This forum is preserved as a permanent archive. The community continues at eMedia Press.

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Electric Motor Secrets

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Peter Lindemann
    replied
    Start Here

    Originally posted by Jetijs View Post
    Hi all and thank you
    Here is a very basic schematic that I would like to use. Since we have only one transistor per two coils, I think that we do not need any amplification, those optotriggers should be able to trigger the transistor by themselves. I intend to use the MJL21194 transistors with apropriate heat sink. For the first tests I would like to use a secondary battery on the isolated output. The optotriggers will be placed 90 degree apart from each other to get the right timing and the comutator wheel will have two slots on each side.



    So can I use such circuit, or should I use the voltage divider on each transistor base like in previous circuit? Any other comments on the circuit?

    Thank you.
    Jetijs,

    You can try it. The main problem is the low current the output section of the opto-interrupter provides. The max collector current is 20ma. See what happens. Up-grading the circuit for more gain later is simple enough.

    Peter

    Leave a comment:


  • Jetijs
    replied
    Hi all and thank you
    Here is a very basic schematic that I would like to use. Since we have only one transistor per two coils, I think that we do not need any amplification, those optotriggers should be able to trigger the transistor by themselves. I intend to use the MJL21194 transistors with apropriate heat sink. For the first tests I would like to use a secondary battery on the isolated output. The optotriggers will be placed 90 degree apart from each other to get the right timing and the comutator wheel will have two slots on each side.



    So can I use such circuit, or should I use the voltage divider on each transistor base like in previous circuit? Any other comments on the circuit?

    Thank you.

    Leave a comment:


  • sykavy
    replied
    Horray!!
    congrades on your hard work!!

    Leave a comment:


  • lighty
    replied
    @Jetijs

    Since you didn't have the opportunity to use preformed coils you could have tested resistance between wire and stator after every turn of the coil. That would have saved you some time if you found out compromised insulation section straight away. You could have even simply additionally isolate only that section of coil. Please don't take this as criticism- it's just a suggestion for people reading this thread that will hopefully follow your lead. Good work m8!


    Anyway- I suggest that you weigh the rotor before you assemble everything. In that way you would have some numbers in regards to the inertia of the rotor. With that value and rotor RPM one could calculate the amount of kinetic energy.

    BTW- a strong impulse and heavy rotor will easily overcome bearings friction if it's not too excessive. When I made Tesla induction motor and turned it on for a first time I was astounded at the amount of accumulated kinetic energy when the device was turned off. All because momentum gained with the action of the rotating magnetic field was stored in the weight of the rotor core and copper windings.

    Flywheel aspect of rotor does have it's merit in rotational engines and especially in pulse driven ones since it smooths out the mechanical impulses transients and makes it easier for rotor to overcome possible rotational dead zones.

    I'm talking too much anyway- you're doing an excellent job Jetijs.

    Leave a comment:


  • theremart
    replied
    It Runs

    whew hoo... so good to be seeing results for so much hard work......

    Leave a comment:


  • Jetijs
    replied
    Good news everyone!
    My motor is finished
    The last coil was a real pain in the ass, we had to rewind it three times, because it turned out that somewhere on the edges the insulation was not thick enough. My fingers need a good rest after this. If someone shall try to build a motor like this, I suggest him seriously to consider making the stator so, that prewound coils could be used, because this coil winding process turned out to be the hardest part Nevertheless everything seems to work fine. I assembled the motor and turned the rotor to a "firing" position, then I took one series coil leads and just hit the battery terminals with them, the motor just took off (at least as far as it could without proper timing. My bearings have considerable friction and I was afraid that this would be a problem, because the rotor wont spin freely even for a little while if I spun it with hand. But when I made this one power pulse, the rotor made whole three or four revolutions. For now it seems that the motor has a lot of torque at least as far as I can tell with this simple test. Now I will need to work on the timing circuit. I will draw it tomorrow and post here so you can comment and maybe suggest something. So that is it for now.



    Thanks,
    Jetijs

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter Lindemann
    replied
    Awesome

    Originally posted by Jetijs View Post
    Hi sykavy,
    I think that your idea would just make everything harder, because a 90 degree bend is only on the first layer of the coil, then the bend is more ark like. Also it is alot harder to wind the coil if the wire is not straight.
    And just a little update. I sanded off the sharp edges and covered all the edges along with the rough areas of the poles with two layers of thin epoxy resin. I must say that this works really well. Today I wound only 3 poles. The winding process is hard and takes a lot of time. Also if you wind the coil in bifilar fashion, you need help from another person, because the two wires tend to twist very much and you constantly need to straighten the wire out from both sides of the stator. Four hands makes this alot easier Each pole winding took about 35 minutes of time because we wanted to make the coil as tight as possible. Each pole has 25 turns of two gauge 16 wires, that is a whole of 7.5 meters. It would be hard to get the additional 5 turns on a coil, because there is not much space left and some of the turns could slip off to the rotor side. But I think 25 turns should work well. Each coil has a resistance of 0.5 Ohms and I did not once have to rewind them, the insulation is very good. I will wind the remaining pole tomorrow, then I will mark the coil ends so that later I can connect them in series so that both poles have different polarities. And then I will assemble the whole thing. Here is a picture:



    Those black cloth stripes are there only temporary, I will remove them after all the coils will be finished.
    Thank you,
    Jetijs
    Jetijs,

    As usual, your work is excellent.

    Peter

    Leave a comment:


  • peper10
    replied
    Happy to hear from you!!

    I was wondering what you can do with the windings,but,you seem to
    overcome the problem anyway..
    Nice to see it going foward and been done nicely..
    You are an exemple for all of us Jetijs..
    Happy you share it with us!!


    peper10

    Leave a comment:


  • Jetijs
    replied
    Hi sykavy,
    I think that your idea would just make everything harder, because a 90 degree bend is only on the first layer of the coil, then the bend is more ark like. Also it is alot harder to wind the coil if the wire is not straight.
    And just a little update. I sanded off the sharp edges and covered all the edges along with the rough areas of the poles with two layers of thin epoxy resin. I must say that this works really well. Today I wound only 3 poles. The winding process is hard and takes a lot of time. Also if you wind the coil in bifilar fashion, you need help from another person, because the two wires tend to twist very much and you constantly need to straighten the wire out from both sides of the stator. Four hands makes this alot easier Each pole winding took about 35 minutes of time because we wanted to make the coil as tight as possible. Each pole has 25 turns of two gauge 16 wires, that is a whole of 7.5 meters. It would be hard to get the additional 5 turns on a coil, because there is not much space left and some of the turns could slip off to the rotor side. But I think 25 turns should work well. Each coil has a resistance of 0.5 Ohms and I did not once have to rewind them, the insulation is very good. I will wind the remaining pole tomorrow, then I will mark the coil ends so that later I can connect them in series so that both poles have different polarities. And then I will assemble the whole thing. Here is a picture:



    Those black cloth stripes are there only temporary, I will remove them after all the coils will be finished.
    Thank you,
    Jetijs

    Leave a comment:


  • sykavy
    replied
    Originally posted by Peter Lindemann View Post
    Jetijs,

    Seems like your cloth tape does not offer enough structural integrity to prevent the sharp edge of the stator from penetrating the wire insulation when you wind the coils that tight. This is why Lighty suggested the Mylar sheet over the square edges.

    I've wound a lot of my stators more than once, so any of the ideas you are suggesting is a worthy experiment. I sometimes find if I mount the stator in a vise, and ask a friend to tension the wire feed, then I have both hands available to wind and position the two wires on each turn. Its a tedious operation, so just go slow and you can do it.

    Any other suggestions from other builders are welcome.

    Peter
    I had an idea. Maybe you can make a piece of wood that is the same size and shape of the iron you are going to put your coil. (It will be only 30X) Once you do that you let it unwind but it will already have corners bent so that could help since it is so hard to bend.

    Leave a comment:


  • cdsalmons
    replied
    Thanks Peter

    Peter,
    I have watched your video and thought it was great. I have seen a few others that you were in including the Keely Con in 2001. I love your work, and the direction that you are going in.

    I mentioned the link because of its simplicity and somewhat resemblance to your first design. I know his circut would not work, I just like the idea of having one massive winging instead of 2-4.

    The question of function has already been answered. You have already proven the application. I will be benchmarking my own, but I was wanting to see what your results were because I am sure that yours is more effecent then mine will be. I know that your primary focus was to show that the concept worked. I was just wondering if you measured how much work you could get out of it as a no back emf motor.

    I hope that I did not offend you. I respect your work. I am just trying to learn as much as I can so I will be able to do my own testing and understand what I am doing verses what I am seeing.

    It is very hard to get straight unbiased information. I have a general understanding of electricity. Most people in this feild learn conventional electronics then struggle to shift their mindset to this area. I am trying to learn as much as I can from You and John, then fill in what I don't understand with conventional teachings.

    I don't know if I m on the right road or not, but atleast I am going forward. I am glad that I can join you on your path and learn from your prior knowledge. Thank you for making sense of the masters before you, Dustin

    Leave a comment:


  • Peter Lindemann
    replied
    Great Little Experiment

    Originally posted by cdsalmons View Post
    Hi Peter,
    I found this page on Variable reluctance motors. I could be wrong, but it looks to me like this simple design could be scaled up and be used like your design with some modifications. The page also has a small video HERE.

    Also, I was wondering if you tested your HP before/after when you converted your off-the-shelf motor. I am sure it loses mechanical, but I was wondering what the approx. conversion rate is/was. I just ordered a 5hp motor to play with, so I just wondering about how much usable energy I may have after conversion.

    Thanks for your help, Dustin
    Dustin,

    Thanks for posting this link! It is obvious from this person's page, that he got the idea for this motor from some class he took years ago. His ingenuity in building the motor from plate steel is excellent. While his motor runs on a magnetic attraction process, his "concept" of the motor as an AC Synchronous Motor is very different than our project here at EMS Forum. First, he has to get the motor to "synchronize" with the pulses of current coming from his 555 timer. Here, we use an electronic commutator to "tell" the coil when to fire, due to the rotor position. Second, since he has conceived of his motor as an AC motor, he isn't doing anything with the "inductive collapse" energy. He doesn't show us a schematic, so we don't know how he is handling this, but the industry standard is to throw the energy away with a reverse diode, to protect the transistor. He doesn't mention this, because it is incidental to his AC Synchronous Motor concept. Third, his air-gap is quite large, so his total mechanical energy production is very low.

    His model is a "concept" project for him, just to see that the idea works.... which it does.

    Here, at EMS Forum, we have taken the "idea" of a "variable reluctance motor" and developed all of the interacting processes to a significant degree. Now, we are moving the design from "concept" to something practical. When Jetijs' motor is tested, it should show a much more interesting result.

    Your question of whether I tested the hp before and after I converted the motor in my demo videos is the WRONG QUESTION!!!!!!!!! Those demonstrations were not about POWER but about FUNCTION. I showed that I took a standard, off-the-shelf electric motor, that normally operates with "Back EMF", and easily converted it to an electric motor that exhibited "No Back EMF".

    If you want to understand all of these ideas, you should:

    1) Buy my DVD Electric Motor Secrets where I demonstrate what Back EMF is, and how it robs the motor of its real efficiency. Just click on this link to go to my Products Page: Free Energy - Electric Motor Secrets, Bob Teal | Magnipulsion, Edwin Gray, Nikola Tesla, and other books & videos by Dr Peter Lindemann
    2) Read this entire thread, from the beginning.

    Thanks again for the link.

    Peter

    Leave a comment:


  • cdsalmons
    replied
    variable reluctance motor

    Hi Peter,
    I found this page on Variable reluctance motors. I could be wrong, but it looks to me like this simple design could be scaled up and be used like your design with some modifications. The page also has a small video HERE.

    Also, I was wondering if you tested your HP before/after when you converted your off-the-shelf motor. I am sure it loses mechanical, but I was wondering what the approx. conversion rate is/was. I just ordered a 5hp motor to play with, so I just wondering about how much usable energy I may have after conversion.

    Thanks for your help, Dustin

    Leave a comment:


  • lighty
    replied
    Well then sand off edges and apply a thin layer of epoxy. I'm pretty sure that that should do the trick.

    BTW- do ask them for the glass fiber tape they ought to use that.

    Leave a comment:


  • Jetijs
    replied
    Lighty, thank you for those advices
    I just don't know where to get this mylar. In the motor rewinding company they said that they use a simple cloth tape and glue it around the transformer cores before coil winding. I will sand off those sharp edges, as you suggested, and only then try to insulate the poles.
    Thank you,
    Jetijs

    Leave a comment:

Working...
X