david

[david lambright]

dissimilar metals

months ago working with PMHs.....single junction,circular toroid, iwas using Aluminum foil in the junction and the foil now sticks to a magnet.....BUT..the effects seem to increase with a dissimilar metal in the junction...the zinc is quite thick in places, thicker than foil anyway...by

effects

, i mean visibility of this wave and an increase in interaction with metals.....we WILL get this.....and by this.....well you know.....david

[SDK]

David, that would be great
I was going to ask you for a small sample of that pipe anyway to make a spectral analysis of the material so that we could be sure what alloy this is. I have some friends that can make this analysis for me

Hi Guys,

Ehm, there may be something to the galvanized pipe. It is hot dip galvanized, which is the standard. Hot dip galvanizing makes steel somewhat brittle, even though not hard, especially where it has been previously mechanically stressed by bending, which is the case with welded pipes. It is not unusual for all kinds of bent brackets to crack in a few days after in their bends after hot dip galvanizing without further stressing, as opposed to brackets of the same shape from the same material, which have not been hot dip galvanized. Standard of the alloy will be listed on some professional website, including the limits of the component metals.

Ciao, Slavek.

[david lambright]

this time i got it

using a blue screen on my tv as a back ground this wave is visible...now i know this works i can improve upon it....please let me know if anyone can see this any better.....look at the lines on the screen....distorsion like heat wave........david....i am still having trouble posting links potatoheadist channel on youtube has any one seen these yet...........david

[witsend]

i agree with witsend.....i have been working on a theory for some months now and the 90 degree/laminar to turbulent effect plays a key role...a rock falls....laminar...into a pond ....waves radiate at 90 degrees...i am compiling my work inbetween videos....hope to have them done soon....i have only read a tiny fraction of witsends work...trust that her work will be KEY in building the new physics model!!!...........david

Hi Dave. My son tells me that the understanding of my model increases in an inverse proportion to the number of people who read it. LOL The worst of it is that he's right. But I need to sit back and see where your experiments go before I get too carried away. But you're right. I'm really excited at where this seems to be pointing. Who knows. Perhaps you've got the ingredients to antigravity, self propelling generators - who knows? I've been flirting with these concepts for ages. You've simply and very elegantly - put this together in an easily readable rig with an aplomb that simply blows me away.

It may interest you to check out the thread COP>1 by Inquorate. It's definitely off topic - but yet it isn't. The guys, Inquorate and GroundLoop are doing some amazing things - also with very elegant simple circuitry. I LOVE SIMPLICITY. And I really love this thread.

[david lambright]

Photographic reaction of chemicals. You will often find similar effects on old photos. In this photo I would say the additional shade of the tripod caused the background to have less brightness; over time it discolored to reddish.

Nothing to read in that coloring.

However there is another issue most people overlook. Leedskalnin not only moved the rocks - but he also CUT and DRILLED them with results that are even to this day difficult to achieve - including high tech water and laser cutting.

Oh yes; there is one more effect I wonder about: SOUND. It was sometimes noted that there were 'weird noises' from his place. Now add to this the Buddhist monks that moved huge boulders with trumpets and drums. Makes me wonder if sound waves might have something to do with the deflection/shielding/reflection of 'gravitons'

@Witsend: I do not believe in the gravitational pull anymore - like zero. In my theory of 'Pushing' I still have to find something that is in contradiction. The PULL theory does not work unless you change the variables, finds an obstacle and bring some new math in to make things work. In the PUSH theory there is only six variables (what I can think of): Material, Distance, Density, Size, Speed and Rotation.

There is no 90 degrees in effect - that is what confuses people. The universe and everything within is 3D. The EM radiation is also coming 3D; from all possible angles. I am thinking how to present this theory properly and easily explained in a video.

i agree with witsend.....i have been working on a theory for some months now and the 90 degree/laminar to turbulent effect plays a key role...a rock falls....laminar...into a pond ....waves radiate at 90 degrees...i am compiling my work inbetween videos....hope to have them done soon....i have only read a tiny fraction of witsends work...trust that her work will be KEY in building the new physics model!!!...........david

[Cloxxki]

@Aromaz,
I have read your posts before, and thought (hurt my head) about pushing gravity. The way you word it in this thread, finally seems to solve the riddle I mentioned here earlier, being the lack of drought on the poles, and huge flooding at the equator. The spin at the equator fights against the push of gravity at equal rate to its spin itself. It equals out perfectly, after all?
If gravity AND centrifugal force are both reigned by a (relative) constant, being the density of the aether, it's not a big surprise these would cancel out. Their magnitude is a seperate one from the push onto earth, which I intuitively agree with you is a product of size, density, material etc.
Rotation however, might be taken from your list if what I'm babbling here, is of any substance.

That everyday object seem to lack this spin-balancing counter aetheric gravity push, could be due to the way size and distance are taken up in the formula. Double an object's diameter (distance from surface to center), and you'll see the mass increase by factor 8. Earth has the advantage here with size. And its proximity to our hand held object (say a 5kg shot put steel ball), might even effect the self-balancing force on an object orbit the ball. A relatively simple experiment could see this repeated in deep space. But how to convince NASA to take up a 6kg experimental setup consiting mostly of a steel ball with a bearing, strain gauge and glass kids marble... :-)

If Remelic is on the right track with his theories, there is a lot more complexity to Ed's inventions than met the eye. And hey, objects in David's house are not yet shooting out the roof. So he may have uncovered the source of the energy, it's still a long way from matching Ed's claimed feats.

If I continue on my hypothesis of the loacked magnetic ring acting as a lense of sorts, Ed may have tuned it to transform the wave form from a field of substantial volume, to a ray of miniscule width. If EM gravity push can be countered, perhaps similar technology can disassociate particles inside a cut. Like a 1-dimensional (ray) zipper. A ray of such strength would seem greatly detrimental to me, unless it was contained within a limited range. Say, existing between 2 generators, or between a genrator/lense and an absorbing "grounding device" of sorts.

Sorry for the loose thoughts. Greater and fruther developed brains than mine are welcome to use them as a leaping board. I can throw you in orbit, but you can stand on my head if that helps.

[witsend]

@Witsend: I do not believe in the gravitational pull anymore - like zero. In my theory of 'Pushing' I still have to find something that is in contradiction. The PULL theory does not work unless you change the variables, finds an obstacle and bring some new math in to make things work. In the PUSH theory there is only six variables (what I can think of): Material, Distance, Density, Size, Speed and Rotation.

There is no 90 degrees in effect - that is what confuses people. The universe and everything within is 3D. The EM radiation is also coming 3D; from all possible angles. I am thinking how to present this theory properly and easily explained in a video.

I'll look forward to viewing this.


LOL Unlike you I actually ONLY need that 90 degrees. But I need way more than 3 dimensions. In fact I need 10. But I still think this is probably way off topic. Nonetheless, I'd love to learn more of your thinking here Aromaz. Very intrigued. I'll look out for a link to be posted in due course. Can't wait.

[david lambright]

finally captured?

check out my latest video....this may be the one........david....YouTube - toroid PMH