ENLIGHTENED MAGNETISM (The Full Proof of Ken Wheeler's Theories)

[bistander]

Why?

Why?... no point... you will come up again with something like...


these are not real empirical data or so forth so on...

Why? To back up your claims.

[Markoul]

Great. Let's see it.

Why?... no point... you will come up again with something like...


these are not real empirical data or so forth so on...

[Ufopolitics]

Thanks Al,

Different ferrocells with different light sources and different viewing angles look very different, don't they? Your first link reminds me of this:
[VIDEO]v=vhCaXWJ5nUo[/VIDEO]

Notice that none of the tiny compasses point to the center of either magnet.

bi

Hello Bistander,

Of course no one of those small compasses are going to aim their poles towards the center of the magnet, no one here has said such thing.

It is Typical Common Sense here...no need to know magnetism "too deep" to understand that these small magnets will align by seeking their Opposed Polarity alignment with the Bigger Magnet Poles!

And so, no matter if you set all those red tiny magnets (compasses) around the center of the bigger magnet in a belt like shape...all their tiny North Poles are going to seek-aim towards the Bigger Magnet South Pole as all their tiny South Poles are aiming at Big Magnet North Pole.

The center of the Magnet's Mass is like a "neutral area" between its two poles, and what I mean by neutral area is that any smaller magnet you set there will receive an equal attraction pull from the bigger magnet poles, therefore the small magnets will extend along the main magnet axis in that area, but facing their opposite poles towards big magnet poles.

Same exact deal takes place when we sprinkle iron filings over a magnet...each one of those particles will get magnetized immediately due to their small mass, then will follow same exact alignment as I have described above...

Re read all of the above if you need to...and then tell me:

1-Do you really think that this alignment followed by all these magnetized small compasses (on your video above) or iron filings sprinkled over a magnet...are Portraying the true Magnetic Field?

2-Or are they just following a SPATIALLY STABILIZED CHAIN-LINKAGE STRUCTURE...BASED ON ALL THEIR ATTRACTING POLES ALIGNMENT?

Is it 1 or is it 2 your choice Bistander?


Regards


Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Cool

empirical data 100%the knowledge offered by practical work on a particular subject

Take care,

EM

Great. Let's see it.

[Markoul]

From google: empirical definition, first hit.

The theory: Colored lines image from ferrocell represents magnet's flux field.

Offered as empirical data: Colored lines image from ferrocell.

How about some real data, like gaussmeter reading showing the line entering the magnet center is actually a result of flux?

bi

empirical data 100%the knowledge offered by practical work on a particular subject

Take care,

EM

[Markoul]

Hello Markoul,

Incorrect, if "Brian's Video" is PUBLISHED on You Tube, meaning have a link where you could "call it"...then the YT plugin we have here will display it...even if it is an "Unlisted Video" you still could show it in your post.

So Brian, nor anyone else can do absolutely nada to avoid video to be reproduced and played by a plugin if it is on YT.

Watch it below:

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aRxyRuGP2c[/VIDEO]

If you wanna see how I did it, quote my message and look at what I meant by enclosing it with YT Code-Brackets.

Regards


Ufopolitics

so i put the yt brackets [VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch[/VIDEO] on the youtube link but it gave me the video on the forum black screened saying a message about permission... what i did wrong? maybe i did not copy paste correctly the link... have some troubles lately with my mouse...

okay you mean like this?

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=-aRxyRuGP2c[/VIDEO]

hahahaha!

Thanks friend.

EM

[bistander]

Magnetic field

See six (6) side views.
See two (2) side views.


Al

Thanks Al,

Different ferrocells with different light sources and different viewing angles look very different, don't they? Your first link reminds me of this:
[VIDEO]v=vhCaXWJ5nUo[/VIDEO]

Notice that none of the tiny compasses point to the center of either magnet.

bi

[Markoul]

Dear Ufopolitics,

Thanks very much Ufopolitcs for your generosity! I really appreciate it! look at your pm box. I have something for you and ask for your real name I will put you at the acknowledgements section of the paper as a supporter.

That's the least I can do for you. You really have inspired me with your video series as Ken did and many others independent researchers, which are ahead of the thick sculled academics by 100 years.

My goal is to bring this independent research guys to academia. It is a difficult task and I face the danger to be ridiculed as a scientist and labeled as an heretic. But I don't care the truth must come out.

I am the guy who wrote the paper with the ferrocell showing the dynamic magnetic field of a transmitting radio antenna and it had a tremendous success. I used an MIT algorithm for motion magnification of the image by the ferrocell. I put a 900Vp-p radio signal on an antenna rod (telescopic) and used a microscope with the ferrocell. The black body frame of the antenna became miraculously transparent like glass and you can see the field inside and around the antenna. It's like a coaxial cable with the Bloch region as a black strip at the center of the antenna running along its full length! The dipolar field appears as a red pulsating halo and you can see the signal travelling as transverse sinusoidal fluctuations imprinted by the dipolar field on the Bloch dark string:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fGcvh4Rb0G4

Currently I am the only academic promoting the ferrocell, Timm is my friend and we share regularly ideas, also I emailed to Ken a couple of times. He knows me.

Best Regards,

EM aka Markoul

[Gambeir]

Hello again,

Now let's see Time without "Space"...A Time Field.

Every time we refer to the Time Dimension, we ALWAYS relate it to Space...

We have read it in Minkowski's "Space-Time"...

We have read it in Einstein's "Special Relativity"...

And the fact is that "we all need to relate" the Space Dimension to be able to "see" time.

By relating space to time we automatically think of time as "linear"...traveling through space correct?

But in reality...do we need to relate time with space?

TIME is a completely "non dependent" parametrical dimension.

Time exists without the need of space...

The Problem by "permanently" marrying Time with Space...is that we will not conceive, nor accept terms like:

1- Bending a Time Field...

2- Traveling through a Time Field without "including" the Space Field.

3- Or even an object...or a person who "materializes" right in front of Us, out of nowhere...

Now related to the Magnetic Field and a Time Field

When we create "A Magnet" by passing an Electric Flow through a ferromagnetic core in the form of a Coil-Spring...

Once we remove power and disconnect all electrical wires, a Magnetic Field remains in that Core...and it could be there, exist Permanently

Permanently: For All Time, for ever...

This Magnetic Field occupies a CONSTANT (PERMANENT) SPACE which surrounds and EXTENDS over the core mass space-boundaries-limits.

So we could conclude that this Magnetic Field is within a Space-Time Field "Frame"...

And we all know we could expand or shrink that Spatial Field by outer interactions...(attract-repulse-expand to another ferromagnetic, non magnetized body, etc,etc)

But the final question here is:

Could we "alter" Time on that Magnetic Field, without altering Space Field?...and of course not referring to "terminate" life of magnet, since it will also terminate space...but alter as to modulate it?


Just thinking out loud...


Regards



Ufopolitics

Ufopolitics, you might refer to what John St. Clair has to say on this in his patents. These patents may be missing critical parts IMO because they would fall under concern in national security and could then rightly be expected to be excised of critical parts: Speculating is all.

I think convention says that the magnetic field should retain a relative time inside of it's own limits, or dimensional field. Not sure it can be accelerated but logic would suggest it could be by passing it down a decreasing radius/funnel of pulsed magnetic conductors. Not too sure this is such a great idea to be messing with until we first figure out what it's actually doing when applied inside an altered area of space.

According to John St. Clair, a moving magnetic field carries a moment whose gradient then is capable of creating a wave which distorts space and which can also be used to create lift. Everything outside the field which is creating the magnetic moment might then have a kind of malleability to it in the sense that there now exists both a distortion in space and distortion in time.

Matter inside the field is now time displaced from the matter outside the field, and that enables this matter inside the field to pass through other matter outside of the field, and without effecting either of the two. All matter outside of the field would not see the matter inside the field and likely the reverse is true.

Now I think that if you then went about increasing the speed of a magnetic moment inside the already existing field it would create a movement in time, almost certain to be a forward direction, but exactly to where in the light cone would be difficult to know.

So yes I think it's possible and by spinning the magnetic field in a decreasing funnel like spiral it might be possible.

.
John St. Clairs' Patent

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20030209636A1/en

Abstract
This invention relates to a spacecraft which generates its own magnetic moment and magnetic field gradient in order to produce lift on the hull. The magnetic moment is generated by a large area solenoid located in the hull. A toroidal core wrapped with electrical bobbins at intervals along said core produces a traveling magnetic wave along its surface. This magnetic wave creates a spacetime curvature, similar to a tilted plate, which causes the formation of a magnetic field gradient. Power is not critical because the system uses a magnetic vortex wormhole generator to lower the speed of light in order to efficiently create highly relativistic fields due to Lorentz transformation.

BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
[0001]
This invention, which is the subject of my present application, is comprised of a toroidal core around which are wound a plurality of electromagnetic bobbins. The bobbins are pulsed electrically to create an amplified magnetic wave that travels around the core. At the same time, a circular electrical conductor carrying direct current creates a magnetic field around its area which results in the formation of a magnetic moment. This magnetic moment, together with the spacetime curvature distortion created by the traveling magnetic wave, produces a lift force on the vehicle.

Paraphrased the rest.

By using a ring shaped conductor (transformer lamination fashioned in to a ring), which is laced with solenoids, an electric current is pulsed at a suitable frequency that then creates a slow traveling magnetic field around the edges of the spherical device.

The velocity of the wave is the square root of the frequency of the pulsed electrical charges, and divided by the conductivity and permeability of the material.

According to the General Theory of Relativity, this type of wave traveling around the circumference creates a curvature in space, and which is a distortion in the vertical direction (in relation to a horizontally located ring) which is pulsed to create the traveling magnetic wave.

The distorted space creates a magnetic gradient in the z-direction, which together with the magnetic moment that was developed by the pulsed solenoids then produces a lifting force.

*Power is not critical because the system uses a magnetic vortex wormhole generator to lower the speed of light.

Magnetic vortex wormhole generator

https://patents.google.com/patent/US20030197093A1/en

[aljhoa]

You say those colored lines are the magnetic field. I say they are not.

See six (6) side views.
See two (2) side views.


Al

[ricards]

Hello Ricards,

Well, it seems you have missed one of my videos where I FULLY explain IT, in Millions of colors and 3D CAD Animations...ALL THREE PRESSURES LAYERS OF MAGNETISM...:

LOW, MID & HIGH...

[VIDEO]https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QZhETcDHDRY[/VIDEO]

MAGNETISM CAN BEND AN ELECTRON BEAM (We call it "DEFLECTION")...it has been observed with sufficient EMPIRICAL DATA (I started to like that Greek Word...) for the last two centuries with the development of the CRT...

What Ken is showing there as also on some videos he has on YT...that Light gets distorted, basically at the Center Plane...Bloch Wall, Counterspace, Dielectric Field Plane... or whatever you wanna call it.


Regards


Ufopolitics

Okay now Ufo thanks I get it.. the experiment in actuality and ken's work was not totally to "thrash" the current "magnetic field" just modify and add some features.. It made much more sense now.

the closed loop is there..
the lines of force (spiral 3d)..

these are the two where the features of a magnetic field I was searching for that is clearly depicted by the Iron filing method.. and the supposed mid flux that loops in the middle are directed by the filings to the other end so its not visible..

in that video that was the outer most flux lines correct?..

but a question arises..
if the Mid Bloch region has this flow of dielectricity towards counterspace.. theoretically it should posses gravitational force (aether flow towards earth) as well? as the theory suggest.. and should be able to "deflect" the light even without the ferrous medium or view film?..
I don't remember reading something in ken's book about it's sized but the ferrocell experiment show its larger than the actual metal of the magnet..

mainstream science suggest that light (not electron beam) isn't affected by magnetic field..
and I have not seen any data that suggest otherwise..
do you know any?
or can you refer to an explanation why it shouldnot work as I theorize?....

[Ufopolitics]

Honestly,

After all these data and info you were presented by Ufopolitcs and others , including me, you saying that there are no empirical data!?

I find YOUR attitude quite insulting and irrational.

Here is your empirical data. Doesn't look like fantasy to me.


wrong flux pattern of the pole of a magnet:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1Mzi7JKC6AXJl1Q-Jkn1SUFGYx0o5DQPv/view?usp=sharing

correct flux pattern of the pole of a magnet:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1VTSXlS5QuLiamdY248wnC4jgWj9UL6BE/view?usp=sharing

The above last is the correct field flux on the pole of a magnet.

it is like a rolled-in slinky.

individual flux rings are closing circuit between each pole and and the Bloch region of the magnet at its middle.

Exactly as Ufopolitics presented it at his illustration here:

https://drive.google.com/file/d/1yLpi5KSPluqti9oOfHi-d4T1Q7PNppkO/view

EM

Hello Markoul,

Friend...You can go ahead and use my Image for your papers...no need to credit me for it...enjoy it...it is Public Domain.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Empirical Evidence versus Instrument Reading Data.

From google: empirical definition, first hit.

The theory: Colored lines image from ferrocell represents magnet's flux field.

Offered as empirical data: Colored lines image from ferrocell.

How about some real data, like gaussmeter reading showing the line entering the magnet center is actually a result of flux?

bi

Hello Bistander,


All my CRT Scanline Plane Experiments with magnetism show clearly Empirical Evidence.

Now, the fact that you do not want to believe it...nor "observe" there is a Partial Rotation for each pole...is just because you do not want to accept it...but "your non believer position" does not disprove it as not being Empirical Evidence.

What you want is just "Instrument Reading Data"...and not experimental data based on pure observation and scientific analysis.

That is just my opinion.


Regards


Ufopolitics

[Ufopolitics]

Time without "Space"...A Time Field.

Hello again,

Now let's see Time without "Space"...A Time Field.

Every time we refer to the Time Dimension, we ALWAYS relate it to Space...

We have read it in Minkowski's "Space-Time"...

We have read it in Einstein's "Special Relativity"...

And the fact is that "we all need to relate" the Space Dimension to be able to "see" time.

By relating space to time we automatically think of time as "linear"...traveling through space correct?

But in reality...do we need to relate time with space?

TIME is a completely "non dependent" parametrical dimension.

Time exists without the need of space...

The Problem by "permanently" marrying Time with Space...is that we will not conceive, nor accept terms like:

1- Bending a Time Field...

2- Traveling through a Time Field without "including" the Space Field.

3- Or even an object...or a person who "materializes" right in front of Us, out of nowhere...

Now related to the Magnetic Field and a Time Field

When we create "A Magnet" by passing an Electric Flow through a ferromagnetic core in the form of a Coil-Spring...

Once we remove power and disconnect all electrical wires, a Magnetic Field remains in that Core...and it could be there, exist Permanently

Permanently: For All Time, for ever...

This Magnetic Field occupies a CONSTANT (PERMANENT) SPACE which surrounds and EXTENDS over the core mass space-boundaries-limits.

So we could conclude that this Magnetic Field is within a Space-Time Field "Frame"...

And we all know we could expand or shrink that Spatial Field by outer interactions...(attract-repulse-expand to another ferromagnetic, non magnetized body, etc,etc)

But the final question here is:

Could we "alter" Time on that Magnetic Field, without altering Space Field?...and of course not referring to "terminate" life of magnet, since it will also terminate space...but alter as to modulate it?


Just thinking out loud...


Regards



Ufopolitics

[bistander]

Data please

From google: empirical definition, first hit.

The theory: Colored lines image from ferrocell represents magnet's flux field.

Offered as empirical data: Colored lines image from ferrocell.

How about some real data, like gaussmeter reading showing the line entering the magnet center is actually a result of flux?

bi