This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Imhotep's Radiant Oscillator Video

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Bodkins
    replied
    [QUOTE=shlodo;42690]
    Originally posted by Bodkins View Post

    Awesome, cant wait to see it in action bodkins. next time u post a vid, draw a circuit so we can see exactly wats goin on. the mess on your workbench is as bad as your spelling mate!

    Bedini says u cant use radiantly charged batteries like we do normal ones. we can run lights but motors.. no..we are dealing with 2 types of electricities. Look at some of tesla's patents (ill find the patent numbers when i got time), he came up with ways to catch the radiant and power normal dc motors.
    He runs the radiantly charged into inverter and charges the front battery with a standard charger.
    I now how he did it

    What you talking about the last two videos it was in action
    circuit im not doing any more diagrams you dont need it
    school girl motor ignition coil postive and negative connect to the collecter.
    bulbs big diodes and play play play

    Leave a comment:


  • shlodo
    replied
    [QUOTE=Bodkins;42674]
    Originally posted by sucahyo View Post
    @Bodkins, what this video about?

    Kickback energy from the coil
    The coil fires one spark to the bulb in a postive dirrection I put a Big diode after bulb so the spark goes to ground,
    After spark leaves the coil and goes to ground there is a kickback.(like a stone dropped in water, the water fills the gap after the stone has past)But the gap cannot be filled from ground because of the diode.
    So it will take any path it can and I give it a path another ground to any part of the Setup.
    Put a cap in that path and pill it up,Or a light, I dont think the energy will run a motor.

    BodKins
    Awesome, cant wait to see it in action bodkins. next time u post a vid, draw a circuit so we can see exactly wats goin on. the mess on your workbench is as bad as your spelling mate!

    Bedini says u cant use radiantly charged batteries like we do normal ones. we can run lights but motors.. no..we are dealing with 2 types of electricities. Look at some of tesla's patents (ill find the patent numbers when i got time), he came up with ways to catch the radiant and power normal dc motors.
    He runs the radiantly charged into inverter and charges the front battery with a standard charger.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bodkins
    replied
    [QUOTE=sucahyo;42655]@Bodkins, what this video about?

    Kickback energy from the coil
    The coil fires one spark to the bulb in a postive dirrection I put a Big diode after bulb so the spark goes to ground,
    After spark leaves the coil and goes to ground there is a kickback.(like a stone dropped in water, the water fills the gap after the stone has past)But the gap cannot be filled from ground because of the diode.
    So it will take any path it can and I give it a path another ground to any part of the Setup.
    Put a cap in that path and pill it up,Or a light, I dont think the energy will run a motor.

    BodKins

    Leave a comment:


  • Aromaz
    replied
    Originally posted by sucahyo View Post
    @All, about bifilar coil:
    That hammers the nail right on the head.
    Now you can see the light with regards to the Tesla Pancake coil?

    Leave a comment:


  • dmonarch
    replied
    Kick Back

    Cheers for that Bodkins. I am as confused as ever now . I will hopefully get my unit going tommorow. I obviously need some hands on experience. You are a wiz at this stuff. Cheers

    Originally posted by Bodkins View Post

    Leave a comment:


  • sucahyo
    replied
    @Bodkins, what this video about?

    @All, about bifilar coil:
    Originally posted by http://jnaudin.free.fr/html/scalwfaq.htm
    > Can you clarify, in terms of "superposition", what the difference is between
    > the above and a bifiliar coil, or a magnetic or electrostatic bucking field
    > achieved with paired coils and capacitors respectively?

    This difference was the subject of a fairly long running discussion here
    some months back. The thread was somthing like "differences in the
    field(s)...".

    Basically, if we take two conventional coils, and connect them in
    series, but orient them such that the poles of the two coils are in
    opposition, what is often called 'bucking fields', we will find that the
    total inductance is greater than that of a single coil. The total
    energy stored in the fields of the two coils is not significantly
    effected by their orientation, and the system is highly inductive.

    All we have done is to distort the flux, we have not canceled ANY flux
    at all.

    On the other hand, if we were to construct a bifilar coil with exactly
    the same ammount of wire, we would find that the coil had nearly no
    inductance at all, and stores no significant energy in the form of a
    magnetic field.

    Some have argued that the field is still present, even though the
    current through such a coil reaches E/R in a time limited by stray
    inductance alone.

    but when we interrupt the circuit, such a coil return NO energy from
    this supposed field.

    In this case, it appears that we have actually canceled flux, that is
    the flux from adjecent bifilar windings has undergone true
    superposition, or added algebraically to essentially zero magnetic flux.

    Note that when we deal with whole poles of permanent magnets, or
    conventional coils, this NEVER happens.

    This apparent difference in magnetic field behavior is not a matter of
    physical scale as some had suggested, as the bifilar coil simply does
    not store, nor return any energy as an inductive coil does.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bodkins
    replied
    dmonarch

    YouTube - Kickback research
    YouTube - Kickback 2

    good luck
    B

    Leave a comment:


  • sucahyo
    replied
    Originally posted by Allcanadian View Post
    First we must use the correct terminology, an applied voltage is "EMF"(electromotive force), when the applied voltage is removed from a coil an inductive discharge will be produced. This is not Bemf, Bemf (back electromotive force or counter electromotive force), is an opposition to the applied emf which occurs "before" the current has been disrupted, the inductive discharge is produced after the current has been disrupted.
    So, we should call it inductive charge? How do we know that the spike voltage happen before or after current has been disrupted?

    positive BEMF = BEMF, negative BEMF = inductive charge? or the other way around?

    Can anyone having scope replicate this?
    YouTube - How BEMF happen #1

    Originally posted by redeagle View Post
    I also noticed that when i tuned my circuit to max charging rate that my amperage draw went down.
    I use joule thief and the amperage draw always increase at the same rate as charging amp on either PNP or NPN configuration.

    How do you measure max charging rate? If you make it faster, I also experience reduced amperage draw, but charging amp also reduced too.

    Higher frequency = reduce amperage draw = reduce charging amp, most of the time. Reducing frequency bellow optimum will result in INCREASED amperage draw BUT REDUCED charge amp.
    Last edited by sucahyo; 01-23-2009, 07:48 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • redeagle
    replied
    ? about solid state driving.

    I have setup my lite with a BR on the low voltage side of the cfl. i have noticed that the when i switched from a relay driver to a bifilar coil and transistor self oscillator that my ign. coil reasonates and my charging shot up a bunch while maintaining a similar light brightness.

    I also noticed that when i tuned my circuit to max charging rate that my amperage draw went down.

    Has anyone else seen similar results? when using the "soldi-state bedini" as a driver?

    BTW: i am using an air core coil the plastic spool is a 1lb solder spoon with a 3/4" bore.


    Matt

    Leave a comment:


  • Aromaz
    replied
    Originally posted by Allcanadian View Post
    @Aromaz .........
    Last edited by Aromaz; 01-23-2009, 01:03 AM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Allcanadian
    replied
    @Aromaz
    The Tesla pancake flat coil is of no unique value when using in electrical applications. The pure and only advantage - I have seen this far - is in increased magnetic field i.e. electro magnet.
    I think the biggest value of BEMF will only be obtained from a single long wire placed in such a way that the EM flux from one part does not have effect on the other part. In other words, wound it around your room and keep the windings far enough so their EM flux does not overlap. A coil will reduce BEMF.
    Unfortunately, I have never heard a reasonable explanation by anyone in regards to what effects Tesla's pancake coil was meant to produce and how Tesla achieved this goal. First we must use the correct terminology, an applied voltage is "EMF"(electromotive force), when the applied voltage is removed from a coil an inductive discharge will be produced. This is not Bemf, Bemf (back electromotive force or counter electromotive force), is an opposition to the applied emf which occurs "before" the current has been disrupted, the inductive discharge is produced after the current has been disrupted. Bemf has also been called "generated emf" as a coil with an expanding magnetic field will have it's flux cut it's own conductors inducing a current in the opposite direction in much the same way a motor will generate an opposite emf to reduce current flow at higher RPM.
    In regards to Nicola Tesla's pancake coil and the following statement, "The Tesla pancake flat coil is of no unique value when using in electrical applications"------ In truth Tesla's unique coil when operated correctly has no conventional magnetic field as you know it, How can a single turn copper strap utilized as a primary produce a magnetic field of any significance? The magnetic field produced is a function of amp/turns so why use a single turn primary?.Yet Tesla's short primary could produce inductive effects of large magnitude in all open and shorted conductors in the vicinity. If you want to understand Tesla's world seperate the actions---- one induces and the other is induced and these forces need not necessarily be magnetic in nature. Understand what electricity and magnetism are in reality, If I want to know the extent of knowledge a person has aquired I need only ask one simple question---"what is electricity and magnetism"?. If one understands what these forces are fundamentally then they can harness these forces to produce any magnitude of power they may require. Another question we should ask is how can we understand complex electrical machines without first understanding the fundamental forces which drive them?
    Keep up the good work guys

    Regards
    AC
    Last edited by Allcanadian; 01-22-2009, 05:28 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • Bodkins
    replied
    Happy Playing
    YouTube - Maybe negative resistor

    dmonarch got some videos up loading you may find usefull
    Last edited by Bodkins; 01-22-2009, 06:13 PM.

    Leave a comment:


  • dmonarch
    replied
    Moving leg rest

    Yeah I think that this is the problem Sucahyo, my relay does have the rest that i saw in the video.


    Originally posted by sucahyo View Post
    @dmonarch, inside the relay there is two leg that will make the relay turned on if it's powered. Then there are a pair of leg that will only connect when the relay is turned on. The fifth leg that you want to know is not one of them. It is a metal where the moving metal rest, if it isn't available, make one.

    Leave a comment:


  • sucahyo
    replied
    @dmonarch, inside the relay there is two leg that will make the relay turned on if it's powered. Then there are a pair of leg that will only connect when the relay is turned on. The fifth leg that you want to know is not one of them. It is a metal where the moving metal rest, if it isn't available, make one.

    Leave a comment:


  • dmonarch
    replied
    Boch

    Thanks heaps Aromaz. I will try and exchange first tommorw and see how i go.
    Cheers
    Damian

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X